The Book of OneTrueShot
#76
Guest_MasterReefa_*
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 05:17
Guest_MasterReefa_*
#77
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 05:17
Which would be a rollback on a nerf a Female quarian has gotten.
Or the "Nudity DLC" Will contain a male quarian.
Modifié par Rokayt, 04 septembre 2012 - 05:18 .
#78
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 05:29
Asebstos wrote...
My lost likely state within the hour:
Picture
My state:
#79
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 05:30

Mine.
#80
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:13
OneTrueShot wrote...
Email.
Female quarian.
Location of shared history/race.
Forget the N.
Geez, I can't even be cryptic with you guys. LET ME HAVE MY FUN, DAMNIT.
OK GUYS.
The e-mail, if it's a reply, it has that nice "re:" tag, right? We got RE.
The female quarian = TALI.
I am assuming that what we're looking for is the name of the DLC, I can think of two options: Retaliate or Retaliation (which would line up nicely with the names of the first two DLCs), but I can't fit either one of them with the third clue, where you're supposed to drop the N.
Ra(NN)och
Pla(N)et
Tikku(N)
I'll grab myself some coffee.
#81
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:15
#82
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:18
[quote]OneTrueShot wrote...
When one person attacks another, what is the action returned? Contemplate this to find enlightenment![/quote]
[/quote]
At this point I'm probably just stupid for not being able to connect Retaliation with the third clue.
Modifié par Killahead, 04 septembre 2012 - 06:19 .
#83
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:19
Killahead wrote...
OneTrueShot wrote...
Email.
Female quarian.
Location of shared history/race.
Forget the N.
Geez, I can't even be cryptic with you guys. LET ME HAVE MY FUN, DAMNIT.
OK GUYS.
The e-mail, if it's a reply, it has that nice "re:" tag, right? We got RE.
The female quarian = TALI.
I am assuming that what we're looking for is the name of the DLC, I can think of two options: Retaliate or Retaliation (which would line up nicely with the names of the first two DLCs), but I can't fit either one of them with the third clue, where you're supposed to drop the N.
Ra(NN)och
Pla(N)et
Tikku(N)
I'll grab myself some coffee.
Son of a....you got it and didn't even realize it. Just as he said some of us would. I'll give you a shot at finishing it, but I defnitely know the answer and the logic behind it now.
#84
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:22
Killahead wrote...
Also, considering this clue, I'm pretty sure it has to be Retaliation.
At this point I'm probably just stupid for not being able to connect Retaliation with the third clue.
It's the gathering/group of people with a common history part. Just finish looking at the rest of the pieces and you've got it.
Modifié par BjornDaDwarf, 04 septembre 2012 - 06:23 .
#85
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:22
BjornDaDwarf wrote...
Killahead wrote...
OneTrueShot wrote...
Email.
Female quarian.
Location of shared history/race.
Forget the N.
Geez, I can't even be cryptic with you guys. LET ME HAVE MY FUN, DAMNIT.
OK GUYS.
The e-mail, if it's a reply, it has that nice "re:" tag, right? We got RE.
The female quarian = TALI.
I am assuming that what we're looking for is the name of the DLC, I can think of two options: Retaliate or Retaliation (which would line up nicely with the names of the first two DLCs), but I can't fit either one of them with the third clue, where you're supposed to drop the N.
Ra(NN)och
Pla(N)et
Tikku(N)
I'll grab myself some coffee.
Son of a....you got it and didn't even realize it. Just as he said some of us would. I'll give you a shot at finishing it, but I defnitely know the answer and the logic behind it now.
Well, I thought of Nation too, could it be that simple?
Anyway, now it's speculation time. Who is retaliating? The collectors or our new characters?
#86
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:23
#87
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:27
#88
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:29
#89
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:30
Killahead wrote...
Well, I thought of Nation too, could it be that simple?
Anyway, now it's speculation time. Who is retaliating? The collectors or our new characters?
Definitely Nation, fits the rest of the clues.
To me, the only ones who can retaliate are the alliance forces. The reapers struck first, it's up the the allies to strike back, retaliate. Up until the retaking of Earth, the galaxy is mostly just reacting to the Reapers, defending worlds or running away. Retaliation implies punching them back. Taking the fight to them.
But what does that mean? It's not like they have a homeworld to attack. Hmm, actually. There is some stuff in Leviathan that could point to a new mission type, but I won't describe it here as I would hate to spoil it for anyone.
Oh, and nice job figuring it out. I was no where near that close. It's the Re: email part that really threw me. But I had gone back to reading to see if the pieces would fall into place if I wasn't directly thinking about them.
#90
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:32
Rokayt wrote...
Makes me eager for this Friday.
Yeah, and hopefully we'll get some clues about the DLC in the event announcement on Wednesday.
#91
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:35
BjornDaDwarf wrote...
But what does that mean? It's not like they have a homeworld to attack. Hmm, actually. There is some stuff in Leviathan that could point to a new mission type, but I won't describe it here as I would hate to spoil it for anyone.
True! It is starting to make sense now. They pretty much have to give us some clues in this week's event announcement, since we know the DLC is due september. That is, if they are planning to link the event with the DLC, but I assume they will.
#92
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:36
#93
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 06:58
Asebstos wrote...
So, its the name of the DLC then? Retaliation?
Eh, two possiblities. OTS actually knows something and has been dropping clues in some of his posts. Or he's just having some forum fun in a creative way, and using vague enough information that fits well enough that it's believable, even if it's all conjecture on his part.
If it's even close to being true, this is what he has said.
1. DLC is Retaliation - Fits with the first two DLC names (each started with Re) - Fits thematically.
2. New guns will include weapons from the SP Firefight pack - That seems painfully obvious - However, OTS seemed to know the names of those guns before they were announced.
3. New enemy faction, probably collectors - Briefly mentioned awhile ago that they were working on a new faction, but that it was a lot of work and not guaranteed.
4. A change to the Geth to make farming harder. New Geth unit? Change to AI? Would take a patch, not DLC...I think.
Killahead wrote...
True! It is starting to make sense now. They pretty much have to give us some clues in this week's event announcement, since we know the DLC is due september. That is, if they are planning to link the event with the DLC, but I assume they will.
Yep. For anyone who has Leviathon, but doesn't see the connection, read the final Encyclopedia entry-thingie after finishing the DLC. Could point straight at MP.
Modifié par BjornDaDwarf, 04 septembre 2012 - 07:04 .
#94
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 07:02
BjornDaDwarf wrote...
Eh, two possiblities. OTS actually knows something and has been dropping clues in some of his posts. Or he's just having some forum fun in a creative way, and using vague enough information that fits well enough that it's believable, even if it's all conjecture on his part.
Heck, I wanna believe so bad that I started a new thread for it. Credited you in it too, without asking, haha.
#95
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 07:04
BjornDaDwarf wrote...
4. A change to the Geth to make farming harder. New Geth unit? Change to AI? Would take a patch, not DLC...I think.
A new unit could probably be added with DLC. AI might need a patch.
#96
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 07:25
Modifié par CROAT_56, 04 septembre 2012 - 07:26 .
#97
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 07:35
Dey was cheated on, thus, they now troll the forums, making threads titled: "BRYAN JOHNSON EXPOSeD!"
#98
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 07:39
#99
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 07:42
Killahead wrote...
Stop trying to find rational explanations for OneTrueShot's immense knowledge. He is a Biotic God and is not to be questioned with neither the use of logic or petty attempts at deduction.
Butitisntitobviouskillahead?!?!?
#100
Posté 04 septembre 2012 - 07:51





Retour en haut




