279 réponses à ce sujet

[SJK93]

KENNY4753 wrote...

Nette wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

If the goal from ME1 was to destroy the reapers then that's what any canon ending should be, either with the crucible or the war assets finally doing their part.

Couldn't have said it better myself!

the thing that really got me is you argue with TIM about how his methods and controlling the reapers is wrong but a minute later when given the chance they say why the hell not. and synthesis is just wrong, no explanation needed.

It doesn't bother me in the slightest that the options of Control and Synthesis are presented. People can choose whatever they want. However, it does bother me that BioWare is willing to completely nullify that choice in the future. Synthesis might as well be the ONLY solution presented to you at the end of the game if that's what BioWare wants.

[Ryoten]

To me this question is like. "Would you play mass effect 4 if Taco Bell not only gave you the ****s, but gave you the ****s for a week, a kidney stone, and liver cancer."

[Nette]

SJK93 wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

Nette wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

If the goal from ME1 was to destroy the reapers then that's what any canon ending should be, either with the crucible or the war assets finally doing their part.

Couldn't have said it better myself!

the thing that really got me is you argue with TIM about how his methods and controlling the reapers is wrong but a minute later when given the chance they say why the hell not. and synthesis is just wrong, no explanation needed.

It doesn't bother me in the slightest that the options of Control and Synthesis are presented. People can choose whatever they want. However, it does bother me that BioWare is willing to completely nullify that choice in the future. Synthesis might as well be the ONLY solution presented to you at the end of the game if that's what BioWare wants.

If that is indeed what they want then they must've caught a serious case of the stupid at Bioware HQ. Why not just put a sign outside that says "Please don't buy our games".... it would save them (and us) alot of time and money.

[Tazzmission]

none of the endings are canon. thats why i believe the breath scene was a hint that maybe the catalyst thing was a dream

and yes i have been on record saying i enjoy the ec but notice how bioware has always avoided the shepard breath scene questions

[SJK93]

Tazzmission wrote...

none of the endings are canon. thats why i believe the breath scene was a hint that maybe the catalyst thing was a dream

and yes i have been on record saying i enjoy the ec but notice how bioware has always avoided the shepard breath scene questions

From what I understand, they said something like the breath scene was intended to give the player a spot of hope or something like that. (Unfortunately I don't have a link to the statement).

Interpret that however you want.

[KENNY4753]

Ryoten wrote...

To me this question is like. "Would you play mass effect 4 if Taco Bell not only gave you the ****s, but gave you the ****s for a week, a kidney stone, and liver cancer."

I don't know, that 5 layer burrito is quite tempting

[BigBadMammogram]

Tazzmission wrote...

none of the endings are canon. thats why i believe the breath scene was a hint that maybe the catalyst thing was a dream

and yes i have been on record saying i enjoy the ec but notice how bioware has always avoided the shepard breath scene questions

They avoid those questions because they cant explain it. Shepard should be dead.

[Tazzmission]

SJK93 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

none of the endings are canon. thats why i believe the breath scene was a hint that maybe the catalyst thing was a dream

and yes i have been on record saying i enjoy the ec but notice how bioware has always avoided the shepard breath scene questions

From what I understand, they said something like the breath scene was intended to give the player a spot of hope or something like that. (Unfortunately I don't have a link to the statement).

Interpret that however you want.

the comic con panel to be exact. i think either A. there going to revive shepard through leviathan or B. a seperate dlc somehow

i just find it strange they would have your LI not put up the name on the memorial wall and leave it unfinished

theres even also alot of diolauge on how shepard wants to just retire from the n7 and settle down

[GarvakD]

No.
I'm not big on the synthesis option.

[SJK93]

Tazzmission wrote...

SJK93 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

none of the endings are canon. thats why i believe the breath scene was a hint that maybe the catalyst thing was a dream

and yes i have been on record saying i enjoy the ec but notice how bioware has always avoided the shepard breath scene questions

From what I understand, they said something like the breath scene was intended to give the player a spot of hope or something like that. (Unfortunately I don't have a link to the statement).

Interpret that however you want.

the comic con panel to be exact. i think either A. there going to revive shepard through leviathan or B. a seperate dlc somehow

i just find it strange they would have your LI not put up the name on the memorial wall and leave it unfinished

theres even also alot of diolauge on how shepard wants to just retire from the n7 and settle down

I wouldn't count on them expanding on the scene. They already said that they're done with ending DLC. Leviathan will apparently add to the conversation with the Catalyst a little, but that's it. If they wanted to alter the breath scene, they would have done so with the EC.

[Tazzmission]

GarvakD wrote...

No.
I'm not big on the synthesis option.

i like synthesis but i would rather have a dlc about the aftermath of it being picked instead of a full game on it

Modifié par Tazzmission, 22 août 2012 - 05:16 .

[Tazzmission]

SJK93 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

SJK93 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

none of the endings are canon. thats why i believe the breath scene was a hint that maybe the catalyst thing was a dream

and yes i have been on record saying i enjoy the ec but notice how bioware has always avoided the shepard breath scene questions

From what I understand, they said something like the breath scene was intended to give the player a spot of hope or something like that. (Unfortunately I don't have a link to the statement).

Interpret that however you want.

the comic con panel to be exact. i think either A. there going to revive shepard through leviathan or B. a seperate dlc somehow

i just find it strange they would have your LI not put up the name on the memorial wall and leave it unfinished

theres even also alot of diolauge on how shepard wants to just retire from the n7 and settle down

I wouldn't count on them expanding on the scene. They already said that they're done with ending DLC. Leviathan will apparently add to the conversation with the Catalyst a little, but that's it. If they wanted to alter the breath scene, they would have done so with the EC.

look i love the game i really do and im not here to get anyones hopes up but i have noticed a pattern with bioware latley wich isnt bad but i have learned anytime they say nope no new ending in ec but then bam refusal. i feel the same with with leviathan and they even stated it will tease more dlc in the future.


i know maybe 95% of the board is mad at bioware but maybe there going to fix the situation by releasing cut content? some could be free others could be a price

i see alot of people on this forum say theyll pay for w/e ok fine dont talk the talk and then do a complete 360 and go well nope ill just watch it on youtube

Modifié par Tazzmission, 22 août 2012 - 05:21 .

[BigBadMammogram]

Tazzmission wrote...

SJK93 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

SJK93 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

none of the endings are canon. thats why i believe the breath scene was a hint that maybe the catalyst thing was a dream

and yes i have been on record saying i enjoy the ec but notice how bioware has always avoided the shepard breath scene questions

From what I understand, they said something like the breath scene was intended to give the player a spot of hope or something like that. (Unfortunately I don't have a link to the statement).

Interpret that however you want.

the comic con panel to be exact. i think either A. there going to revive shepard through leviathan or B. a seperate dlc somehow

i just find it strange they would have your LI not put up the name on the memorial wall and leave it unfinished

theres even also alot of diolauge on how shepard wants to just retire from the n7 and settle down

I wouldn't count on them expanding on the scene. They already said that they're done with ending DLC. Leviathan will apparently add to the conversation with the Catalyst a little, but that's it. If they wanted to alter the breath scene, they would have done so with the EC.

look i love the game i really do and im not here to get anyones hopes up but i have noticed a pattern with bioware latley wich isnt bad but i have learned anytime they say nope no new ending in ec but then bam refusal. i feel the same with with leviathan and they even stated it will tease more dlc in the future.


i know maybe 95% of the board is mad at bioware but maybe there going to fix the situation by releasing cut content? some could be free others could be a price

i see alot of people on this forum say theyll pay for w/e ok fine dont talk the talk and then do a complete 360 and go well nope ill just watch it on youtube

I've noticed that too, but just releasing some cut content wont fix the ending. Thats why people just watch it on youtube, they dont want to pay for something they already know will be crap.

[Tazzmission]

BigBadMammogram wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

SJK93 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

SJK93 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

none of the endings are canon. thats why i believe the breath scene was a hint that maybe the catalyst thing was a dream

and yes i have been on record saying i enjoy the ec but notice how bioware has always avoided the shepard breath scene questions

From what I understand, they said something like the breath scene was intended to give the player a spot of hope or something like that. (Unfortunately I don't have a link to the statement).

Interpret that however you want.

the comic con panel to be exact. i think either A. there going to revive shepard through leviathan or B. a seperate dlc somehow

i just find it strange they would have your LI not put up the name on the memorial wall and leave it unfinished

theres even also alot of diolauge on how shepard wants to just retire from the n7 and settle down

I wouldn't count on them expanding on the scene. They already said that they're done with ending DLC. Leviathan will apparently add to the conversation with the Catalyst a little, but that's it. If they wanted to alter the breath scene, they would have done so with the EC.

look i love the game i really do and im not here to get anyones hopes up but i have noticed a pattern with bioware latley wich isnt bad but i have learned anytime they say nope no new ending in ec but then bam refusal. i feel the same with with leviathan and they even stated it will tease more dlc in the future.


i know maybe 95% of the board is mad at bioware but maybe there going to fix the situation by releasing cut content? some could be free others could be a price

i see alot of people on this forum say theyll pay for w/e ok fine dont talk the talk and then do a complete 360 and go well nope ill just watch it on youtube

I've noticed that too, but just releasing some cut content wont fix the ending. Thats why people just watch it on youtube, they dont want to pay for something they already know will be crap.

i may sound like im white knighting bioware and trust me i have some things im concerned about also but what i do is i dont cling to faith but i do cling to possibilities that bioware can somehow please everybody no matter what side there on and imo i do believe thats impossible

[Master Xanthan]

Han Shot First wrote...

Jessica Merizan recently revealed that Bioware considers synthesis an inevitibility for the Mass Effect universe, and that if they set a game forward in the timeline synthesis will occur regardless of whether or not Shepard was the agent that instigated it. The galaxy at some point will choose synthesis on its own.

The question is: Would you be interested in playing Mass Effect IV, if synthesis has occured?

Poll


Also if synthesis being canon doesn't interest you, what is it you don't like about that being the backdrop for ME4?

Eh, I don't like the synthesis ending, but I'd consider it. I'd rather that you be able to import each save and the world significantly changes depending on the ending you choose. It seems like it would be a lot of programming, but Bioware did decide to be "artistic". 

[Tazzmission]

Master Xanthan wrote...

Han Shot First wrote...

Jessica Merizan recently revealed that Bioware considers synthesis an inevitibility for the Mass Effect universe, and that if they set a game forward in the timeline synthesis will occur regardless of whether or not Shepard was the agent that instigated it. The galaxy at some point will choose synthesis on its own.

The question is: Would you be interested in playing Mass Effect IV, if synthesis has occured?

Poll


Also if synthesis being canon doesn't interest you, what is it you don't like about that being the backdrop for ME4?

Eh, I don't like the synthesis ending, but I'd consider it. I'd rather that you be able to import each save and the world significantly changes depending on the ending you choose. It seems like it would be a lot of programming, but Bioware did decide to be "artistic". 

see the thing is though the catalyst tells us they did try sythesis before and it failed

im more curious to hear more on that really because who was the species and why is shepard the ** one** to pull it off?

[Elorin Silverblade]

No, If they are going to have synthesis happen in the future regardless of what we choose, they why give us a choice in the first place?

Modifié par Elorin Silverblade, 22 août 2012 - 05:36 .

[Master Xanthan]

Tazzmission wrote...

Master Xanthan wrote...

Han Shot First wrote...

Jessica Merizan recently revealed that Bioware considers synthesis an inevitibility for the Mass Effect universe, and that if they set a game forward in the timeline synthesis will occur regardless of whether or not Shepard was the agent that instigated it. The galaxy at some point will choose synthesis on its own.

The question is: Would you be interested in playing Mass Effect IV, if synthesis has occured?

Poll


Also if synthesis being canon doesn't interest you, what is it you don't like about that being the backdrop for ME4?

Eh, I don't like the synthesis ending, but I'd consider it. I'd rather that you be able to import each save and the world significantly changes depending on the ending you choose. It seems like it would be a lot of programming, but Bioware did decide to be "artistic". 

see the thing is though the catalyst tells us they did try sythesis before and it failed

im more curious to hear more on that really because who was the species and why is shepard the ** one** to pull it off?

We'll probably hear more on that in the Leviathan dlc. I still think being able to import your ending would be best, though. 

[Darth Malice113]

Elorin Silverblade wrote...

No, If they are going to have synthesis happen in the future regardless of what we choose, they why give us a choice in the first place?

Same reason they gave you the Rachni choice, or the Collector base choice, or the Kasumi Greybox choice.

[Tazzmission]

Elorin Silverblade wrote...

No, If they are going to have synthesis happen in the future regardless of what we choose, they why give us a choice in the first place?

project overlord says hi if you dont remember. keep in mind they were trying to interface with the geth


also look at edi as a hint notice how she wants to be more human instead of machine

maybe that was the goal all along

[NPH11]

Just make it about conflict between those who have undergone synthesis and those who haven't...

then just link it with Dragon Age and have a civil war.

Total Biscuit wrote...

Why even bother using the ME universe, if it'd be related in name only? If they want to do a game about a post Transhumanism homogenised society of immortal cyborgs, make a new property. Don't permanently change Mass Effect into something completely unrecognisable beyond a few aesthetic details to do it.

 

Modifié par NPH11, 22 août 2012 - 06:12 .

[sUiCiDeKiNgS13]

I don't even want anymore ME games. Once the final DLC comes out, they need to move on. They had their chance.

[Goneaviking]

I'd be interested enough to have a look at it. If it looked promising I'd give the game a chance, least I can do considering how reluctant I was to try the franchise in the first place.

[LucasShark]

As the great Yatzee Crowshaw put it:
"Short answer: No, long answer: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO..."