227 réponses à ce sujet

[ld1449]

MerchantGOL wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

IGN likes the ending and defended Bioware but dislikes Levi? *massive headdesk*

They Gave it a Passing Score.

Why do you give a ****???

Honestly you're sitting here decrying everyone's opinion as wrong waving that 7.5 like its the new gospel.

Read the freaking review. The guy said it succeeds in X, Fails in Y and will have a tough time because of Z.

The written word puts the DLC as average. IGN gives everything a 9. something something.

Arrival is rated 7.0 as you mentioned and is widely considered the WORST DLC of ME2 for Leviathan to score a .5 above it is not much when held up to the standard of Shadow Broker and Overlord, which recieved a 9. something and a 8. respectively.

But out of all this the most baffling thing is why you give a rats ass.

You enjoyed it, whoop dee freakin do. Most people here interpret this review as  IGN expressing dissapointment in aspects of this DLC, they're not wrong.

They're also primarilly debating why the change of tone from IGN's unlimited praise and defense of anything and everything ME3 related a few months ago to suddenly nitpicking a huge DLC like they took a surgery class. Giving it a 7.5 when they gave ME3, original endings and all 9.7 I believe.

So again, in this whole thing what vested interest do you have?

Either we're right, and this whole thing was mediocre/IGN is starting to tell the truth with no more money coming in. Or we're wrong in which case you can rest easy?

Sooooooyeah. Why are you even bothering with this???

[Mr.House]

The issue is they got several things wrong in their review, the biggest being the length of the end dialog. Unless they are talking about the debriefing with Hackett that was fail.

[3DandBeyond]

Seboist wrote...

Mr Cloud wrote...

They didn't get their money this time ;<

Chobot wasn't in it either.

From what I understand someone at IGN was up to play the Leviathan-ok, not really.

[Reptilian Rob]

Typical IGN.

[C9316]

Well I guess someone's not getting anymore money!

[MerchantGOL]

ld1449 wrote...

MerchantGOL wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

IGN likes the ending and defended Bioware but dislikes Levi? *massive headdesk*

They Gave it a Passing Score.

Why do you give a ****???

Honestly you're sitting here decrying everyone's opinion as wrong waving that 7.5 like its the new gospel.

Read the freaking review. The guy said it succeeds in X, Fails in Y and will have a tough time because of Z.

The written word puts the DLC as average. IGN gives everything a 9. something something.

Arrival is rated 7.0 as you mentioned and is widely considered the WORST DLC of ME2 for Leviathan to score a .5 above it is not much when held up to the standard of Shadow Broker and Overlord, which recieved a 9. something and a 8. respectively.

But out of all this the most baffling thing is why you give a rats ass.

You enjoyed it, whoop dee freakin do. Most people here interpret this review as  IGN expressing dissapointment in aspects of this DLC, they're not wrong.

They're also primarilly debating why the change of tone from IGN's unlimited praise and defense of anything and everything ME3 related a few months ago to suddenly nitpicking a huge DLC like they took a surgery class. Giving it a 7.5 when they gave ME3, original endings and all 9.7 I believe.

So again, in this whole thing what vested interest do you have?

Either we're right, and this whole thing was mediocre/IGN is starting to tell the truth with no more money coming in. Or we're wrong in which case you can rest easy?

Sooooooyeah. Why are you even bothering with this???

its the stupidty on this thread that annoys me. the "ign isn't getting paid so they gave it a "Bad" score" 

[Cobretti ftw]

What happened? Did The money stoped flowing? Bioware stoped givin them money? LMAO

Modifié par Cobretti ftw, 01 septembre 2012 - 12:41 .

[B.Shep]

digitalchumps.com/game-reviews/34-360/9556-mass-effect-3-leviathan.html

Modifié par B.Shep, 01 septembre 2012 - 12:34 .

[KiwiQuiche]

They dun got no moolah and are b!tching at Bioware.

Burned girlfriend almost lol

[B.Shep]

Pretty much that...Some of the things they are complaining are stupid.

[Jadebaby]

6.0 wow

[ZackG312]

hahahahahahahahahahaha

even IGN who called us entitled is fed up with this stuff

[ZackG312]

Mr.House wrote...

Also 30 seconds of dialog? LOL. This is why I can't take IGN serious at all. What a joke of a site.

talking about star brat dialog

[Someone With Mass]

Even if I agree that the DLC's story was very meh and not even near the quality of LotSB, since LotSB didn't try to insult me with some incredibly lame and nonsensical background story (quirky dialogues and new environments won't solve everything), that's really credible for a site that was blindly defending everything BioWare just a few months ago.

Stay classy, IGN.

[GreyLycanTrope]

"When you know the outcome it's hard to go back just to hear one more story told by the "Shepard"" Well they got that part right at least.

[7he Island Head]

The Spamming Troll wrote...

7he Island Head wrote...

No, the difference is IGN is no longer getting add money from ME3, so they're being honest now...

make up your mind.

either be a troll, or be cool.

how are we supposed to swap names then?

I do what I want, when I want

[ObserverStatus]

wafflez wrote...
Bioware wouldn't let Colin Moriarty star in it so IGN got mad

Colin Moriarty?  You mean the pimp from Megaton in Fallout 3?  I think that would be Bethesda's call.

[kyban]

7he Island Head wrote...

No, the difference is IGN is no longer getting add money from ME3, so they're being honest now...

I bet there's more truth to this than we know. /sad

[Kalas Magnus]

JBPBRC wrote...

As others have said, looks like IGN didn't get their cut.

[txgoldrush]

Troxa wrote...

Please...this is BS

Sorry, but EA doesn't buy reviews.

Why do EA games, many of them hyped, get low scores?

Medal of Honor was very hyped, but look at the review scores of that game. It dropped EA's stock.

Just face facts, reviewers LIKED MASS EFFECT 3!!!!!! Get over it.

[txgoldrush]

ShepnTali wrote...

This review rips on Bioware's strong suit. Essentially, if you're in this for emotional/character attachment, forget it.

This isn't that kind of DLC....Omega will be, but not this one.

[Cobretti ftw]

txgoldrush wrote...

Troxa wrote...

Please...this is BS

Sorry, but EA doesn't buy reviews.

Why do EA games, many of them hyped, get low scores?

Medal of Honor was very hyped, but look at the review scores of that game. It dropped EA's stock.

Just face facts, reviewers LIKED MASS EFFECT 3!!!!!! Get over it.

I dont want to be the one that will wreck ur innocence.. can some1 plz explain to hin?

[JBPBRC]

Cobretti ftw wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Troxa wrote...

Please...this is BS

Sorry, but EA doesn't buy reviews.

Why do EA games, many of them hyped, get low scores?

Medal of Honor was very hyped, but look at the review scores of that game. It dropped EA's stock.

Just face facts, reviewers LIKED MASS EFFECT 3!!!!!! Get over it.

I dont want to be the one that will wreck ur innocence.. can some1 plz explain to hin?

Just look up Jeff Gerstmann for an example of how much influence a publisher has on reviews.