222 réponses à ce sujet

[Argetfalcon]

 Could they

[blueumi]

not sure though a dlc with shep waking up in hsopital and then a better ending would be nice but if bioware keeps things as they are which they will
then it's not for a lot of fans

[Tocquevillain]

dildogun could save it

[DrwEddy]

IT WOULD BE IF THEY ADD A REUNION SCENE! >:-[

[D24O]

No let it burn

[Conniving_Eagle]

Puzzle Theory?

[AresKeith]

D24O wrote...

No let it burn

*joker voice* Everything burns

[shepskisaac]

With big push in DLC, yes. But they would really have to push it big. That means War Assets in London DLC.

[MissMaster_2]

naw....

[Terminus Echoes]

http://social.biowar...ndex/10681738/1

Hell no.

[Fiji Indian]

There will always be 50 million complaints until Bioware makes it so that every question is answered with infinitely different endings depending on infinite different choices made throughout the trilogy.

For some reason people think that Bioware has unlimited money, resources, time, and energy to create a trilogy that is perfect in every way, down to the last bit of minutiae.

The game is fine, the DLCs will be entertaining. Get over it.

[LilLino]

It's a bloody good game with flaws like any other. I'm disappointed with developers lies pre-release, but I still goddamn enjoyed every moment until Priority:Earth. And EC fixed the total crappy-ness of vanilla endings.

Still I agree with IsaacShep that our Assets need to be seen. I also want to see Palaven, not rescue Omega for some crime-queen-****.

[Terminus Echoes]

Fiji Indian wrote...

There will always be 50 million complaints until Bioware makes it so that every question is answered with infinitely different endings depending on infinite different choices made throughout the trilogy.

For some reason people think that Bioware has unlimited money, resources, time, and energy to create a trilogy that is perfect in every way, down to the last bit of minutiae.

The game is fine, the DLCs will be entertaining. Get over it.

No one's saying that they have unlimited money, resources, time, and energy.

http://social.biowar...index/10056886/ 

We're saying they lied to us.

[JPN17]

Not really, at least not with something bioware would be willing to release. Their fix was to add a few cutscenes which changed zero of the underlying problems with the narrative. It would take an expansion pack type release to fix the major problems (god kid, etc) and that's just something that's not gonna happen. I also wouldn't feel like paying for a fix that should have been in the game anyway. I already threw away 80 bucks on ME3, bioware doesn't need any more of my money.

[shepskisaac]

LilLino wrote...

Still I agree with IsaacShep that our Assets need to be seen. I also want to see Palaven, not rescue Omega for some crime-queen-****.

But Omega will add a new hub. Systemic content is what the game needs much more than seeing more of Turians and Garrus who were heavily covered in the game already.

As for the Assets, I would be glad even if it was as simple as the models of the characters placed in London map with some basic combat animation/shooting from behind covers. Nothing more. Miranda, Jacob & 2 ex-Cerberus guys standing and shooting in one spot, then Geth Prime with 2 Quarian marines shooting in another spot, a little bit futher some Vorcha & Blue Suns, then some random Alliance soldiers with Jack & her students, passing by Samara & Asari soldiers further down the road while we move along etc. Literally all models & animations are there, except for Elcor tanks. Everything else is ready, they would just have to put them on the map and slap generic animation on them. Even that would make me feel like those War Assets numbers mattered more since I would at least see all of those numbers represented in fight in London.

Modifié par IsaacShep, 21 août 2012 - 12:07 .

[Terminus Echoes]

IsaacShep wrote...

LilLino wrote...

Still I agree with IsaacShep that our Assets need to be seen. I also want to see Palaven, not rescue Omega for some crime-queen-****.

But Omega will add a new hub. Systemic content is what the game needs much more than seeing more of Turians and Garrus who were heavily covered in the game already.

And this is confirmed?

[Versus Omnibus]

Terminus Echoes wrote...

Fiji Indian wrote...

There will always be 50 million complaints until Bioware makes it so that every question is answered with infinitely different endings depending on infinite different choices made throughout the trilogy.

For some reason people think that Bioware has unlimited money, resources, time, and energy to create a trilogy that is perfect in every way, down to the last bit of minutiae.

The game is fine, the DLCs will be entertaining. Get over it.

No one's saying that they have unlimited money, resources, time, and energy.

http://social.biowar...index/10056886/ 

We're saying they lied to us.

To be fair, many things change in the development of a game. What they said may have planned in the game but for some reason it got cut.

So instead of accusing Bioware of lying we should be demanding answers to why none of those promises came true.

[shepskisaac]

Terminus Echoes wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

LilLino wrote...

Still I agree with IsaacShep that our Assets need to be seen. I also want to see Palaven, not rescue Omega for some crime-queen-****.

But Omega will add a new hub. Systemic content is what the game needs much more than seeing more of Turians and Garrus who were heavily covered in the game already.

And this is confirmed?

It's not confirmed, but very likely since we saw OmgHub level in Firefight's files, along with other Omega levels and Levi levels: social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/323/index/13564528

[LilLino]

IsaacShep wrote...

LilLino wrote...

Still I agree with IsaacShep that our Assets need to be seen. I also want to see Palaven, not rescue Omega for some crime-queen-****.

But Omega will add a new hub. Systemic content is what the game needs much more than seeing more of Turians and Garrus who were heavily covered in the game already.

As for the Assets, I would be glad even if it was as simple as the models of the characters placed in London map with some basic combat animation/shooting from behind covers. Nothing more. Miranda, Jacob & 2 ex-Cerberus guys standing and shooting in one spot, then Geth Prime with 2 Quarian marines shooting in another spot, a little bit futher some Vorcha & Blue Suns, then some random Alliance soldiers with Jack & her students, passing by Samara & Asari soldiers further down the road while we move along etc. Literally all models & animations are there, except for Elcor tanks. Everything else is ready, they would just have to put them on the map and slap generic animation on them. Even that would make me feel like those War Assets numbers mattered more since I would at least see all of those numbers represented in fight in London.

I agree with London part 100%, but...

Do you really believe that they'd turn Omega into a hub world? Location isn't the only thing that makes a hub, it's submissions, dialogue, shops. It'd be a colossal undertaking which was never the case in any ME DLC.
You must realise it's gonna be mostly run&shoot with some drama-dialogue in it.

And although I agree that Turians were heavily covered, Palaven is not only them, it's also Krogans&Quarians &Geth later in the game. It'd also be a good opportunity to see our assets in action kicking ass, which massive battles around. It's the only planet we've never seen, needless to mention we've never seen females of the species.

[Terminus Echoes]

Versus Omnibus wrote...

Terminus Echoes wrote...

Fiji Indian wrote...

There will always be 50 million complaints until Bioware makes it so that every question is answered with infinitely different endings depending on infinite different choices made throughout the trilogy.

For some reason people think that Bioware has unlimited money, resources, time, and energy to create a trilogy that is perfect in every way, down to the last bit of minutiae.

The game is fine, the DLCs will be entertaining. Get over it.

No one's saying that they have unlimited money, resources, time, and energy.

http://social.biowar...index/10056886/ 

We're saying they lied to us.

To be fair, many things change in the development of a game. What they said may have planned in the game but for some reason it got cut.

So instead of accusing Bioware of lying we should be demanding answers to why none of those promises came true.

Well we're never going to get those answers. Hudson and Walters are hiding in their bunker, the ending is being called art, we're being told to "not get too attached to a plot", so basically BioWare doesn't care about what the fans want.

And before someone says I'm being ungrateful or demanding, but the whole point of a business is to satisfy your customers. Not satisfying your customers and then finding a dozen polite ways to tell them to screw off is not a good way to run a business.

[devSin]

Nope. I think the sun has set.

But we'll hopefully get some more time with the squad before having to pack things up.

[Grogimus]

Pretty sure I'm in the minority on this particular forum....but it's fine as is. Thought so even before extended cut. I am a bit eccentric though.....

[Ariella]

Argetfalcon wrote...

 Could they

Why salvage... the game is fine, especially with the extended cut ending.

[Blueprotoss]

Argetfalcon wrote...

 Could they

Haters gonna hate.