Aller au contenu

Photo

It is not something that can be. . . forced.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
224 réponses à ce sujet

#201
Kamfrenchie

Kamfrenchie
  • Members
  • 572 messages

wizardryforever wrote...

-Draikin- wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...
"The cycle will end, the Reapers will cease their harvest, and the civilzations preserved in their forms will be connected to all of us"

Come to think of it, that last part is yet another horrifying thought. Whatever's left of those entire civilizations that were turned into goo isn't something I'd want to be "connected" with. Shepard's Paragon speech after destroying the Reaper on Rannoch actually states he/she wants those souls to rest in peace. That's also why I dislike Control.

wizardyforever wrote...
This doesn't jive with the popular "synthesis forces a change on the galaxy!" line of logic that is so prevalent.  It flat-out contradicts it, in fact.

Uhm, what? The only contradiction here is what the Catalyst says. Obviously Synthesis IS forced by its very definition. Just because the Catalyst says we're "ready" doesn't mean it's actually true. Legion argued against this kind of evolution in Mass Effect 2. He said the geth rejected the Reaper's proposal to force their evolution and turn them into a Reaper, even when that was more or less their goal. He argued that the process of getting there is as important as the results. Unfortunately Bioware had the Geth do the exact opposite in ME3, but the point was still valid. Mording also argued against a forced evolution like this, citing the uplifting of the Krogan as an example of what happens as a result. Yet all this suddenly doesn't matter in the end. And that's not even counting EDI's "I'm alive" speech, which again tramples on what we learn about EDI and Legion in ME2 and most of ME3. To me it's just another example of how utterly stupid the endings are.

The Catalyst is the only source of information on the Crucible's inner workings.  Thus we either trust what he says and use the Crucible, or we assume he's lying (for God knows what reason) and pick refuse.  Don't cherry pick what he may or may not be lying about, because honestly, the proof is nowhere to be found.  Ultimately the Crucible options being explained by the Catalyst and not someone we're more inclined to trust was a poor decision on Bioware's part.  So much of the dislike for the endings is based around the dislike of the Catalyst and the perception that the Catalyst is in control.  That's false, but it is understandable why people feel that way.  But regardless, the Catalyst is our only source of information about synthesis, so if we throw what he says out the window, then what are we left with?  Speculation and headcanon, and nothing else.  You see now why I think we should believe the Catalyst?

And about Mordin's uplifting dialogue, it doesn't apply because it affects everybody equally.  Nobody is being left out, and everyone's core is left the same.  The Krogan uplift was so disasterous because the Krogan were lifted with tech, but no one else was given a comparable rise in power.  That's the big difference.

EDI says "Only now do I feel alive" at the FOB, and "I am alive" in the epilogue.  The key difference is the words "feel" versus "am."  It's analogous to a blind person understanding the concept of color, then getting a miracle operation that gives them sight.  They realize that their previous understanding of color was hollow, a facsimile of the real thing.  I don't see EDI's lines as contradictory in that context.


except the krogans also nuked each other thanks to the technology the salarians brought them, so no, you are wrong. If you were to give rifles to primitive shuman tribes, you would screw up their development even if other civilisations made a super jump forward in their tech.

Also, whether the catalyst lies or no, his logic is fubar, so even if he isn't even tryin to lie, his conclusions are terribad and I question them.

He also doesn't specify what he means by "ready"

Teenagers who undergo puberty are ready to procreate (physically) and also not reeady to procreate (mentally)

Am i ready to fight a war ? tehnicaly, yes, I'm a quite healthy adult and I'd know the basics but I aint mentally prepared for i, nor am I properly trained to be a soldier.

Therefore, The galaxy isn't ready for me. I don't care if technicaly it's possble accordng to the kid, though again,synthesis is stupid space BS, it's not right morally to change everyone without their consent, especially when i know so lttle about th consequences.

Also, reaperss need to die

Modifié par Kamfrenchie, 08 septembre 2012 - 12:12 .


#202
Suspire

Suspire
  • Members
  • 421 messages
"The Krogan uplift was so disasterous because the Krogan were lifted with tech, but no one else was given a comparable rise in power. That's the big difference."
That's really not what the problem was, the problem was the Krogan were an agressive and fast-multiplying species who hadn't learned how to co-exist with other species yet.

It is funny the notion one should believe an AI that spouts Yo-Dawg circular logic and BS "The synthetics will always rebel (wrong, Geth, EDI) and kill their creators so I created some synthetics to kill the creators before they make synthetics that could kill them" lol EAware

Modifié par Suspire, 08 septembre 2012 - 01:54 .


#203
wizardryforever

wizardryforever
  • Members
  • 2 826 messages

Kamfrenchie wrote...

except the krogans also nuked each other thanks to the technology the salarians brought them, so no, you are wrong. If you were to give rifles to primitive shuman tribes, you would screw up their development even if other civilisations made a super jump forward in their tech.

Well no, actually.  The krogan had a nuclear war milennia before the salarians arrived, and had endured a nuclear winter.  They were relatively primitive in the aftermath of that war.  A number of things changed about their society, like blood rage.  Previously it was only something a few krogans suffered from, like a mental disorder.  Then after the nuclear war, for whatever reason that trait became more prominent (I forget the reason why, it's in the codex).  So the salarian uplift happened during this dark age, not when the krogan were at their previously most advanced.

My point was that people use the krogan uplift as a reason why synthesis will become unstable, when it doesn't work because everyone is uplifted equally.  The effects on their culture and whatnot is not what I was talking about, nor do I believe it would affect that in a negative way anyway.  But that's headcanon, and I try not to use that in arguments.

#204
Suspire

Suspire
  • Members
  • 421 messages
"because everyone is uplifted equally"
That's not why the krogan uplift didn't work though, it was because they weren't "ready"

#205
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages
Well, as a synthesis supporter I'd concede that the implications of all these species (yahg! omg) being uplifted certainly troubles me.

#206
Kamfrenchie

Kamfrenchie
  • Members
  • 572 messages

wizardryforever wrote...

Kamfrenchie wrote...

except the krogans also nuked each other thanks to the technology the salarians brought them, so no, you are wrong. If you were to give rifles to primitive shuman tribes, you would screw up their development even if other civilisations made a super jump forward in their tech.

Well no, actually.  The krogan had a nuclear war milennia before the salarians arrived, and had endured a nuclear winter.  They were relatively primitive in the aftermath of that war.  A number of things changed about their society, like blood rage.  Previously it was only something a few krogans suffered from, like a mental disorder.  Then after the nuclear war, for whatever reason that trait became more prominent (I forget the reason why, it's in the codex).  So the salarian uplift happened during this dark age, not when the krogan were at their previously most advanced.

My point was that people use the krogan uplift as a reason why synthesis will become unstable, when it doesn't work because everyone is uplifted equally.  The effects on their culture and whatnot is not what I was talking about, nor do I believe it would affect that in a negative way anyway.  But that's headcanon, and I try not to use that in arguments.



If you gave a bunch of assault rifles to every nations in midle age, I tell you it's would be brutal and have negative impact.

Isn't one of the comon sci-fi trope tha you shouldn't intrfer with other lesser species development anyway ?

#207
Kataphrut94

Kataphrut94
  • Members
  • 2 136 messages
From what we've seen of synthesis, isn't it pretty much exactly like the techno-organic parts of Commander Shepard but with radioactive dye? The point of Shepard's cybernetics, which are meant to be the template for synthesis is that they enhance his physical abilities and keep him alive, but not affect his personality in any way.

I wonder what would happen if Miranda had been allowed to put that control chip inside Shepard. Theoretically, if Shepard had chosen synthesis, then suddenly everyone in the galaxy would have a Cerberus control chip inside them. Not much use with Cerberus gone, but all it takes is one lunatic to figure out the control signal, remove their own chip and have instant brain control of everyone in the galaxy.

Thank god for the Illusive Man, eh folks?

#208
DirtyPhoenix

DirtyPhoenix
  • Members
  • 3 938 messages

Kataphrut94 wrote...

From what we've seen of synthesis, isn't it pretty much exactly like the techno-organic parts of Commander Shepard but with radioactive dye? The point of Shepard's cybernetics, which are meant to be the template for synthesis is that they enhance his physical abilities and keep him alive, but not affect his personality in any way.

I wonder what would happen if Miranda had been allowed to put that control chip inside Shepard. Theoretically, if Shepard had chosen synthesis, then suddenly everyone in the galaxy would have a Cerberus control chip inside them. Not much use with Cerberus gone, but all it takes is one lunatic to figure out the control signal, remove their own chip and have instant brain control of everyone in the galaxy.

Thank god for the Illusive Man, eh folks?


Implications... VERY unpleasant!

#209
Suspire

Suspire
  • Members
  • 421 messages
I don't think Shepard's cybernetics have anything to do with synthesis' new DNA thing, so I don't think that would happen.

#210
wizardryforever

wizardryforever
  • Members
  • 2 826 messages

Suspire wrote...

"because everyone is uplifted equally"
That's not why the krogan uplift didn't work though, it was because they weren't "ready"

Well it seems that we've come full circle with this one, since the Catalyst does state that you (meaning this cycle) are ready.

But of course, what "ready" means in this context is something that we've gone over a lot in this thread, so I won't rehash it.

#211
Rip504

Rip504
  • Members
  • 3 259 messages
This game is just one big disappointment.

Modifié par Rip504, 09 septembre 2012 - 03:57 .


#212
Suspire

Suspire
  • Members
  • 421 messages
Yeah, and also depends on whether you believe the psycho AI :P Was just pointing out that the krogan uplift is not an invalid argument for that reason.

Modifié par Suspire, 09 septembre 2012 - 03:57 .


#213
Conniving_Eagle

Conniving_Eagle
  • Members
  • 6 013 messages
"The pinnacle of evolution" is an oxymoron. Even moreso within the context of the Reapers.

Modifié par Conniving_Eagle, 09 septembre 2012 - 04:00 .


#214
Suspire

Suspire
  • Members
  • 421 messages
Yep, like I said the writers just threw away whatever they knew about science XD

#215
inversevideo

inversevideo
  • Members
  • 1 775 messages

wizardryforever wrote...

Suspire wrote...

"because everyone is uplifted equally"
That's not why the krogan uplift didn't work though, it was because they weren't "ready"

Well it seems that we've come full circle with this one, since the Catalyst does state that you (meaning this cycle) are ready.

But of course, what "ready" means in this context is something that we've gone over a lot in this thread, so I won't rehash it.


I don't know. Am I really the only one who thinks the Yahg are not ready? 
Why would I believe that Starkid is aware of the readiness of every species in the galaxy, to undergo synthesis?
If we were ready, for synthesis, then why proceed with the Harvest?

The Starkid is dangerous

Modifié par inversevideo, 09 septembre 2012 - 04:50 .


#216
inversevideo

inversevideo
  • Members
  • 1 775 messages
Sorry, phone is not made for forums. I was trying to say the Starkid is dangerously unbalanced and you are being manipulated.

#217
wizardryforever

wizardryforever
  • Members
  • 2 826 messages

inversevideo wrote...

wizardryforever wrote...

Suspire wrote...

"because everyone is uplifted equally"
That's not why the krogan uplift didn't work though, it was because they weren't "ready"

Well it seems that we've come full circle with this one, since the Catalyst does state that you (meaning this cycle) are ready.

But of course, what "ready" means in this context is something that we've gone over a lot in this thread, so I won't rehash it.


I don't know. Am I really the only one who thinks the Yahg are not ready? 
Why would I believe that Starkid is aware of the readiness of every species in the galaxy, to undergoes synthesis?
If we were ready, for synthesis, then why proceed with the Harvest?

The Starkid is dangerous

If synthesis can be forced, then why doesn't the Catlyst force it instead of continuing the harvest or letting Shepard choose other options?  ;)

Regarding the Yahg, they don't increase in power relative to anyone else.  The increase is purely temporal.  They are better than they were, but the change doesn't make them relatively better off versus everyone else.

#218
Suspire

Suspire
  • Members
  • 421 messages
But based on the krogans' uplift it could be trouble anyway, because they weren't ready to live with other species

Though if everyone has synthetics' hiveminds now and my pc is also a person now then....... problematic.... but I digress

Modifié par Suspire, 09 septembre 2012 - 04:24 .


#219
MetioricTest

MetioricTest
  • Members
  • 1 275 messages

wizardryforever wrote...
If synthesis can be forced, then why doesn't the Catlyst force it instead of continuing the harvest or letting Shepard choose other options?  ;)


Because the Catalyst makes no ****ing sense.

Going to stay on the fence on the argument in general but I just want to point out that anything starting with "Why doesn't the Catalyst...."  is doomed to failure.

#220
Suspire

Suspire
  • Members
  • 421 messages
It is pretty hard to forget his Yo Dawg circular logic to murder/preserve people, and how he TOTALLY FORGETS geth and just keeps lying saying all synthetics rebel. Though Shepard forgets geth too. Lolol Eaware.

#221
wizardryforever

wizardryforever
  • Members
  • 2 826 messages

MetioricTest wrote...

wizardryforever wrote...
If synthesis can be forced, then why doesn't the Catlyst force it instead of continuing the harvest or letting Shepard choose other options?  ;)


Because the Catalyst makes no ****ing sense.

Going to stay on the fence on the argument in general but I just want to point out that anything starting with "Why doesn't the Catalyst...."  is doomed to failure.

Oh come now, you have to try!  Don't just give up!  =]

People try to ascribe all of these supervillian style qualities to the Catalyst, but then when he fails to act like the supervillian they paint him as, they have no answer.  That's the point I was making.

#222
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 431 messages

Suspire wrote...

Yep, like I said the writers just threw away whatever they knew about science XD


The Catalyst is the master of Lego Genetics :lol:

#223
Suspire

Suspire
  • Members
  • 421 messages
Well it's hardly ME fans' job to write the Starbrat more consistantly (or explain his plot holes away), he is obviously a flawed plot device and Eaware just wrote themselves into a corner by using Yo Dawg logic to justify his mass murder tendencies
No one thinks he's the "supervillain", just a badly written psychopath Deus Ex Machina (copied from the Architect)
To go from that to "nah he's probably telling the truth, the geth totally rebelled, and he makes total sense and seems harmless so I can trust him with this big machine" is a bit of a stretch

And so the Starbrat might have a bunch of reasons for not forcing Synthesis himself, they're not hard to think of, like maybe because he prefers to KILL PEOPLE FOREVER and maybe preserve their guts in little glass jars (lol)... When Shepard gets to him he decides it needed to change (for some reason) and offers new solutions -to a nonexistent problem-, which fix nothing because his logic is flawed.
Now there are many reasons to think he might offer these solutions if you think he is afraid of being killed, and so decides to do as much damage as he can before he dies... and thus the citadel, if you think of how bad each of the 3 colored flavors can be and not how wonderful. Specially now with Leaviathan.
But basically if you think of Starbrat as the writers it's easy. It just wants to mess with your head and be "art"
"Art" is above all criticism and logic, because space magic

Modifié par Suspire, 09 septembre 2012 - 06:54 .


#224
wizardryforever

wizardryforever
  • Members
  • 2 826 messages
These sound like deeply held beliefs, Suspire. What brought this on?

#225
Suspire

Suspire
  • Members
  • 421 messages
The fact that ME3 has crappy writing.
You asked and I speculated accordingly.