IsaacShep wrote...
TMA LIVE wrote...
I'm just worried that if it's another Catalyst thing, it's just going to keep ruining a lot of the point of the ending. The Catalyst appears at the end as a surprise. It's suppose to be a surprise and a discovery. But if they make a DLC where characters are like "Clearly there's an AI somewhere on the Citadel", it's like spelling out your plot twist before it happens in a very bad way. "Hmmm, Intelligence... Hmm... AI on Citadel... wonder why no one at C-Sec is considering this seriously until it's too late?"
Well, Leviathan already did most of it, to the point that some of the questions Shep asks the Catalyst now are simply redundant since he knows the answers already
Exactly, which is another issue I have with Leviathan. Maybe I'd have less issue with it, if EC never came out, and those questions were answered in Leviathan. Because after I played that, and rewatched EC, I just felt like info repeat. That I was just getting the same info, but from the Catalyst's perspective.
The other issue I had is that I don't like meeting the creators of the Catalyst face to face, and learning that the reason why everything happened was because the catalyst was made by lazy dicks, with evil objectives. Because it makes everything comes down to just a screw up, then because there was a real issue going on in the galaxy. And such a thing doesn't really help being forced to pick options to solve these problems, if the issue never really existed. I mean, if you're going to force me to make a choice that solves a problem, you try to convince me that the problem needs to be solved. Not make me believe I shouldn't make these choices because the problem didn't have much weight since the beginning, even though I'm forced to.
Modifié par TMA LIVE, 31 août 2012 - 01:28 .