dzero wrote...
Ziegrif wrote...
I have decided to disagree with everything written in this thread due to Skillz > all.
On a technical standpoint though well some charachters have more tools at their disposal but it's the player who has to utilize those tools.
Marking the tools on tiers... eh everything has a use.Everything's equal to me just my opinion :/
Course yer all entitled to voice your disagreements and own opinions on my opinion o.o
Fair enough, though I would argue that a highly skilled player after playing every class to its maximum potential would still be able to form some sort of tier ranking.
That's a fair point aswell. But there are variables. Some people are better with Krogans than let's say Asari. So a tier list made by a skilled player would have to mean that the player is as skilled with every class and does not excel in one above the others and this is impossible due to there being prefrences in gameplay between people.
So they could go to the plausible maximum and still go beyond said maximum on other classes and fall short on something else. For example I'd rate The Krogan soldier SSS because I can demolish entire games with it.
There's also loadouts and builds to take account to. There are just too many personal variables and differences in the classes to make them into a tier list. Special snowflake situation and all that jazz.
A robot is the only thing that could actually build a tier list due to it's objectivity. So a tier list is only a personal prefrence list or a forum consensus list. But it's never accurate.
dzero wrote...
Forgive me, I haven't played the Slayer, but I believe Phase Disruptor is useless? And Charge is Charge so... what is really useful about the Slayer other than spamming slash?
Falcon + disruptor ammo + Slayer Phase = max 3-4 Tech bursts in a row. See my point with prefrences?
Modifié par Ziegrif, 21 août 2012 - 11:26 .