JesseLee202 wrote...
This thread needs to ascend.
Agreed there too. Man we really think alike!
Modifié par pirate1802, 06 septembre 2012 - 03:59 .
JesseLee202 wrote...
This thread needs to ascend.
Modifié par pirate1802, 06 septembre 2012 - 03:59 .
Rhayak wrote...
Shepard had a choice not to choose synthesis
Uh, yeah, and water is wet. That doesn't really work to disprove my point.BTW, your example is crap... you equate synthesis as something benevolent when there is no way you can ascertain that.
Actually, there is no way to ascertain it isn't. In the ending cinematic, Synthesis IS benevolent. Period. The only thing you can do is entrench yourself in the baseless assumption that the populace gets brainwashed, like most Synthesis bashers do. That and/or some up with inconsistent headcanon.May I ask why you didn't say that the bomb was actually for napalm instead of cancel curing? Your analogy is utter useless when it is not objective
Uh.... because if i said napalm, THEN it wouldn't have been objective. Duh.
Seriously where the hell is TAO? She'd oppose me but at least she'd understand.
Modifié par Vigilant111, 06 septembre 2012 - 04:15 .
pirate1802 wrote...
JesseLee202 wrote...
This thread needs to ascend.
Agreed there too. Man we really think alike!
ghost9191 wrote...
pirate1802 wrote...
JesseLee202 wrote...
This thread needs to ascend.
Agreed there too. Man we really think alike!
I'm prepared for ascension.
pirate1802 wrote...
Though I must say I haven't seen a single good argument in favour of synthesis brainwashing people other than former enemies getting along? Must be brainwashing! There can be a hundred reasons why former enemies may want to "get along".
EnvyTB075 wrote...
HYR 2.0 wrote...
without Reapers we wouldn´t forced to built the Crucible and wouldn´t forced to choose from Catalyst´s dinner menu.
When did that happen?
Last I checked, those options came from the thing we created: the Crucible. Options that the Catalyst can't influence past offering his $0.02 on the matter.
Actually the choices come from the Citadel, and by extension the Catalyst, since i doubt that Crucible engineers went and created the two terminals in the end game themselves.

Telling people they are stupid doesn't help your case
yeah synthesis is benevolent so are other options.
like you don't have any other than some fanfic?
dude, i get you, okay? is that clear?
wizardryforever wrote...
That's the thing though. Most people are willing to believe what he says about everything else, or at least believe that he believes it, but they suddenly get skeptical when he brings up synthesis. If we take what the Catalyst says with a grain of salt, then pretty much everything he says is called into question.Hrothdane wrote...
The problem I have is that I'm supposed to just take his word for it that we are ready. In the few minutes I spend talking to him, he's already shown me that his judgements and grasp of deductive reasoning are lacking.
Even if I did have faith in his ability to arrive at conclusions via sound logic, I would require evidence to back up his assertions, which he seems loathe to give me. He could explain why he thinks we are ready in more detail, but he doesn't. Whether or not that is his fault or due to the limited time we apparently have is irrelevant; I will not make such an extraordinary decision without extraordinary evidence.
Besides, he cites why he knows that synthesis cannot be forced: he tried it before and it failed every time. Presumably, because he tried to force it on an un-ready galaxy. Interestingly, he doesn't say what happened to the previous cycles that he tried to actually force synthesis on. They were of course harvested, but what were the results of the failure? One's headcanon of that answer could play a significant part in making your choice without metagaming.
But of course, when we actually watch the synthesis ending, we see that it worked perfectly, as intended. So clearly, the galaxy actually was ready.
Queenie4000 wrote...
And of course if we watch the control and destroy ending through the cut scences we aslo see that those options "worked perfectly, as intended" (in so far as doing to the universe what was told to us). I think the biggest problem is that we all have our own way of seeing things, wanting things to go a certain way. Without knowing if Bioware ever really meant for there to be a "cannon ending" (which I don't - I think these endings were specifically intended to give each of us our own ending) we cannot make others agree with the ending that we choose. So no matter how rational you may believe your point to be, for those who simply do not like, did not choose syntheses there really is no way to sway their opinion.
Ieldra2 wrote...
This sums up my thoughts about it perfectly. There's a war for survival, and Synthesis doesn't just end it, it also upgrades everyone with the ability to integrate technology and gives access to a treasure trove of knowledge that puts the sum of all Prothean beacons to shame - and people complain because they didn't ask for it. Call me a cynic, but people complaining about something good is a consequence I can live with very well.Rhayak wrote...
Yes, Synthesis is forced. And yes, the results vastly compensate the absence of popular vote.
Shepard makes the leap of faith and everyone in the Galaxy is shot with green energy. Love it or hate it, now you got green DNA.
As i said sometime ago, if a mad scientist set off a bomb that did nothing except making everyone in the world immune to cancer, forever, would people **** and moan because he "didn't have the right"?
The answer is a resounding yes.... but now you can't get cancer, douchebag. Perhaps after a few generations your descendants will have grown the brains to feel thankful.
As for the line "It cannot be forced", I interpret that as "if you're not ready, the results will be less than satisfactory or it won't work at all." It has nothing to do with the moral dimension of the decision. If you make the decision for the whole galaxy, then you force the change on everyone.
pirate1802 wrote...
Though I must say I haven't seen a single good argument in favour of synthesis brainwashing people other than former enemies getting along? Must be brainwashing! There can be a hundred reasons why former enemies may want to "get along".
paul165 wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
This sums up my thoughts about it perfectly. There's a war for survival, and Synthesis doesn't just end it, it also upgrades everyone with the ability to integrate technology and gives access to a treasure trove of knowledge that puts the sum of all Prothean beacons to shame - and people complain because they didn't ask for it. Call me a cynic, but people complaining about something good is a consequence I can live with very well.Rhayak wrote...
Yes, Synthesis is forced. And yes, the results vastly compensate the absence of popular vote.
Shepard makes the leap of faith and everyone in the Galaxy is shot with green energy. Love it or hate it, now you got green DNA.
As i said sometime ago, if a mad scientist set off a bomb that did nothing except making everyone in the world immune to cancer, forever, would people **** and moan because he "didn't have the right"?
The answer is a resounding yes.... but now you can't get cancer, douchebag. Perhaps after a few generations your descendants will have grown the brains to feel thankful.
As for the line "It cannot be forced", I interpret that as "if you're not ready, the results will be less than satisfactory or it won't work at all." It has nothing to do with the moral dimension of the decision. If you make the decision for the whole galaxy, then you force the change on everyone.
And the price for access to that knowledge is horrific.
You have sentient husks, banshees, brutes - can we say body horror? Yes, yes we can.
The species that was trying to exterminate you is now wandering around your cities and everyone is just supposed to be okay with that?
Yes the knowledge is nice but the cost the galaxy pays is beyond anything even the most mad scientist would willingly accept.
Especially since control gives you access to most of the "good" aspects - knowledge and rebuilding without the body horror of synthesis.
That of course disregards the whole synthesis as written makes very little sense - I am aware Ieldra2 has had a play with and headcanoned it into something far more sane but as written everything is affected by synthesis. Armour, animals, plants. I'm sure the apple tree outside my window as I write this is really "ready" for synthesis not to mention all the fridge logic that synthesised plants and animals generate.
And hey you think uplifting the krogan was bad congratulations you have just uplifted everyone.
I don't think it ever shows or claims that the behavioral changes happen instantly. The slides happen an indefinite period of time after the end. Maybe it's a few days, maybe it's several months or even years. We just don't know.Kamfrenchie wrote...
pirate1802 wrote...
Though I must say I haven't seen a single good argument in favour of synthesis brainwashing people other than former enemies getting along? Must be brainwashing! There can be a hundred reasons why former enemies may want to "get along".
I have never seen oppressed civlisation become friend instantly with their oppressor that were exterminating them the daay before.
French-German relationship after WW2 got progressively better, but it didn't happen in a day, and there was a purge of most **** officers and criminals.
To think the galaxy would instantly be frien with reapers who have ben attemptingto exterminate them either mean they are too dumb to live (possible/likely) or brainwashed
wizardryforever wrote...
Shepard asks the Catalyst why it never tried synthesis before, and the Catalyst responds that it did, but every attempt failed. To which Shepard asks "Why?" "Because they were not ready. It is not something that can be. . . forced. You are ready."
then the slides do a poor jobwizardryforever wrote...
I don't think it ever shows or claims that the behavioral changes happen instantly. The slides happen an indefinite period of time after the end. Maybe it's a few days, maybe it's several months or even years. We just don't know.Kamfrenchie wrote...
pirate1802 wrote...
Though I must say I haven't seen a single good argument in favour of synthesis brainwashing people other than former enemies getting along? Must be brainwashing! There can be a hundred reasons why former enemies may want to "get along".
I have never seen oppressed civlisation become friend instantly with their oppressor that were exterminating them the daay before.
French-German relationship after WW2 got progressively better, but it didn't happen in a day, and there was a purge of most **** officers and criminals.
To think the galaxy would instantly be frien with reapers who have ben attemptingto exterminate them either mean they are too dumb to live (possible/likely) or brainwashed
pirate1802 wrote...
I'm a foolish bosh'tet!