syllogi wrote...
Cole might, after some time and maturity, become less dangerous, but that doesn't mean he still doesn't have the capacity for that sort of amoral and chaotic violence.
True, but that can be said of anyone.
syllogi wrote...
Cole might, after some time and maturity, become less dangerous, but that doesn't mean he still doesn't have the capacity for that sort of amoral and chaotic violence.
MichaelStuart wrote...
syllogi wrote...
Cole might, after some time and maturity, become less dangerous, but that doesn't mean he still doesn't have the capacity for that sort of amoral and chaotic violence.
True, but that can be said of anyone.
syllogi wrote...
MichaelStuart wrote...
syllogi wrote...
Cole might, after some time and maturity, become less dangerous, but that doesn't mean he still doesn't have the capacity for that sort of amoral and chaotic violence.
True, but that can be said of anyone.
Not everyone has the abilities that Cole has, or has committed the acts that Cole has. That's like saying we should give serial killers who are currently in jail a break and let them reintegrate into society if they say sorry and promise not to do it again.
MichaelStuart wrote...
syllogi wrote...
MichaelStuart wrote...
syllogi wrote...
Cole might, after some time and maturity, become less dangerous, but that doesn't mean he still doesn't have the capacity for that sort of amoral and chaotic violence.
True, but that can be said of anyone.
Not everyone has the abilities that Cole has, or has committed the acts that Cole has. That's like saying we should give serial killers who are currently in jail a break and let them reintegrate into society if they say sorry and promise not to do it again.
Everyone has the abilty to kill, often all it takes is one bad day.
Just because Cole can kill better than the average person, doesn't mine he should be treated different than the average person.
Also, Cole was sorry and did keep his promise to not kill people again, even when someone begged him help to kill themself.
True, he may have killed someone at the end, but honestly, whose weeping for that guy.
Modifié par syllogi, 30 août 2012 - 03:02 .
syllogi wrote...
Err, no. One bad day does not turn most people into serial killers. Cole was a spirit who did not appear to fully understand the import of his actions when he was killing the mages, which is very different than you or I going "postal" after a bad day at the office. In Cole's case, there is room to hope that he can redeem himself, somewhat, but he is still a spirit, who only has begun recently to experience "human" emotions.
Like Justice, it's hard to know what Cole exactly *is*, so it's hard to judge him by human standards, but as a human, I'm not going to just hand wave murder of innocents.
If Cole is a party member, I can give the character the benefit of the doubt, at least at first, because my character will most likely not have all the background information on him that a reader of Asunder has. That doesn't mean that, as a player, I haven't already formed an opinion, based on what I know. And my opinion is that he's both violent towards innocents and has not yet proven he's capable of knowing right from wrong in most situations, so I'm going to be wary of him (and I really think he's not appropriate for a romance, yikes).
cogsandcurls wrote...
Sidestepping the issue of whether I actually like Cole as a person or not (as with a lot of my favourite DA characters, it's not an easy question to answer because it's full of so many shades of grey), I am really looking forward to the idea of having Cole appear in DA3. He has the capacity to be a really interesting companion - there's so much stuff that could be delved into, from personal issues to some really fresh lore stuff regarding spirits/demons etc.
Plus a good rogue is always welcome in my party!
Leoroc wrote...
I am so amazed that people are less forgiving of the abused disturbed kid who doesn't really understand what he is doing (and is certainly capable of redemption) over the guy who kills for money (Zevran)
Modifié par syllogi, 30 août 2012 - 04:18 .
syllogi wrote...
Leoroc wrote...
I am so amazed that people are less forgiving of the abused disturbed kid who doesn't really understand what he is doing (and is certainly capable of redemption) over the guy who kills for money (Zevran)
He's not a kid, he's a spirit with the memories of an abused kid who accidentally killed someone. Cole, the spirit, killed people on purpose, either because he had some sort of sense that they could possibly see them, or because he wanted to be seen by them. That's really bizarre. We can't relate to him, and we don't even have a clear understanding of what he is.
Zevran, on the other hand, was a human, raised first in a brothel and then sold to assassins, to be a killer. It was all he knew, and when he was tired of it, he chose the assignment to go after the Grey Warden as a way out (by suicide by Warden, or when that failed, he tried to change, by joining the Warden). Not everyone can relate to him, but it's at least something we can try to understand, based on our own experiences.
Not really that amazing, honestly.
MichaelStuart wrote...
You need to relate to someone to understand them.
Honestly, spirt or not, I can understand what Cole was going threw, I not saying I would have done what he did, but I can understand why he did it.
As I've said, Cole would be a intresting character to have as a companion, more for conversation than for combat.
But I rarely pick companions, just for combat anyway.
Zevran was a human?syllogi wrote...
Zevran, on the other hand, was a human...
syllogi wrote...
I'm not saying that Cole isn't very interesting, just that the nature of the companion system would limit how he can develop, or else we get a situation where his static storyline plays out regardless of how the player character interacts with him (see: Anders in DA2).
My other point was that he's a really bad choice for a romance plot, but most people see it that way too, it seems.
Modifié par Xeyska, 30 août 2012 - 05:35 .
Xeyska wrote...
Zevran was a human?syllogi wrote...
Zevran, on the other hand, was a human...
syllogi wrote...
I'm not saying that Cole isn't very interesting, just that the nature of the companion system would limit how he can develop, or else we get a situation where his static storyline plays out regardless of how the player character interacts with him (see: Anders in DA2).
brushyourteeth wrote...
My understanding of Cole was that he felt a kind of compulsion draw him to someone who he *knew* would be able to see him before he even necessarily knew who they were or even if they definitely existed. He would be drawn to a bedroom or a dungeon or what-have-you and inside would be someone who could inexplicably see him, and he would kill them in order to feel real again. Not necessarily any motive involved except self-preservation, and definitely not because he felt compassion for them. He killed the ones who could see him, rather than revealing himself to the ones he killed. If you asked him why they could see him he'd probably say "I don't know. But I killed them because I felt like I had to."
Modifié par CommanderJessica, 31 août 2012 - 10:14 .
Modifié par Avroseeker, 01 septembre 2012 - 01:56 .
CommanderJessica wrote...
Can't demons become spirits, same as spirits can become demons? I think that's been said somewhere on BSN.
I don't believe Cole is evil though, he didn't want to kill those people really - he just didn't want to be alone. Plus I don't think he realised he was possessing people either. I read Asunder a while ago though.
I would like to see Cole as a companion, he's still a huge mystery and has so much potential.
I can see why people who have read Asunder might not want him but I don't get how those who haven't are so opposed!