Because of this:
http://news.cnet.com...for-on-purpose/
This is why games like Mass Effect 3 and Skyrim are being screwed over on the PS3.
Another PS3 crybaby
Débuté par
Frogman1975
, août 31 2012 09:44
Retour en haut
#52
Guest_Rubios_*
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 02:28
Guest_Rubios_*
Guest_Rubios_*
-
- Guests
Miekkas wrote...
Because of this:
http://news.cnet.com...for-on-purpose/
This is why games like Mass Effect 3 and Skyrim are being screwed over on the PS3.
And still, the 70% of the studios have no problem with it.
At this point bad developers are the reason why some games are being screwed over, not the split memory pool / SPUs.
Modifié par Rubios, 04 septembre 2012 - 02:59 .
#53
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 11:32
inblack
-
- Members
- 203 messages
gtfo little noobBringBackNihlus wrote...
brettc893 wrote...
LOL
Some of the people in this thread who think they Know what they're talking about...
Anyway OP, who cares?
We have plenty of other things to make us happy and proud to own a PS3.
PS3 SUCKS MANG
#54
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 11:36
Beemo
-
- Members
- 5 messages
Rubios has hit the right string
Take a look, the game is almost 1year old, in other words, since its release day and now
they had more than enough time to take the effort to code it for PS3, but apparently they didnt even take the time to bother
anyway i dont really care much, in-game armors combinations are stronger than the DLC weps and the Harrier is the strongest wep
gotta love them arm-chair warrior that say that every PS3 owner is a "ps3-butthurt"...
Take a look, the game is almost 1year old, in other words, since its release day and now
they had more than enough time to take the effort to code it for PS3, but apparently they didnt even take the time to bother
anyway i dont really care much, in-game armors combinations are stronger than the DLC weps and the Harrier is the strongest wep
gotta love them arm-chair warrior that say that every PS3 owner is a "ps3-butthurt"...
#55
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 05:36
Frogman1975
-
- Members
- 273 messages
Rubios wrote...
Miekkas wrote...
Because of this:
http://news.cnet.com...for-on-purpose/
This is why games like Mass Effect 3 and Skyrim are being screwed over on the PS3.
And still, the 70% of the studios have no problem with it.
At this point bad developers are the reason why some games are being screwed over, not the split memory pool / SPUs.
^ This is my opinion too.
EA is just being lazy with PS3 content. They are happy to get the cross promotion and advertising (without making it really clear that everything they are offering as a promotion won't be available on all platforms), but they won't do what is necessary to make it available to the entire player-base. And when it is something as simple as a graphical skin, and turning on a weapon or ability that is already available on a different build, I don't buy the development hardship angle at all.
It's got to be either laziness, some back-door deal with Microsoft, or varying combinations of the two (depending on product).
#56
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 05:39
Frogman1975
-
- Members
- 273 messages
Beemo wrote...
Rubios has hit the right string
Take a look, the game is almost 1year old, in other words, since its release day and now
they had more than enough time to take the effort to code it for PS3, but apparently they didnt even take the time to bother
anyway i dont really care much, in-game armors combinations are stronger than the DLC weps and the Harrier is the strongest wep
gotta love them arm-chair warrior that say that every PS3 owner is a "ps3-butthurt"...
Yeah, I love that too. Especially when the original post states that the lack of promotional DLC isn't a game-breaker, just more of a curiosity / slight aggravation.
