302 réponses à ce sujet

[Conniving_Eagle]

Atakuma wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

How was this a confirmation of Leviathan selling well?

Him saying we don't have to worry is proof enough that at this time we don't have to worry about more DLC. I rather take the word of someone who would know more about it and works on such DLC compared to your assumption at this stage. His word on this situation is of more value to me than your assumption.

I'm still waiting for a real answer...

And this isn't an assumption. I am questioning the OP's assumption.

It pretty much confirms that there will be more DLC, but that by itself doesn't necessarily mean Leviathen sold well.

Yes, I realize that. I don't need Dragoonlordz to strawman me and state the obvious.

[Atakuma]

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Yes, because he actually takes his time to make thoughtful posts without insulting anyone. Something you seem to be incapable of.

[AresKeith]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

How was this a confirmation of Leviathan selling well?

Him saying we don't have to worry is proof enough that at this time we don't have to worry about more DLC. I rather take the word of someone who would know more about it and works on such DLC compared to your assumption at this stage. His word on this situation is of more value to me than your assumption.

so it wouldn't be because the Omega DLC is probably already in the works, that doesn't mean Leviathan sold well

[Tazzmission]

Atakuma wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Yes, because he actually takes his time to make thoughtful posts without insulting anyone. Something you seem to be incapable of.

that and plus hence the name * angry one* he may want to seek some mental health help for that

[The Angry One]

Atakuma wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Yes, because he actually takes his time to make thoughtful posts without insulting anyone. Something you seem to be incapable of.

Uhuh. Sure. Where did I insult anyone? Oh right, I didn't.
This is especially amusing coming from someone as condescending as you. But by all means, continue to attempt to misrepresent things.

[BatmanPWNS]

Tazzmission wrote...

Atakuma wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Yes, because he actually takes his time to make thoughtful posts without insulting anyone. Something you seem to be incapable of.

that and plus hence the name * angry one* he may want to seek some mental health help for that

It's a she.

[Conniving_Eagle]

Atakuma wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Yes, because he actually takes his time to make thoughtful posts without insulting anyone. Something you seem to be incapable of.

Like the one directed to me?

[Dragoonlordz]

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Meow, hiss hiss.. Your name still suit you it would seem.

I do not care that the OP says selling well just like I don't really care about the person I replied to regarding their assumption that it might not. Two assumptions by those two people.

I was replying about the ideology of the thread title. He says we do not have to worry, a statement from someone with more knowledge and details than others posting in here. If someone at Bioware says we do not have to worry about more DLC I will take his word over someone on here who does not.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:05 .

[The Angry One]

BatmanPWNS wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

Atakuma wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Yes, because he actually takes his time to make thoughtful posts without insulting anyone. Something you seem to be incapable of.

that and plus hence the name * angry one* he may want to seek some mental health help for that

It's a she.

I've far less issue with what people think my gender is than with someone thinking my username means anything.
Though I guess it does show insight into their psyche. I'm the best armchair psychologist ever.

[Conniving_Eagle]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Meow, hiss hiss.. I do not care that the OP says selling well just like I don't really care about the person I replied to regarding their assumption that it might not. Two assumptions by those two people.

I was replying about the ideology of the thread title. He says we do not have to worry, a statement from someone with more knowledge and details than others posting in here. If someone at Bioware says we do not have to worry about more DLC I will take his word over someone on here who does not.

So questioning an assumptiong is an assumption.

The irony.

Assumption-ception

[The Angry One]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Meow, hiss hiss.. Your name still suit you it would seem.

You mistake anger for one pointing out the fact that you meander and flame bait constantly. You know, like right now?

I do not care that the OP says selling well just like I don't really care about the person I replied to regarding their assumption that it might not. Two assumptions by those two people.

I was replying about the ideology of the thread title. He says we do not have to worry, a statement from someone with more knowledge and details than others posting in here. If someone at Bioware says we do not have to worry about more DLC I will take his word over someone on here who does not.

Which has nothing to do with Eagle's post, does it? The issue is where the OP is getting "DLC selling well" from Weekes' assurance that there will be more DLC.

Modifié par The Angry One, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:09 .

[Peranor]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Meow, hiss hiss.. I do not care that the OP says selling well just like I don't really care about the person I replied to regarding their assumption that it might not. Two assumptions by those two people.

I was replying about the ideology of the thread title. He says we do not have to worry, a statement from someone with more knowledge and details than others posting in here. If someone at Bioware says we do not have to worry about more DLC I will take his word over someone on here who does not.

It is true though. You could probably make a very successful career in politics. Because you are an expert on giving non-answers and avoiding the real question 

[Dragoonlordz]

The Angry One wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Meow, hiss hiss.. Your name still suit you it would seem.

You mistake anger for one pointing out the fact that you meander and flame bait constantly? You know, like right now?

Your so funny, go look up flame baiting..

When you post...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

You don't get to use the "he/she is flame biating" card without looking very silly.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:10 .

[Atakuma]

The Angry One wrote...

Atakuma wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Yes, because he actually takes his time to make thoughtful posts without insulting anyone. Something you seem to be incapable of.

Uhuh. Sure. Where did I insult anyone? Oh right, I didn't.
This is especially amusing coming from someone as condescending as you. But by all means, continue to attempt to misrepresent things.

I'd consider a snide remark implying that someone never gives real answers an insult, but whatever. And you calling me condescending is simply the pot calling the kettle black. 

[BatmanPWNS]

People, you're going off-topic.

[The Angry One]

You think that's an insult? You both must have very thin skins, which doesn't suit the attitudes you demonstrate here.

Dragoon, you constantly deliberately  miss the point and give non-answers. Everybody knows this. You did it here. Remarking on a known fact is not an insult. Get over it.

Modifié par The Angry One, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:16 .

[Dragoonlordz]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Meow, hiss hiss.. I do not care that the OP says selling well just like I don't really care about the person I replied to regarding their assumption that it might not. Two assumptions by those two people.

I was replying about the ideology of the thread title. He says we do not have to worry, a statement from someone with more knowledge and details than others posting in here. If someone at Bioware says we do not have to worry about more DLC I will take his word over someone on here who does not.

So questioning an assumptiong is an assumption.

The irony.

Assumption-ception

I asked you no question, I did not question your assumption as it is clear that is what it was. I pointed that whether you think sold well or not it has no impact on what the thread was about which is -a Bioware employee saying we do not have to worry about more DLC. We don't until you can prove otherwise or he says otherwise. Could I have said the same to the OP? Sure but I couldn't be bothered at the time. No point you whining over that.

[Peranor]

Atakuma wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Atakuma wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Yes, because he actually takes his time to make thoughtful posts without insulting anyone. Something you seem to be incapable of.

Uhuh. Sure. Where did I insult anyone? Oh right, I didn't.
This is especially amusing coming from someone as condescending as you. But by all means, continue to attempt to misrepresent things.

I'd consider a snide remark implying that someone never gives real answers an insult, but whatever. And you calling me condescending is simply the pot calling the kettle black. 

It's not so much implying as it simply is stating facts. Though facts can be seen as flame bait I guess. But Dragoonlordz is infamous.

[Conniving_Eagle]

The truth can hurt. Insults are associated with derision.

[Dragoonlordz]

The Angry One wrote...

You think that's an insult? You both must have very thin skins, which doesn't suit the attitudes you demonstrate here.

Dragoon, you constantly deliberately  miss the point and give non-answers. Everybody knows this. You did it here. Remarking on a known fact is not an insult. Get over it.

Shall I apply your logic to your own issue you took offence towards?

It is noted and spoken about by many on here many times how your posts always appear angry and condecending yet when someone as you put it states this "known fact" and that your user name matches such perception you imply it is an insult? Double standards I call that.

[The Angry One]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

You think that's an insult? You both must have very thin skins, which doesn't suit the attitudes you demonstrate here.

Dragoon, you constantly deliberately  miss the point and give non-answers. Everybody knows this. You did it here. Remarking on a known fact is not an insult. Get over it.

Shall I apply your logic to your own issue you took offence towards?

It is noted and spoken about by many on here many times how your posts always appear angry and condecending yet when someone as you put it states this "known fact" and that your user name matches such perception you imply it is an insult? Double standards I call that.

Because you have yet to prove that my posts are angry or condescending.
You seem to make assumptions about the intent behind my words due to my username, which is... funny.

Your behaviour on the other hand I can prove because you're doing it in this very thread.
All Eagle commented on was how does Weekes' assurance prove anything about DLC sales, and you still go on about the relevance of that to the OP, seemingly ignoring the fact that *the OP said it* and that's why it's relevant.

[Reptilian Rob]

The Angry One wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

You think that's an insult? You both must have very thin skins, which doesn't suit the attitudes you demonstrate here.

Dragoon, you constantly deliberately  miss the point and give non-answers. Everybody knows this. You did it here. Remarking on a known fact is not an insult. Get over it.

Shall I apply your logic to your own issue you took offence towards?

It is noted and spoken about by many on here many times how your posts always appear angry and condecending yet when someone as you put it states this "known fact" and that your user name matches such perception you imply it is an insult? Double standards I call that.

Because you have yet to prove that my posts are angry or condescending.
You seem to make assumptions about the intent behind my words due to my username, which is... funny.

Your behaviour on the other hand I can prove because you're doing it in this very thread.
All Eagle commented on was how does Weekes' assurance prove anything about DLC sales, and you still go on about the relevance of that to the OP, seemingly ignoring the fact that *the OP said it* and that's why it's relevant.

This gun b gud. 

Modifié par Reptilian Rob, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:31 .

[ShepnTali]

Eagle is correct in that this says nothing one way or another about Leviathan sales. Kingdoms of Amalur received 2 or 3 healthy sized DLC's, yet the company was in financial distress the whole way.

[Dragoonlordz]

The Angry One wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

You think that's an insult? You both must have very thin skins, which doesn't suit the attitudes you demonstrate here.

Dragoon, you constantly deliberately  miss the point and give non-answers. Everybody knows this. You did it here. Remarking on a known fact is not an insult. Get over it.

Shall I apply your logic to your own issue you took offence towards?

It is noted and spoken about by many on here many times how your posts always appear angry and condecending yet when someone as you put it states this "known fact" and that your user name matches such perception you imply it is an insult? Double standards I call that.

Because you have yet to prove that my posts are angry or condescending.
You seem to make assumptions about the intent behind my words due to my username, which is... funny.

Your behaviour on the other hand I can prove because you're doing it in this very thread.
All Eagle commented on was how does Weekes' assurance prove anything about DLC sales, and you still go on about the relevance of that to the OP, seemingly ignoring the fact that *the OP said it* and that's why it's relevant.

A lot of people see the way you express yourself in your own words then realise what they noticed matches your username not the other way around. Why do you think so many people say you seem angry in your posts and so many say you appear to be responding in a condescending manner? Maybe because you do but merely refuse to acknowledge that. It is interesting how you turned it into yet again another personal ****** for tat as normal with your posts as opposed to topic once again.

Seems to be a bad habit of yours of late.

Edit: You should rename your avatar to the Thread Killer because of your habit of trying to turn every thread into a personal dispute instead of keeping on topic.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:38 .

[The Angry One]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

A lot of people see the way you express yourself in your own words then realise what they noticed matches your username not the other way around. Why do you think so many people say you seem angry in your posts now and again and so many say you appear to be responding in a condescending manner?

You can continue to claim it all you like. I've yet to see you prove it in any way.

Maybe because you do but merely refuse to acknowledge that. It is interesting how you turned it into yet again another personal ****** for tat as normal with your posts as opposed to topic once again.

Seems to be a bad habit of yours of late.

Last I checked, you responded to me. In fact, you are completely ignoring my remarks that are relevant to this topic and rather focusing solely on me like you always do.
Did I force you to respond? But then that's another thing you do isn't it? Accuse others of doing what you're doing. While you're doing it.

You are perfectly welcome to not respond and therefore end this supposed "****** for tat", but I know you well enough to know you always want the final word. But do try to at least address Eagle's point while you're at it.

Modifié par The Angry One, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:39 .