514 réponses à ce sujet

[The Night Mammoth]

Hey, if he's game so am I.

And so is Montoya.

[I am disappoint]

Blueprotoss wrote...

 

I am disappoint wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

Genocide is a part of nature just like death itself.
Thats an opinion not a fact on that topic. 

That's just your opinions.

Is the Neanderthal still around?  Nope because they were killed off by our homosapien ancestors.

That's just your opinionated view of what happened.

[The Night Mammoth]

Blueprotoss wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Eh what? A genocide is deliberate. The Neanderthals were not systematically destroyed because some jerks didn't like them.

Mass extinctions are only genocides if they're carried out with intent. 

So unless you're arguing that something divine is responsible, it's always going to be humans doing it to other humans. 

Most of the mass extinctions aren't done on purpose and humans aren't the only thing in nature.

Did you miss that part where genocide is an act commited with intent?

Humans are the only beings on this planet with that ability.

[Blueprotoss]

Seneva wrote...

Day 1 DLC smells like "we didnt had enough time to script it properly in the game before shipping so we just gonna say it's a day 1 dlc"

DLC's shouldnt start untill a month after release day.
Bug fixing should have 100% priority after release day and not a 5 euro day1 dlc.

Every bug can't be fixed and if you want to axe Day 1 DLC then you'll have to axe pre-order DLC as well.

[Blueprotoss]

I am disappoint wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

 

I am disappoint wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

Genocide is a part of nature just like death itself.
Thats an opinion not a fact on that topic. 

That's just your opinions.

Is the Neanderthal still around?  Nope because they were killed off by our homosapien ancestors.

That's just your opinionated view of what happened.

If that was the case then Neanderthals would still be alive.

[The Night Mammoth]

Blueprotoss wrote...

 

I am disappoint wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

Genocide is a part of nature just like death itself.
Thats an opinion not a fact on that topic. 

That's just your opinions.

Is the Neanderthal still around?  Nope because they were killed off by our homosapien ancestors.

Of course you have absolute proof for this that throws out the dozens of other hypotheses. 

Oh wait. 

Conflict could have been part of their extinction, in which case genocide might have occured to some extent, which wouldn't have been natural, or modern humans most likely didn't kill them with intent to destroy specific groups, so there was no genocide. 

Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 09 septembre 2012 - 12:56 .

[I am disappoint]

Blueprotoss wrote...

I am disappoint wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

 

I am disappoint wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

Genocide is a part of nature just like death itself.
Thats an opinion not a fact on that topic. 

That's just your opinions.

Is the Neanderthal still around?  Nope because they were killed off by our homosapien ancestors.

That's just your opinionated view of what happened.

If that was the case then Neanderthals would still be alive.

It's just your opinion nothing else killed them off.

[The Night Mammoth]

Blueprotoss wrote...
If that was the case then Neanderthals would still be alive.

Or you could just be wrong about what happened to them.

I think that's probably quite likely. 

Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 09 septembre 2012 - 12:52 .

[Blueprotoss]

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Did you miss that part where genocide is an act commited with intent?

Most of the mass extinctions aren't on purpose and vice versa on genocide.

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Humans are the only beings on this planet with that ability.

So there's no such thing as Asian Giant Hornets killing hundreds of bees.

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Of course you have absolute proof for this that throws out the dozens of other hypotheses. 

Oh wait. 

Conflict could have been part of their extinction, in which case genocide might have occured to some extent, which wouldn't have been natural, or modern humans most likely didn't kill them with intent to destroy specific groups, so there was no genocide.

Neanderthals didn't die out because of homosapiens while we did help out with their extinction.

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Or you could just be wrong about what happened to them.

I think that's probably quite likely.

Yet there are currently no living Neanderthals. 

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 09 septembre 2012 - 12:59 .

[The Night Mammoth]

Blueprotoss wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Did you miss that part where genocide is an act commited with intent?

Most of the mass extinctions aren't on purpose and vice versa on genocide.

Yes............... exactly. So it's always humans doing it, and genocide is defined as something humans do to other humans. 

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Humans are the only beings on this planet with that ability.

So there's no such thing as Asian Giant Hornets killing hundreds of bees.

The Hornet isn't there to kill the bees because it doesn't like their stripes, it's there to get inside the hive to obtain food. 

[Blueprotoss]

I am disappoint wrote...

It's just your opinion nothing else killed them off.

I'm so disappointd that you think Neanderthals are still walking around without any proof.

[Blueprotoss]

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Yes............... exactly. So it's always humans doing it, and genocide is defined as something humans do to other humans.

Genocide isn't only attached to humans.

The Night Mammoth wrote...

The Hornet isn't there to kill the bees because it doesn't like their stripes, it's there to get inside the hive to obtain food.

Yet you assume genocide is all about racism and its not.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 09 septembre 2012 - 01:03 .

[GreyLycanTrope]

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...
If that was the case then Neanderthals would still be alive.

Or you could just be wrong about what happened to them.

I think that's probably quite likely. 

Failure to adapt hunting methods after climate change is the most likely scenario.
Jared Diamond has suggested genocide as an alternate hypothesis but the theory's mostly speculation.

[The Night Mammoth]

Blueprotoss wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Of course you have absolute proof for this that throws out the dozens of other hypotheses. 

Oh wait. 

Conflict could have been part of their extinction, in which case genocide might have occured to some extent, which wouldn't have been natural, or modern humans most likely didn't kill them with intent to destroy specific groups, so there was no genocide.

Neanderthals didn't die out because of homosapiens while we did help out with their extinction.

Perhaps. 

Genocide might have occured, but that wouldn't be natural, or it won't have. 

Yet there are currently no living Neanderthals. 

You're likely wrong that they were genocided into extinction.

[Blueprotoss]

Greylycantrope wrote...

Failure to adapt hunting methods after climate change is the most likely scenario.
Jared Diamond has suggested genocide as an alternate hypothesis but the theory's mostly speculation.

This because it is all about adaptation to survive.

[D24O]

Dinosaur DLC on day 1 would've been p cool IMO.

[I am disappoint]

Blueprotoss wrote...

I am disappoint wrote...

It's just your opinion nothing else killed them off.

I'm so disappointd that you think Neanderthals are still walking around without any proof.

I'm disappointed that you fail to comprehend English, yet again.

I'm actually surprised at how fast you fell on your backbone.
Initially you were saying Homosapiens killed them off.
And then you said they helped kill them off.
And now you're saying I said Neanderthals are still walking around.

Honestly you're all the proof I need that Neanderthals are still walking around.

Modifié par I am disappoint, 09 septembre 2012 - 01:07 .

[Blueprotoss]

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Perhaps. 

Genocide might have occured, but that wouldn't be natural, or it won't have. 

Disease is natural just like all the life on Earth is.

The Night Mammoth wrote... 

You're likely wrong that they were genocided into extinction.

Yet I said it was a possibility that homosapiens caused the mass extinction of Neanderthals.

[HiddenInWar]

I will state again, please get this back on topic or this thread will eventually be locked.

[GreyLycanTrope]

Blueprotoss wrote...

Greylycantrope wrote...

Failure to adapt hunting methods after climate change is the most likely scenario.
Jared Diamond has suggested genocide as an alternate hypothesis but the theory's mostly speculation.

This because it is all about adaptation to survive.

Wasn't agreeing with you, genocide is a hypothesis, and not a likely one.

[Blueprotoss]

I am disappoint wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

I am disappoint wrote...

It's just your opinion nothing else killed them off.

I'm so disappointd that you think Neanderthals are still walking around without any proof.

I'm disappointed that you fail to comprehend English, yet again.

I'm actually surprised at how fast you fell on your backbone.
Initially you were saying Homosapiens killed them off.
And then you said they helped kill them off.
And now you're saying I said Neanderthals are still walking around.

Honestly you're all the proof I need that Neanderthals are still walking around.

Ad hominems and insults are everywhere.   

[HiddenInWar]

D24O wrote...

Dinosaur DLC on day 1 would've been p cool IMO.

 

Velociraptor squad mate

Yes. 

[Blueprotoss]

Greylycantrope wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

Greylycantrope wrote...

Failure to adapt hunting methods after climate change is the most likely scenario.
Jared Diamond has suggested genocide as an alternate hypothesis but the theory's mostly speculation.

This because it is all about adaptation to survive.

Wasn't agreeing with you, genocide is a hypothesis, and not a likely one.

I know while I'm saying that homsapiens didn't cause the mass extinction of Neanderthals.  All we have are theories until a time machine is invented.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 09 septembre 2012 - 01:10 .

[drayfish]

@ Blueprotoss:

I have to presume that you are being needlessly contradictory, because almost nothing that you are saying here (which is utterly off-topic, by the way) is making any sense.

Firstly, the definition of 'genocide' is not 'all the creatures is dead'. It is an action. It is a deliberate, ideological act that intends to exterminate a race of beings.

Secondly, you have no conclusive proof of the death of Neanderthals (I cannot believe I just typed that sentence). If you consult any actual scientific anything you will see numerous theories of what may have led to their extinction, some of which include their inability to adapt to their new circumstance, some that even posit interbreeding with the ancestors of modern humans.





EDIT: ...For the love of god I want Dinosaur DLC immediately.

Modifié par drayfish, 09 septembre 2012 - 01:12 .

[The Night Mammoth]

Blueprotoss wrote...

The Night Mammoth wrote...

Yes............... exactly. So it's always humans doing it, and genocide is defined as something humans do to other humans.

Genocide isn't only attached to humans.

Yeah, it is, that's part of the meaning of the term. 

The Night Mammoth wrote...

The Hornet isn't there to kill the bees because it doesn't like their stripes, it's there to get inside the hive to obtain food.

Yet you assume genocide is all about racism and its not.

No, I'm not. 

It's about things only humans are capable of determining. The hornet doesn't care about the bees, it doesn't have any sort of prejudice or agenda, it's there for a completely different reason. Genocide is DELIBERATE. Only humans can do anything like that.