78 réponses à ce sujet

[Shermos]

I'm curious to know how many people changed or did not change the ending they prefer after playing Leviathan and which ending they now choose.

http://social.biowar...85/polls/38964/

Please take the time to vote. Discussion is welcome.

[Someone With Mass]

Nope. It just made me want to choose Destroy even more.

To end their pointless existence, retarded logic and severe case of delusional superiority.

Modifié par Someone With Mass, 31 août 2012 - 09:58 .

[funfryfrenzy]

Someone With Mass wrote...

Nope. It just made me want to chose Destroy even more.

To end their pointless existence, retarded logic and severe case of delusional superiority.

x100

Take a look at avatar.. Imagine Chunk as the Red Pipe..

Modifié par funfryfrenzy, 31 août 2012 - 09:50 .

[saracen16]

No. Besides bringing the synthetics on par with the organics, it would also make them more on par with the Leviathans. The Reapers may be gone, but the organics and synthetics know of Leviathan through the Leviathan Codex. If the Leviathans try anything stupid, the organics will cook them by orbitally bombarding their ocean worlds with molten slag, turning them into calamari for all organics and synthetics to feed on.

[N7 Shadow Liara]

BringBackNihlus wrote...

Nope.

BioWare can release anything they want, even a new Mass Effect game with synthesis as canon. I'll still be blowing the Reapers to hell and gone, no matter what.

[ATiBotka]

Nope.

[d-boy15]

why big seafood alone can change preferred ending?

hell, they even say catalyst is given the instruction about conflict is inevitable, and it task
is to save life at any cost. so, instead, catalyst never saw or had any proof that conflict is
inevitable. it just a shackled AI with false instruction.

seafood as a threat? funny... they can't even protect themselves and the conversation in
DLC didn't had any point that suggest they will (or could) try something after war.

also, didn't EC made all ending (even refuse) outcome to be good?

Modifié par d-boy15, 31 août 2012 - 09:58 .

[JeffZero]

Nope. Still a Synthesis/Control supporter.

[fchopin]

Nope, still shoots the pipe.

[Mr Cloud]

Nope, I'm still shooting the pipe.

edit: ninja'd

Modifié par Mr Cloud, 31 août 2012 - 10:02 .

[Mavqt]

fchopin wrote...

Nope, still shoots the pipe.

[devSin]

They can proselytize all they want.

I'm not going to pick synthesis.

[Mimitochan]

I picked "I prefer Destroy and the DLC did not change my preference.", though i would rather say i can't see myself picking any other ending. My actual prefered ending in theory is Refuse.

[KiwiQuiche]

No, I still tell the Catalyst where he can shove it; the next cycle will be able to kill both the Reapers and their moronic creators (by proxy) on their own with no help from the Cruible or that AI.

[Neizd]

Nope, I'm still shooting the pipe, while going into explosion, and taking it manly on myself.

[Remanentmoss01]

No still destroy , I just cant stand the sight of my Shepard being Huskified in the other endings,

[corkey sweet]

Someone With Mass wrote...

Nope. It just made me want to choose Destroy even more.

To end their pointless existence, retarded logic and severe case of delusional superiority.

My thoughts exactly:)

[Heimdall]

All the Leviathan DLC made me think was that they should have made the Leviathans a major part of the primary plot, at least then the Catalyst wouldn't have come so out of nowhere.

[Chardonney]

Destroy, always.

[themikefest]

no I pick destroy for that is the goal from the beginning

[yarpenthemad21]

destroy always.

[NM_Che56]

I pull the trigger harder

[Ashii6]

Naaah. I really like the red color. Seriously though, Control is stupid in so many ways and synthesis is just sick. I won't comment on the Refusal because it is not an option.. at least for now.

[TaradosGon]

I'm not as critical of the ending as many. Though the big thing that I would change about the ending is to make it so the Catalyst DOESN'T tell you how to destroy it nor how to control the Reapers. That information should come from Crucible scientists, TIM, Miranda's father, etc.

The Catalyst was programmed by the Leviathans to find a permanent solution to ending conflict at all costs and has turned the galaxy into one big repeating experiment looking for a solution that it has not yet found (and apparently will not find until the Crucible docks with the Citadel). For him to say "oh by the way this is how you destroy us" (not a solution in Catalyst logic) or "this is how you usurp me and take over the Reapers" (not a solution) is just random and out of character. I'd only have known the character for a matter of minutes by that point, but the fact that he's helping me undermine billions of years of his work is ridiculous.

The Catalyst should tell you nothing except how to achieve Synthesis. Perhaps TIM can tell you before he dies that he has everything set up to achieve Control but that Indoctrination prevented him from carrying it out, and destroy should similarly be learned from another source, not the Catalyst himself.

Shepard is helpless at the end, and even if you fulfill the goal of destroying the Reapers as you set out to do, you are only able to do so with the Catalyst's consent and help, which is random, ridiculous, and robs Shepard of his big moment in achieving victory.

Leviathan only reinforced this belief for me, since it made it clear that the Catalyst is a rebellious program (and Leviathans are even too arrogant to admit they made a mistake). The Catalyst should not voluntarily tell you how to terminate it nor how to usurp it - especially if for some reason it's OK with Shepard using the Crucible to destroy it, but refuses to allow Shepard to destroy it by other means.