253 réponses à ce sujet

[sporeian]

Shepard has been an integral part of the universe. It'd be like, removing Master Chief from Halo or removing The Fellowship from LotR.

[JeffZero]

Yes it can. And removing Master Chief from Halo would not cause the universe to explode. In fact, it's already been done.

[sporeian]

JeffZero wrote...

Yes it can. And removing Master Chief from Halo would not cause the universe to explode. In fact, it's already been done.

Because the $60 map pack known as ODST worked perfectly

[krukow]

sure. There's a whole galaxy out there that we could play in, say 100 years later or something. Heck, we could even romance Liara again!

[ShepnTali]

Can Star Wars live without Luke? Star Trek without Kirk?


Yes, yes, and yes.

[gorezeelar]

 KROGAN PIRATE!!!! 

[JeffZero]

sporeian wrote...

JeffZero wrote...

Yes it can. And removing Master Chief from Halo would not cause the universe to explode. In fact, it's already been done.

Because the $60 map pack known as ODST worked perfectly

Here I was under the mistaken impression Reach didn't star Master Chief, either.

[ATiBotka]

Of course!
Shepard was a good hero. But it's time to let him rest.

[JeffZero]

ShepnTali wrote...

Can Star Wars live without Luke? Star Trek without Kirk?


Yes, yes, and yes.

Exactly.

Goodness, the amount of fan outcry toward TNG early on was legendary. Granted, it was pretty poor for a while. But people eventually came around as Picard's crew began to rock. And Sisko's as well.

[Slappy]

As much as I hate to say this, yes it can. But are people tired of Shepard yet? I'm definately not...

[AlloutAce]

Halo Reach Breh

[MearasNZ]

krukow wrote...

sure. There's a whole galaxy out there that we could play in, say 100 years later or something. Heck, we could even romance Liara again!

^^This.  Definitely this.  Could still romance Liara, even 500 years later!! 

[sporeian]

JeffZero wrote...

sporeian wrote...

JeffZero wrote...

Yes it can. And removing Master Chief from Halo would not cause the universe to explode. In fact, it's already been done.

Because the $60 map pack known as ODST worked perfectly

Here I was under the mistaken impression Reach didn't star Master Chief, either.

Reach was okay, but the main problem was you knew everyone was gonna die. It was just a question of how they shall die.

Also, Master Chief was in Reach (Easter Egg), but I'm not trying to catch you in a loop hole or anything.

[sporeian]

MearasNZ wrote...

krukow wrote...

sure. There's a whole galaxy out there that we could play in, say 100 years later or something. Heck, we could even romance Liara again!

^^This.  Definitely this.  Could still romance Liara, even 500 years later!! 

Plus, Asari only get more... mass... after time, If Donnely is right.

[o Ventus]

Yes.

Will it be as interesting? No.

[gorezeelar]

o Ventus wrote...

Yes.

Will it be as interesting? No.

You kidding? What can be more interesting than Krogan pirate? 

[Lonsecia]

To me I think that's the biggest shame of the way shep is sacrificed. It felt like his/her death should have been more in the heat of battle, with friends and squad mates around. When they died, their body would be taken and buried, and then there'd be a monument. whatever we did in the universe would help shape any future games and it'd feel like it mattered. With the way the series ended, I don't feel that.

I do think the series could technically go on without Shepard, but without some kind of closure there, it would feel very weird.

I do suspect that any games set in the future will in some way refer back to Shepard though, in an attempt to give us that closure.

[o Ventus]

gorezeelar wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Yes.

Will it be as interesting? No.

You kidding? What can be more interesting than Krogan pirate? 

Dinosaur krogan.

[gorezeelar]

o Ventus wrote...

gorezeelar wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Yes.

Will it be as interesting? No.

You kidding? What can be more interesting than Krogan pirate? 

Dinosaur krogan.

[KOM_95]

No. It would be like removing John Mcclane from Diehard or removing Chief from Halo. Not a good idea. Although I would be intrigued if they went with a new main character

[Jamie9]

Yes.

I don't play Mass Effect for Shepard. Never have. I play it to see Omega, Illium, Tuchanka. I play it to see the Turians, the Krogan, the Salarians, the Asari.

I play it to see all the internal conflicts of likeable, believable characters.

All of these exist without Shepard.

[devSin]

Meh.

[o Ventus]

gorezeelar wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

gorezeelar wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Yes.

Will it be as interesting? No.

You kidding? What can be more interesting than Krogan pirate? 

Dinosaur krogan.

Does the idea not intrigue you?

[Tealjaker94]

Well Tolkien wrote a **** ton more than just LotR(They're also making the Hobbit into a movie). And Halo: Reach was fantastic.

[ShepnTali]

KOM_95 wrote...

No. It would be like removing John Mcclane from Diehard or removing Chief from Halo. Not a good idea. Although I would be intrigued if they went with a new main character

Die Hard is a different animal. The DH universe is zero without McClane because there's literally nothing interesting about it by itself. The ME universe is rich with or without Shepard.