For ODST, you see the faces of whole team in ODST other then the Rookie. For Reach, Emile is the only that didn't remove his helmet in general while we don't see Six's face. I wonder if Cheif's face will be shown in the new trilogy?MacNasty wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
What about ODST and Reach?
You see neither of their faces as well. though Noble six does lose his helmet... The point being... No faces!
Modifié par Blueprotoss, 20 août 2012 - 11:04 .
Nyoka wrote...
Now go tell blueprotoss that. Please!sheppard7 wrote...
Nyoka wrote...
Just read the books dude.
I just read what the books were about. What do they say about Shepard? The brief descriptions make it seem like none of them have Shepard in them.
If the eviidence can be shown then show it. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong while saying and doing nothing wouldn't do anything.Nyoka wrote...
Now go tell blueprotoss that. Please!sheppard7 wrote...
Nyoka wrote...
Just read the books dude.
I just read what the books were about. What do they say about Shepard? The brief descriptions make it seem like none of them have Shepard in them.
Yet you aren't listening.AresKeith wrote...
be he won't listen
Modifié par Blueprotoss, 20 août 2012 - 11:06 .
Mshep is so obviously better.Yuqi wrote...
I wonder how long before this turns into the inevitable Mshep VS Fshep shi&fight.
Guest_Nyoka_*
You want someone to scan all the pages of all the books and post them in this thread for you?Blueprotoss wrote...
If the eviidence can be shown then show it. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong while saying and doing nothing wouldn't do anything.
Modifié par Nyoka, 20 août 2012 - 11:15 .
Yet debates don't work like that especially when you're one of the people saying no without a counter.Nyoka wrote...
You want someone to scan all the pages of all the books and post them in this thread for you?
If I was clearly wrong then you wold have proven me wrong and you wold have also countered the ME favoring Male Shep.Nyoka wrote...
You said something about the books without having read them and you made a mistake. Go read the books, realize your mistake, and learn from it. Maybe you'll support your assertions with facts from now on, instead of just making stuff up without getting informed first.
Insulting people won't help you. Again likie I said if I'm wrong then I'm wrong while saying and doing nothing wouldn't do anything.Nyoka wrote...
It's not the forum's responsibility to educate you, you know.
Modifié par Blueprotoss, 20 août 2012 - 11:18 .
Nyoka wrote...
You want someone to scan all the pages of all the books and post them in this thread for you?Blueprotoss wrote...
If the eviidence can be shown then show it. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong while saying and doing nothing wouldn't do anything.
You said something about the books without having read them and you made a mistake. Go read the books, realize your mistake, and learn from it. Maybe you'll support your assertions with facts from now on, instead of just making stuff up without getting informed first.
It's not the forum's responsibility to educate you, you know.
Guest_Nyoka_*
Blueprotoss wrote...
If you can counter it then go ahead.Baronesa wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
There is a cannon Shepard because the Shepard in the books is a male.LanceSolous13 wrote...
There isn't a canon Shepard.
Sheploo and the basic Fem!Shep are simply defaults, nothing more.
Bwahahahahhaha
That was funny.
Try harder
Modifié par erilben, 20 août 2012 - 11:20 .
How is that when thats a straw-mann thats being pulled based on how how he/she can't even answer.sheppard7 wrote...
Nyoka wrote...
You want someone to scan all the pages of all the books and post them in this thread for you?Blueprotoss wrote...
If the eviidence can be shown then show it. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong while saying and doing nothing wouldn't do anything.
You said something about the books without having read them and you made a mistake. Go read the books, realize your mistake, and learn from it. Maybe you'll support your assertions with facts from now on, instead of just making stuff up without getting informed first.
It's not the forum's responsibility to educate you, you know.
Tell him to scan one page in the books that supports his statement since he's asking you to scan thousands. It's only fair, right?
Straw-mann here.Nyoka wrote...
The books are the proof you say you want. Go read them if you like, or continue making stuff up if you like.
As I said, it's not our responsibility to educate you. You can educate yourself or remain ignorant. Your choice.
Modifié par Blueprotoss, 20 août 2012 - 11:21 .
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet debates don't work like that especially when you're one of the people saying no without a counter.Nyoka wrote...
You want someone to scan all the pages of all the books and post them in this thread for you?If I was clearly wrong then you wold have proven me wrong and you wold have also countered the ME favoring Male Shep.Nyoka wrote...
You said something about the books without having read them and you made a mistake. Go read the books, realize your mistake, and learn from it. Maybe you'll support your assertions with facts from now on, instead of just making stuff up without getting informed first.Insulting people won't help you.Nyoka wrote...
It's not the forum's responsibility to educate you, you know.
Yet you're the one "trolling".Tealjaker94 wrote...
I mean seriously guys.
Yet it is a debate.AresKeith wrote...
1 and 2. this isn't a debate seen you didn't even read the books and rely on your friends instead while we did read them
For not doing the leg work.AresKeith wrote...
3, that wasn't an insult, since you don't wanna the books for yourself
Modifié par Blueprotoss, 20 août 2012 - 11:27 .
erilben wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
If you can counter it then go ahead.Baronesa wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
There is a cannon Shepard because the Shepard in the books is a male.LanceSolous13 wrote...
There isn't a canon Shepard.
Sheploo and the basic Fem!Shep are simply defaults, nothing more.
Bwahahahahhaha
That was funny.
Try harder
The books are on google books, you can search them for "Shepard".
Acension
Retribution
Shepard is not described and no pronouns are used.
Yet those only show 4 pages. If you really don't know then why do you answer?erilben wrote...
The books are on google books, you can search them for "Shepard".
Acension
Retribution
Shepard is not described and no pronouns are used.
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet those only show 4 pages. If you really don't know then why do you answer?erilben wrote...
The books are on google books, you can search them for "Shepard".
Acension
Retribution
Shepard is not described and no pronouns are used.
I'm debating not arguing and telling me to look when its the job of the other party to counter me is shameful by itself. Btw you shouldn't use the word "troll" when you're doing the "trolling". Ironically telling me to do your work would be considered "trolling".AresKeith wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet those only show 4 pages. If you really don't know then why do you answer?erilben wrote...
The books are on google books, you can search them for "Shepard".
Acension
Retribution
Shepard is not described and no pronouns are used.
now there is no point for you to continue agruing since the proof is right there and you choose to ignore it. But your just a troll so its obvious
Modifié par Blueprotoss, 20 août 2012 - 11:34 .
Ledgend1221 wrote...
If declaring a canon based on what evidence I have makes me an insecure sexist, then what must be done will be done.
True to Caesar!
Modifié par Khajiit Jzargo, 20 août 2012 - 11:49 .
Dude I don't think you're a troll. I think you either have too much self-pride to admit you're wrong or you're dumb, no offense.Blueprotoss wrote...
I'm debating not arguing and telling me to look when its the job of the other party to counter me is shameful by itself. Btw you shouldn't use the word "troll" when you're doing the "trolling". Ironically telling me to do your work would be considered "trolling".AresKeith wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet those only show 4 pages. If you really don't know then why do you answer?erilben wrote...
The books are on google books, you can search them for "Shepard".
Acension
Retribution
Shepard is not described and no pronouns are used.
now there is no point for you to continue agruing since the proof is right there and you choose to ignore it. But your just a troll so its obvious
http://www.urbandict....php?term=troll
Page numbers where shepard is refered to as "He/him" or GTFOBlueprotoss wrote...
There is a cannon Shepard because the Shepard in the books is a male.LanceSolous13 wrote...
There isn't a canon Shepard.
Sheploo and the basic Fem!Shep are simply defaults, nothing more.
I have read both those books, and since MY canon Shep is female I took notice weither Shep was referred to as a male.Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet those only show 4 pages. If you really don't know then why do you answer?erilben wrote...
The books are on google books, you can search them for "Shepard".
Acension
Retribution
Shepard is not described and no pronouns are used.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
