149 réponses à ce sujet

[Reptilian Rob]

BringBackNihlus wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

[Betrays Nihlus]

IS THAT A SHIP?

LOOK AT THE SIZE OF IT!

Look, Nihlus...

[Conniving_Eagle]

-Spawns Geth Destroyer behind you on Insanity-

www.youtube.com/watch

[StElmo]

SSPBOURNE wrote...

I didn't care for Skyrim.
Ohhh man someone call the cops I'm 2 kool 4 skewl.

StElmo wrote...

Binary_Helix 1 wrote...

While Skyrim is still at or near full price? Skyrim even sold four times as many copies as ME3. Can someone explain?

Because endings. Seriously, the game doesn't deserve to have the same price as Skyrim. Skyrim actually delivered on it's promises.

 Todd Howard is almost on par with Peter Molyneux in terms of false promises.  Todd Howard promised that the game would be 4 times bigger than it actually was. We were proised a dynamic economy system, realistic wildlife, an immense choise system, and a world that you could shape completely into your own form depending on what you do.
We got none of that. Skyrim was a very shallow experience. It was big and plentiful, but it had no depth.

Did you follow Skyrim news?

This was all pre-gold statements, I'm always kinda willing to forgive pre-gold statements.

[StElmo]

Speezy wrote...

Skyrim: Oblivion with even less features.

Better writing then ME3 though.

[SSPBOURNE]

StElmo wrote...

SSPBOURNE wrote...

I didn't care for Skyrim.
Ohhh man someone call the cops I'm 2 kool 4 skewl.

StElmo wrote...

Binary_Helix 1 wrote...

While Skyrim is still at or near full price? Skyrim even sold four times as many copies as ME3. Can someone explain?

Because endings. Seriously, the game doesn't deserve to have the same price as Skyrim. Skyrim actually delivered on it's promises.

 Todd Howard is almost on par with Peter Molyneux in terms of false promises.  Todd Howard promised that the game would be 4 times bigger than it actually was. We were proised a dynamic economy system, realistic wildlife, an immense choise system, and a world that you could shape completely into your own form depending on what you do.
We got none of that. Skyrim was a very shallow experience. It was big and plentiful, but it had no depth.

Did you follow Skyrim news?

This was all pre-gold statements, I'm always kinda willing to forgive pre-gold statements.

Skyrim was also supposed to be bigger than Oblivion.
It wasn't even close.
But we can all agree that they're not as good as Fallout 3, because they don't have Liam Neeson.

Modifié par SSPBOURNE, 26 août 2012 - 04:31 .

[StElmo]

OnelShot wrote...

cavs25 wrote...

Lol people are saying skyrim appeals to the unwashed masses?
Mass Effect 3: Auto dialog: action mode: Multiplayer

Get out

Yep all optional stuff. 

Autodialogue is not optional, it's in every god damn conversation.

[o Ventus]

xsdob wrote...

Bigger fanbase, not fractured by opinion.

Skyrim's fanbase, or ME3's?

If it's the latter, you're wildly incorrect.

Modifié par o Ventus, 26 août 2012 - 04:32 .

[Conniving_Eagle]

Is action mode the one where there's autodialogue and no neutral option? That's what I play on. I can't find roleplaying mode.

[Gruntburner]

StElmo wrote...

Speezy wrote...

Skyrim: Oblivion with even less features.

Better writing then ME3 though.

Worse voiced acting, though.  "Have you seen those warriors from Hammerfell? They have curved swords. Curved swords."  That line is consistently awful across all voice actors delivering it.

[Iakus]

jackkel dragon wrote...

xsdob wrote...

How did broken steal change the ending? I never understood this. All it did was add on to it, you still effectively die at the end of the game, everything plays out exactly as it did before, all you do now is pick up after you die.

That is technically incorrect. The post-game plotline retconned the PC's death into a coma.

Yup, which turned a weird and awkard ending into a weird and awkward moment in the game, which then proceeded to a much better ending.  

Moments can be overlooked.  Finales stay with you.   Bethesda understood this.  Bioware just tries to tell you you're wrong and just don't understand the awesomeness.

Modifié par iakus, 26 août 2012 - 04:33 .

[SSPBOURNE]

Speezy wrote...

Broken Steel didn't fix the number 1 issue with Fallout 3.

Namely that it was a ****ty Fallout game.

Oh man you go against people's opinions like yours is a fact. I wish I could be as cool as you. The way you're all edgy and badass.

[StElmo]

SSPBOURNE wrote...

StElmo wrote...

SSPBOURNE wrote...

I didn't care for Skyrim.
Ohhh man someone call the cops I'm 2 kool 4 skewl.

StElmo wrote...

Binary_Helix 1 wrote...

While Skyrim is still at or near full price? Skyrim even sold four times as many copies as ME3. Can someone explain?

Because endings. Seriously, the game doesn't deserve to have the same price as Skyrim. Skyrim actually delivered on it's promises.

 Todd Howard is almost on par with Peter Molyneux in terms of false promises.  Todd Howard promised that the game would be 4 times bigger than it actually was. We were proised a dynamic economy system, realistic wildlife, an immense choise system, and a world that you could shape completely into your own form depending on what you do.
We got none of that. Skyrim was a very shallow experience. It was big and plentiful, but it had no depth.

Did you follow Skyrim news?

This was all pre-gold statements, I'm always kinda willing to forgive pre-gold statements.

Skyrim was also supposed to be bigger than Oblivion.
It wasn't even close.
But we can all agree that they're not as good as Fallout 3, because they don't have Liam Neeson.

Interesting, I spent 100 hours in oblivion, up to about 250 in skyrim and am still going (not even got the DLC yet)

I thought the oblivion claims were pretty much lies, but Skyrim, I never seemed to see anything too outrageous, especially before after it went gold. Thats just me, you are perfectly entitled to feel cheated if you feel they lied about features.

Your a customer, just like me, and if you don't like it, feel free to complain

Modifié par StElmo, 26 août 2012 - 04:36 .

[AresKeith]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

Is action mode the one where there's autodialogue and no neutral option? That's what I play on. I can't find roleplaying mode.

its also when they make all the dialogue renegade options

[SCRS JMFCHUCKIE]

That's why when I was at GameStop today they were the same price?

[StElmo]

Gruntburner wrote...

StElmo wrote...

Speezy wrote...

Skyrim: Oblivion with even less features.

Better writing then ME3 though.

Worse voiced acting, though.  "Have you seen those warriors from Hammerfell? They have curved swords. Curved swords."  That line is consistently awful across all voice actors delivering it.

I agree, acting is better in Oblivion - well, sometimes.

The writing though, is thematic gold. I absolutely love the shades of grey surrounding ulfric and the imperials. It's glorious.

[SSPBOURNE]

StElmo wrote...

SSPBOURNE wrote...

StElmo wrote...

SSPBOURNE wrote...

I didn't care for Skyrim.
Ohhh man someone call the cops I'm 2 kool 4 skewl.

StElmo wrote...

Binary_Helix 1 wrote...

While Skyrim is still at or near full price? Skyrim even sold four times as many copies as ME3. Can someone explain?

Because endings. Seriously, the game doesn't deserve to have the same price as Skyrim. Skyrim actually delivered on it's promises.

 Todd Howard is almost on par with Peter Molyneux in terms of false promises.  Todd Howard promised that the game would be 4 times bigger than it actually was. We were proised a dynamic economy system, realistic wildlife, an immense choise system, and a world that you could shape completely into your own form depending on what you do.
We got none of that. Skyrim was a very shallow experience. It was big and plentiful, but it had no depth.

Did you follow Skyrim news?

This was all pre-gold statements, I'm always kinda willing to forgive pre-gold statements.

Skyrim was also supposed to be bigger than Oblivion.
It wasn't even close.
But we can all agree that they're not as good as Fallout 3, because they don't have Liam Neeson.

Interesting, I spent 100 hours in oblivion, up to about 250 in skyrim and am still going (not even got the DLC yet)

I thought the oblivion claims were pretty much lies, but Skyrim, I never seemed to see anything too outrageous, especially before after it went gold. Thats just me, you are perfectly entitled to feel cheated if you feel they lied about features.

Your a customer, just like me, and if you don't like it, feel free to complain

But they ruined the magic system! I've always been a mage! They're not catering to my interests!  AAGGGHHH11!11!1!1

[StElmo]

SCRS JMFCHUCKIE wrote...

That's why when I was at GameStop today they were the same price?

b oth 60 or both 30?

If the latter, thats not surprising. Skyrim has been around for a while now.

[StElmo]

SSPBOURNE wrote...

StElmo wrote...

SSPBOURNE wrote...

StElmo wrote...

SSPBOURNE wrote...

I didn't care for Skyrim.
Ohhh man someone call the cops I'm 2 kool 4 skewl.

StElmo wrote...

Binary_Helix 1 wrote...

While Skyrim is still at or near full price? Skyrim even sold four times as many copies as ME3. Can someone explain?

Because endings. Seriously, the game doesn't deserve to have the same price as Skyrim. Skyrim actually delivered on it's promises.

 Todd Howard is almost on par with Peter Molyneux in terms of false promises.  Todd Howard promised that the game would be 4 times bigger than it actually was. We were proised a dynamic economy system, realistic wildlife, an immense choise system, and a world that you could shape completely into your own form depending on what you do.
We got none of that. Skyrim was a very shallow experience. It was big and plentiful, but it had no depth.

Did you follow Skyrim news?

This was all pre-gold statements, I'm always kinda willing to forgive pre-gold statements.

Skyrim was also supposed to be bigger than Oblivion.
It wasn't even close.
But we can all agree that they're not as good as Fallout 3, because they don't have Liam Neeson.

Interesting, I spent 100 hours in oblivion, up to about 250 in skyrim and am still going (not even got the DLC yet)

I thought the oblivion claims were pretty much lies, but Skyrim, I never seemed to see anything too outrageous, especially before after it went gold. Thats just me, you are perfectly entitled to feel cheated if you feel they lied about features.

Your a customer, just like me, and if you don't like it, feel free to complain

But they ruined the magic system! I've always been a mage! They're not catering to my interests!  AAGGGHHH11!11!1!1

Fair enough, magic is a bit too straightforward. You don't feel like an academic arcan university student counting stats and crafting spells. I see that.

I like skyrims action focus personally. Funnily enough I hate ME3's action focus, so thats kinda funny.

[Conniving_Eagle]

Speezy wrote...

SSPBOURNE wrote...
Oh man you go against people's opinions like yours is a fact. I wish I could be as cool as you. The way you're all edgy and badass.

Welcome to BBA.

Fixed.

[OnelShot]

StElmo wrote...

OnelShot wrote...

cavs25 wrote...

Lol people are saying skyrim appeals to the unwashed masses?
Mass Effect 3: Auto dialog: action mode: Multiplayer

Get out

Yep all optional stuff. 

Autodialogue is not optional, it's in every god damn conversation.

Darnet, must of imagined all those dialog choices I made again.