General User wrote...
What makes Cassandra so special is that she doesn't have any major flaws, defects, or suspect "tendencies", she was just a smart, incredibly attractive, woman who was consistently trying to do the right thing. Many characters in Dragon Age do indeed fall short compared to Cassandra, but that's their fault.
That would be great if I believed that Bioware could actually make a relatively sane character seem appealing, but unfortunately I don't. That might not be a bad thing, because with the way RPG companion mechanics work, you have to leave most companion characterization in their backstory (Zev, Leliana, Alistair), their quirks (Morrigan, Shale, Oghren) and their beliefs (Sten and the
entire freaking cast of DA2)*.
As it stands right now, Cassandra (in terms of characterization and being interesting), is about as interesting as any "rando-background-npc" in Skyrim.
I believe she has potential to be more interesting of course, but you wouldn't want that because you don't like "flawed characters." Besides, the phrase "flawed characters" is such a loaded word. I prefer "tragic heroes."
*Examples, of course, and not an exhaustive list.
Modifié par Ophir147, 06 septembre 2012 - 05:50 .