Kel Riever wrote...
I like Blade Runner, so that's a good example. Well, let me get to this first. I like TAOs posts because first, I agree with them, and second, I don't really find them any more self righteous than you, or me, or anybody else.
A person who says that "X is fact and is not up for debate" is by any one's definition self-righteous, moreso than other, especially when they espouse a holier-than-thou attitude.
I tend to find, however, Walters to be a great degree more self-righteous than any of us by writing off an excuse that 'he just can't write a certain ending' or you know, the 'artistic integrity.'
Since when did Mass Effect give us a choice that we wanted? The expression the trilogy started with was on an old TV ad: many decisions lie ahead, none of them easy. The decisions in the game were placed by the writers, not by you, not by me, not by any other fan. It is an artist's right to defend his own artistic integrity and his right to self-expression. To call him self-righteous for doing his job is like calling a doctor self-righteous for saving the life of a boy with a peanut allergy who just scarfed on a Snickers bar.
Mostly because he had a job and it is an excuse for a job, imo, not well done. Now, you can tell me you like the ending(s) of me3 and I won't argue with that, and you aren't self righteous for saying that. Nor do I find someone who is purchasing a game and critical of it to be self righteous. If they are, then they certainly paid for that priviledge.
And that's what the writers did: they invested money and heart into the project.
I am going to go out there and say I do not take anything away from you from liking the endings. I have a lot of people I know here in BSN who like the endings. Of course I have a lot more who don't. But regardless, none of them is calling it amazing ---
Prove it. Prove that there is no other poster beside me who loved the ending of ME3 and thinks it's amazing.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





