269 réponses à ce sujet

[txgoldrush]

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...


Please....your ignorance is showing.

Actually ,your ignorance is showing. You refuse to acknowledge anyone who completely uproots your wavering points.

Please, ME3 bashers don't know what the themes of the series are.

After all three games multiple times each, I believe I can say I understand exactly what was going on. was the theme of loss there? yes. was it major? no. the major theme was that it was up to you to stop the extinction of all sentient life. That is whats it was in ME, it's what it was in ME2, and is also yet again what it is in ME3. Stop covering up your own unintelligence with sarcastic remarks and actually state some evidence as to why you think you're right instead of spewing out pointless condescendance.

And you do stop the cycle, did you miss that part in ME3? You plainly miss the part in 3 of the 4 endings, the Reapers quit Reaping, and in the fourth, the next cycle stops the cycle.

Please.

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created. Sacrifice is the main theme of ME3 specifically however. Like ME1 was about humanity finding its place in the galaxy and ME2 about earning loyalty and trust from your crew before a tough mission.

Modifié par txgoldrush, 30 août 2012 - 05:08 .

[Ticonderoga117]

txgoldrush wrote...
And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Swing and a miss.

It's a tie between "Through unity, anything is possible." and "Sheer force of will will see you through."

At best, that's a sub theme for the Quarian arc.

[txgoldrush]

Ticonderoga117 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...
And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Swing and a miss.

It's a tie between "Through unity, anything is possible." and "Sheer force of will will see you through."

At best, that's a sub theme for the Quarian arc.

No, its how the Reapers and the cycle was created.

Its how the Mass Effect universe is built.

You don't get it.

If the Extended Cut didn't define the ME Universe, Levithan certainly did.

Nevermind the billion other examples throughout the trilogy.

[Epique Phael767]

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...


Please....your ignorance is showing.

Actually ,your ignorance is showing. You refuse to acknowledge anyone who completely uproots your wavering points.

Please, ME3 bashers don't know what the themes of the series are.

After all three games multiple times each, I believe I can say I understand exactly what was going on. was the theme of loss there? yes. was it major? no. the major theme was that it was up to you to stop the extinction of all sentient life. That is whats it was in ME, it's what it was in ME2, and is also yet again what it is in ME3. Stop covering up your own unintelligence with sarcastic remarks and actually state some evidence as to why you think you're right instead of spewing out pointless condescendance.

And you do stop the cycle, did you miss that part in ME3? You plainly miss the part in 3 of the 4 endings, the Reapers quit Reaping, and in the fourth, the next cycle stops the cycle.

Please.

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Wow, you truly don't know what you're talking about. That theme was not even mentioned until ME3 and the only way it could be seen in ME1 and 2 is hindsight bias.Yes, you do end the cycle, but at the end you don't feel like the big hero you were led to believe you were, you felt like the destroyer yourself. And that is why I'm right. The marketing campaign had you believe you were the big hero only to slam "art" in your face instead.

[MissMaster_2]

txgoldrush wrote...

Ticonderoga117 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...
And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Swing and a miss.

It's a tie between "Through unity, anything is possible." and "Sheer force of will will see you through."

At best, that's a sub theme for the Quarian arc.

No, its how the Reapers and the cycle was created.

Its how the Mass Effect universe is built.

You don't get it.

If the Extended Cut didn't define the ME Universe, Levithan certainly did.

Nevermind the billion other examples throughout the trilogy.

Please explain. Seriously the only time I have heard about the whole created vs creators thing is the Geth and Shepard fixed that whole issue if I'm not mistaken. That is the ONLY time it has been talked about them adding that to the main plot is where it the series failed. It was cut and dry, Reapers come from dark space because they are rude and wanna Reap they did have to explain ANYTHING. It was fine the way it was. They were beyond anyones comprehension of why they do what they do. A simple story about one human trying to get the galaxy to fight the Reapers. They should have left it as that. Convolution breeds plot holes.  

You can't 'define' an almost 10 year trilogy months after the last installment with a tacked on DLC for 9.99, no.  

Modifié par MissMaster_2, 30 août 2012 - 05:22 .

[movieguyabw]

txgoldrush wrote...

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created. Sacrifice is the main theme of ME3 specifically however. Like ME1 was about humanity finding its place in the galaxy and ME2 about earning loyalty and trust from your crew before a tough mission.

...Clearly you do not know what a "theme" is in a literary sense. 

[txgoldrush]

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...


Please....your ignorance is showing.

Actually ,your ignorance is showing. You refuse to acknowledge anyone who completely uproots your wavering points.

Please, ME3 bashers don't know what the themes of the series are.

After all three games multiple times each, I believe I can say I understand exactly what was going on. was the theme of loss there? yes. was it major? no. the major theme was that it was up to you to stop the extinction of all sentient life. That is whats it was in ME, it's what it was in ME2, and is also yet again what it is in ME3. Stop covering up your own unintelligence with sarcastic remarks and actually state some evidence as to why you think you're right instead of spewing out pointless condescendance.

And you do stop the cycle, did you miss that part in ME3? You plainly miss the part in 3 of the 4 endings, the Reapers quit Reaping, and in the fourth, the next cycle stops the cycle.

Please.

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Wow, you truly don't know what you're talking about. That theme was not even mentioned until ME3 and the only way it could be seen in ME1 and 2 is hindsight bias.Yes, you do end the cycle, but at the end you don't feel like the big hero you were led to believe you were, you felt like the destroyer yourself. And that is why I'm right. The marketing campaign had you believe you were the big hero only to slam "art" in your face instead.

No, there is no hindsight....let see.

Cerebrus against Alliance, started as alliance black op.
Krogan against the other races.
Rachni against Binary Helix on Noveria AND Cerberus
Geth against Quarians
The Citadel AI against its creator (the one thats funneling money from a gambling machine in ME1)
Thorian against exogeni
Miranda aginst her father
Jack against her captors and Cerberus
The Geth against Tali's father
Overlord VI against Project Overlord
The Yahg against the Shadow Broker before him.
The Rachni against the Protheans
EDI against Cerebrus
Reapers against Leviathan

The whole universe is built around the conflict between those used as "tools" and the ones the "create" these "tools". The entire Reaper threat is because of this.

Modifié par txgoldrush, 30 août 2012 - 05:26 .

[ticklefist]

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...


Please....your ignorance is showing.

Actually ,your ignorance is showing. You refuse to acknowledge anyone who completely uproots your wavering points.

Please, ME3 bashers don't know what the themes of the series are.

After all three games multiple times each, I believe I can say I understand exactly what was going on. was the theme of loss there? yes. was it major? no. the major theme was that it was up to you to stop the extinction of all sentient life. That is whats it was in ME, it's what it was in ME2, and is also yet again what it is in ME3. Stop covering up your own unintelligence with sarcastic remarks and actually state some evidence as to why you think you're right instead of spewing out pointless condescendance.

And you do stop the cycle, did you miss that part in ME3? You plainly miss the part in 3 of the 4 endings, the Reapers quit Reaping, and in the fourth, the next cycle stops the cycle.

Please.

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Wow, you truly don't know what you're talking about. That theme was not even mentioned until ME3 and the only way it could be seen in ME1 and 2 is hindsight bias.Yes, you do end the cycle, but at the end you don't feel like the big hero you were led to believe you were, you felt like the destroyer yourself. And that is why I'm right. The marketing campaign had you believe you were the big hero only to slam "art" in your face instead.

No, there is no hindsight....let see.

Cerebrus against Alliance, started as alliance black op.
Krogan against the other races.
Rachni against Binary Helix on Noveria AND Cerberus
Geth against Quarians
The Citadel AI against its creator (the one thats funneling money from a gambling machine in ME1)
Thorian against exogeni
Miranda aginst her father
Jack against her captors and Cerberus
The Geth against Tali's father
Overlord VI against Project Overlord
The Yahg against the Shadow Broker before him.
The Rachni against the Protheans
EDI against Cerebrus
Reapers against Leviathan

The whole universe is built around the conflict between those used as "tools" and the ones the "create" these "tools". The entire Reaper threat is because of this.

Are you going to argue the point? The argument you've chosen has gone way off topic. If you don't agree that Priority: Earth is the worst mission in the trilogy then simply tell us which you think is worse or even why you think Priority: Earth is not. You're not on topic at all. You've springboarded yourself into having the only discussion I've ever seen you take part in: How dumb you think the rest of the fan base is.

Modifié par ticklefist, 30 août 2012 - 05:33 .

[MissMaster_2]

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...


Please....your ignorance is showing.

Actually ,your ignorance is showing. You refuse to acknowledge anyone who completely uproots your wavering points.

Please, ME3 bashers don't know what the themes of the series are.

After all three games multiple times each, I believe I can say I understand exactly what was going on. was the theme of loss there? yes. was it major? no. the major theme was that it was up to you to stop the extinction of all sentient life. That is whats it was in ME, it's what it was in ME2, and is also yet again what it is in ME3. Stop covering up your own unintelligence with sarcastic remarks and actually state some evidence as to why you think you're right instead of spewing out pointless condescendance.

And you do stop the cycle, did you miss that part in ME3? You plainly miss the part in 3 of the 4 endings, the Reapers quit Reaping, and in the fourth, the next cycle stops the cycle.

Please.

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Wow, you truly don't know what you're talking about. That theme was not even mentioned until ME3 and the only way it could be seen in ME1 and 2 is hindsight bias.Yes, you do end the cycle, but at the end you don't feel like the big hero you were led to believe you were, you felt like the destroyer yourself. And that is why I'm right. The marketing campaign had you believe you were the big hero only to slam "art" in your face instead.

No, there is no hindsight....let see.

Cerebrus against Alliance, started as alliance black op.
Krogan against the other races.
Rachni against Binary Helix on Noveria AND Cerberus
Geth against Quarians
The Citadel AI against its creator (the one thats funneling money from a gambling machine in ME1)
Thorian against exogeni
Miranda aginst her father
Jack against her captors and Cerberus
The Geth against Tali's father
Overlord VI against Project Overlord
The Yahg against the Shadow Broker before him.
The Rachni against the Protheans
EDI against Cerebrus
Reapers against Leviathan

The whole universe is built around the conflict between those used as "tools" and the ones the "create" these "tools". The entire Reaper threat is because of this.

Guess who fixed almost all of these issues? Shepard. Without needing space magic. 

Modifié par MissMaster_2, 30 août 2012 - 05:31 .

[txgoldrush]

ticklefist wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...


Please....your ignorance is showing.

Actually ,your ignorance is showing. You refuse to acknowledge anyone who completely uproots your wavering points.

Please, ME3 bashers don't know what the themes of the series are.

After all three games multiple times each, I believe I can say I understand exactly what was going on. was the theme of loss there? yes. was it major? no. the major theme was that it was up to you to stop the extinction of all sentient life. That is whats it was in ME, it's what it was in ME2, and is also yet again what it is in ME3. Stop covering up your own unintelligence with sarcastic remarks and actually state some evidence as to why you think you're right instead of spewing out pointless condescendance.

And you do stop the cycle, did you miss that part in ME3? You plainly miss the part in 3 of the 4 endings, the Reapers quit Reaping, and in the fourth, the next cycle stops the cycle.

Please.

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Wow, you truly don't know what you're talking about. That theme was not even mentioned until ME3 and the only way it could be seen in ME1 and 2 is hindsight bias.Yes, you do end the cycle, but at the end you don't feel like the big hero you were led to believe you were, you felt like the destroyer yourself. And that is why I'm right. The marketing campaign had you believe you were the big hero only to slam "art" in your face instead.

No, there is no hindsight....let see.

Cerebrus against Alliance, started as alliance black op.
Krogan against the other races.
Rachni against Binary Helix on Noveria AND Cerberus
Geth against Quarians
The Citadel AI against its creator (the one thats funneling money from a gambling machine in ME1)
Thorian against exogeni
Miranda aginst her father
Jack against her captors and Cerberus
The Geth against Tali's father
Overlord VI against Project Overlord
The Yahg against the Shadow Broker before him.
The Rachni against the Protheans
EDI against Cerebrus
Reapers against Leviathan

The whole universe is built around the conflict between those used as "tools" and the ones the "create" these "tools". The entire Reaper threat is because of this.

Are you going to argue the point? If you don't agree that Priority: Earth is the worst mission in the trilogy then simply tell us which you think is worse or even why you think Priority: Earth is not. Do not engage in how an opinion is wrong. That's what stupid people do.

Most of ME1's side quests, Pinnacle Station, the Shadow Broker ship (a really boring linear corridor, probably the worst in the series), Therum.

[ticklefist]

txgoldrush wrote...

ticklefist wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...


Please....your ignorance is showing.

Actually ,your ignorance is showing. You refuse to acknowledge anyone who completely uproots your wavering points.

Please, ME3 bashers don't know what the themes of the series are.

After all three games multiple times each, I believe I can say I understand exactly what was going on. was the theme of loss there? yes. was it major? no. the major theme was that it was up to you to stop the extinction of all sentient life. That is whats it was in ME, it's what it was in ME2, and is also yet again what it is in ME3. Stop covering up your own unintelligence with sarcastic remarks and actually state some evidence as to why you think you're right instead of spewing out pointless condescendance.

And you do stop the cycle, did you miss that part in ME3? You plainly miss the part in 3 of the 4 endings, the Reapers quit Reaping, and in the fourth, the next cycle stops the cycle.

Please.

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Wow, you truly don't know what you're talking about. That theme was not even mentioned until ME3 and the only way it could be seen in ME1 and 2 is hindsight bias.Yes, you do end the cycle, but at the end you don't feel like the big hero you were led to believe you were, you felt like the destroyer yourself. And that is why I'm right. The marketing campaign had you believe you were the big hero only to slam "art" in your face instead.

No, there is no hindsight....let see.

Cerebrus against Alliance, started as alliance black op.
Krogan against the other races.
Rachni against Binary Helix on Noveria AND Cerberus
Geth against Quarians
The Citadel AI against its creator (the one thats funneling money from a gambling machine in ME1)
Thorian against exogeni
Miranda aginst her father
Jack against her captors and Cerberus
The Geth against Tali's father
Overlord VI against Project Overlord
The Yahg against the Shadow Broker before him.
The Rachni against the Protheans
EDI against Cerebrus
Reapers against Leviathan

The whole universe is built around the conflict between those used as "tools" and the ones the "create" these "tools". The entire Reaper threat is because of this.

Are you going to argue the point? If you don't agree that Priority: Earth is the worst mission in the trilogy then simply tell us which you think is worse or even why you think Priority: Earth is not. Do not engage in how an opinion is wrong. That's what stupid people do.

Most of ME1's side quests, Pinnacle Station, the Shadow Broker ship (a really boring linear corridor, probably the worst in the series), Therum.

No argument, those missions are terrible. I do think Priority: Earth was a bigger let down but the missions you mentioned are certainly worse. Let's move on!

[txgoldrush]

MissMaster_2 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...


Please....your ignorance is showing.

Actually ,your ignorance is showing. You refuse to acknowledge anyone who completely uproots your wavering points.

Please, ME3 bashers don't know what the themes of the series are.

After all three games multiple times each, I believe I can say I understand exactly what was going on. was the theme of loss there? yes. was it major? no. the major theme was that it was up to you to stop the extinction of all sentient life. That is whats it was in ME, it's what it was in ME2, and is also yet again what it is in ME3. Stop covering up your own unintelligence with sarcastic remarks and actually state some evidence as to why you think you're right instead of spewing out pointless condescendance.

And you do stop the cycle, did you miss that part in ME3? You plainly miss the part in 3 of the 4 endings, the Reapers quit Reaping, and in the fourth, the next cycle stops the cycle.

Please.

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Wow, you truly don't know what you're talking about. That theme was not even mentioned until ME3 and the only way it could be seen in ME1 and 2 is hindsight bias.Yes, you do end the cycle, but at the end you don't feel like the big hero you were led to believe you were, you felt like the destroyer yourself. And that is why I'm right. The marketing campaign had you believe you were the big hero only to slam "art" in your face instead.

No, there is no hindsight....let see.

Cerebrus against Alliance, started as alliance black op.
Krogan against the other races.
Rachni against Binary Helix on Noveria AND Cerberus
Geth against Quarians
The Citadel AI against its creator (the one thats funneling money from a gambling machine in ME1)
Thorian against exogeni
Miranda aginst her father
Jack against her captors and Cerberus
The Geth against Tali's father
Overlord VI against Project Overlord
The Yahg against the Shadow Broker before him.
The Rachni against the Protheans
EDI against Cerebrus
Reapers against Leviathan

The whole universe is built around the conflict between those used as "tools" and the ones the "create" these "tools". The entire Reaper threat is because of this.

Guess who fixed almost all of these issues? Shepard. Without needing space magic. 

and that is not the point.

[plfranke]

MissMaster_2 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...


Please....your ignorance is showing.

Actually ,your ignorance is showing. You refuse to acknowledge anyone who completely uproots your wavering points.

Please, ME3 bashers don't know what the themes of the series are.

After all three games multiple times each, I believe I can say I understand exactly what was going on. was the theme of loss there? yes. was it major? no. the major theme was that it was up to you to stop the extinction of all sentient life. That is whats it was in ME, it's what it was in ME2, and is also yet again what it is in ME3. Stop covering up your own unintelligence with sarcastic remarks and actually state some evidence as to why you think you're right instead of spewing out pointless condescendance.

And you do stop the cycle, did you miss that part in ME3? You plainly miss the part in 3 of the 4 endings, the Reapers quit Reaping, and in the fourth, the next cycle stops the cycle.

Please.

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Wow, you truly don't know what you're talking about. That theme was not even mentioned until ME3 and the only way it could be seen in ME1 and 2 is hindsight bias.Yes, you do end the cycle, but at the end you don't feel like the big hero you were led to believe you were, you felt like the destroyer yourself. And that is why I'm right. The marketing campaign had you believe you were the big hero only to slam "art" in your face instead.

No, there is no hindsight....let see.

Cerebrus against Alliance, started as alliance black op.
Krogan against the other races.
Rachni against Binary Helix on Noveria AND Cerberus
Geth against Quarians
The Citadel AI against its creator (the one thats funneling money from a gambling machine in ME1)
Thorian against exogeni
Miranda aginst her father
Jack against her captors and Cerberus
The Geth against Tali's father
Overlord VI against Project Overlord
The Yahg against the Shadow Broker before him.
The Rachni against the Protheans
EDI against Cerebrus
Reapers against Leviathan

The whole universe is built around the conflict between those used as "tools" and the ones the "create" these "tools". The entire Reaper threat is because of this.

Guess who fixed almost all of these issues? Shepard. Without needing space magic. 

Not to mention a lot of the things you're citing aren't the created vs the creators at all. And it shouldn't really count if the creators are picking a fight with the created I mean anyone would fight back against that so that would be pretty stupid. That's like saying "Those who you fight with will fight back it is inevitable"

[ticklefist]

Oh Jesus. Everybody's off topic here.

[Brovikk Rasputin]

No it's not.

The Reaper IFF. That last part of Feros. Samara's recruitment mission.

[MissMaster_2]

ticklefist wrote...

Oh Jesus. Everybody's off topic here.

Back on topic Priority Earth failed as the last battle. 

[suprhomre]

no argument here the mission is not only one of the worse in the series, but it's dead silence during the assault were is all the epic music? etc etc etc..............

[txgoldrush]

plfranke wrote...

MissMaster_2 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Epique Phael767 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...


Please....your ignorance is showing.

Actually ,your ignorance is showing. You refuse to acknowledge anyone who completely uproots your wavering points.

Please, ME3 bashers don't know what the themes of the series are.

After all three games multiple times each, I believe I can say I understand exactly what was going on. was the theme of loss there? yes. was it major? no. the major theme was that it was up to you to stop the extinction of all sentient life. That is whats it was in ME, it's what it was in ME2, and is also yet again what it is in ME3. Stop covering up your own unintelligence with sarcastic remarks and actually state some evidence as to why you think you're right instead of spewing out pointless condescendance.

And you do stop the cycle, did you miss that part in ME3? You plainly miss the part in 3 of the 4 endings, the Reapers quit Reaping, and in the fourth, the next cycle stops the cycle.

Please.

And the main theme of the series is actually the conflict between the creators and the created.

Wow, you truly don't know what you're talking about. That theme was not even mentioned until ME3 and the only way it could be seen in ME1 and 2 is hindsight bias.Yes, you do end the cycle, but at the end you don't feel like the big hero you were led to believe you were, you felt like the destroyer yourself. And that is why I'm right. The marketing campaign had you believe you were the big hero only to slam "art" in your face instead.

No, there is no hindsight....let see.

Cerebrus against Alliance, started as alliance black op.
Krogan against the other races.
Rachni against Binary Helix on Noveria AND Cerberus
Geth against Quarians
The Citadel AI against its creator (the one thats funneling money from a gambling machine in ME1)
Thorian against exogeni
Miranda aginst her father
Jack against her captors and Cerberus
The Geth against Tali's father
Overlord VI against Project Overlord
The Yahg against the Shadow Broker before him.
The Rachni against the Protheans
EDI against Cerebrus
Reapers against Leviathan

The whole universe is built around the conflict between those used as "tools" and the ones the "create" these "tools". The entire Reaper threat is because of this.

Guess who fixed almost all of these issues? Shepard. Without needing space magic. 

Not to mention a lot of the things you're citing aren't the created vs the creators at all. And it shouldn't really count if the creators are picking a fight with the created I mean anyone would fight back against that so that would be pretty stupid. That's like saying "Those who you fight with will fight back it is inevitable"

Please, you are moving the goalposts here. Some created definitely do have a good reason to fight back, thats not the point. The point is that this conflict exists. If you use people or beings as tools, they can turn against you. For instance, the quarians tried killing the geth because they were scared that they wouldn't be tools anymore.

[Killdren88]

That mission was horrid. I realy wanted to summon a horde of rachni and overwhelm a bunch of brutes. Would have been even better say you see a Reaper coming at you and the rachni make the ground unstable, causing the Reaper to fall through. That would have been awesome.

[txgoldrush]

suprhomre wrote...

no argument here the mission is not only one of the worse in the series, but it's dead silence during the assault were is all the epic music? etc etc etc..............

Because it isn't supposed to be "epic". They aren't gong for "hoo-rah" here.

[Brovikk Rasputin]

suprhomre wrote...

no argument here the mission is not only one of the worse in the series, but it's dead silence during the assault were is all the epic music? etc etc etc..............

Sometimes, silence can be good. You just described everything that's wrong with today's gamers. "OMFG WHERES TEH EPIC MUSIC?!?!?! I NEED EPIC MUSIC TO TELL ME SUMTHINS EPIC! WHERE THE ORCHESTRA!!!?!?!" 

Unbelievable. 

[MissMaster_2]

txgoldrush wrote...

suprhomre wrote...

no argument here the mission is not only one of the worse in the series, but it's dead silence during the assault were is all the epic music? etc etc etc..............

Because it isn't supposed to be "epic". They aren't gong for "hoo-rah" here.

Well given the backlash they should have been going for that.

[Brovikk Rasputin]

No. They shouldn't..

[plfranke]

The music wasn't even half of the problem though...

[EnvyTB075]

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

suprhomre wrote...

no argument here the mission is not only one of the worse in the series, but it's dead silence during the assault were is all the epic music? etc etc etc..............

Sometimes, silence can be good. You just described everything that's wrong with today's gamers. "OMFG WHERES TEH EPIC MUSIC?!?!?! I NEED EPIC MUSIC TO TELL ME SUMTHINS EPIC! WHERE THE ORCHESTRA!!!?!?!" 

Unbelievable. 

Heh, nope, ME3 already catered to everything thats wrong about todays gamers with its basic gameplay. If anything it needed MW3 techno music to go along with the generic combat.