Aller au contenu

Photo

Why does everyone complain about space magic?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
503 réponses à ce sujet

#1
JC_aka_fps_john

JC_aka_fps_john
  • Members
  • 525 messages
It's science fiction. Science fiction is space magic.

Get over it.

#2
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
Is a house a home?

Is a chair just a chair, even when it's just sitting there?

#3
JBPBRC

JBPBRC
  • Members
  • 3 444 messages
Because there's mostly talky-techy science fiction with "magic" sprinkled in every now and then like Star Trek and Mass Effect 1, and then there's science-fantasy like Star Wars where space magic (The Force) is woven into the fiber of the futuristic franchise itself.

I don't mind space magic at all personally, if that's what I expect from the universe. Star Wars and WH40k being good examples. Space magic can work well even in talky-techy sci-fi like Star Trek if used properly--such as Q.

It wasn't used properly here. Not by a long shot.

#4
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 273 messages

JC_aka_fps_john wrote...

It's science fiction. Science fiction is space magic.

Get over it.


I've been on internet forums too long to really tell if somebody is trolling or not.

Are you?

#5
Versus Omnibus

Versus Omnibus
  • Members
  • 2 832 messages
Because Mass Effect is Science Fiction, not Future Fantasy.

#6
F4H bandicoot

F4H bandicoot
  • Members
  • 1 247 messages
You can;t explain the how things like synthesis works with the lore, therefore it's magic.
You can explain the vast majority of everything else in the universe, therefore it's not magic.

#7
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 273 messages

F4H bandicoot wrote...

You can;t explain the how things like synthesis works with the lore, therefore it's magic.
You can explain the vast majority of everything else in the universe, therefore it's not magic.


Crudely put, this.

#8
Armass81

Armass81
  • Members
  • 2 762 messages
No its not, Mass Effect is not Alice in Wonderland.

#9
Guest_Speezy_*

Guest_Speezy_*
  • Guests
You don't think it is jarring for a setting that typically tries to explain itself with somewhat plausible scientific nonsense to suddenly drop that for synthesis?

#10
Terminus Echoes

Terminus Echoes
  • Members
  • 1 143 messages
Mass Effect painstakingly explains how everything works. How the Mass Relays work, how Element Zero works, even how the Geth work.

The fate-of-the-world decision, the solution to the Reaper threat, is only explained in function, and with the presented data, makes no sense.

#11
JC_aka_fps_john

JC_aka_fps_john
  • Members
  • 525 messages

o Ventus wrote...

JC_aka_fps_john wrote...

It's science fiction. Science fiction is space magic.

Get over it.


I've been on internet forums too long to really tell if somebody is trolling or not.

Are you?


To an extent, yes, but the point is still valid.  Element zero, the basis of just about everything in Mass Effect, is pure space magic, but nobody bats an eyelid at that

#12
Guest_Speezy_*

Guest_Speezy_*
  • Guests
Element Zero is explained within the confines of the lore. And makes sense within the setting.

#13
Versus Omnibus

Versus Omnibus
  • Members
  • 2 832 messages

JC_aka_fps_john wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

JC_aka_fps_john wrote...

It's science fiction. Science fiction is space magic.

Get over it.


I've been on internet forums too long to really tell if somebody is trolling or not.

Are you?


To an extent, yes, but the point is still valid.  Element zero, the basis of just about everything in Mass Effect, is pure space magic, but nobody bats an eyelid at that


But Eezo is still explained how it works and what it does. It doesn't need to be scientifically possible, it just needs an explaination.

The Crucible doesn't explain how it does anything; it just does it.

#14
D24O

D24O
  • Members
  • 7 579 messages
Does this prove IT?

#15
KoorahUK

KoorahUK
  • Members
  • 1 122 messages
Clarke's Three Laws are three "laws" of prediction formulated by the British writer and scientist Arthur C. Clarke. They are:

1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.

2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.

3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

#16
Tealjaker94

Tealjaker94
  • Members
  • 2 947 messages
Suspension of disbelief. Most things, like FTL, are fine. They're explained within lore and make the experience better. Some things, like the Lazarus Project, start to stretch it. These aren't explained as well but we can get past them as long as they benefit the story. And a few things, namely Synthesis, completely shatter the suspension of disbelief. They either lack any sort of explanation or are explained in a way that only makes them more absurd i.e. New DNA WTF?! They don't benefit the overall plot of the game and are thus dismissed as space magic.

#17
JC_aka_fps_john

JC_aka_fps_john
  • Members
  • 525 messages

Speezy wrote...

Element Zero is explained within the confines of the lore. And makes sense within the setting.


"Element zero is a material that, when subjected to an electrical current, releases dark energy which can raise or lower the mass of matter. A positive current increases mass, a negative current decreases it"


That isn't an explanation. It's a black box of science designed to allow something inexplicable that defies the laws of science as we know them (i.e. space magic).



Which I'm fine with, that's why I like science fiction. What annoys me is how selective people are being about this. It's all space magic, accept it.

#18
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 273 messages

JC_aka_fps_john wrote...

"Element zero is a material that, when subjected to an electrical current, releases dark energy which can raise or lower the mass of matter. A positive current increases mass, a negative current decreases it"


That isn't an explanation. It's a black box of science designed to allow something inexplicable that defies the laws of science as we know them (i.e. space magic).



Which I'm fine with, that's why I like science fiction. What annoys me is how selective people are being about this. It's all space magic, accept it.


You know eezo is based on actual theoretical physics, right?

#19
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages
I've had enough of your disingenuous assertions.

#20
DeadpoolBub

DeadpoolBub
  • Members
  • 234 messages
My problem with the space magic is that it came out of nowhere. The Crucible was built to destroy the Reapers, but now it has the power to control them or change everyone's DNA? wut

#21
zambot

zambot
  • Members
  • 1 236 messages
There is space magic you introduce at the beginning of a sci-fi story that you base your world upon.

Then there is space magic that you use to resolve the plot of your sci-fi story in the very last chapter.

One of these two things makes your story silly.

#22
JC_aka_fps_john

JC_aka_fps_john
  • Members
  • 525 messages

o Ventus wrote...

JC_aka_fps_john wrote...

"Element zero is a material that, when subjected to an electrical current, releases dark energy which can raise or lower the mass of matter. A positive current increases mass, a negative current decreases it"


That isn't an explanation. It's a black box of science designed to allow something inexplicable that defies the laws of science as we know them (i.e. space magic).



Which I'm fine with, that's why I like science fiction. What annoys me is how selective people are being about this. It's all space magic, accept it.


You know eezo is based on actual theoretical physics, right?



The idea of dark energy is, albeit with a lot of creative license. Eezo is purely fictional

#23
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 273 messages

JC_aka_fps_john wrote...

The idea of dark energy is, albeit with a lot of creative license. Eezo is purely fictional


Eezo takes properties from both antimatter and dark matter. 

So...

#24
shepdog77

shepdog77
  • Members
  • 2 634 messages
What about this.

#25
ShepnTali

ShepnTali
  • Members
  • 4 535 messages
It's fine to have a story about a magic box. It's not fine to introduce a magic banana at the end of the story that turns the magic box into a donkey. The end.