Flambrose wrote...
Smash and Shockwave seem to function differently from other powers. They can both detonate multiple BEs in close proximity.
chipsandwich wrote...
Another question about smash that I forgot the first time.
I was reading through the combo primer/detonator thread and I got the explanation about targets "losing" their primed status if hit with a certain power:
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/343/index/14889947
So, with the radius of smash being 1.5m default and the range being 8m, i would assume it would work like a close range version shockwave? Anyway, it's kind of hard to see, but how many "instances" of smash occur, and how far apart are they if you have the exact numbers? It's also kind of weird with the Radius evolution, where you would decrease the chance of multi detonations by picking radius, but at the same time increasing the cap on the max number possible.
VerySeed wrote...
Does TC work with the DoT damage of arc grenades with the QMI, similar to the huntress' DC?
Modifié par peddroelmz, 07 décembre 2012 - 07:50 .
peddroelmz wrote...
Jay_Hoxtatron wrote...
Hey Peddroelmz/Corlist, I have a question. Does the Reegar benefit from Smart choke? I remember you said that it was inaccurate, and that not all pellets hit the target.
Thanks in advance for the clarification.
PS ; if it does benefit, can you explain it in detail.
I don't know (pretty sure it doesn't benefit +accuracy )... Pretty hard to tell as Reegar does not leave pellet impact marks like the other weapons ... The "burn" mark it leaves on wall seems to be the same size no matter the range to wall // +accuracy consumables used.. (this would indicate that unlike the other weapons possible trajectories for pellets do not form a cone but a cylinder) ...
About not all the pellets hitting the target (even targets that should be impossible to miss such as ravager/Geth Prime) I have a new theory - 8 pellets at 1000 RPM - is like an assault weapon firing at 8000 RPM ...133 pellets per second .. Game engine might not be able to keep up ... Lowering the ROF in config file so delay between bursts would be observable would help - but I cannot do that ...MikeSlackenerny wrote...
When the patch goes live, can you guys do some kind of quick testing on Shadow to see if the "double count" on shadow strike with tactical cloak on still applies?
Eric Fagnan said he is not aware of any fix for this issue so it should still "work" the same ...Only now max damage SS builds should be able to get past 10k damage vs shields,barriers or armor ...
Shadow users will swarm the forums when/if that will happen for sure ... WHY IS MY SS no longer killing enemy X ?
tyhw wrote...
Graal only needs to be charged for .8 seconds to reach double damage.
http://social.biowar.../index/15202482
Guest_MastahDisastah_*
corlist wrote...
CmnDwnWrkn wrote...
Has the damage from the hazards on specific hazard maps been tested? The Reactor on Firebase Reactor, the flying electrical bug swarm thing on Glacier, and the rain on Ghost?? This would be interesting to see.
Hazard damage tests
General
- Hazard/environmental damage is not scaled to difficulty.
- Hazard damage can be reduced with DR, or by going into cover.
Glacier
- The base damage of the seeker hazard is 62.5.
- The RoF of the seekers when close to it is approximately 240. The RoF is doubled in the middle part/ core.
- If the seekers are shot at and become "enraged", the effective area widens significantly.
- Enraged seekers lose their ability to double their RoF even if victims stand near the core.
Reactor
- The base damage of the reactor hazard is 770.
- 5 to 6 instances of the damage is dealt once a second.
Ghost
- The base damage of the acid rain is 17 (may lack precision due to damage rounding).
- As with the glacier hazard, acid rain damage is inflicted four times a second.
Test data
Deerber wrote...
Ok, I have a question. How does ULM interact with mods that add weight?
I recall seeing a post from a dev saying that ULM is supposed to work multiplicatively, or something like that, and that although the CD shown hints at the weapon having the original, unmodded weight, the in game recharge speed would actually be quite lower.
Problem is, I cannot seem to find that post by any means, and I'm starting to fear that I recall incorrectly.
Has someone got any solid knowledge on this?
Deerber wrote...
Deerber wrote...
Ok, I have a question. How does ULM interact with mods that add weight?
I recall seeing a post from a dev saying that ULM is supposed to work multiplicatively, or something like that, and that although the CD shown hints at the weapon having the original, unmodded weight, the in game recharge speed would actually be quite lower.
Problem is, I cannot seem to find that post by any means, and I'm starting to fear that I recall incorrectly.
Has someone got any solid knowledge on this?
I'm bumping this because it's not been answered, as far as I know. Is anyone willing to tell me something about it? I'd appreciate it!
Modifié par peddroelmz, 12 décembre 2012 - 05:14 .
peddroelmz wrote...
Deerber wrote...
Deerber wrote...
Ok, I have a question. How does ULM interact with mods that add weight?
I recall seeing a post from a dev saying that ULM is supposed to work multiplicatively, or something like that, and that although the CD shown hints at the weapon having the original, unmodded weight, the in game recharge speed would actually be quite lower.
Problem is, I cannot seem to find that post by any means, and I'm starting to fear that I recall incorrectly.
Has someone got any solid knowledge on this?
I'm bumping this because it's not been answered, as far as I know. Is anyone willing to tell me something about it? I'd appreciate it!
Have no idea.. What I can test/measure with great precision is damage inflicted (even for fast rof // DOT effects) ... Cooldown lenghts do not directly impact dmage inflicted ... A pretty accurate (an very time consuming ) way of measuring various cooldown lenghts is recorded video analysis which is not really my cup of tea ...
![=]](https://lvlt.forum.bioware.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sideways.png)
Modifié par peddroelmz, 12 décembre 2012 - 05:13 .
DieselL wrote...
is there any difference on the damage a FIRE EXPLOSION deals by detonating it with a warp (level 4 specced for detonate),than a warp specced for (detonate/expose/pierce) deals against a primes armor? How much damage does a FE deal and are there FEs that can deal more or less ?
Modifié par peddroelmz, 12 décembre 2012 - 06:06 .
DieselL wrote...
is there any difference on the damage a FIRE EXPLOSION deals by detonating it with a warp (level 4 specced for detonate),than a warp specced for(detonate/expose/pierce) deals against a primes armor?
How much damage does a FE deal and are there FEs that can deal more or less ?
Modifié par Relix28, 12 décembre 2012 - 06:04 .
Quething wrote...
I come on behalf of friends with questions about enemy power blocking.
My understanding is that if you apply a DoT on a banshee, and she puts up her hand of denial, the DoT does no damage but remains "active" and can start doing damage again once she drops her hand, provided there's any duration left. True?
Do phantoms and praetorians work the same? If I Reave a phantom and she bubbles, does she stop taking Reave damage? If the bubble drops while Reave has time left on it, does she start taking damage again? Does her bubble block Incendiary ammo DoT? Does it block the damage from front-loaded ammo effects like AP? What about prae bubbles?
If I drop a Warp on a hand-of-denial banshee, does it just fizzle out, or does it apply its damage (zeroed by the hand) and its DoT (zeroed while the hand is up, resumes once the hand falls)?
Shampoohorn wrote...
OP and team, two questions:
-Does the 15% Vulnerability from Warp5b:Expose also apply to melee damage? The wording would suggest otherwise: "Increase weapon damage taken by a target by 15%. Increase power damage taken by a target by 15% for 10 seconds." But as we know, the tooltip wording in the game is frequently wrong.
-Does the 40% damage resistance from hard cover continue to apply when weapons are hip-fired from hard cover? The hipfire animation is substantially different versus when guns are aimed/zoomed. It seems to me that I take less damage when hipfiring but that may just be due to having a smaller hitbox (or whatever) exposed to enemy fire.
Retour en haut
