This i a very nice thread, although I am afraid it is quite futile.
Nontheless, some very interesting discussion going on here. (btw, whatever happened to the AWTR thread?)
Biosman wrote...
All BW needed to do was end it when you go to activate the crucible after the death of Anderson, a truly emotional scene when Anderson tells Shep "I'm proud of you" i had mantears , then the call that the crucible isnt doing anything, here, shep crawls to the interface and activates it...CUE THE FINALE CUTSCENES no need for a "breathe" scene, just sheps name on the honor board on the Normandy. thats is what the true ending shgould have been, that is how to end a franchise.
No star kid, no RBG there was absolutely no need for it. you could even have left the Normandy stranded instead of making it cheesy...yes the EC had cheese that should also never have been there, do the right thing BW
While I personally disagree with the notion that the reapers didn't need at least a partial explanation before I kill them all (not to mention the fact that our last confrontation, the climax of the story would be with over inflated TIM of all people), I definitely agree on the cheesy EC. This is especially bad since Shepards choice are so horrible. At least in the original endings, we were left wondering how e.g. synthesis would turn out for the galaxy. Did we really make the right decision? Will a Control Shepard succumb to the principle that "absolute power corrupts absolutely"? It was "speculation for everyone", which was really bad but I feel that the EC tries to push a forced happy ending on these three atrocities which IMO is even worse.
But this is just part of the general problem with asking BW to fix things. Had they done it in the first months (e.g. with the EC), it might have worked. Right now, so many people have so many different opinions, requests, suggestions and ideas they - facing the bad situation that we had - grew very passionate about. What is BW to do exactly? A fix for one party will ruin the game for another. I for example would be shocked if we could suddenly have a conventional victory. "Why?" would I ask, "how does that make sense?". However, I do know that many many people want such an ending.
By leaving things as long as they have and by making the statements they made, essentially BW has taken from themselves the option to change the endings with any form of dignity.
I am not saying that I don't want them to or that I wouldn't be happy if they did it anyway. I am just saying that indications are unfortunately not very positive.
@TheRealJayDee: It's a shame you stopped after mars. I think the best parts of ME3 are between Mars and Priority earth. You take these out and it's an excellent game with just a few flaws IMO.
Modifié par MrFob, 07 octobre 2012 - 01:11 .