Modifié par bloodmage13, 21 août 2012 - 11:45 .
The possibility of dwarvern LI and seeing female Kossith
Débuté par
bloodmage13
, août 21 2012 11:33
#1
Posté 21 août 2012 - 11:33
Many people on this forum (including me) have been hinting that we want dwarves to be romanceable (Varric) and want to see a female kossith. What concerns me is the fact that we made the same requests before DA2 and none of them were implemented. I have two questions. Do you think that Bioware will implement those requests? Also why the resistance from Bioware? P.S. I would also love to have a Kossith LI but I doubt that Bioware would implement both dwarven LI and Kossith LI in the same game.
#2
Posté 21 août 2012 - 03:50
bloodmage13 wrote...
Many people on this forum (including me) have been hinting that we want dwarves to be romanceable (Varric) and want to see a female kossith. What concerns me is the fact that we made the same requests before DA2 and none of them were implemented. I have two questions. Do you think that Bioware will implement those requests? Also why the resistance from Bioware? P.S. I would also love to have a Kossith LI but I doubt that Bioware would implement both dwarven LI and Kossith LI in the same game.
People make a lot of requests, particularly when it comes to romance. Heck, if we mentioned that we'd added a mailbox into the game someone would request a romance with it. So the fact that dwarven romances or female kossith (and/or romances with female kossith) have been requested by some is hardly remarkable.
Insofar as romances with dwarves go, we might add one at some point-- for the right character. I've joked about finding dwarf romance icky in the past, but I have no particular objection so long as the dwarf in question doesn't look child-like.
Insofar as female kossith go, we might also add one at some point. That would be awesome. I think their concept looks hawt.
Why haven't we done either of these things yet? Because we're doing other things, and we don't create whole plots or characters on demand nor do we do something solely because it hasn't been done. Eventually we're likely to do both.





Retour en haut






