Your just upset because it did change the end...Something that was stated time and time agein that this was not going to be the case.RiptideX1090 wrote...
ATiBotka wrote...
RiptideX1090 wrote...
Nothing. 5000 War Assets, Refuse ending.
You get one option on the dialogue wheel and it adds nothing you did not already know.
Nothing.
Thanks. I will buy it anyway.
I hope you enjoy it more than I did, and I mean that sincerely. If you guys want to buy it or whatever, hey, that's totally up to you.
I merely offer my own opinion, for whatever that is worth.
ME3 Leviathan: SPOILER Discussion [poll included]
#626
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:46
#627
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:46
Baa Baa wrote...
I didn't expect it to have hardly any impact on the ending either, just a few lines. But I was mainly interested to see if Leviathan looked awesome and if the gameplay looked good. And neither of those things seemed appealing to me. Particularly Levithan.. who just looks like a giant rock.
The gameplay sounds pretty solid to me and I dig Leviathan's design, so oh well. Very subjective things, I guess.
#628
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:46
aridor1570 wrote...
DoomNation wrote...
Reason were are fixated on the endings is because we were told we'd get easter eggs for the ending. One line of dialogue is not an easter egg. Another lie from Bioware.
How is that not an easter egg? easter eggs are small and subtle, not big and game changing.
I wasn't wanting a big game changer. I was wanting more than one line of dialogue and extra scene added to the endings to expand upon them further.
#629
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:47
dreman9999 wrote...
Argueing about what?What is the point with argueing with a shackled AI?
I could ask the same question about shackled BSN posters.
#630
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:47
to me it seems like they wrote this so even idiots could understand and I have to assume we all know what happens to things made for idiots...
just bought the DLC, downloading it now, gonna see for myself, not having any expectations,
Bierwichtel out.
#631
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:47
#632
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:48
Jimuth wrote...
Right, that's 800 points saved. Back to DA:O for me. Thanks Riptide!
Yup, I still have some DLC left to invest in for DA:O and at least I know that the Dragon Age team deliver quality on that front.
#633
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:48
Where?mauro2222 wrote...
Mobius-Silent wrote...
mauro2222 wrote...
Not that
The final final part when Shep watchs to the beyond and the Reapers awaken and start their travel, there you have like 20 different reapers, some of them don't even ressemble a cuttlefish.
EDIT: For the love of Talos, I hate this system. There fixed.
Actually only 4
The "tail-like" "reaper" is most likely a processor (and mentioned in the ME3 codex) and is present as a hologram in one of the Cerberus bases in ME3
The "Wide mouth" reaper is most likely a transport and does have an ingame model in BioD_N7Spdr1_500
The one in the background is not a "tail type"... you have 5 and 6 with the one painted in violet... Harbinger? wtf?
#634
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:49
mauro2222 wrote...
The one in the background is not a "tail type"... you have 5 and 6 with the one painted in violet... Harbinger? wtf?
You're going to need to be a little clearer than that. Which one?
Also, the other "Harbinger type" is just that, a Sovereign-class without the center nose-leg, it just has it's legs angled forward, I've tilted and re-posed the Harbinger-model to check
Modifié par Mobius-Silent, 28 août 2012 - 04:50 .
#635
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:49
#636
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:49
mauro2222 wrote...
aridor1570 wrote...
They don't, their shells just looks exactly the same, Harbinger, most likely, doesn't have a shell, he's the perfect reaper.
Oh for ****'s sake... are you trolling me?
I just can't see the retconn, it's pretty obvious when you think about it hard enough.
#637
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:49
Don't matter. I'm right.RinjiRenee wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
Argueing about what?What is the point with argueing with a shackled AI?
I could ask the same question about shackled BSN posters.
#638
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:50
DoomNation wrote...
aridor1570 wrote...
DoomNation wrote...
Reason were are fixated on the endings is because we were told we'd get easter eggs for the ending. One line of dialogue is not an easter egg. Another lie from Bioware.
How is that not an easter egg? easter eggs are small and subtle, not big and game changing.
I wasn't wanting a big game changer. I was wanting more than one line of dialogue and extra scene added to the endings to expand upon them further.
Still not an easter egg.
#639
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:50
#640
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:50
Knowing the endings were never going to change I will give you an unbiased review when I am done playing.
#641
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:50
#642
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:50
Moirai wrote...
darthnick427 wrote...
Ranger1337 wrote...
darthnick427 wrote...
Fawx9 wrote...
Velocithon wrote...
RiptideX1090 wrote...
I just realized Shepard doesn't even ASK what the Catalyst is. It's the most crucial piece of intel in the war and he didn't bother asking the Leviathans about it.
Wow. Shoddy writing abounds.
You mean to leviathan? He wouldn't have known about it yet though.
He still knows he needs it(thoughnot sure what it is) at that point. Wouldn't he bother asking if these guys knew about it?
Leviathan flat out says they know of the Crucible. They knew of the lesser species creating it but it has failed times beyond counting. How woudld they know about the Catalyst when they didn't help create it, have little to no knowledge of it other than it's existance, and have been in self imposed exile on an unknown planet the last 50 billion years and killed anyone that came close to discovering them.
The Universe only existed for 6 billion years or so . Or did it? o_O
lol well I was just throwing a random number out there. it's probably much less. more around 2 billion I assume
Way more. Around 14 billion...
I'd kill myself after just 200 years...
The idea of living for a billion years? Ugh!!
#643
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:50
Mobius-Silent wrote...
mauro2222 wrote...
The one in the background is not a "tail type"... you have 5 and 6 with the one painted in violet... Harbinger? wtf?
You're going to need to be a little clearer than that. Which one?
There are only 2 with violet dots, it's on the left of Harby.
#644
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:51
Ar7emis wrote...
Jimuth wrote...
Right, that's 800 points saved. Back to DA:O for me. Thanks Riptide!
Yup, I still have some DLC left to invest in for DA:O and at least I know that the Dragon Age team deliver quality on that front.
DA:O and quality DLC? really?
#645
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:51
I been arguing with poster since EC on the fact that the catalystis a machine doing what it's programed to do. If BW watched it's forum, they would see they have to be bluntly clear.Bierwichtel wrote...
Question: is this the writers catering to the lowest common denominator, or something more nefarious?
to me it seems like they wrote this so even idiots could understand and I have to assume we all know what happens to things made for idiots...
just bought the DLC, downloading it now, gonna see for myself, not having any expectations,
Bierwichtel out.
#646
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:52
mauro2222 wrote...
There are only 2 with violet dots, it's on the left of Harby.
You caught me while I was editing, my question was about your first point. WRT the other Harbinger-type:
The other "Harbinger type" is just that, a Sovereign-class without the center nose-leg, it just has it's legs angled forward, I've tilted and re-posed the Harbinger-model to check, you can tell by the nose-lights and the tail shape and pattern
Modifié par Mobius-Silent, 28 août 2012 - 04:53 .
#647
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:52
aridor1570 wrote...
mauro2222 wrote...
aridor1570 wrote...
They don't, their shells just looks exactly the same, Harbinger, most likely, doesn't have a shell, he's the perfect reaper.
Oh for ****'s sake... are you trolling me?
I just can't see the retconn, it's pretty obvious when you think about it hard enough.
I asked you because you missed the point just like the previous guy. And after I got his joke I thought you were trolling. You have the image now, that's my point about different Reapers.
#648
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:53
dreman9999 wrote...
Don't matter. I'm right.RinjiRenee wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
Argueing about what?What is the point with argueing with a shackled AI?
I could ask the same question about shackled BSN posters.
you -------------------------> the point
#649
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:53
Yeah it is. I was expecting Leviathan to be huge mainly because he's in an ocean and has plenty of space to occupy. That was kind of what I was looking forward to was the mystery, gameplay, and Leviathan's appearance. It sounds like they got the mystery aspect right so I'm still considering getting it. I'll just need to hear more details on it though.JeffZero wrote...
Baa Baa wrote...
I didn't expect it to have hardly any impact on the ending either, just a few lines. But I was mainly interested to see if Leviathan looked awesome and if the gameplay looked good. And neither of those things seemed appealing to me. Particularly Levithan.. who just looks like a giant rock.
The gameplay sounds pretty solid to me and I dig Leviathan's design, so oh well. Very subjective things, I guess.
#650
Posté 28 août 2012 - 04:53
aridor1570 wrote...
DoomNation wrote...
aridor1570 wrote...
DoomNation wrote...
Reason were are fixated on the endings is because we were told we'd get easter eggs for the ending. One line of dialogue is not an easter egg. Another lie from Bioware.
How is that not an easter egg? easter eggs are small and subtle, not big and game changing.
I wasn't wanting a big game changer. I was wanting more than one line of dialogue and extra scene added to the endings to expand upon them further.
Still not an easter egg.
If what you truly wanted was the absolute literalist definition of an easter egg, then you would have wound up with potentially even less than what has been provided -- something subtle, maybe even downright subliminal, cleverly nodding its reference to a past event, in this case, Leviathan.





Retour en haut






