296 réponses à ce sujet

[Tealjaker94]

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

Modifié par Tealjaker94, 19 août 2012 - 02:42 .

[Ieldra]

Hmm.... the idea is interesting, and *if* they make a sequel, things may go that way. I wouldn't like it though, because a unifying future, regardless of which decision it's based on, would trivialize the choices we made in ME3. Which means, I hope there won't be a sequel.

[Seival]

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

But you forgot that Shepard's story was ended in ME3. Your own Shepard did everything according to her/his way of thinking. And new story still shows consequences of her/his actions, no matter Synthesis in inevitable.

...New story, new protagonist, Dark Energy problem to solve, plus ME Trilogy events affecting this new Stroy

I think that if you killed Rachni and didn't cure the Genophage, then there will be no Rachni, and there will be too few Krogan.

[Tealjaker94]

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

But you forgot that Shepard's story was ended in ME3. Your own Shepard did everything according to her/his way of thinking. And new story still shows consequences of her/his actions, no matter Synthesis in inevitable.

...New story, new protagonist, Dark Energy problem to solve, plus ME Trilogy events affecting this new Stroy

I think that if you killed Rachni and didn't cure the Genophage, then there will be no Rachni, and there will be too few Krogan.

But you're telling me I failed. I didn't want synthesis to be forced upon anyone. Yet it was forced upon everyone. You're basically telling everyone who chose destroy "LOL! It's just like synthesis and you killed your friends for nothing!"

[Conniving_Eagle]

Seival wrote...

anorling wrote...


Yeah sorry.... I still remember your post about the Normandy test flight theory and loads of different derpy support threads with ideas probably conceived while stoned on shrooms.

Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, you say can ever be taken seriously ever again.

You know, we have a saying in russia: "Each joke is only partially a joke. The rest of the joke is the truth".

In this particular case, never say never to crazy ideas, because some of that ideas may become great in fact.

...Well, and did you actually read the OP before comment?

Where do you live?

[Seival]

Ieldra2 wrote...

Hmm.... the idea is interesting, and *if* they make a sequel, things may go that way. I wouldn't like it though, because a unifying future, regardless of which decision it's based on, would trivialize the choices we made in ME3. Which means, I hope there won't be a sequel.

The idea will unify only Synthesis part. A lot of variables still can be used to affect New RPG Trilogy story (I described how exactly in OP). And this will strongly depend on the final choice make in ME3 actually...

...This is why I said about making Synthesis "canon" without making any ME3 ending "canon". A good example of viable paradox

[Applepie_Svk]

Tealjaker94 wrote...

But you're telling me I failed. I didn't want synthesis to be forced upon anyone. Yet it was forced upon everyone. You're basically telling everyone who chose destroy "LOL! It's just like synthesis and you killed your friends for nothing!"

This...

[Wayning_Star]

Green glowing eyes windows® to the soul...

[Seival]

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

But you forgot that Shepard's story was ended in ME3. Your own Shepard did everything according to her/his way of thinking. And new story still shows consequences of her/his actions, no matter Synthesis in inevitable.

...New story, new protagonist, Dark Energy problem to solve, plus ME Trilogy events affecting this new Stroy

I think that if you killed Rachni and didn't cure the Genophage, then there will be no Rachni, and there will be too few Krogan.

But you're telling me I failed. I didn't want synthesis to be forced upon anyone. Yet it was forced upon everyone. You're basically telling everyone who chose destroy "LOL! It's just like synthesis and you killed your friends for nothing!"

Failed? Your task was to stop the Reaper threat. There was no actual plan to stop the Reapers, and you should have been prepared for everything. Even for the entire Galaxy destruction because of Crucible.

You've stopped the Reapers (if you didn't choose Refusal of course). You mission was complete. There was no failure at all, even if Synthesis was inevitable.

Modifié par Seival, 19 août 2012 - 03:02 .

[Zardoc]

[Wayning_Star]

Ieldra2 wrote...

Hmm.... the idea is interesting, and *if* they make a sequel, things may go that way. I wouldn't like it though, because a unifying future, regardless of which decision it's based on, would trivialize the choices we made in ME3. Which means, I hope there won't be a sequel.

wouldn't it make them as confusing as the controversy of same? Everyone cannot 'decide' on what choice, if any, are best suited for the MEU. Some even goe as far as to reinvent the MEU and catalytic tech to suit their own version(s) of events,therein? Cannot trivialize events that are unrealized? Maybe the word 'undermine' might fit better??

[Tealjaker94]

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

But you forgot that Shepard's story was ended in ME3. Your own Shepard did everything according to her/his way of thinking. And new story still shows consequences of her/his actions, no matter Synthesis in inevitable.

...New story, new protagonist, Dark Energy problem to solve, plus ME Trilogy events affecting this new Stroy

I think that if you killed Rachni and didn't cure the Genophage, then there will be no Rachni, and there will be too few Krogan.

But you're telling me I failed. I didn't want synthesis to be forced upon anyone. Yet it was forced upon everyone. You're basically telling everyone who chose destroy "LOL! It's just like synthesis and you killed your friends for nothing!"

Failed? Your task was to stop the Reaper threat. There was no actual plan to stop the Reapers, and you should have been prepared for everything. Even for the entire Galaxy destruction because of Crucible.

You've stopped the Reapers (if you didn't choose Refusal of course). You mission was complete. There was no failure at all, even if Synthesis was inevitable.

I certainly failed at the bolded part. 

[Seival]

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

But you forgot that Shepard's story was ended in ME3. Your own Shepard did everything according to her/his way of thinking. And new story still shows consequences of her/his actions, no matter Synthesis in inevitable.

...New story, new protagonist, Dark Energy problem to solve, plus ME Trilogy events affecting this new Stroy

I think that if you killed Rachni and didn't cure the Genophage, then there will be no Rachni, and there will be too few Krogan.

But you're telling me I failed. I didn't want synthesis to be forced upon anyone. Yet it was forced upon everyone. You're basically telling everyone who chose destroy "LOL! It's just like synthesis and you killed your friends for nothing!"

Failed? Your task was to stop the Reaper threat. There was no actual plan to stop the Reapers, and you should have been prepared for everything. Even for the entire Galaxy destruction because of Crucible.

You've stopped the Reapers (if you didn't choose Refusal of course). You mission was complete. There was no failure at all, even if Synthesis was inevitable.

I certainly failed at the bolded part. 

Forced, but not by you. According to the idea in case of Destroy, Synthesis was forced upon everyone by an accident, and 500 years after ME3 events. Survived Destroyer-Shepard will not even live for that long.

[Tealjaker94]

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

But you forgot that Shepard's story was ended in ME3. Your own Shepard did everything according to her/his way of thinking. And new story still shows consequences of her/his actions, no matter Synthesis in inevitable.

...New story, new protagonist, Dark Energy problem to solve, plus ME Trilogy events affecting this new Stroy

I think that if you killed Rachni and didn't cure the Genophage, then there will be no Rachni, and there will be too few Krogan.

But you're telling me I failed. I didn't want synthesis to be forced upon anyone. Yet it was forced upon everyone. You're basically telling everyone who chose destroy "LOL! It's just like synthesis and you killed your friends for nothing!"

Failed? Your task was to stop the Reaper threat. There was no actual plan to stop the Reapers, and you should have been prepared for everything. Even for the entire Galaxy destruction because of Crucible.

You've stopped the Reapers (if you didn't choose Refusal of course). You mission was complete. There was no failure at all, even if Synthesis was inevitable.

I certainly failed at the bolded part. 

Forced, but not by you. According to the idea in case of Destroy, Synthesis was forced upon everyone by an accident, and 500 years after ME3 events. Survived Destroyer-Shepard will not even live for that long.

I don't care who or what forced it. I killed EDI and the geth because I didn't think it should be forced. If this happened, I could have achieved the same result without killing them.

[Wayning_Star]

it's already here.. synthesis.. indoctrination at the basic level.


There's a macro lesson here.
If you think your kid is spending too much time on their iPad and not enough time outside getting some exercise, don't blame the iPad. Before the iPad, they were playing video games, and before video games they were watching TV, and before TV they were reading comic books. Throughout history, you will uncover generations of youth who would rather sit around and play than go outside and play.

http://www.twistimag...out-technology/

[Wayning_Star]

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

But you forgot that Shepard's story was ended in ME3. Your own Shepard did everything according to her/his way of thinking. And new story still shows consequences of her/his actions, no matter Synthesis in inevitable.

...New story, new protagonist, Dark Energy problem to solve, plus ME Trilogy events affecting this new Stroy

I think that if you killed Rachni and didn't cure the Genophage, then there will be no Rachni, and there will be too few Krogan.

But you're telling me I failed. I didn't want synthesis to be forced upon anyone. Yet it was forced upon everyone. You're basically telling everyone who chose destroy "LOL! It's just like synthesis and you killed your friends for nothing!"

Failed? Your task was to stop the Reaper threat. There was no actual plan to stop the Reapers, and you should have been prepared for everything. Even for the entire Galaxy destruction because of Crucible.

You've stopped the Reapers (if you didn't choose Refusal of course). You mission was complete. There was no failure at all, even if Synthesis was inevitable.

I certainly failed at the bolded part. 

Forced, but not by you. According to the idea in case of Destroy, Synthesis was forced upon everyone by an accident, and 500 years after ME3 events. Survived Destroyer-Shepard will not even live for that long.

I don't care who or what forced it. I killed EDI and the geth because I didn't think it should be forced. If this happened, I could have achieved the same result without killing them.

"" I killed EDI and the geth because I didn't think it should be forced.""

What should be forced?

[Tealjaker94]

Wayning_Star wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

But you forgot that Shepard's story was ended in ME3. Your own Shepard did everything according to her/his way of thinking. And new story still shows consequences of her/his actions, no matter Synthesis in inevitable.

...New story, new protagonist, Dark Energy problem to solve, plus ME Trilogy events affecting this new Stroy

I think that if you killed Rachni and didn't cure the Genophage, then there will be no Rachni, and there will be too few Krogan.

But you're telling me I failed. I didn't want synthesis to be forced upon anyone. Yet it was forced upon everyone. You're basically telling everyone who chose destroy "LOL! It's just like synthesis and you killed your friends for nothing!"

Failed? Your task was to stop the Reaper threat. There was no actual plan to stop the Reapers, and you should have been prepared for everything. Even for the entire Galaxy destruction because of Crucible.

You've stopped the Reapers (if you didn't choose Refusal of course). You mission was complete. There was no failure at all, even if Synthesis was inevitable.

I certainly failed at the bolded part. 

Forced, but not by you. According to the idea in case of Destroy, Synthesis was forced upon everyone by an accident, and 500 years after ME3 events. Survived Destroyer-Shepard will not even live for that long.

I don't care who or what forced it. I killed EDI and the geth because I didn't think it should be forced. If this happened, I could have achieved the same result without killing them.

"" I killed EDI and the geth because I didn't think it should be forced.""

What should be forced?

Synthesis.

[Wayning_Star]

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Wayning_Star wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

But you forgot that Shepard's story was ended in ME3. Your own Shepard did everything according to her/his way of thinking. And new story still shows consequences of her/his actions, no matter Synthesis in inevitable.

...New story, new protagonist, Dark Energy problem to solve, plus ME Trilogy events affecting this new Stroy

I think that if you killed Rachni and didn't cure the Genophage, then there will be no Rachni, and there will be too few Krogan.

But you're telling me I failed. I didn't want synthesis to be forced upon anyone. Yet it was forced upon everyone. You're basically telling everyone who chose destroy "LOL! It's just like synthesis and you killed your friends for nothing!"

Failed? Your task was to stop the Reaper threat. There was no actual plan to stop the Reapers, and you should have been prepared for everything. Even for the entire Galaxy destruction because of Crucible.

You've stopped the Reapers (if you didn't choose Refusal of course). You mission was complete. There was no failure at all, even if Synthesis was inevitable.

I certainly failed at the bolded part. 

Forced, but not by you. According to the idea in case of Destroy, Synthesis was forced upon everyone by an accident, and 500 years after ME3 events. Survived Destroyer-Shepard will not even live for that long.

I don't care who or what forced it. I killed EDI and the geth because I didn't think it should be forced. If this happened, I could have achieved the same result without killing them.

"" I killed EDI and the geth because I didn't think it should be forced.""

What should be forced?

Synthesis.

Oh, I thought you meant 'death' shouldn't be forced..oh wait?!?

nevermind..

[Wayning_Star]

Wayning_Star wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Wayning_Star wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

Seival wrote...

Tealjaker94 wrote...

I would absolutely hate this. I was forced to sacrifice EDI and the geth to defeat the Reapers without trying to be a god or forcing synthesis on the galaxy and now synthesis is forced upon us anyways. **** that. Give me a prequel that doesn't need to take on the absolute ****storm around the endings.
Edit: Also, what if you killed the rachni and didn't cure the genophage? Would the krogan/rachni planets just be deserted?

But you forgot that Shepard's story was ended in ME3. Your own Shepard did everything according to her/his way of thinking. And new story still shows consequences of her/his actions, no matter Synthesis in inevitable.

...New story, new protagonist, Dark Energy problem to solve, plus ME Trilogy events affecting this new Stroy

I think that if you killed Rachni and didn't cure the Genophage, then there will be no Rachni, and there will be too few Krogan.

But you're telling me I failed. I didn't want synthesis to be forced upon anyone. Yet it was forced upon everyone. You're basically telling everyone who chose destroy "LOL! It's just like synthesis and you killed your friends for nothing!"

Failed? Your task was to stop the Reaper threat. There was no actual plan to stop the Reapers, and you should have been prepared for everything. Even for the entire Galaxy destruction because of Crucible.

You've stopped the Reapers (if you didn't choose Refusal of course). You mission was complete. There was no failure at all, even if Synthesis was inevitable.

I certainly failed at the bolded part. 

Forced, but not by you. According to the idea in case of Destroy, Synthesis was forced upon everyone by an accident, and 500 years after ME3 events. Survived Destroyer-Shepard will not even live for that long.

I don't care who or what forced it. I killed EDI and the geth because I didn't think it should be forced. If this happened, I could have achieved the same result without killing them.

"" I killed EDI and the geth because I didn't think it should be forced.""

What should be forced?

Synthesis.

Oh, I thought you meant 'death' shouldn't be forced..oh wait?!?

nevermind..

edit: That'll teach Geth and Edi to NOT be created, shame on them, unsightly and rude contraptions anyways!!

[Hannah Montana]

If I knew this thread was going to evolve into pyramid quotes I would not have entered.

[Sajuro]

I'm sorry OP, but no. first destroy seems to get the shaft in this and secondly in destroy we already see the citadel rebuilt without your magical green splosions.

[Wayning_Star]

Hannah Montana wrote...

If I knew this thread was going to evolve into pyramid quotes I would not have entered.

It would seem the game it's self suffers from that symptom, leaves you in a quandry?

[Wayning_Star]

Sajuro wrote...

I'm sorry OP, but no. first destroy seems to get the shaft in this and secondly in destroy we already see the citadel rebuilt without your magical green splosions.

but what we don't get to see is the original question of synthesis return to the MEU. The catalyst will return, according to all concerned. The pattern will continue.

You cannot destroy that what is integral to yourself, you can only 'deny' it, or modify your options of living 'with' it or without it. That being technology and it's inevitible advance.

The actual test: Technology, or no technology... rather booliean.

[Sajuro]

Wayning_Star wrote...

Hannah Montana wrote...

If I knew this thread was going to evolve into pyramid quotes I would not have entered.

It would seem the game it's self suffers from that symptom, leaves you in a quandry?

The game suffers from pyramid quotes?

[Applepie_Svk]

Seival wrote...


Forced, but not by you. According to the idea in case of Destroy, Synthesis was forced upon everyone by an accident, and 500 years after ME3 events. Survived Destroyer-Shepard will not even live for that long.

Are you serious ???

Defending of nonsense is ignorance to bad writing or another intention, ignorance is bliss...
By fallacies which said kid is synthesis inevitable part of evolution, than why his solution used in previous cycle symbiotic species as a weapon and turn them into husks ? If it was realy inevitable, than he could study that symbiotic relationship and learn something even maybe end his vicious cycle 50 thousand years sooner but no, there wasn´t TM by Catalyst or better said without his god word you cannot evolved - which is realy interesting together with quote from previous games:  Relay technology is our technology, reaper technology - we left it here for civilizations to evolve in path which we have desire - in our paths...

Modifié par Applepie_Svk, 19 août 2012 - 04:01 .