333 réponses à ce sujet

[GallowsPole]

Gockey wrote...

 

waltervolpatto wrote...

Gockey, thanks for the "idiot", I see than your rage obfuscate your judgment...

If you cannot keep the conversation civili I see no point to argue...

I hope that one day your child will understand what I was talking about...

Ah got it.  You have no rebuttle and are clearly feeling embarassed so you create a strawman argument.

Nice try.  You still made an ass out of yourself.  Know what your talking about next time so your betters don't have to correct you.

GallowsPole wrote...

Gockey wrote...

waltervolpatto wrote...

Steej, ethic is universal, you have it, use it teach it or you don't.

Yes, Toyota does not get you car away, but "you" killed someone I know because you where driving outside of those boundaries...

And, the police can relocate your driver license... You know that right?

Your an idiot.  You want to argue comparative morality (see ethics), and expect people to agree with you on the internet?  Wow...  I don't even know what to say to that much fail.

Let's not even get started about your failed car analogy, which ignored the fact that speedlimits are different in different places, and that speed limits only apply (in the US) to government roads.  Not private property or tracks.

It is amazing to me that you even bothered to hit that reply button.  You had to know how dumb you would look. 

EDIT: I had to hit the edit key and keep going.

Do you even understand what the word ethics means?  Obviously not.  Not really.  You practice a dozen different ethnic codes every year.  One for work, one for social arenas (like eating out), etc.  You MEANT to say morals. Morality is a personal code that tends to be fixed, unchanging and immutable, whereas ethics are something you practice that are usually other-dependent. 

Are you really so naive that you think just because you believe something everyone else does too?  Do you actually think everyone shares the same moral code you do?  What an asinine belief.  

Geeze the ignorance here is amazing.

For an obvious intelligent person, the ignorance seems to belong to you. Apparently you need to split hairs or twist the argument to suit your needs. Whether or not you wish to debate the terms 'morality' or 'ethics', the choice to take advantage of a well known exploit still lies with the user. Personal responsibility its called.

I'll stipulate that Bioware, as a company, is responsilble for fixing its product, however, that does not free the user to take advantage of said product's failures. You signed an agreement with them, and when you decided to cheat, you broke that agreement making any argument you may have, null and void.

Any intelligent person knows, that once you lay your 60 bucks out, all you get is a game. No where, does it state that the company is responsible for maintaining its product after you purchase it. They do work on it, so that any future products by them will be bought by their current customer base and by word of mouth by those happy customers, other people will purchase it as well.

*Yawn*

Reading comprehension is for cool kids dude.  Nowhere did I argue that cheating is right.  I would already be banned if I engaged in those behaviours.  

The problem I have isn't with the players though.  The problem is with the failure of a company to patch potentially game breaking glitches for more than 6 months.  You want to argue that I'm CONDONING cheating because I'm CONDEMNING a company?

Nice try.  Any intelligent person knows to read before they type.

Reading is cool. In case you didnt realize it, I dont believe I accused you of anything. "You" was used in the general sense.Dont feel guilty now.

[Jeff Dundat]

PHENOMENAL GUISE!!! THEY DID NOT GET ME TENDER LITTLE TWO OTHER ACTIVE ACCOUNTS!!! LET'S THROW A ME3 CHEATER PARTY FOR ME3 CHEATERS!!! I THINK I HAVE ACTUALLY FOUND THE WAY TO CIRCUMCISE THIER BAN-HAMMERING EFFORTS! MAZELTOV TO EVERYONE, AND A BID YOU ALL A GOOD ME3 NIGHT, MUHAHAHAH!!! :-)
PS: I savor my intelligence for me, and only me. So do not get soft by thinking I will help you achieve anything I speak of. You can use this banned account that I am typing this message on as proof to my kind, god-like words. I am a genuine **** that only cares about me, get over it guise. 

[Gockey]

 

GallowsPole wrote...
In case you didnt realize it, I dont believe I accused you of anything. "You" was used in the general sense.Dont feel guilty now.

 

Then you fail at writing.  When you chose to use 'you' in the personal sense in the first parapgraph, you set a tone. By failing to use a transitory statement clarifying the transition of 'you' from a personal statement to generalized one, you made your latter post (and by extension yourself) look idiotic.  

Then there is the fact you attempted, and failed pathetically, to associate my correct intepretation of your diction as an inadvertent admission of guilt. 

Your pathetic.  If you want to insult me, do it like a man.  Not like a coward.  You sitting at a keyboard for goodness sakes.  Grow a spine.

waltervolpatto wrote...

Ethics, also known as moral philosophy, is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior.[1]

Yep, I know what I'm talking about.

Exploiting the SP with mod on the computer is equivalent to your car-track analogy, is your fun, your choice and you're alone in that. Have fun.

Exploiting the extra speed of the car in a normal residential street if wrong/outside of the boundaries of the law.

The choice to follow the law is entirely yours. What's right or wrong could be personal or it belong to the society as a whole, regardless, if you decide to infring a rule, you also should be willing to accept the responsability of your choice.... That for a videogame came in a form of a ban...

Except... You don't.  You quoted wikipedia.  Don't make me laugh.  If you are really going to be basing your argument on semantics in it's entirety, your going to need to try harder.  Regardless of the difference in your 'definition' of ethics, my point is still pertinent and correct.

You still failed to address the most salient point: comparative morality. Your personal view of morality and ethics is not the universal one, and is also not the correct one.  Because there is no basis, no foundation, upon which to assert ultimate authority.  You want to argue God?  People will laugh at you for obvious reasons.  You want argue governments?  Lol look at all the different legal systems.  You have nothing.  Your wrong.

Calling you naive is insufficient, but I don't know of a better word for it.  

I made no, "car-track analogy," as you put it.  Rather I was simply refuting your poorly analogy.  The analogy you chose was poorly suited.  It was plagued with omissions and failed to be apt.  I simply pointed out some of the more egregious oversights.  Why are you bothering, and failing, to ressurect it?


Honestly, your outclassed and your wrong.  Give it up lol.

Modifié par Gockey, 27 août 2012 - 05:15 .

[Jeff Dundat]

This section of the forum is not for poetry. Take that **** back to high school, son.

EDIT: Riddle that crap. Also, if anyone makes seriously failing attempts to be correct or troll, then please use correct mechanics and grammar. Do not try to seem intelligent when you cannot even proofread a two year old's paragraph.

EDIT2: Also, stop trying to insult people with names. You only make yourself seem like you severely lack intelligence for an incredibly poor choice of wording.

Modifié par Jeff Dundat, 27 août 2012 - 05:17 .

[pantherdan]

Look, I havent been banned or anything, because I dont ABUSE glitches, but I dont keep count of my missiles in Platinum and in the heat gameplay, if I had an "infinite missile" glitch, I doubt I would ever know, I dont go around shooting everything, but I would click like mad if covered by Banshees and Brutes. Blaming the players for running around and not knowing their Vorcha is invincible or that they have infinite missiles is just stupid in many cases. I wouldn't know. I would think I was just a good Vorcha player or lost count of my missiles. Bioware WOULD be at fault if the banned me because I would have accidentally used a glitch. THEIR glitch, not mine.

As far as the stupidity of your ignorant crap about the car companies, do YOU ride your brakes down a hill just to maintain a certain lawfully posted speed? Do YOU? If your answer is yes, then STFU because you are a liar and can't be trusted. Stop being stupid. Bioware needs to fix their glitches and quit banning everyone or they WILL eventually lose their fanbase. THAT IS A FACT.

[waltervolpatto]

... Mmmm....

First and foremost, I apologize in advance if my argumentation is not up to snuff for you, may be I can try to speak in my native language instead to use English...

On the next account, "exploit" can be defined as morally wrong for your definition as for mine, so I do not understand where are you trying to go with it.

We do not live in a wacuum, the single individual morality cannot be put on top of the comunity/society one: the will of one man cannot exceed the will of the whole otherwise society will not exist, that is close to dictatorship. That is why we have codes that can serve as guideline to identify where the right/wrong line lie... Even without a specific code, we all know basic things like killing someone is bad, stealing is bad, and even offending other people willingly is bad moral code, in any comunity....

Your turn...

[waltervolpatto]

No, I put a gear where the engine will slow my car down naturally, I do not have to break you know?

And I love how ppl like to insult... You make my day.

Modifié par waltervolpatto, 27 août 2012 - 05:17 .

[Jeff Dundat]

Don't let that guy upset you. He is from an English based country, but he still has the grammar skills of a wet llama.

EDIT: Don't come at the troll like a loose cannon either. I am sure a blind man can spot that many mistakes.

Modifié par Jeff Dundat, 27 août 2012 - 05:26 .

[Gockey]

waltervolpatto wrote...

... Mmmm....

First and foremost, I apologize in advance if my argumentation is not up to snuff for you, may be I can try to speak in my native language instead to use English...

On the next account, "exploit" can be defined as morally wrong for your definition as for mine, so I do not understand where are you trying to go with it.

We do not live in a wacuum, the single individual morality cannot be put on top of the comunity/society one: the will of one man cannot exceed the will of the whole otherwise society will not exist, that is close to dictatorship. That is why we have codes that can serve as guideline to identify where the right/wrong line lie... Even without a specific code, we all know basic things like killing someone is bad, stealing is bad, and even offending other people willingly is bad moral code, in any comunity....

Your turn...

The fact that english isn't you native language is irrelevant at this point.  You chose to espouse falsehoods, and I'm here to correct them.

I do not disagree with exploit being morally wrong personally.  But you trying to speak for everyone is laughable. You can't.  To say you would make you a liar.  Are you?

There isn't such a thing as a community morality.  There is such a thing as a communal code of ethics.  Get it straight.  

As for the opinion, that killing someone is bad, etc etc.  Your wrong.  You can't make a blanket statement like that. I for one happen to believe in capitol punishment.  The fact that you don't is fine, but it doesn't make you wrong. That's morals.  The fact that your country has supports capitol punishment is ethics.  Loosely defined anyways.

My point still remains.  You are categorically incapable of making that judgement about it being right or wrong. The only absolute here is that Biofail deems any exploitation of any glitch a bannable offense.  Everything else you argue is just your opinion and conjecture.  Bad conjecture and opinions that I would abhorently oppose.

You can argue with me until your blue in the face about this.  You'll still be wrong.  Arguing semantics and comparative morality is a black hole.  No one wins.  

Jeff Dundat wrote...

Don't let that guy upset you. He is from an English based country, but he still has the grammar skills of a wet llama.

EDIT: Don't come at the troll like a loose cannon either. I am sure a blind man can spot that many mistakes.[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/surprised.png[/smilie]

 

People like you make me laugh too.  You the type of person who throws out grammar and spelling as if it meant a dam.  Welcome to the internet.  Go google the evolution of language and you'll see how funny you look.  

Honeslty, the things some people say when they have nothing of actual substance to contribute.

Modifié par Gockey, 27 août 2012 - 05:34 .

[waltervolpatto]

Killing someone out of free will is wrong in almost all the society, capital punishment (that I happen to do not agree upon) is a consequence of law enforcement upon judgment. Even if I do not agree, I understand why is enforced in that way and I will respect it. Using a restrict example to prove a point does not make the rule...

It is funny that you use moral when suit you and ethics when moral fell short...

If I can use as best your example, capital punishment is use to punish some law offender, in this Bioware interpretation of the law, ban is the punishment for breaking the game code of law. I see no difference in morality.

[Jeff Dundat]

Gockey wrote...

waltervolpatto wrote...

... Mmmm....

First and foremost, I apologize in advance if my argumentation is not up to snuff for you, may be I can try to speak in my native language instead to use English...

On the next account, "exploit" can be defined as morally wrong for your definition as for mine, so I do not understand where are you trying to go with it.

We do not live in a wacuum, the single individual morality cannot be put on top of the comunity/society one: the will of one man cannot exceed the will of the whole otherwise society will not exist, that is close to dictatorship. That is why we have codes that can serve as guideline to identify where the right/wrong line lie... Even without a specific code, we all know basic things like killing someone is bad, stealing is bad, and even offending other people willingly is bad moral code, in any comunity....

Your turn...

The fact that english isn't you native language is irrelevant at this point.  You chose to espouse falsehoods, and I'm here to correct them.

I do not disagree with exploit being morally wrong personally.  But you trying to speak for everyone is laughable. You can't.  To say you would make you a liar.  Are you?

There isn't such a thing as a community morality.  There is such a thing as a communal code of ethics.  Get it straight.  

As for the opinion, that killing someone is bad, etc etc.  Your wrong.  You can't make a blanket statement like that. I for one happen to believe in capitol punishment.  The fact that you don't is fine, but it doesn't make you wrong. That's morals.  The fact that your country has supports capitol punishment is ethics.  Loosely defined anyways.

My point still remains.  You are categorically incapable of making that judgement about it being right or wrong. The only absolute here is that Biofail deems any exploitation of any glitch a bannable offense.  Everything else you argue is just your opinion and conjecture.  Bad conjecture and opinions that I would abhorently oppose.

You can argue with me until your blue in the face about this.  You'll still be wrong.  Arguing semantics and comparative morality is a black hole.  No one wins.  

Jeff Dundat wrote...

Don't let that guy upset you. He is from an English based country, but he still has the grammar skills of a wet llama.

EDIT: Don't come at the troll like a loose cannon either. I am sure a blind man can spot that many mistakes.[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/surprised.png[/smilie]

 

People like you make me laugh too.  You the type of person who throws out grammar and spelling as if it meant a dam.  Welcome to the internet.  Go google the evolution of language and you'll see how funny you look.  

Honeslty, the things some people say when they have nothing of actual substance to contribute.

Actually, you can tell it matters to you a lot, you just suck at it. So, you lied once there. You lied again when you said I make you laugh. YOU ARE INFURIATED IN ME3 TALK, AS WE ALL CAN SEE. You sir, are not laughing at all. The only people that laugh are the ones reading the spew that comes from your mouth when it is not on your mom's ******. :-)

Reply back please, loser. 

If you knew anything about the internet, then you would have never replied to me. I reassure you that you can use the internet and "Google" that. Once again, you demonstrate your skills that were obtained from wet llamas, kid.

EDIT: In college, we follow a standard way of communicating, so put the internet aside. We all can tell that college is not your background. :-)

EDIT2: Yes, reply back to tell me what I am not. It will make yourself feel better. 

EDIT3: I bank, that is how I cheat in your glorious game. I can purchase a new account as soon as Bioware decides my other two have had enough. So do not think anyone can stop this troll. It is cheaper to be smart and cheat, then it is to buy their in-game money. Also, I get to put smiles on faces like yours!!! I also get to make you laugh!!! LOL :-)

<3

Modifié par Jeff Dundat, 27 août 2012 - 06:01 .

[Gockey]

Jeff Dundat wrote...

Gockey wrote...

waltervolpatto wrote...

... Mmmm....

First and foremost, I apologize in advance if my argumentation is not up to snuff for you, may be I can try to speak in my native language instead to use English...

On the next account, "exploit" can be defined as morally wrong for your definition as for mine, so I do not understand where are you trying to go with it.

We do not live in a wacuum, the single individual morality cannot be put on top of the comunity/society one: the will of one man cannot exceed the will of the whole otherwise society will not exist, that is close to dictatorship. That is why we have codes that can serve as guideline to identify where the right/wrong line lie... Even without a specific code, we all know basic things like killing someone is bad, stealing is bad, and even offending other people willingly is bad moral code, in any comunity....

Your turn...

The fact that english isn't you native language is irrelevant at this point.  You chose to espouse falsehoods, and I'm here to correct them.

I do not disagree with exploit being morally wrong personally.  But you trying to speak for everyone is laughable. You can't.  To say you would make you a liar.  Are you?

There isn't such a thing as a community morality.  There is such a thing as a communal code of ethics.  Get it straight.  

As for the opinion, that killing someone is bad, etc etc.  Your wrong.  You can't make a blanket statement like that. I for one happen to believe in capitol punishment.  The fact that you don't is fine, but it doesn't make you wrong. That's morals.  The fact that your country has supports capitol punishment is ethics.  Loosely defined anyways.

My point still remains.  You are categorically incapable of making that judgement about it being right or wrong. The only absolute here is that Biofail deems any exploitation of any glitch a bannable offense.  Everything else you argue is just your opinion and conjecture.  Bad conjecture and opinions that I would abhorently oppose.

You can argue with me until your blue in the face about this.  You'll still be wrong.  Arguing semantics and comparative morality is a black hole.  No one wins.  

Jeff Dundat wrote...

Don't let that guy upset you. He is from an English based country, but he still has the grammar skills of a wet llama.

EDIT: Don't come at the troll like a loose cannon either. I am sure a blind man can spot that many mistakes.[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/surprised.png[/smilie]

 

People like you make me laugh too.  You the type of person who throws out grammar and spelling as if it meant a dam.  Welcome to the internet.  Go google the evolution of language and you'll see how funny you look.  

Honeslty, the things some people say when they have nothing of actual substance to contribute.

Actually, you can tell it matters to you a lot, you just suck at it. So, you lied once there. You lied again when you said I make you laugh. YOU ARE INFURIATED IN ME3 TALK, AS WE ALL CAN SEE. You sir, are not laughing at all. The only people that laugh are the ones reading the spew that comes from your mouth when it is not on your mom's ******. :-)

Reply back please, loser. 

If you knew anything about the internet, then you would have never replied to me. I reassure you that you can use the internet and "Google" that. Once again, you demonstrate your skills that were obtained from wet llamas, kid.

EDIT: In college, we follow a standard way of communicating, so put the internet aside. We all can tell that college is not your background. :-)

EDIT2: Yes, reply back to tell me what I am not. It will make yourself feel better. 

EDIT3: I bank, that is how I cheat in your glorious game. I can purchase a new account as soon as Bioware decides my other two have had enough. So do not think anyone can stop this troll. It is cheaper to be smart and cheat, then it is to buy their in-game money. Also, I get to put smiles on faces like yours!!! I also get to make you laugh!!! LOL :-)

<3

Lol, Miss Cleo called: Shes said she's revoking your psychic license.  What an idiot.  I would get into the whole baseless accusation thing, or how it's evident you know nothing about Strunk and White, but why bother.

Your clearly a troll.  While I enjoy a arguing as much as the next bloke, there has to be a base for the exchange of ideas and insults.  You just make **** up whole-cloth.  

The strawman tactic is juvenile and we all see through it.  When you want to reply based on merit, hit me up.  Until then please, by all means, keep entertaining me.  Your eralier attempts at demagoguery and this latest attempt at being a troll are amusing.  Is the fool's cap next?  

[Gockey]

waltervolpatto wrote...

Killing someone out of free will is wrong in almost all the society,

Annnnnndddd......

That's the game.  You just admitted your advocating for majority opinion instead of right and wrong.  Nice try dude.

As I said before, comparative morality means your never right.  You can't base an argument off that, or you look stupid every time.  Same goes for semantics.  

Stoning someone is my country is cruel and inhumane.  In other countries it still is legal.  In my country, there is no meritocracy.  You get ahead based on the color of your skin, your immigration status, if your a vet, etc.  I personally disagree with that.  Other countries do too.

The point is, it's all relative.  Your lying when you claimed otherwise.  You can keep claiming your right until your blue in the face.  It won't change the fact that your wrong.

[waltervolpatto]

I did not use the absolute on my sentence because I cannot exclude the minority that accept that killing is not a bad thing, if you want to use that as an excuse feel free.

"killing is bad" is not just an opinion, if that was the reality it will not be mentioned in any civil code. The matter that murder is one of the worst punished crimes prove the point.
There a instances where killins is merely accepted, like in war, or in extremes cases like self-defense, that does not imply the killing is right...

You might be right in stating that we cannot ever be absolutely right or wrong, instead the common acceppted morality in the here and now is a deciding factor in judging if an action is right within the limit of the code and the current morality.

Yes, there are places where people's get stoned. I'm sad about that, I do not agree, but I do not agree either to invade them to "enforce" a different idea of democracy as well. Ad that is just my personal opinion...

[Variasaber]

ZombieGambit wrote...

Why would you do a ban wave right before an operation? It's like you guys don't want us to ever get that extra medi-gel.

50k promotions is easy. I'll be shocked if we didn't get that.

[Argus1127]

I FOR ONE WILL NOT MISS THEN!!!

[Jeff Dundat]

Gockey wrote...

Lol, Miss Cleo called: Shes said she's revoking your psychic license.  What an idiot.  I would get into the whole baseless accusation thing, or how it's evident you know nothing about Strunk and White, but why bother.

Your clearly a troll.  While I enjoy a arguing as much as the next bloke, there has to be a base for the exchange of ideas and insults.  You just make **** up whole-cloth.  

The strawman tactic is juvenile and we all see through it.  When you want to reply based on merit, hit me up.  Until then please, by all means, keep entertaining me.  Your eralier attempts at demagoguery and this latest attempt at being a troll are amusing.  Is the fool's cap next?  

A psychic license, you are too funny!!

If I was clearly a troll, then you are an idiot, because your ****** is still replying. Like I said, your intelligence rivals that of a pack of wet llamas. The strawman tactic is not pertinent, because this arguement is about your stupidity. I can see your mechanics and grammar fading ever more, as you get your nerd hands all in a rage, just to respond. The only juvenile here is the one arguing about a game, kiddo. You should form everything you spew out just a little bit better. For one, it is a lot easier to read. Plus, we do not have to wonder if you are struggling to make sense, or are just a complete ******.

PS: I guess the picture to the left was a hint about trolling? Yes, you have proved your stupidity, move along please!! Also, drop the big word talk. In college you will learn that it makes you look more like an idiot if used inappropriately. Save that talk for running over your family. They are oblivious!!



Just for the fun, I reported all of our posts, lol. :-)......including mine.

Modifié par Jeff Dundat, 27 août 2012 - 08:11 .

[Gockey]

Jeff Dundat wrote...

Lol, Miss Cleo called: Shes said she's revoking your psychic license.  What an idiot.  I would get into the whole baseless accusation thing, or how it's evident you know nothing about Strunk and White, but why bother.

Your clearly a troll.  While I enjoy a arguing as much as the next bloke, there has to be a base for the exchange of ideas and insults.  You just make **** up whole-cloth.  

The strawman tactic is juvenile and we all see through it.  When you want to reply based on merit, hit me up.  Until then please, by all means, keep entertaining me.  Your eralier attempts at demagoguery and this latest attempt at being a troll are amusing.  Is the fool's cap next?  

A psychic license, you are too funny!!

If I was clearly a troll, then you are an idiot, because your ****** is still replying. Like I said, your intelligence rivals that of a pack of wet llamas. The strawman tactic is not pertinent, because this arguement is about your stupidity. I can see your mechanics and grammar fading ever more, as you get your nerd hands all in a rage, just to respond. The only juvenile here is the one arguing about a game, kiddo. You should form everything you spew out just a little bit better. For one, it is a lot easier to read. Plus, we do not have to wonder if you are struggling to make sense, or are just a complete ******.

PS: I guess the picture to the left was a hint about trolling? Yes, you have proved your stupidity, move along please!! Also, drop the big word talk. In college you will learn that it makes you look more like an idiot if used inappropriately. Save that talk for running over your family. They are oblivious!!

*Yawn*

I know this is difficult for you, but do try and read.  We already covered strawmen tactics and how they don't work. Please, for the sake of trolls everywhere, try harder.  Your besmirching their good name.  

I've no problem feeding a troll.  You probably won't believe it, but I do find you amusing.  I won't describe why, as I do need to limit your diet lol.

Now, please try again and troll on topic.  Making ****e up out of moonbeams is beneath you.  This forum deserves a better class of troll, and by gosh, I'm going to try for one.  You should take tips from DNC proto, at least that mans got style.  

[Jeff Dundat]

Hey guise, let's type up our posts in a word editor, fail at proofreading, then right-click to get the synonyms to beef up my surface-deep intellectual ability. How about googling up a response for everyone intead? :-)

Save everyone the trouble, lol. You are an idiot, at best. If you even realized my intention, then you would retract your garbage. :-)

Edit: If you look at my first post, it has nothing to with you, smart guy. Maybe you can decipher the intention from that. I bet not though. :innocent:

Modifié par Jeff Dundat, 27 août 2012 - 10:01 .

[visionazzery]

wait this is outrageous you penalize pple just cos of a glitch caused by your guys? that makes NO SENSE why punish those who did not MAKE the glitch? what the deal?

[visionazzery]

if bioware fix the glitches there be NO bans for explouting glitches got that bioware?
you cannot blame pple for doing that i certainly do NOT but you gott to take responsibility fix the glitches then you have far less cheaters right?

[jpraelster93]

rymajn3 wrote...

Gockey wrote...

*sigh*

Yet another Ban Wave and still no patch. Way to kill the game guys. Way to kill the game.

If only patching the game was as easy as analyzing data.

Patching a game doesnt take this long

[Leones Maneres]

ZombieGambit wrote...

Why would you do a ban wave right before an operation? It's like you guys don't want us to ever get that extra medi-gel.

Ok - now THAT's a totally in character post from the Illusive Man...

Nice Job!

[Red Son Rising]

Barry Bonds
Lance Armstrong
Marion Jones
Jose Canseco
Mark McGwire
Ben Johnson

eventually the ban hammer will catch you, cheaters never win

[Siran]

Jeff Dundat wrote...

PHENOMENAL GUISE!!! THEY DID NOT GET ME TENDER LITTLE TWO OTHER ACTIVE ACCOUNTS!!! LET'S THROW A ME3 CHEATER PARTY FOR ME3 CHEATERS!!! I THINK I HAVE ACTUALLY FOUND THE WAY TO CIRCUMCISE THIER BAN-HAMMERING EFFORTS! MAZELTOV TO EVERYONE, AND A BID YOU ALL A GOOD ME3 NIGHT, MUHAHAHAH!!! :-)
PS: I savor my intelligence for me, and only me. So do not get soft by thinking I will help you achieve anything I speak of. You can use this banned account that I am typing this message on as proof to my kind, god-like words. I am a genuine **** that only cares about me, get over it guise. 

So, what - you bought the same game three times in total? Yeah, you're a total genius.