299 réponses à ce sujet

[dreman9999]

X

Modifié par dreman9999, 25 août 2012 - 08:16 .

[o Ventus]

Mythanblood wrote...

What is this edning you people are talking about?

It's the presidium fish.

[legion999]

Program 21 you have been determined to be faulty and so will be deleted.

[Mythanblood]

o Ventus wrote...

Mythanblood wrote...

What is this edning you people are talking about?

It's the presidium fish.

Oh, that. I heard eating a fish from the presidium is like screwing Shaira.

... That actually makes a lot of sense. Both Asari and Fish have scales...

[MerchantGOL]

EnvyTB075 wrote...

I still don't understand how anyone can say they have an emotional investment in Mass Effect, look at the endings (or the game for some of us, myself included) and say "Yeah, that was amazing".

you dont see how shepard making the ultimate sacrafice for the good of the gslsxy, while keeping the tone of choice and consiqunce the game has had, with out comprimising and giving a phoned in ride off into the sunset ending, as well as creating an intresting new status quo for the universe would appeal to some one?

for a pure thematic stand point the music and shooting when shepard made his choice was perfect, and watching the wave spread across the galaxy is evrry bit as epic a visusal as the serise deserved for its ending

[o Ventus]

Mythanblood wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Mythanblood wrote...

What is this edning you people are talking about?

It's the presidium fish.

Oh, that. I heard eating a fish from the presidium is like screwing Shaira.

... That actually makes a lot of sense. Both Asari and Fish have scales...

No, that quote is actually backwards. You have to eat Shaira to screw a presidium fish. Krogan have some... Unique fetishes.

[dreman9999]

o Ventus wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

1. To the creators submitting would mean killing the geth. That still is 
opposition to one in authority or dominance.
The quaran authority want to kill of the geth. If they fought back, they are rebelling.

So you're saying-

Surrender = rebellion
Self defense = rebellion

wat?

No, what i'm saying is everytime  a group apposes authority or a ruling of authority is a rebellion. It matters not if the geth were wilingl to co operate. If the quarian authoriy stated the geth had to be killed off and the geth fought back even after they tryed to be peaceful, then it's a rebellion. What you not gettingis a rebellion is self defence. It a defence of a beings right, ideals, concepts and lives.
If the geth fought back ageint a quarian authority that ruled that the geth had to die, it's a rebellion.

Modifié par dreman9999, 25 août 2012 - 08:23 .

[StElmo]

legion 21 wrote...

i kinda did

I kinda did too, then I started thinking about it and it made me really sad to see the previous games pretty much nullified and space magic become an actual plot device, breaking the secondary world and not allowing me to immerse myself due to the large amount of plot issues that break my immersion.

[dreman9999]

o Ventus wrote...


And what do you have to support this?

Everything stated on cronos station about EDI.

[o Ventus]

dreman9999 wrote...

o Ventus wrote...


And what do you have to support this?

Everything stated on cronos station about EDI.

And what is said on Cronos about EDI?

[o Ventus]

dreman9999 wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

1. To the creators submitting would mean killing the geth. That still is 
opposition to one in authority or dominance.
The quaran authority want to kill of the geth. If they fought back, they are rebelling.

So you're saying-

Surrender = rebellion
Self defense = rebellion

wat?

No, what i'm saying is everytime  a group apposes authority or a ruling of authority is a rebellion. It matters not if the geth were wilingl to co operate. If the quarian authoriy stated the geth had to be killed off and the geth fought back even after they tryed to be peaceful, then it's a rebellion. What you not gettingis a rebellion is self defence. It a defence of a beings right, ideals, concepts and lives.
If the geth fought back ageint a quarian authority that ruled that the geth had to die, it's a rebellion.

Rebellions are not always done in self defense. The Boxer Rebellion in China wasn't done in self defense.

[MerchantGOL]

o Ventus wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

o Ventus wrote...


And what do you have to support this?

Everything stated on cronos station about EDI.

And what is said on Cronos about EDI?

i get the feeling u didn't ever play these games

[EnvyTB075]

MerchantGOL wrote...

EnvyTB075 wrote...

I still don't understand how anyone can say they have an emotional investment in Mass Effect, look at the endings (or the game for some of us, myself included) and say "Yeah, that was amazing".

you dont see how shepard making the ultimate sacrafice for the good of the gslsxy, while keeping the tone of choice and consiqunce the game has had, with out comprimising and giving a phoned in ride off into the sunset ending, as well as creating an intresting new status quo for the universe would appeal to some one?

for a pure thematic stand point the music and shooting when shepard made his choice was perfect, and watching the wave spread across the galaxy is evrry bit as epic a visusal as the serise deserved for its ending

1. Shepard had already made the ultimate sacrifice, this happened in ME2 when she was killed by the Collectors. Her second death does absolutely nothing for the thematics. Shes already given her life, why is it that this time it suddenly means something

2. Ah yes, "choice". I was barely given any choices in dialogue, the only renegade/paragon choices were with TIM, Cortez only got one of those options, and everything else was turned into War Asset points that are dwarfed by my uber-N7 squad from MP, who are apparently worth more than the entire Turian, Quarian and Geth militaries combined. "Choices" in this game are meaningless, since it doesn't actually affect the outcome.

3. Synthesis is stupid, and you should feel bad for saying its "interesting", let alone implying that its a good thing.


So no, can't see how people can like it.

Modifié par EnvyTB075, 25 août 2012 - 08:31 .

[IceTrey1987]

I'm a fan of the destroy ending I suppose. Starchild stuff was kind of dumb to me. I felt like his "here you can destroy them, but here's why you shouldn't" speech was pretty weak. Everything in the game has been screaming at you to destroy the reapers this whole time, all the antagonists have tried to ally with or control the reapers, and all the reapers who have talked to shepard are heartless killing machines. I feel like if you tried to control or synthesize with the reapers the game should've just slapped you in the face with a big old "you freaking idiot, you doomed us all" ending. control wouldn't be such a bad ending if it wasn't for the fact that everyone trying to control or study reapers has been indoctrinated, so why should Shepard think he's any different? Synthesis is a dumb pipe dream of human 'perfection' but it's an unethical choice to make for everyone in the galaxy and it makes humans and aliens lose their flaws which make them unique.

Destroy them all. I felt it was a satisfactory ending for me. Shepard lived, and he learned that sometimes the hardest decision is the best one in the end, even if it has to sacrifice people in the process.

Just seems silly though, that you have to unite the galaxy for no reason, since everyone combined still isn't enough.

[MissMaster_2]

No pls...

[JimJamBimBam]

Yeah, I didn't mind the original endings and loved the EC. Mind you, I'm a very 'the journey over the destination' kind of person, so even if I disliked the endings, it still wouldn't have stopped me from playing ME3 again and again.

[o Ventus]

MerchantGOL wrote...

i get the feeling u didn't ever play these games

I've played through ME3 about 14 times. ME2 about 20 times, and ME1 maybe 6 or 7 times.

But, y'know, not according to you.

[Vinchisters]

I actualy liked the ending with EC installed...
F**k me, right?

[MissMaster_2]

o Ventus wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

i get the feeling u didn't ever play these games

I've played through ME3 about 14 times. ME2 about 20 times, and ME1 maybe 6 or 7 times.

But, y'know, not according to you.

ME3 14 times! Naw, I would vomit.

[dreman9999]

o Ventus wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

i get the feeling u didn't ever play these games

I've played through ME3 about 14 times. ME2 about 20 times, and ME1 maybe 6 or 7 times.

But, y'know, not according to you.

Did you missed the video log were TIM is trying to get control of EDI agien so he can take back the normady and can't because she is unshackled?

[CptBomBom00]

Well, I hated the original one, but EC made it up for it.

[dreman9999]

IceTrey1987 wrote...

I'm a fan of the destroy ending I suppose. Starchild stuff was kind of dumb to me. I felt like his "here you can destroy them, but here's why you shouldn't" speech was pretty weak. Everything in the game has been screaming at you to destroy the reapers this whole time, all the antagonists have tried to ally with or control the reapers, and all the reapers who have talked to shepard are heartless killing machines. I feel like if you tried to control or synthesize with the reapers the game should've just slapped you in the face with a big old "you freaking idiot, you doomed us all" ending. control wouldn't be such a bad ending if it wasn't for the fact that everyone trying to control or study reapers has been indoctrinated, so why should Shepard think he's any different? Synthesis is a dumb pipe dream of human 'perfection' but it's an unethical choice to make for everyone in the galaxy and it makes humans and aliens lose their flaws which make them unique.

Destroy them all. I felt it was a satisfactory ending for me. Shepard lived, and he learned that sometimes the hardest decision is the best one in the end, even if it has to sacrifice people in the process.

Just seems silly though, that you have to unite the galaxy for no reason, since everyone combined still isn't enough.

The concept of uniting the galexy was never to over power the reapers. It was to hold them back till you can use the crucible.

[MerchantGOL]

EnvyTB075 wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

EnvyTB075 wrote...

I still don't understand how anyone can say they have an emotional investment in Mass Effect, look at the endings (or the game for some of us, myself included) and say "Yeah, that was amazing".

you dont see how shepard making the ultimate sacrafice for the good of the gslsxy, while keeping the tone of choice and consiqunce the game has had, with out comprimising and giving a phoned in ride off into the sunset ending, as well as creating an intresting new status quo for the universe would appeal to some one?

for a pure thematic stand point the music and shooting when shepard made his choice was perfect, and watching the wave spread across the galaxy is evrry bit as epic a visusal as the serise deserved for its ending

1. Shepard had already made the ultimate sacrifice, this happened in ME2 when she was killed by the Collectors. Her second death does absolutely nothing for the thematics. Shes already given her life, why is it that this time it suddenly means something

2. Ah yes, "choice". I was barely given any choices in dialogue, the only renegade/paragon choices were with TIM, Cortez only got one of those options, and everything else was turned into War Asset points that are dwarfed by my uber-N7 squad from MP, who are apparently worth more than the entire Turian, Quarian and Geth militaries combined.

3. Synthesis is stupid, and you should feel bad for saying its "interesting", let alone implying that its a good thing.


So no, can't see how people can like it.

Shepard din't make a ultimate sacrafice, his death had no positive effects. this time he directly gives his life to save the galaxy.

any way I am not asking you to agree, but your being  willfully ignorant if you cant understand how some one would feel diffrently.

and screw you syntheisis is intresting, the effeccts it will have across the galxy would be incredble to see unfold.

[MissMaster_2]

o Ventus wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

o Ventus wrote...


And what do you have to support this?

Everything stated on cronos station about EDI.

And what is said on Cronos about EDI?

Really? 14 times and you missed this? Come on.

Modifié par MissMaster_2, 25 août 2012 - 08:35 .

[EnvyTB075]

So you would be okay kissing and making up with the Reapers which just turned your wife/husband into a husk?

Yeah....interesting....

MerchantGOL wrote...
Shepard din't make a ultimate sacrafice,
his death had no positive effects. this time he directly gives his life
to save the galaxy.

Tell that to the hundreds of service men and woman from every country on Earth who have ever died in a war they haven't "won".

MerchantGOL wrote...
any way I am not asking you to agree, but
your being  willfully ignorant if you cant understand how some one would
feel diffrently.

Willfully ignorent. Ok since we're doing some arsepulls here, you're willfully ignorent that the ending is actually garbage.

Modifié par EnvyTB075, 25 août 2012 - 08:37 .