302 réponses à ce sujet

[Dragoonlordz]

The Angry One wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

A lot of people see the way you express yourself in your own words then realise what they noticed matches your username not the other way around. Why do you think so many people say you seem angry in your posts now and again and so many say you appear to be responding in a condescending manner?

You can continue to claim it all you like. I've yet to see you prove it in any way.

Maybe because you do but merely refuse to acknowledge that. It is interesting how you turned it into yet again another personal ****** for tat as normal with your posts as opposed to topic once again.

Seems to be a bad habit of yours of late.

Last I checked, you responded to me. In fact, you are completely ignoring my remarks that are relevant to this topic and rather focusing solely on me?
Did I force you to respond? But then that's another thing you do isn't it? Accuse others of doing what you're doing. While you're doing it.

You are perfectly welcome to not respond and therefore end this supposed "****** for tat", but I know you well enough to know you always want the final word. But do try to at least address Eagle's point while you're at it.

Really? I seem to recall my post was on topic of what Patrick said. You were the one who decided to turn it personal with your post claiming "Waiting for a real answer from dragoon? I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while".

The irony is killing me here. and your kidding no-one.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:44 .

[The Angry One]

Again, I was stating a fact. In fact, you have yet to properly address what Eagle stated.

... you're doing this on purpose aren't you?

[Reptilian Rob]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

A lot of people see the way you express yourself in your own words then realise what they noticed matches your username not the other way around. Why do you think so many people say you seem angry in your posts now and again and so many say you appear to be responding in a condescending manner?

You can continue to claim it all you like. I've yet to see you prove it in any way.

Maybe because you do but merely refuse to acknowledge that. It is interesting how you turned it into yet again another personal ****** for tat as normal with your posts as opposed to topic once again.

Seems to be a bad habit of yours of late.

Last I checked, you responded to me. In fact, you are completely ignoring my remarks that are relevant to this topic and rather focusing solely on me?
Did I force you to respond? But then that's another thing you do isn't it? Accuse others of doing what you're doing. While you're doing it.

You are perfectly welcome to not respond and therefore end this supposed "****** for tat", but I know you well enough to know you always want the final word. But do try to at least address Eagle's point while you're at it.

Really? I seem to recall my post was on topic of what Patrick said. You were the one who decided to turn it personal with your post claiming "Waiting for a real answer from dragoon? I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while".

The irony is killing me here. and your kidding no-one.

*Sees "YOUR killing no-one."*

/You're

/No one

I told you this was gun b gud. 

Modifié par Reptilian Rob, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:44 .

[Dragoonlordz]

The Angry One wrote...

Again, I was stating a fact. In fact, you have yet to properly address what Eagle stated.

... you're doing this on purpose aren't you?

It does show you do not know the difference between topic and person however. My post talking about what the thread is about future DLC and what Patrick said, your post was talking about me and ignoring all of that.

@Rep

Oh no! The grammar police have turned up...

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:46 .

[AresKeith]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Again, I was stating a fact. In fact, you have yet to properly address what Eagle stated.

... you're doing this on purpose aren't you?

It does show you do not know the difference between topic and person however. My post talking about what the thread is about future DLC and what Patrick said, your post was talking about me and ignoring all of that.

@Rep

Oh no! The grammar police have turned up...

she's trying to get you to address Eagle's statement

[Reptilian Rob]

AresKeith wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Again, I was stating a fact. In fact, you have yet to properly address what Eagle stated.

... you're doing this on purpose aren't you?

It does show you do not know the difference between topic and person however. My post talking about what the thread is about future DLC and what Patrick said, your post was talking about me and ignoring all of that.

@Rep

Oh no! The grammar police have turned up...

she's trying to get you to address Eagle's statement

Damn it, don't tell him that! Now my fun is ruined. 

[Dragoonlordz]

AresKeith wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Again, I was stating a fact. In fact, you have yet to properly address what Eagle stated.

... you're doing this on purpose aren't you?

It does show you do not know the difference between topic and person however. My post talking about what the thread is about future DLC and what Patrick said, your post was talking about me and ignoring all of that.

@Rep

Oh no! The grammar police have turned up...

she's trying to get you to address Eagle's statement

Keep telling yourself that.

[AresKeith]

Reptilian Rob wrote...

Damn it, don't tell him that! Now my fun is ruined. 

whoops, well more Palaven http://social.biowar.../index/13252530 lol

Modifié par AresKeith, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:50 .

[The Angry One]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Again, I was stating a fact. In fact, you have yet to properly address what Eagle stated.

... you're doing this on purpose aren't you?

It does show you do not know the difference between topic and person however. My post talking about what the thread is about future DLC and what Patrick said, your post was talking about me and ignoring all of that.

@Rep

Oh no! The grammar police have turned up...

I'm pointing out that what you have said has nothing to do with what Eagle said, and if you're going to respond to him you should actually address what he says.
But, just like I predicted, you aren't. And you're still trying to go on about me!

Well, nevermind. I tried.

[Dragoonlordz]

The Angry One wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Again, I was stating a fact. In fact, you have yet to properly address what Eagle stated.

... you're doing this on purpose aren't you?

It does show you do not know the difference between topic and person however. My post talking about what the thread is about future DLC and what Patrick said, your post was talking about me and ignoring all of that.

@Rep

Oh no! The grammar police have turned up...

I'm pointing out that what you have said has nothing to do with what Eagle said, and if you're going to respond to him you should actually address what he says.
But, just like I predicted, you aren't. And you're still trying to go on about me!

Well, nevermind. I tried.

Really? Pretty sure already answered this long ago.

Maybe you missed it with all the hypocritical comments made since then by you.

I asked you no question, I did not question your assumption as it is clear that is what it was. I pointed that whether you think sold well or not it has no impact on what the thread was about which is -a Bioware employee saying we do not have to worry about more DLC. We don't until you can prove otherwise or he says otherwise.

Ironically answered and posted this prior to your personal insult directed at me.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 05 septembre 2012 - 10:58 .

[AresKeith]

and Eagle said that doesn't mean that Leviathan sold well

[The Angry One]

Yes and that, dragoon, was a non-answer. Because it was irrelevant to what he said.
Eagle asked how does the OP know that this means the DLC sold well. Not what impact DLC sales have.
You were then told it was a non answer. I then remarked that expecting a real answer from you is likely a waste of time. And hey, I was right.

Insult? Fact. Hilariously, you're still doing it.

[Dragoonlordz]

AresKeith wrote...

and Eagle said that doesn't mean that Leviathan sold well

Whether you or she thinks has sold well or not does not matter. Just like did not matter about the OP claiming does. I addressed this issue above. If they say will be lot's more DLC and not to worry about it, then until you prove otherwise or they say different then there will be lot's more DLC.

[Dragoonlordz]

The Angry One wrote...

Yes and that, dragoon, was a non-answer. Because it was irrelevant to what he said.
Eagle asked how does the OP know that this means the DLC sold well. Not what impact DLC sales have.
You were then told it was a non answer. I then remarked that expecting a real answer from you is likely a waste of time. And hey, I was right.

Insult? Fact. Hilariously, you're still doing it.

Do not confuse liking the answer to not being an answer that is relevant to point mentioned.

[AresKeith]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

and Eagle said that doesn't mean that Leviathan sold well

Whether you or she thinks has sold well or not does not matter. Just like did not matter about the OP claiming does. I addressed this issue above. If they say will be lot's more DLC and not to worry about it, then until you prove otherwise or they say different then there will be lot's more DLC.

that still doesn't answer Eagle's comment about "how is that proof that Leviathan is selling good"

[Dragoonlordz]

AresKeith wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

and Eagle said that doesn't mean that Leviathan sold well

Whether you or she thinks has sold well or not does not matter. Just like did not matter about the OP claiming does. I addressed this issue above. If they say will be lot's more DLC and not to worry about it, then until you prove otherwise or they say different then there will be lot's more DLC.

that still doesn't answer Eagle's comment about "how is that proof that Leviathan is selling good"

If it does not matter whether OP thinks is selling well anymore than person replied to thinks might not be. Goes for both those claim selling well and those claiming might not be, it simply does not matter. Until Bioware change their tune on this topic or until one or the other has proof then neither side matter -which was my point and seems some of you are only throwing a hissy fit because I mentioned this to one poster instead of the other. It changes nothing, they said will be lots more DLC to come. For now that means there will be lots more DLC to come which I am glad to hear.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 05 septembre 2012 - 11:31 .

[Mathias]

Atakuma wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Atakuma wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Waiting for a real answer from dragoon?
I hope you brought something good to read. It'll be a while.

Yes, because he actually takes his time to make thoughtful posts without insulting anyone. Something you seem to be incapable of.

Uhuh. Sure. Where did I insult anyone? Oh right, I didn't.
This is especially amusing coming from someone as condescending as you. But by all means, continue to attempt to misrepresent things.

I'd consider a snide remark implying that someone never gives real answers an insult, but whatever. And you calling me condescending is simply the pot calling the kettle black. 

Then i'll call you condescending. There that better?

[UrgentArchengel]

I guess the upcoming DLC has been given The Weekes stamp of epicness.

[Mathias]

To answer Conniving Eagle's question from earlier, no this does not confirm Leviathan has sold well. Especially considering it hasn't even been 2 weeks since release. Bioware has been working on more DLC (probably Omega) for some time now anyways, so it's a given that other DLC is on the way. This is not news. It's fine to get excited, but don't act shocked about it.

Now if i may speculate, I would say Leviathan would at most sell "well". I can't for the life of me see Leviathan selling "great", for many many reasons. Given that it's EA we're talking about, "well" may not be enough for them.

[Tipsyfresh]

Anybody care why he said it in the first place...obviously he mucked it up regardless. But isn't it strange that both statements say very little. "If fans don't buy, no dlc...oops I mean dlc for dayzz."

The statements don't do anything but stir up attention and controversy...oh wait.

[BatmanPWNS]

BringBackNihlus wrote...

wright1978 wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...
I support...Miranda Lawson.

Yessssss.....

Double Yessssss...

L-L-L-LUDICROUS YES

Ain't gonna happen. I mean err... yes.

[I am disappoint]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

How was this a confirmation of Leviathan selling well?

Him saying we don't have to worry is proof enough that at this time we don't have to worry about more DLC. I rather take the word of someone who would know more about it and works on such DLC compared to your assumption at this stage. His word on this situation is of more value to me than your assumption.

Loads of people ****ed at you already for this.
But read what he said again and then read what you said, you will see that what you said is stupid and has nothing to do with sales figures.

[silentassassin264]

Well, I am holding out for a good Omega DLC.


And Aria. One renegade romance, plz.

[Dragoonlordz]

I am disappoint wrote...

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

How was this a confirmation of Leviathan selling well?

Him saying we don't have to worry is proof enough that at this time we don't have to worry about more DLC. I rather take the word of someone who would know more about it and works on such DLC compared to your assumption at this stage. His word on this situation is of more value to me than your assumption.

Loads of people ****ed at you already for this.
But read what he said again and then read what you said, you will see that what you said is stupid and has nothing to do with sales figures.

I suggest it is you who read what I said again.
Here is some free clarification and closure for you in order to prevent you popping a vein.

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 06 septembre 2012 - 08:56 .