281 réponses à ce sujet

[hanshotfirs]

This is quite a good idea. Making the LI playable would a really cool idea.

I really hope someone from on high is listening, as this would be really fun to play.

[Tyrannosaurus Rex]

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Lizardviking wrote...

No.

<snip>

Third. What about low EMS destroy? Do those guys just get a glorified "mission failed" when starting it?

Uh. Low EMS Destroy? Earth is glassed. You really have to try to fail to get this one. I got it once and it took a lot of metagaming to do it. So... who cares about them? They can replay and get a better score

But Bioware seems to keep the policy that everyone should be able to access the DLC regardless of situation.

[GarvakD]

I like this idea.  Except I would rather 
http://social.biowar...4309/1#13714689
and be Shepard looking for your LI/crew.  But, if I had to pick this threads idea or nothing to actually be created, I would pick this thread in a heartbeat.

[Seival]

Uncle Jo wrote...

I... like your idea Seival.

Thanks

[Jamie9]

Seival, this is a really great idea. Considering there are 4 variations, I would lower the expected 5 hours of gameplay to 3. If they were making 4 variants, we can't expect 20 hours of gameplay from a DLC.

This would make the Crucible choice more important than it is now, and we would get to see the effects in more detail. We'd finally understand what Synthesis actually does, for instance.

[Seival]

Jamie9 wrote...

Seival, this is a really great idea. Considering there are 4 variations, I would lower the expected 5 hours of gameplay to 3. If they were making 4 variants, we can't expect 20 hours of gameplay from a DLC.

This would make the Crucible choice more important than it is now, and we would get to see the effects in more detail. We'd finally understand what Synthesis actually does, for instance.

Well, actually I meant about 5 hours of content in total (for all variants).

And thanks, by the way

Modifié par Seival, 17 août 2012 - 05:24 .

[Jamie9]

Seival wrote...
Well, actually I meant about 5 hours of content in total (for all variants).

And thanks, by the way

Oh, right, that makes sense then. Guess I misread.

Sure thing. I mean I don't really fit into pro-ender or anti-ender camp. I don't love the ending but I don't like the idea of conventional victory = instant win.

I think something like this, letting you experience the ME universe just after the Crucible fires would be a very memorable moment.

I wonder if we can bring a couple BioWare staff's attention to this idea...

[Seival]

Jamie9 wrote...

Seival wrote...
Well, actually I meant about 5 hours of content in total (for all variants).

And thanks, by the way

Oh, right, that makes sense then. Guess I misread.

Sure thing. I mean I don't really fit into pro-ender or anti-ender camp. I don't love the ending but I don't like the idea of conventional victory = instant win.

I think something like this, letting you experience the ME universe just after the Crucible fires would be a very memorable moment.

I wonder if we can bring a couple BioWare staff's attention to this idea...

I think BioWare already noticed this idea

[Jensencool]

I must say that I like the ending with the Extended Cut, but the question about Shepard's fate isn't answered.

I hope that Bioware have noticed this. It would be good for both, for us and for Bioware. I would pay for this DLC, but not for the Levithian or Omega DLC. Maybe...Omega, but this DLC would be for sure.

[Seival]

Jensencool wrote...

I must say that I like the ending with the Extended Cut, but the question about Shepard's fate isn't answered.

I hope that Bioware have noticed this. It would be good for both, for us and for Bioware. I would pay for this DLC, but not for the Levithian or Omega DLC. Maybe...Omega, but this DLC would be for sure.

I think they noticed. And I really want to hear their opinion actually

[Krushiev01]

You know... I'd actually buy this.

Consider me sold. BW/EA... Get on it, chop, chop.

[AlexandraK]

Great idea)) BioWare should do this, it'd be something different (and much better) than their usual DLCs))
(But it's BW so they won't do this xD)

Modifié par AlexandraK, 17 août 2012 - 06:07 .

[Krushiev01]

Just a thought...

What if, in the Refuse ending, it's Jimmy Vega that takes command of the ship (or Kaidan, or Ash) seeing that it's an Alliance vessel. Also, in Refuse, you could choose who to play (any of the surviving squad-mates). They're all going to die anyways, and in the final moments, I'd love to play Garrus

Anyways, great idea and as before, consider me sold.

[AlexandraK]

And maybe if we had high EMS (and maybe Leviathan) we could win in Refuse?

Modifié par AlexandraK, 17 août 2012 - 06:17 .

[known_hero]

Great idea!

However, the major flaw is that there are too many potential playable characters. You would have to record soooooo much dialogue in order for it to work. Maybe, if you narrowed it down to EDI, Traynor, Ash/Kaiden and have the player select. If EDI, Ash and Kaiden are dead then Traynor would be the only option.

[SentinelShepParagon]

This could be cool. Only problem would be with low EMS endings where everyone dies. Who would you control then?

[known_hero]

I just lol'ed at the thought of playing as EDI.

[Seival]

known_hero wrote...

I just lol'ed at the thought of playing as EDI.

Actually, this might be good idea in case if Shepard didn't have LI, and didn't choose Destroy

[Jadebaby]

I think it would be too hard to set up mechanically.

[GarvakD]

AlexandraK wrote...

And maybe if we had high EMS (and maybe Leviathan) we could win in Refuse?

That's an interesting concept.  One of the few  I support.  But the losses would have to be devastating still.  

[Seival]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

I think it would be too hard to set up mechanically.

It wouldn't be that hard actually. But it will be expensive (a lot of voice actors needed). And as I said, it will not be a problem, because they can make this DLC paid.

[Seival]

GarvakD wrote...

AlexandraK wrote...

And maybe if we had high EMS (and maybe Leviathan) we could win in Refuse?

That's an interesting concept.  One of the few  I support.  But the losses would have to be devastating still.  

I strongly believe that conventional victory is not possible, and will never be possible.

[GarvakD]

You can bet a load of fans will buy this DLC and be darned happy. If it goes according to plan. So, they can probably afford it.
Fans happy.
Bioware doesn't get yelled at anymore.

[Jensencool]

But there is one thing, that can be intergrated in this DLC, too. Was Anderson at the end real? He wasn't hurt, when he arrived at the console. And when Shepard was forced to shoot at him, Shepard got hurt, too. There are more than these two reasons, why Anderson couldn't have been real. So it can be about him, too. About the heros' fate, but especially about Shepard.

[Seival]

GarvakD wrote...

You can bet a load of fans will buy this DLC and be darned happy. If it goes according to plan. So, they can probably afford it.
Fans happy.
Bioware doesn't get yelled at anymore.

I think they can achieve that with such DLC even without conventional victory. Besides, conventional victory can disappoint some fans.

BioWare don't wanna change anything, some fans too. Most of pro-enders and anti-enders like idea of this DLC, and find it a nice way to provide final closure to the Trilogy. So, if BioWare will make such DLC and release it as the last one for ME3, then most people will be happy. Even haters will finally calm down I suppose

Modifié par Seival, 17 août 2012 - 09:19 .