eye basher wrote...
You do know that the catalyst tried synthesis once already and it didn't work why should it now.
Because now it has a battery efficient enough to make it work.
eye basher wrote...
You do know that the catalyst tried synthesis once already and it didn't work why should it now.
eye basher wrote...
You do know that the catalyst tried synthesis once already and it didn't work why should it now.
The Twilight God wrote...
RadicalDisconnect wrote...
The Twilight God wrote...
Are you honestly unable to accept that there are different interpretations that are just as valid as your's? Not everyone thinks alike.
Oh, brother. If it isn't Nagging Nancy.
Modifié par The Twilight God, 17 août 2012 - 09:52 .
The Twilight God wrote...
Mobius-Silent wrote...
This entire section of the Citadel is reconfigurable, the chasm wasn't there before the Crucible docked, the sliding panels can move and reconfigure to a desired shape, that much is obvious if you lookd around the map at _all_
The chasm wasn't there... right...Definitely wasting my time here.




Modifié par Mobius-Silent, 20 août 2012 - 07:11 .
Mobius-Silent wrote...
The Twilight God wrote...
The chasm wasn't there... right...Definitely wasting my time here.
Lets start here. There is so much wrong packed into this one line I think it's going to take me an enire post to enumerate how wrong you are

Modifié par The Twilight God, 27 août 2012 - 07:39 .
I actualy agree with youThe Angry One wrote...
Yes it's that time where TAO attempts to make sense of shoddy writing once again.
The Crucible - or rather, the Citadel, since I also submit that the functions attributed to the Crucible are and always have been the Citadel's - fires Destroy and Synthesis in exactly the same way.
Yet, they are activated very differently. In fact, Destroy is activated counter-intuitively, by breaking a component. Since when does breaking a device activate it in the manner intended by the designers?
I therefore submit the following, which is extrapolation based on in game evidence:
- The Citadel's primary function is synthesis, as designed by the Catalyst.
- Destroy works by breaking a primary component (the inanimate tube of doom) and causing the Citadel to malfunction and trigger an effect that wipes out synthetics. The Crucible then explodes due to generating more power than the effect actually needs (because less space magic is involved I guess) and overloading.
- Control doesn't use the Crucible at all. The Crucible is a power source, designed to provide the Citadel with the energy it requires to spread Synthesis across the galaxy. Control requires no extra power because the Catalyst already controls. The Citadel is already providing power for this. All you're doing is installing a new OS and sending a software update to all Reapers. I come to this conclusion because the Citadel does not fire a beam in Control. The wave itself handles everything.
EDIT: Actually, upon remembering the control scene, the Crucible is clearly being interacted with, therefore I amend this to Control requiring little of the Crucible's power, perhaps to spread the "software patch" to the Reapers. However the fact remains that the Citadel clearly isn't using the same amount of power as in Destroy/Synthesis.
- Synthesis, like Destroy, clearly needs both the Citadel and Crucible to function. Like Destroy, the Citadel fires the beam and suffers damage to the wards in the same way. However, unlike Destroy it's not activated by breaking something, but rather by interacting with the rather prominently displayed and accessable beam.
Think of the terms being used here. Crucible. Synthesis. Catalyst. Get it?
The entire point of the Crucible is to provide the necesarry power for the Citadel to perform it's intended function - synthesis. The Catalyst is possibly ambivalent about finally reaching this point and so reveals the chance to break it. But that's the thing. Destroy is breaking it. It's not working as intended.