883 réponses à ce sujet

[Skeem]

Arbiter156 wrote...

I'm not holding my breath..

Niether is Shepard.

[Ithurael]

liggy002 wrote...

So Priestly confirms that there will be no new ending DLC but he said nothing of Mass Effect 4 and how that could continue on post breath scene. And before you say that Bioware has said this is the end of the story arc, that is subject to change and look at Halo 4.

ME4 could continue a new story arch (post reaper war) that is very possible.

However, if they do have a ME4 (post reaper war) where shep is alive. Even that will disprove IT Dream because that means RGB happend (or in this case only red happened).

Also, if they do make ME4 continue after shep wakes up to "finish the fight" I am actually going to be a bit mad as a consumer.

That technically means that I bought the collectors edition of ME3 that did not have an ending. Then, Bioware expanded on the non-ending to not give an ending only to make a new game (that has the ending?)  showing the ending?

Honestly, I think that will ****** off even more people. IT is a bit better than RGB, but in the end it was just the bad writing theory.

[sporeian]

Not sure if feeling in gut is excitement

Or just anticipating the let down

Or that burrito I just had

[DextroDNA]

sporeian wrote...

Not sure if feeling in gut is excitement

Or just anticipating the let down

Or that burrito I just had

It's already been denied by Evil Chris on this thread, my friend.

Don't throw up the burrito.

[bydoritos]

I think what will happen is simple.
bioware will use the blizzard formula
3 different factions = 3 different games (I'm talking about starcraft 2)

Mass Effect have
3 different endings, which will have 3 different games... completing the mass effect hexalogy.
(for some reason I like this idea)

 after that they'll follow the George Lucas formula (remake the games for 3D)

/conspiracy

Modifié par bydoritos, 24 août 2012 - 09:54 .

[DextroDNA]

bydoritos wrote...

I think what will happen is simple.
bioware will use the blizzard formula
3 different factions = 3 different games (I'm talking about starcraft 2)

Mass Effect have
3 different endings, which will have 3 different games... completing the mass effect hexalogy.
(for some reason I like this idea)

 after that they'll follow the George Lucas formula (remake the games for 3D)

/conspiracy

Dear God...
This man's onto something!

[Brovikk Rasputin]

Chris Priestly wrote...

You can keep discussing this if you wish, but it is false. Sorry.

We have aid numerous times now, we have "ended the endings". While there is more DLC for both Single and Multiplayer still to come, there is no more "endings" DLC.

Thank you. The OP made me really worried.

[Nihilismus]

It's hard to trust the Illusive Man...

EDIT: When I wrote that, I kinda just saw the entering post and the reply vom Priestly, so my post would have been funny but now I'm at the end of page 10!
Forget about it...

Modifié par Nihilismus, 24 août 2012 - 10:19 .

[v0rt3x22]

IsaacShep wrote...

So to sum up. Clevernoob, a hardcore ITer desperate for IT DLC gets an information from another hardcore ITer who claims to have sources at Bioware that there's an IT DLC coming.

I have to go with this one.

[Mixxer5]

Chris Priestly wrote...

You can keep discussing this if you wish, but it is false. Sorry.

We have aid numerous times now, we have "ended the endings". While there is more DLC for both Single and Multiplayer still to come, there is no more "endings" DLC.

Ok, then... So are endings of ME3 actually endings...? If we don't consider them as endings (Shepard BREATHES)- because Shepard's death at the very beginning of ME2 could as well be taken as "ending" (he died...)- than Bioware don't have to consider discussing endings. Because we didn't really seen them. Yet...

[PerhapsDeadMaybeNot]

Perhaps the reason why he doesnt say if he belives it or not is simply that he doesnt know...i look at this theory and only believe that it has a possibility of being true, i cant say whether i believe it is true or not because i dont know what to believe either...what i do believe is that the ending sucks...real bad

[bydoritos]

RussianZombeh wrote...

bydoritos wrote...

I think what will happen is simple.
bioware will use the blizzard formula
3 different factions = 3 different games (I'm talking about starcraft 2)

Mass Effect have
3 different endings, which will have 3 different games... completing the mass effect hexalogy.
(for some reason I like this idea)

 after that they'll follow the George Lucas formula (remake the games for 3D)

/conspiracy

Dear God...
This man's onto something!

It's possible man.
and I think it's safe to say that very soon we gonna get a "Mass Effect Dance off" for Kinect. (that's actually very cool idea.. I wonder why they haven't done it yet.)

PerhapsDeadMaybeNot wrote...

Perhaps the reason why he doesnt say if he belives it or not is simply that he doesnt know...i look at this theory and only believe that it has a possibility of being true, i cant say whether i believe it is true or not because i dont know what to believe either...what i do believe is that the ending sucks...real bad

 

the endings are okay now (for some people because of the extended cut)
and I think it's wrong to say that IT theory is correct. or not correct.
What bioware intended with the endings (at least from what I understand) was to provided us the cutscenes
and dialogues in very open way, so the players could create their own theory of what happend with Shepard and the galaxy.
and the IT theory proves that they managed to do that.
the players have created an awesome theory of what they think it happen, but this is not a theory that it is shared by everybody.
 I don't believe on IT. 
it is a great theory, but I don't think that Shepard was indoctrinated (at least no in my view) 

but if you believe, that's great.
 you can imagine how Shepard will wake up and finish the reapers.
 while for me, Shepard died, in an 'cough' 'cough' heroic way, killing a ton of reapers in the process.
yeah that's what happen with my shepard.

Modifié par bydoritos, 24 août 2012 - 11:35 .

[Joe1962]

PerhapsDeadMaybeNot wrote...

...i cant say whether i believe it is true or not because i dont know what to believe either...what i do believe is that the ending sucks...real bad

Sadly, this is the cold hard fact.

Sad, I know. :(

[Arbiter156]

Bump

[XxDarkTimexX]

Chris Priestly wrote...

You can keep discussing this if you wish, but it is false. Sorry.

We have aid numerous times now, we have "ended the endings". While there is more DLC for both Single and Multiplayer still to come, there is no more "endings" DLC.

you right project x is not real i understand

[Chaosproscho]

Okay guys, first time I post here and I'll explain everyone how this will hopefully end.

New Ending DLC's have been denied yes, BUT with IT (NO DREAM ADDED HERE INDOCTRINATION THEORY DREAM MAKES NO SENSE AND EVERYONE WHO USES IT P****ES ME OF)
you dont need a new ending, because the ending that is allready provided is the true ending of the Indoctrination Arc. It either ends with the blue or green ending and with Shepard being indoctrinated or with the red ending when Shepard wakes up in the rubble. You don't need a new ending to prove IT because IT works perfectly with the ending that we allready have. Now eventhough an ending DLC is denied a POST ending DLC is not. Also we now that Data of the Leviathan and the Omega DLCs are hidden in the Extended Cut data. Couldn't it be that the "new"/"real"ending allready is added with the Extended Cut but in order to unlock it first all pieces have to fall into place and those pieces are Leviathan and Omega DLCs and maybe more.  Who knows what I want to say is: IT ist not ruled out neither is that the endings contain more than we are able to see right now.

[Ithurael]

XxDarkTimexX wrote...

Chris Priestly wrote...

You can keep discussing this if you wish, but it is false. Sorry.

We have aid numerous times now, we have "ended the endings". While there is more DLC for both Single and Multiplayer still to come, there is no more "endings" DLC.

you right project x is not real i understand

And they are not going to add on, change, subtract, or expand on the endings any more. They are done with the endings. There is no more DLC that will come out that will give more content to the endings. It is over.

Yes, knowing that I understand too

[Ithurael]

Chaosproscho wrote...

Okay guys, first time I post here and I'll explain everyone how this will hopefully end.

New Ending DLC's have been denied yes, BUT with IT (NO DREAM ADDED HERE INDOCTRINATION THEORY DREAM MAKES NO SENSE AND EVERYONE WHO USES IT P****ES ME OF)
you dont need a new ending, because the ending that is allready provided is the true ending of the Indoctrination Arc. It either ends with the blue or green ending and with Shepard being indoctrinated or with the red ending when Shepard wakes up in the rubble. You don't need a new ending to prove IT because IT works perfectly with the ending that we allready have. Now eventhough an ending DLC is denied a POST ending DLC is not. Also we now that Data of the Leviathan and the Omega DLCs are hidden in the Extended Cut data. Couldn't it be that the "new"/"real"ending allready is added with the Extended Cut but in order to unlock it first all pieces have to fall into place and those pieces are Leviathan and Omega DLCs and maybe more.  Who knows what I want to say is: IT ist not ruled out neither is that the endings contain more than we are able to see right now.

IT Dream is ruled out. 

IT Dream NEEDS more content after the breath scene. Bioware is NOT going to do that. They are done with the endings - this has been said twice now.

If you continue to buy more DLC you will expand the game of ME3 but you will not find any content that will show anything post breath scene. IT Dream NEEDS content post breath scene.

IT Con is your only game left in town guys. Either that or blind hope in ME4 but seriously that would be an even cheaper thing to do than day one DLC

[The Twilight God]

Chris Priestly wrote...

You can keep discussing this if you wish, but it is false. Sorry.

We have aid numerous times now, we have "ended the endings". While there is more DLC for both Single and Multiplayer still to come, there is no more "endings" DLC.

Well, that confirms it. Project X is the real deal.

[Chaosproscho]

Ithurael wrote...

Chaosproscho wrote...

Okay guys, first time I post here and I'll explain everyone how this will hopefully end.

New Ending DLC's have been denied yes, BUT with IT (NO DREAM ADDED HERE INDOCTRINATION THEORY DREAM MAKES NO SENSE AND EVERYONE WHO USES IT P****ES ME OF)
you dont need a new ending, because the ending that is allready provided is the true ending of the Indoctrination Arc. It either ends with the blue or green ending and with Shepard being indoctrinated or with the red ending when Shepard wakes up in the rubble. You don't need a new ending to prove IT because IT works perfectly with the ending that we allready have. Now eventhough an ending DLC is denied a POST ending DLC is not. Also we now that Data of the Leviathan and the Omega DLCs are hidden in the Extended Cut data. Couldn't it be that the "new"/"real"ending allready is added with the Extended Cut but in order to unlock it first all pieces have to fall into place and those pieces are Leviathan and Omega DLCs and maybe more.  Who knows what I want to say is: IT ist not ruled out neither is that the endings contain more than we are able to see right now.

IT Dream is ruled out. 

IT Dream NEEDS more content after the breath scene. Bioware is NOT going to do that. They are done with the endings - this has been said twice now.

If you continue to buy more DLC you will expand the game of ME3 but you will not find any content that will show anything post breath scene. IT Dream NEEDS content post breath scene.

IT Con is your only game left in town guys. Either that or blind hope in ME4 but seriously that would be an even cheaper thing to do than day one DLC

why do you keep calling it IT Dream? It makes no sense to add "Dream" after Theory.
Anyhow: It is not ruled out, it doesn't NEED more content after the breath scene, it works just fine like it is now, but it can continue after the breath scene without a problem, because only ending DLCs were denied, not post ending DLCs. They're done with the ending, but they never said, that they can't continue after the ending (the breathing scene)
And IT Con makes even less sense than regular Indoctrination Theory

[Ithurael]

Chaosproscho wrote...

why do you keep calling it IT Dream? It makes no sense to add "Dream" after Theory.
Anyhow: It is not ruled out, it doesn't NEED more content after the breath scene, it works just fine like it is now, but it can continue after the breath scene without a problem, because only ending DLCs were denied, not post ending DLCs. They're done with the ending, but they never said, that they can't continue after the ending (the breathing scene)
And IT Con makes even less sense than regular Indoctrination Theory

Sorry, there has been a schism in the IT for me.

IT Con - ending happen but reapers are trying to get you to choose everything other than destroy
IT Dream -  the entire ending is a dream post beam

Ok...now I am going to try to reply as best as I can (objectivly lol)

Post ending Definiton: Anything after the explosion

"it doesn't NEED more content after the breath scene, it works just fine
like it is now, but it can continue after the breath scene without a
problem, because only ending DLCs were denied, not post ending DLCs."

- What? dude the ending is not going to be appended. It will not be expanded (this is post ending DLC) Bioware considers EC THE ENDING. The finish, the stop, the end.
    - the stop/end/finish this means that there is nothing else that happens after the breath scene
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/13492198/19#13503201

Chis has said twice now that they will not add to the ending (adding to the ending means post ending DLC)

How do you not understand this? Do you really believe that IT is THAT true? The endings were bad. Bad writing is bad.

Please look at chris's post and tell me where you see post ending DLC is a possibility?

[The Twilight God]

Chaosproscho wrote...

And IT Con makes even less sense than regular Indoctrination Theory

How so?

[Ithurael]

The Twilight God wrote...

Chaosproscho wrote...

And IT Con makes even less sense than regular Indoctrination Theory

How so?

because you don't wake up in London silly-pants mcgillicutty!!!

[eternalnightmare13]

RussianZombeh wrote...

So, Clevernoob's new Indoctrination Theory documentary came out about 2 hours ago, and right at the end... something that is sure to cause a ****-storm of speculation was revealed.

Clevernoob revealed that a source from Bioware's "inner circle" spoke of something called "Project X", rumoured to be released in Quarter 1 of 2013. It will bring all the DLC's for ME3 together, and will take place post-breath scene in ME3. And it will be about Shepard's indoctrination.

Clevernoob makes a point of saying he trusts the source completely, and would not give the identity of the source or where he got this information from as to protect the source's job/position etc. Clevernoob is a very intellectual and trustworthy individual from what I've seen, and it seems he's placed full belief in his source.

This is very exciting. Speculation begins here - what are your thoughts on Mass Effect 3 "Project X", or as I like to call it: Mass Effect 3: Indoctrination.

Here is the documentary should you wish to watch it: Documentary

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wrong answer, bucko!  Not every gets the breath scene. Derpa derpa derp...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Chaosproscho]

Ithurael wrote...

Chaosproscho wrote...

why do you keep calling it IT Dream? It makes no sense to add "Dream" after Theory.
Anyhow: It is not ruled out, it doesn't NEED more content after the breath scene, it works just fine like it is now, but it can continue after the breath scene without a problem, because only ending DLCs were denied, not post ending DLCs. They're done with the ending, but they never said, that they can't continue after the ending (the breathing scene)
And IT Con makes even less sense than regular Indoctrination Theory

Sorry, there has been a schism in the IT for me.

IT Con - ending happen but reapers are trying to get you to choose everything other than destroy
IT Dream -  the entire ending is a dream post beam

Ok...now I am going to try to reply as best as I can (objectivly lol)

Post ending Definiton: Anything after the explosion

"it doesn't NEED more content after the breath scene, it works just fine
like it is now, but it can continue after the breath scene without a
problem, because only ending DLCs were denied, not post ending DLCs."

- What? dude the ending is not going to be appended. It will not be expanded (this is post ending DLC) Bioware considers EC THE ENDING. The finish, the stop, the end.
    - the stop/end/finish this means that there is nothing else that happens after the breath scene
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/13492198/19#13503201

Chis has said twice now that they will not add to the ending (adding to the ending means post ending DLC)

How do you not understand this? Do you really believe that IT is THAT true? The endings were bad. Bad writing is bad.

Please look at chris's post and tell me where you see post ending DLC is a possibility?

I'll tell you. Mass Effect 3 and it's endings were always explained as the ending of Shepards Story never that of the universe. What if Shepards story is his indoctrination? With that in mind, the endings provided are actually the true endings (I'm not saying they really have happened in the physical world) and don't need any addendum, because they conclude Shepards story aka. his indoctrination perfectly fine. Either he falls for the Reaper ruse or he breaks free. It's the end of Shepards indoctrination story. But the Reapers are still out there and need to be fought. From there Bioware can basically do what ever they want without contradicting anything they have said previously.

What I don't like about IT Con is: Why? Why does Harbinger let Shepard come up the Citadel and stop TIM who allready got indoctrinated, only for the offchance that he will chose to synthesis or even control the reapers. Why the hell would he even want Shepard to control the reapers? It makes no sense. If I were Harbinger I would  just have desintegrated Shepard and the Normandy too when it landed just 200 meters away. But no, he didn't do it. Why? And don't start with the Reaper IFF, it may work out in the vasts of space, but not if that goddamn Normandy is basically parking for 5 Minutes straight right in front of the most advanced Reaper. Harbinger should have cutted it to pieces, but he didn't. Why? The only explanation can be that he wants Shepard to be alive and the only reason for him to want Shepard to be alive is to assume direct controll of him. (And IF the Reaper IFF is actually working so well that even Harbi couldnt detect the Normady land right in front of him, then why didn't they just use it to drop off the whole hammer team right in front of the beam?)

I'll go to sleep now and will check in here tomorrow. good night
 

Modifié par Chaosproscho, 25 août 2012 - 01:32 .