279 réponses à ce sujet

[GethPrimeMKII]

There wouldn't be a conflict with the way Synthesis is presented in the ending. And honestly, why would you believe anything that woman says?

[T-Raks]

dreman9999 wrote...
You missed my point. They are not saying synthesis is cannon. They are saying they want to make a game where synthesis is a choice anyone can choose or decline.

Huh? This thread is about something totally different and I have nowhere heard or read that they want to make a game where synthesis is a choice anyone can decline. Where is that coming from?

Modifié par T-Raks, 21 août 2012 - 11:41 .

[SJK93]

T-Raks wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...
You missed my point. They are not saying synthesis is cannon. They are saying they want to make a game where synthesis is a choice anyone can choose or decline.

Huh? This thread is about something totally different and I have nowhere heard or read that they want to make a game where synthesis is a choice anyone can decline. Where is that coming from?

I believe this is one source of the information: http://social.biowar...17/459#13734614 

[dreman9999]

T-Raks wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...
You missed my point. They are not saying synthesis is cannon. They are saying they want to make a game where synthesis is a choice anyone can choose or decline.

Huh? This thread is about something totally different and I have nowhere heard or read that they want to make a game where synthesis is a choice anyone can decline. Where is that coming from?

The op is miss quoting what the Jessia means. That's what I'm trying to point out. The topic is on a game where sysnthesis is cannon but it based on a comment that Jessica made about a a game about choosing synthesis out of free will and not being forced at a all. The op understood the info incorrectly.

[Zulufoxtrot]

So basically she's saying that they want to make Synthesis make even LESS sense? And no it being canon or the default option would be a horrible choice, It's a horrible idea as is, any change to it might make it better yeah but it doesn't change the basic "LOL SPACE MAGIC" that you get from it. Short of retconning it completely I doubt there's something they could do to synthesis to make me like it more. Replace it with something that makes a shred of sense and we might have a deal.

[McAllyster]

Fnork wrote...

[AngryFrozenWater]

SJK93 wrote...

No, I would not be interested in a game where Synthesis is canon. It completely invalidates the most important (in my opinion) choice in the entire Mass Effect trilogy if you picked Destroy or Control. If I wanted Synthesis to happen, I would picked it rather than Destroy. But apparently that doesn't matter. Just my two cents.

Ghehe. Agreed. That's the problem. The reapers don't give us much choice to begin with and BW further nullifies it by making one of the options canon. "Sorry that we had to put you through this horrible ending, but what actually happens is..."

Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 22 août 2012 - 12:02 .

[McAllyster]

If these plans are true...

... than Bioware needs new lead writers. Synthesys was the worst of all endings - making it canon is a huge mistake. I don't like the idea of a Mass Deus Ex Effect.

[Sousabird]

Nope, Synthesis never happened, Shepard killed the reapers.

[Knight of Dane]

No way, Destory is the only ending for me.

[KENNY4753]

If the goal from ME1 was to destroy the reapers then that's what any canon ending should be, either with the crucible or the war assets finally doing their part.

[Alanosborn1991]

Destroy 4 life

[mauro2222]

Saul Iscariot wrote...

I'd beg to differ our climate has changed innumerable times over the last three hundred million years or so yet sharks refuse to produce new species to accommodate these changes.

What are you smoking?

[thearbiter1337]

Destroy and Refusal 5eva

Synthesis Is just like having the Reapers as giant trophy's of the dead and they aren't even controlled by Shepard they just walk around like no ones business

[Geomon19]

Destroy is the only ending I will accept. Any game that doesn't reflect that ending will not be seeing my money.

[MattFini]

Would love to see the stats on which endings are chosen.

Although even those aren't to be trusted completely. I accidentially chose synthesis the first time. I wasn't even sure what the hell StarChild had said and I just sort of lurched forward hoping it wasn't really the end.

And it's even worse for the more casual ME fans I know. When asked what they went with, responses were always "I don't remember what it was. I walked to the left," etc.

But even still, I'd be willing to bet destroy is picked the most

BioWare won't canonize any of them, bit if they did I'm sure they'd pick the most popular choice.

[ediskrad327]

i'm not interested in ANY canon ending. i do not know why so many people are eager of having their choices become even more pointless than the collector base.

[Tyramius Zhan]

Not a chance in hell..if Bioware went so far as to force that abhorent choice as the canon (I cannot begin to lay out all the levels that "choice" is morally wrong) I would have to abandon all Bioware products going forward...and that would suck because I am in the apparent minority who loved DA2 (also loved DA:O don't get me wrong) and want to continue adventures in Thedas.

[MattFini]

ediskrad327 wrote...

i'm not interested in ANY canon ending. i do not know why so many people are eager of having their choices become even more pointless than the collector base.

They can unwrite everything if they want to put Shepard in ME4.

The only reason I'm not positive that this is precisely what they WILL do is because ME4 will be on a next gen console. So the save thing might be tricky.

I'd still be willing to bet that the ending gets retconned at the start of the next game, though.

[Han Shot First]

dreman9999 wrote...

T-Raks wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...
You missed my point. They are not saying synthesis is cannon. They are saying they want to make a game where synthesis is a choice anyone can choose or decline.

Huh? This thread is about something totally different and I have nowhere heard or read that they want to make a game where synthesis is a choice anyone can decline. Where is that coming from?

The op is miss quoting what the Jessia means. That's what I'm trying to point out. The topic is on a game where sysnthesis is cannon but it based on a comment that Jessica made about a a game about choosing synthesis out of free will and not being forced at a all. The op understood the info incorrectly.

I didn't misquote anything.



Here is the relevent text from the post I was referring to:

The reason why Synthesis is seen as the best ending by some BW people is the fact that like the Starbrat says, it is inevitable. Synthesis will happen sooner or later. She said if they were to set a Mass Effect game in the future Synthesis will have taken place, either as a consequence of Shepard’s choice or because it’s naturally occurred.

link

There you have it.

If that poster was quoting Merizan accurately, she states that a Mass Effect game set forward in the timeline will take place after Synthesis has taken place, regardless of whether or not Shepard had instigated it. In other words, the galaxy chooses to become cyborgs at some point after ME3 even if Shepard chose Control or Destroy.

Modifié par Han Shot First, 22 août 2012 - 03:58 .

[BigBadMammogram]

I would love it if synthesis was made canon. If that happens, mass effect 4 will bomb horribly, and bioware will finally realize that their ending is horrible.

So would I be interested in the game if it was made canon? No, not at all.

But I would definatly be interested in watching the ****storm

[darthnick427]

No. HELL NO. Only Destroy

Modifié par darthnick427, 22 août 2012 - 04:33 .

[sH0tgUn jUliA]

No. And Hell No. See my signature. It's the only way to save the franchise. It obliterates any canon that Bioware might be thinking of, it goes against canons of 99% of players and for those two reasons it makes it acceptable. It's the first link in my signature if you're interested. It is full of win.

[Nette]

KENNY4753 wrote...

If the goal from ME1 was to destroy the reapers then that's what any canon ending should be, either with the crucible or the war assets finally doing their part.

Couldn't have said it better myself!

[KENNY4753]

Nette wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

If the goal from ME1 was to destroy the reapers then that's what any canon ending should be, either with the crucible or the war assets finally doing their part.

Couldn't have said it better myself!

the thing that really got me is you argue with TIM about how his methods and controlling the reapers is wrong but a minute later when given the chance they say why the hell not. and synthesis is just wrong, no explanation needed.