494 réponses à ce sujet

[C9316]

KENNY4753 wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...
I want a placemat with mazes and crayons

Then make sure you don't colour outside the lines, or you wont get dessert.

  but I want dessert!

Tell ya what, you can have half the desert for full price, and pay for the rest for another fee.

[AresKeith]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...
I want a placemat with mazes and crayons

Then make sure you don't colour outside the lines, or you wont get dessert.

can I get dessert?

[KENNY4753]

C9316 wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...
I want a placemat with mazes and crayons

Then make sure you don't colour outside the lines, or you wont get dessert.

  but I want dessert!

Tell ya what, you can have half the desert for full price, and pay for the rest for another fee.

dldc, downloadable dessert content? 

[Demon560]

The way i see it if people want the endings changed or redone they will have to have hope in the writing team and in some part in Bioware , they can't just create an ending with actual scenes and dailogue options and all those things that would make it a likeable and watchable ending like some want without money, unless they want more still pictures, some here just complain about the ending and how it sucked and still sucked with the EC, but really how much time and money went into that and it was free, I didn't like it but it is appreciated that they polished the endings to some extent and added the joke-refuse which got rid of buzz for me thnx for that, but yeah the endings suck, the writing team and Bioware have all the cards, us complaining and boycotting might have a worse effect then intented and prevent them from actually making more SP and any possibility of making any ending related DLC, if your ok with that or just think holding the Wallet will work ok then thats your choice, but remember who will create your endings IF it works.

[themikefest]

I haven't given up on the boiware team
am just upset they didn't have a scene or dialogue for Samantha in the leviathan dlc
am hopeful they will in future dlc

[Jadebaby]

C9316 wrote...

Tell ya what, you can have half the desert for full price, and pay for the rest for another fee.

Or how about, "sorry I accidently poisoned you.. But here, you can buy the antidote of me if you want?"

@ Demon560, exactly!

[Gemini1179]

Blind faith purchased DA2, ME3 and TOR.

I'm opening my eyes and closing my wallet as it doesn't seem to matter either way.

[Iakus]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

BSN, you have made me very sad by some of these answers

iI'm sorry, but Bioware seems to have shown little to no interest in making DLCs that I would make the game enjoyable to me again.  As such, whether or not they continue to make any more content is largely irrelevant to me.  Unless by some miracle of space magic, they reverse their position.

[Ticonderoga117]

Demon560 wrote...

The way i see it if people want the endings changed or redone they will have to have hope in the writing team

Not going to happen. With Leviathan and the EC, we know they aren't going to remove the very thing that fundamentally breaks the narrative. Instead, they are trying very hard to hammer it into place, and I say bollocks to that. I'll pass.

[Katosu]

You do not support that which you do not like. BioWare has made a stance, and we - as a consumer - must make a stance. Otherwise, we are only strengthening theirs.

So no, I will NOT buy Leviathan. I will watch YouTube videos of it, laugh my ass off at how lame it is, then go on my marry way because I didn't buy another shoddy/**** product from the BioWare team. They've made their bed, and until they step up and offer what people WANT to buy, people won't choose to buy it.

And to hell with them holding those who like the ending hostage because others don't like it.

[devSin]

I haven't given up on the Mass Effect team (with the exception of Mac—he cannot be lead writer if they expect me to buy their next game). I've given up on Mass Effect.

It sounds like you should to. You're clearly expecting something that's never going to happen.

[Dark_Caduceus]

Nope, I have no hope left for them now. They suck.

[Demon560]

Ticonderoga117 wrote...

Demon560 wrote...

The way i see it if people want the endings changed or redone they will have to have hope in the writing team

Not going to happen. With Leviathan and the EC, we know they aren't going to remove the very thing that fundamentally breaks the narrative. Instead, they are trying very hard to hammer it into place, and I say bollocks to that. I'll pass.

Nothings absolute, what i am saying is that the writing team does have the power to change the endings or make them better, not that they will without a doubt get rid of the DEM, though it would help, what happens next is up to the creators of this series that all of us have enjoyed one time or another, but what you decide is up to you i can no more change your opinions, than you can mine.

[The Twilight God]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

Thanks, but it's not even about changing it, just adjusting it to just let Shepard win. I respect their art and wouldn't want them to promise themselves by just scrapping the whole thing as I feel that would hurt Mass Effect too.

I just want Shepard and everyone else to be able to win on the galaxy's terms.

otherwise, what's the point of everything else?

If you want to win on the galaxy's terms pick Destroy.

[The Twilight God]

double post

Modifié par The Twilight God, 02 septembre 2012 - 12:22 .

[chadesh]

I am mostly sure they will never change the ends to my liking. The only ending I will except is shepard alive and well with friends and LI.

If the DLC don't change the ending to shepard being alive and with team and love interest then I won't buy any DLC's.

I could careless about some old person telling a story to a kid that I have no connection with. Nothing in the endings to date has any connection to shepard. It's just some stranger telling a story.

I say this mainly because you never really see them. If shepards love interest was telling a story to a group of children then it would connect, but as it is right now no connections.

[Jadebaby]

The Twilight God wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

Thanks, but it's not even about changing it, just adjusting it to just let Shepard win. I respect their art and wouldn't want them to promise themselves by just scrapping the whole thing as I feel that would hurt Mass Effect too.

I just want Shepard and everyone else to be able to win on the galaxy's terms.

otherwise, what's the point of everything else?

If you want to win on the galaxy's terms pick Destroy.

Bull****, that's sacrificing the Geth and EDI. Both of which I value highly.

I mean, the whole game I spent talking to EDI it was about helping her understand orgnics, and she COULD!

So to then turn around and intentionally kill them just to achieve that goal sucks. Plus it's not OUR terms, it's very much apart of the Catalyst's terms.

[AresKeith]

Jade

[The Twilight God]

Jade8aby88 wrote...

Bull****, that's sacrificing the Geth and EDI. Both of which I value highly.

I mean, the whole game I spent talking to EDI it was about helping her understand orgnics, and she COULD!

So to then turn around and intentionally kill them just to achieve that goal sucks. Plus it's not OUR terms, it's very much apart of the Catalyst's terms.

Well, we don't know what it does to the geth as they aren't tradtional AI and there is no evidence that they are destroyed. EDI is just one individual. If you're willing to let everyone, including the Geth and EDI die or be enslaved because you don't want to actually see the geth and EDI die your logic is no better than Starbinger. 

How is the demise of the Reapers on Starbinger's terms exactly? Reapers dead. Pretty sure that's not what he wanted.

[AresKeith]

The Twilight God wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

Bull****, that's sacrificing the Geth and EDI. Both of which I value highly.

I mean, the whole game I spent talking to EDI it was about helping her understand orgnics, and she COULD!

So to then turn around and intentionally kill them just to achieve that goal sucks. Plus it's not OUR terms, it's very much apart of the Catalyst's terms.

Well, we don't know what it does to the geth as they aren't tradtional AI and there is no evidence that they are destroyed. EDI is just one individual. If you're willing to let everyone, including the Geth and EDI die or be enslaved because you don't want to actually see the geth and EDI die your logic is no better than Starbinger. 

How is the demise of the Reapers on Starbinger's terms exactly? Reapers dead. Pretty sure that's not what he wanted.

the Starbrat finds Destroy as a Temporary Solution because he says their children will create Synthetics and cause the "problem" all over again in the future

[skate4tacos96]

We need to have faith in BioWare. They're not the ones running the Mass Effects into the ground, it's their supposed "fan-base". Clearly, they care about this franchise as much as we do, so if we just stop complaining and just tell them what we want, they might consider it. How can any of you simply refuse to help them after they have helped us many times already? If any of us want to see ME games continue we need to support them and have their backs, before they decide to abandon the entire Mass Effect franchise as a whole. That would definitely be a very sad day for me, and many of you I'm sure. I like the idea of an independant victory, free from the Catalyst's restraints, and I want to see it a reality. But all of this complaining certainly isn't gonna make it happen. So please, for Mass Effects sake, help out.

[Texhnolyze101]

No thanks OP I'll pass on your lame invitation.

[Jadebaby]

AresKeith wrote...

The Twilight God wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

Bull****, that's sacrificing the Geth and EDI. Both of which I value highly.

I mean, the whole game I spent talking to EDI it was about helping her understand orgnics, and she COULD!

So to then turn around and intentionally kill them just to achieve that goal sucks. Plus it's not OUR terms, it's very much apart of the Catalyst's terms.

Well, we don't know what it does to the geth as they aren't tradtional AI and there is no evidence that they are destroyed. EDI is just one individual. If you're willing to let everyone, including the Geth and EDI die or be enslaved because you don't want to actually see the geth and EDI die your logic is no better than Starbinger. 

How is the demise of the Reapers on Starbinger's terms exactly? Reapers dead. Pretty sure that's not what he wanted.

the Starbrat finds Destroy as a Temporary Solution because he says their children will create Synthetics and cause the "problem" all over again in the future

Precisely.

[The Twilight God]

AresKeith wrote...

The Twilight God wrote...

Jade8aby88 wrote...

Bull****, that's sacrificing the Geth and EDI. Both of which I value highly.

I mean, the whole game I spent talking to EDI it was about helping her understand orgnics, and she COULD!

So to then turn around and intentionally kill them just to achieve that goal sucks. Plus it's not OUR terms, it's very much apart of the Catalyst's terms.

Well, we don't know what it does to the geth as they aren't tradtional AI and there is no evidence that they are destroyed. EDI is just one individual. If you're willing to let everyone, including the Geth and EDI die or be enslaved because you don't want to actually see the geth and EDI die your logic is no better than Starbinger. 

How is the demise of the Reapers on Starbinger's terms exactly? Reapers dead. Pretty sure that's not what he wanted.

the Starbrat finds Destroy as a Temporary Solution because he says their children will create Synthetics and cause the "problem" all over again in the future

No, Destroy is not a solution at all; not temporary or otherwise. In fact, it opens the door for exactly what he wants to prevent. It is in no way, shape or form on its terms.

Modifié par The Twilight God, 02 septembre 2012 - 01:51 .

[TonyIommi]

The presumption is that the forum (and this is true for all game companies with major titles) actually in the end matters or represents somtehing other than a tiny fraction of the community at large or the player base at large. Carry on though, it makes for an amusing discussion.