377 réponses à ce sujet

[The Angry One]

Ledgend1221 wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

Fallout 2's protagonist is confirmed to be male.

No it isn't. Some people think it does because of a character in FNV that describes the potential son of the male Fallout 2 character.
It's an easter egg, and literally ANY male wanderer in Fallout 2's era could've sired Mr. Bishop. In other words it's a male chosen one's son if you want it to be, and only if you want it to be. That's the point.

Its made clear that it is the chosen one's son. The way he is described is similar to one of the ending slides of Fallout 2. It's not a piece of the Couriers dialougle, it is said by another character in the universe. It is canon until something proves otherwise.

It's similar, but not proof of anything. Again, it's an easter egg. It has no bearing on those who don't consider the Chosen One male. Stop being disingenuous about this.

[Hannah Montana]

Blueprotoss wrote...

Hannah Montana wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

Hannah Montana wrote...

This is an honest question.

Do you think the galaxy would depend on anyone but a straight white male?

Nope even when most of the action heroes are Straight, White, and Male.

Did you mean to say yes?
Saying nope means they would not depend on anyone but that.

The answer is no while there are a lot more action heroes that are Straight, White, and Male who save the day.

To say "no" to my question is to say the galaxy would only depend on the straight white male.

[Ledgend1221]

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

Fallout 2's protagonist is confirmed to be male.

No it isn't. Some people think it does because of a character in FNV that describes the potential son of the male Fallout 2 character.
It's an easter egg, and literally ANY male wanderer in Fallout 2's era could've sired Mr. Bishop. In other words it's a male chosen one's son if you want it to be, and only if you want it to be. That's the point.

Its made clear that it is the chosen one's son. The way he is described is similar to one of the ending slides of Fallout 2. It's not a piece of the Couriers dialougle, it is said by another character in the universe. It is canon until something proves otherwise.

It's similar, but not proof of anything. Again, it's an easter egg. It has no bearing on those who don't consider the Chosen One male. Stop being disingenuous about this.

It is canon.
Bishop is the whole reson for Bruce Isacc being in Novac.

[The Angry One]

Ledgend1221 wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

Fallout 2's protagonist is confirmed to be male.

No it isn't. Some people think it does because of a character in FNV that describes the potential son of the male Fallout 2 character.
It's an easter egg, and literally ANY male wanderer in Fallout 2's era could've sired Mr. Bishop. In other words it's a male chosen one's son if you want it to be, and only if you want it to be. That's the point.

Its made clear that it is the chosen one's son. The way he is described is similar to one of the ending slides of Fallout 2. It's not a piece of the Couriers dialougle, it is said by another character in the universe. It is canon until something proves otherwise.

It's similar, but not proof of anything. Again, it's an easter egg. It has no bearing on those who don't consider the Chosen One male. Stop being disingenuous about this.

It is canon.
Bishop is the whole reson for Bruce Isacc being in Novac.

Stop repeating your argument as if it will somehow make it more believable.
Yet again. Bishop could've been sired by ANY MAN. Do you think the player was the only tribal wanderer in the area?

[Blueprotoss]

Greylycantrope wrote...

Read what people post.

Again thats a start while next you should name the pages.  I'm not supposed to do your homework.

[Kathleen321]

I love my broshep and my femshep. They both kick some serious ass.

[Blueprotoss]

AresKeith wrote...

how about you look at the whole comment, when I said read the books for yourself

Yet you haven't read them yourself.  If you actually what to practice what you preach then don't contradict yourself.

[essarr71]

Blueprotoss wrote...

Greylycantrope wrote...

Read what people post.

Again thats a start while next you should name the pages.  I'm not supposed to do your homework.

Funny, coming from someone who refuses to do thier own.

[AngryFrozenWater]

This seems to be the correct thread.

[McAllyster]

Bioware canonized a few things in the novels. For example Udina was always refered as the human councilor regardless of your choice.

[Blueprotoss]

Hannah Montana wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

Hannah Montana wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

Hannah Montana wrote...

This is an honest question.

Do you think the galaxy would depend on anyone but a straight white male?

Nope even when most of the action heroes are Straight, White, and Male.

Did you mean to say yes?
Saying nope means they would not depend on anyone but that.

The answer is no while there are a lot more action heroes that are Straight, White, and Male who save the day.

To say "no" to my question is to say the galaxy would only depend on the straight white male.

Then men wouldn't exist if thats true.

[AresKeith]

Blueprotoss wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

how about you look at the whole comment, when I said read the books for yourself

Yet you haven't read them yourself.  If you actually what to practice what you preach then don't contradict yourself.

your gonna tell me what I read or don't read, after I already told you I read the books while you haven't. Wow your ignorant

[Blueprotoss]

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

It is canon.
Bishop is the whole reson for Bruce Isacc being in Novac.

Stop repeating your argument as if it will somehow make it more believable.
Yet again. Bishop could've been sired by ANY MAN. Do you think the player was the only tribal wanderer in the area?

I see you're flipping the table again.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 21 août 2012 - 08:25 .

[BatmanPWNS]

How about Shepard being a she-male instead. That way everyone is happy.............. right?

[Blueprotoss]

BatmanPWNS wrote...

How about Shepard being a she-male instead. That way everyone is happy.............. right?

Creepy but funny.

[Blueprotoss]

AresKeith wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

how about you look at the whole comment, when I said read the books for yourself

Yet you haven't read them yourself.  If you actually what to practice what you preach then don't contradict yourself.

your gonna tell me what I read or don't read, after I already told you I read the books while you haven't. Wow your ignorant

Actually its up to you to do what you want while if you did read the books then you would have already given out evidence.  The igornace is coming from you based on how your answer is just a no.

[sheppard7]

McAllyster wrote...

Bioware canonized a few things in the novels. For example Udina was always refered as the human councilor regardless of your choice.

What book said what sex Shep was?

[Hannah Montana]

Blueprotoss wrote...

Then men wouldn't exist if thats true.

Why do you think it is true?

Modifié par Hannah Montana, 21 août 2012 - 08:29 .

[Ledgend1221]

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

Fallout 2's protagonist is confirmed to be male.

No it isn't. Some people think it does because of a character in FNV that describes the potential son of the male Fallout 2 character.
It's an easter egg, and literally ANY male wanderer in Fallout 2's era could've sired Mr. Bishop. In other words it's a male chosen one's son if you want it to be, and only if you want it to be. That's the point.

Its made clear that it is the chosen one's son. The way he is described is similar to one of the ending slides of Fallout 2. It's not a piece of the Couriers dialougle, it is said by another character in the universe. It is canon until something proves otherwise.

It's similar, but not proof of anything. Again, it's an easter egg. It has no bearing on those who don't consider the Chosen One male. Stop being disingenuous about this.

It is canon.
Bishop is the whole reson for Bruce Isacc being in Novac.

Stop repeating your argument as if it will somehow make it more believable.
Yet again. Bishop could've been sired by ANY MAN. Do you think the player was the only tribal wanderer in the area?

There was a reason they chose that line.
They wanted you to make the connection between Bishop and the Chosen one.
Its like the dialouge with the Lonesome drifter.

[AresKeith]

Blueprotoss wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

how about you look at the whole comment, when I said read the books for yourself

Yet you haven't read them yourself.  If you actually what to practice what you preach then don't contradict yourself.

your gonna tell me what I read or don't read, after I already told you I read the books while you haven't. Wow your ignorant

Actually its up to you to do what you want while if you did read the books then you would have already given out evidence.  The igornace is coming from you based on how your answer is just a no.

see I don't need to because people have already given you evidence and we even told you to be a big boy and read the books for yourself, but you chose to ignore it because you know your wrong

[sheppard7]

Cthulhu42 wrote...

Oh boy, another thread with blueprotoss in it. Looks like I'm going to reach my daily quota of BSN lols today.

You should check out this for a good laugh. First line is priceless.

link of LOL

[The Angry One]

Ledgend1221 wrote...

There was a reason they chose that line.
They wanted you to make the connection between Bishop and the Chosen one.
Its like the dialouge with the Lonesome drifter.

They wanted you to make the connection if you chose to.
If your CO was male and slept with one of the Bishop women then that line was there for you to connect the dots.
If your CO wasn't, then the line is just a vague reference to Fallout 2, where one of the many other men Mrs. Bishop kidnapped fathered this guy. The end.

[Ledgend1221]

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

There was a reason they chose that line.
They wanted you to make the connection between Bishop and the Chosen one.
Its like the dialouge with the Lonesome drifter.

They wanted you to make the connection if you chose to.
If your CO was male and slept with one of the Bishop women then that line was there for you to connect the dots.
If your CO wasn't, then the line is just a vague reference to Fallout 2, where one of the many other men Mrs. Bishop kidnapped fathered this guy. The end.

It has nothing to do with personal choice.
It is canon that the CO was male, it is part of the FO universe.
It's not could, It is.

[The Angry One]

Ledgend1221 wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

There was a reason they chose that line.
They wanted you to make the connection between Bishop and the Chosen one.
Its like the dialouge with the Lonesome drifter.

They wanted you to make the connection if you chose to.
If your CO was male and slept with one of the Bishop women then that line was there for you to connect the dots.
If your CO wasn't, then the line is just a vague reference to Fallout 2, where one of the many other men Mrs. Bishop kidnapped fathered this guy. The end.

It has nothing to do with personal choice.
It is canon that the CO was male, it is part of the FO universe.
It's not could, It is.

I have refuted your argument, so you again repeat it.
We're done here. There is no canon CO. I have explained exactly why. You have done nothing but say the same thing over and over.
Good day.