67 réponses à ce sujet

[Doctoglethorpe]

Conventional victory is already undeniable with these things. 

But for now they are invisible insignificant ems points.  Yaay. 

[Sajuro]

The last DLC will reveal that Shepard is just a bored student at a university in modern times dreaming of a space adventure where he could nail alien chicks.

[LucasShark]

Sajuro wrote...

The last DLC will reveal that Shepard is just a bored student at a university in modern times dreaming of a space adventure where he could nail alien chicks.

If they actually tried to pull a "twas a dream" ending on this turd sunday I'd actually hunt someone down and beat them with my collectors edition case.

[EnvyTB075]

Tazzmission wrote...

EnvyTB075 wrote...

So...your only passions were TV and movies? And you call me sad for caring about a single videogame that used to have a rich setting full of potential?

i have a major passion for scifi i really do. and when i say scifi i mean real scifi and not that garbage you see on syfy channel where there motto is *imagine greater**

I don't have that channel.

[plfranke]

The point is that if omega does give you the ability to travel super fast without mass relays it's pretty stupid to have it in the game if there's no elaboration on how it's utilized post war or during the war for that matter. Having to headcanon how it will impact the war is ridiculous considering you'll have to pay at least 10 dollars for it.

[Conniving_Eagle]

Fish Theory.

[LucasShark]

Sion1138 wrote...

Selling the ending in pieces is what they're actually doing already.

How? Well, this last DLC contained information that is vital to understanding what the hell that ending was about.

"Doesn't make any sense? Frustrated? Well, we'll tell you what it means but you're gonna have to pay."

And suddenly I understand what turns people into domestic terrorists...

[Killdren88]

LucasShark wrote...

Sion1138 wrote...

Selling the ending in pieces is what they're actually doing already.

How? Well, this last DLC contained information that is vital to understanding what the hell that ending was about.

"Doesn't make any sense? Frustrated? Well, we'll tell you what it means but you're gonna have to pay."

And suddenly I understand what turns people into domestic terrorists...

...What ever happned to those days where when you buy a game, you get everything with it when you buy the said game. NOT 75% of and they sell the remaining 25% Via DLC..THATS BS

[devSin]

Sion1138 wrote...

Selling the ending in pieces is what they're actually doing already.

How? Well, this last DLC contained information that is vital to understanding what the hell that ending was about.

It's even more interesting when you consider that this DLC was designed for the original ending, not the extended cut (which basically just expanded the kid's dialogue so that he gives you the exact same information).

[LucasShark]

devSin wrote...

Sion1138 wrote...

Selling the ending in pieces is what they're actually doing already.

How? Well, this last DLC contained information that is vital to understanding what the hell that ending was about.

It's even more interesting when you consider that this DLC was designed for the original ending, not the extended cut (which basically just expanded the kid's dialogue so that he gives you the exact same information).

Imagine how perplexing and idiotic that would have been if this were the first piece of DLC... Particularly considering there was already a plot-pivotal item in the series called "the leviathan".

[Calamity]

ghostz82 wrote...

Since when is more DLC bad for anyone or even the game? This topic had to be put up by another one of those mass effect 3 haters or this must be a joke because more content is what fans want. Remember that a DLC is meant to extend, add, or improve the story or game not hurt or ruin anything. So the answer is a big NO,NO,NO, and some more NO since this is never a problem. That's all we need is game developers to get the wrong idea and stop giving fans more content to download that would suck.

Please no spoilers if someone response to this:

Bolded in quote

I have downloaded leviathan but just imported the 2nd of my saves from me1/2 and have not actually played leviathan yet. Question concerns the bolded part of ghostz quote: not hurt or ruin anything. I heard this DLC ruins the destroy choice?  

Please a simple yes/no will suffice... If yes then i will skip this mission (DLC).

Thanks!

[LucasShark]

Calamity wrote...

ghostz82 wrote...

Since when is more DLC bad for anyone or even the game? This topic had to be put up by another one of those mass effect 3 haters or this must be a joke because more content is what fans want. Remember that a DLC is meant to extend, add, or improve the story or game not hurt or ruin anything. So the answer is a big NO,NO,NO, and some more NO since this is never a problem. That's all we need is game developers to get the wrong idea and stop giving fans more content to download that would suck.

Please no spoilers if someone response to this:

Bolded in quote

I have downloaded leviathan but just imported the 2nd of my saves from me1/2 and have not actually played leviathan yet. Question concerns the bolded part of ghostz quote: not hurt or ruin anything. I heard this DLC ruins the destroy choice?  

Please a simple yes/no will suffice... If yes then i will skip this mission (DLC).

Thanks!

In my view: yes, it makes the destroy choice quite tainted with what would inevitably follow.

[Veneke]

Tazzmission wrote...

im just saying though todays generation of gamers are becoming spoiled and im not saying that to sound like an a hole or anything but its a game and why cant people except it for that?

i mean how many times does bioware have to tell people that the ec is the official ending till it sinks in?

Two responses, really -

1. Either Mass Effect 3 is art (*chortle*) in which case the answer is 'The same number of times an author, poet or artist has to demand that everyone interpret their work in the same way.'

or

2. ME 3 isn't art in which case the answer is 'Until they turn away all their critical customers.'


@ OP:

No, this won't ever be a problem. Why? BW can simply ignore the inconsistencies/plot-holes etc. To be fair, it's the only way to ensure that they don't cause an uproar over how half the game wasn't included at the beginning but was explained and expanded upon through further DLC that you had to pay for... oh wait.

Where is the outrage?

BSN. I am disappoint.

[Calamity]

LucasShark wrote...

Calamity wrote...

ghostz82 wrote...

Since when is more DLC bad for anyone or even the game? This topic had to be put up by another one of those mass effect 3 haters or this must be a joke because more content is what fans want. Remember that a DLC is meant to extend, add, or improve the story or game not hurt or ruin anything. So the answer is a big NO,NO,NO, and some more NO since this is never a problem. That's all we need is game developers to get the wrong idea and stop giving fans more content to download that would suck.

Please no spoilers if someone response to this:

Bolded in quote

I have downloaded leviathan but just imported the 2nd of my saves from me1/2 and have not actually played leviathan yet. Question concerns the bolded part of ghostz quote: not hurt or ruin anything. I heard this DLC ruins the destroy choice?  

Please a simple yes/no will suffice... If yes then i will skip this mission (DLC).

Thanks!

In my view: yes, it makes the destroy choice quite tainted with what would inevitably follow.

Thanks, Shark.  Knew I could count on you!

[yukon fire]

Doctor_Jackstraw wrote...

yukon fire wrote...

I am sorry, you lost all credibility with that line. Because if they cared they'd be talking, instead of hiding behind a bad PR department and the "perfect scores" they bought.  

The thing about internet rage is that theres no way to respond to it.  Bioware devs spending time to argue with trolls would just be the stupidest waste of time for anyone ever.  Its better to address issues people have in content, because it allows the game to speak for itself.


unless you just wanna rage at a guy.  everyone at any game company has a duty to go online and be yelled at by rage-aholics who are impossible to talk to.

There's a lot of different ways for them to talk, but they aren't saying anything anywhere that isn't trying to drive more nails in to the situation, instead of addressing concerns in a way that doesn't come off as arrogant (like that Hudson & Walters vid talking about the EC where they make it seem like it's our problem they did a crap job).

In fact it could be argued that they don't even understand that there is a problem. To hear Weekes talk about how auto dialogue is good because it "flows" or to hear pretty much half of whatever that Jessica girl says, or to hear different writers says contrary things, it seems the only "Clarity" we're ever going to get is that Bioware still doesn't have a clue (or a care for) what their doing and if they can't address that issue then there is no hope for both Mass Effect or Bioware.  

[daecath]

LucasShark wrote...

The more war assets they add with DLC, won't the problem of conventional victory being non-existant more and more pronounced?

I mean suppose the "prize" for completing the Omega DLC if it comes, is to have a massive fleet of ships, or store of element zero, and another DLC comes with a prize that eclipses that too, where will this end up?

It will just continue to become more and more inplausable.

Too late, we're already there. We have 3 known leviathans in existance, with potentially more from what we heard. And in the very end, we saw a reaper get one-shotted by the leviathan's artifacts. Not even the leviathan itself, but one of those little glowy orb things. He didn't have to be anywhere near the reaper. Heck, with the way those orbs work, he doesn't have to even be in the same system. "Hey Shepard, here's a few hundred of these orby things, just fly through a reaper controlled system, drop a bunch of these off, and give me a second." Bing bang boom, war over.

Of course, then you have to deal with the Leviathans, who are interested in enslaving "lesser" species. Out of the frying pan, into the fire.

[LucasShark]

daecath wrote...

LucasShark wrote...

The more war assets they add with DLC, won't the problem of conventional victory being non-existant more and more pronounced?

I mean suppose the "prize" for completing the Omega DLC if it comes, is to have a massive fleet of ships, or store of element zero, and another DLC comes with a prize that eclipses that too, where will this end up?

It will just continue to become more and more inplausable.

Too late, we're already there. We have 3 known leviathans in existance, with potentially more from what we heard. And in the very end, we saw a reaper get one-shotted by the leviathan's artifacts. Not even the leviathan itself, but one of those little glowy orb things. He didn't have to be anywhere near the reaper. Heck, with the way those orbs work, he doesn't have to even be in the same system. "Hey Shepard, here's a few hundred of these orby things, just fly through a reaper controlled system, drop a bunch of these off, and give me a second." Bing bang boom, war over.

Of course, then you have to deal with the Leviathans, who are interested in enslaving "lesser" species. Out of the frying pan, into the fire.

And yet the Leviathans are nowhere to be seen in the final battle...

And the whole "enslaving" aspect kind of destroys the appeal of 1 out of the 3 endings... that being destroy.