279 réponses à ce sujet

[KENNY4753]

BringBackNihlus wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

Ryoten wrote...

To me this question is like. "Would you play mass effect 4 if Taco Bell not only gave you the ****s, but gave you the ****s for a week, a kidney stone, and liver cancer."

I don't know, that 5 layer burrito is quite tempting

What about the Cantina Bowl that they make seem like that hispanic woman hand-creates for everyone that buys one?

Now I'm hungry:(

[Bfler]

Only if I could play as a pure organic/synthetic soldier of a resistance which tries to revert this ****ty transformation.

[Hrothdane]

In a word, ****no.

[Discotheque]

I would be interested in a game post ME3 .

[The RPGenius]

I would not purchase any Mass Effect product, be it game, comic, book, or other media form, that gave any implication that Synthesis is canon.

[chidingewe8036]

Heeeeeeeeell No

[Father_Jerusalem]

2 out of my 6 playthroughs have/will pick Synthesis as an ending.

Would I want a sequel where Synthesis was the canon ending? No, because then it invalidates 2/3s of the ending choices I made.

Either BioWare needs to make a system where you can choose which "canon" ending your playthrough has in a sequel, or they need to not make a sequel.

Making one canon ending, regardless of what it is, simply will not work.

[darknessmyown]

No, not now and not ever.

[AsheraII]

I simply can't accept any game calling itself Mass Effect 4 if it assumes a canon path through the previous games. Canon is NOT necessary for a Mass Effect 4 game. It just needs some imaginative writing to make all ME3 playthroughs acceptable.

[IchikoSakura]

No. Way.

if they really are that sucidal to define a canon ending they don't deserve it any better then getting dumped by half of the fanbase. I won't buy that.

I'd by loads of useless other Mass Effect merchandise crap without a blink (in fact I did) but not that.

Modifié par IchikoSakura, 22 août 2012 - 02:38 .

[DextroDNA]

No thanks, I'd rather not play as cyborgs with lines of green ass running down my face.

[MasterChief4100]

 NO GOD! PLEASE NO! NO!NO! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

[AnsinJung]

KotoR had a canon ending, don't see what the big deal is if Bioware chooses a canon sometimes. After all, Mass Effects 1 and 2 had cannon endings as to whether or not you completed the final mission. People who lived and died were mostly details.

Of course, I'm totally uninterested in anything that builds upon the disaster of ME3.

[elitedefender2]

 No ****ing way never when den Destroy but i dont want to play as a Hybrid:pinched:

[MasterChief4100]

elitedefender2 wrote...

 No ****ing way never when den Destroy but i dont want to play as a Hybrid:pinched:

Me too

[Siegdrifa]

Nope.
Some people likes some ending and chose them, some people hate some ending and choose another as a lesser evil or refusal.

Forcing synthesis will bother lot of people ...
If it was a new franchise that start with this set up, not many people would complain, but for a franchise that started with humans and continu with mixed genetic organics and synthetic stuff ... hard to accept.

If it's what they plan, there will be another ****storm and heated wars between fans ...
I'm getting too old for this ****... may be i'll pass, i'm still a little pissed at what they did with TOR about KOTOR, it makes me feel i played KOTOR the wrong way or not as intended ... if they want to do the same with ME 1&2&3, i'm not sure i'll follow them on this game.

edit: i'm not saying it like "OMG if you do it Bioware i will never buy a game from you again !" no no, i'm just sayng it as, let's say i don't give a damn about Bioware doing the new command and conquer because it's not my cupe of tea, so i'll just avoid it... nothing personnal or hate toward Bioware.

Modifié par Siegdrifa, 22 août 2012 - 03:11 .

[3DandBeyond]

The RPGenius wrote...

I would not purchase any Mass Effect product, be it game, comic, book, or other media form, that gave any implication that Synthesis is canon.

This exactly.  I was playing a game where all along all we ever wanted to do was destroy the reapers.  In the end, some kid popped up and wanted to explain their motivations, wanted me to understand them and maybe care about them, and then he asked me to help solve his problem.  If my character went against everything she ever said about it in the game, she could choose synthesis and do exactly what the little reaper commander wanted from the start.  So, in choosing synthesis not only does Shepard not destroy the reapers, the goal from the start, Shepard in fact fulfills the goal that the reapers had from the start.

So, yes this makes full sense to base a whole new ME game and potential series on doing exactly the opposite of what Shepard always wanted to do. 

This would be a definite no buy.  Dead reapers is the only way we solve the reaper problem.  They had a canon ending and they instead chose to make it not canon by inserting a gratuitous cost into the mix.  The endings always should have been how to go about destroying the reapers and the aftermath of trying, and not becoming best friends with their daddy.

Modifié par 3DandBeyond, 23 août 2012 - 01:29 .

[Xilizhra]

Honestly? I'd take it. I don't have a problem with Synthesis itself, just the way it was presented, which was far too vague and irritating for such a large change. Here, the vagueness would end and we'd get to see more.

[3DandBeyond]

Father_Jerusalem wrote...

2 out of my 6 playthroughs have/will pick Synthesis as an ending.

Would I want a sequel where Synthesis was the canon ending? No, because then it invalidates 2/3s of the ending choices I made.

Either BioWare needs to make a system where you can choose which "canon" ending your playthrough has in a sequel, or they need to not make a sequel.

Making one canon ending, regardless of what it is, simply will not work.

2 out of the 3 endings are already invalidated since they were never the goal from the very first they knew of the reapers.  No sane person in the game ever wanted to do anything other than destroy the reapers.  That set up destroy as canon.  I seriously doubt that anyone that started ME3 thought they'd be working toward anything other than destroying the reapers.  That made it canon.  The reapers wanted Synthesis, so it's out as canon.  TIM and other insane or indoctrinated people wanted Control, so it's out as canon.  Anderson, Hackett, Shepard, and everyone in the galaxy wanted dead reapers, so that is canon.

2 out of the 3 endings leave reapers alive.  So they are not canon.  Live reapers leave open a possible future problem.  But any future game that has them still alive in it is also problematic.  New enemies will show up-met by reapers.  Thus, no conflict with new enemies.  However, the reapers could become real foes again.  In control, the emotionless Shepard consciousness is not Shepard and very likely would have to at some point, split the baby.  Conflict will start up-bored Krogan need to do something.  And they and the Rachni will breed in their boredom.  Which Many will Shreaper protect.

Synthesis does not rule out the creation of new synthetics or organics, nor does it rule out superior synthetics or organics or some synthesized being that wants to control everything-if indeed they all still maintain their individuality.  If they do not, then it's soul killing and will be the death of the whole galactic civilization.  The galaxy will be destroyed not with a bang, but a whimper.

[Shaigunjoe]

I voted maybe, if they actually do make a game that far in the future such that either synthesis occurred eventually or by Shep's choice, it would be largely irrelevant as to whether or not I think the game is good.

It doesn't even sound like this is making synthesis canon though, it sounds like making all endings fit into the next game, but reduce the added complexity of considering the end choice of ME3 by avoiding the cretion of 3 extremly distinct universes.

Modifié par Shaigunjoe, 23 août 2012 - 02:06 .

[3DandBeyond]

Shaigunjoe wrote...

I voted maybe, if they actually do make a game that far in the future such that either synthesis occurred eventually or by Shep's choice, it would be largely irrelevant as to whether or not I think the game is good.

It doesn't even sound like this is making synthesis canon though, it sounds like making all endings fit into the next game, but reduce the added complexity of considering the end choice of ME3 by avoiding the cretion of 3 extremly distinct universes.

Synthesis by definition can never occur naturally.  It's the joining of 2 or more things to create a new entity, but it's always done artificially.

[Sarevok Synder]

The poll says all that needs to be said.

I'm done regardless.