Aller au contenu

Photo

To everyone who is confused regarding a certain plot point in ME3...


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
266 réponses à ce sujet

#126
Inanna Athanasia

Inanna Athanasia
  • Members
  • 359 messages

BiO_MaN wrote...

iSousek wrote...

BiO_MaN wrote...

iSousek wrote...

AlexMBrennan wrote...

thinking that TIM is indoctrinated, which is completely wrong

Catalyst outright tells you this in the ending so I think you might be mistaken here.


Evolution doesn't prove that TIM is NOT indoctrinated. If anything it hints the opposite.


The Veluvian priests are not a normal form of indoctrination. TIM was not fully transformed, which allowed him to retain his identity, but it also showed him what the Reapers planned. Everything TIM does after that is to thwart the Reapers, not their arrival, but their cycle of harvest. Which is why he never told Shepard about the Alpha Relay, but instead targeted him at the Collectors.


Yes, as I said, Evolution does not exclude the possibility of TIM being indoctrinated. He was in a presence of the reaper artifact, and even more than that.


If TIM was indoctrinated, why the hell did he revive Shepard and pit him against the collectors?


There could be several reasons, however while playing 3, this is what went through my head on it. While Cerberus has some serious ethics issues, on the whole TIM really did want to save humans at the beginning of ME2, however, as he tells Shep, he stopped all other researce and whatnot to devote all resources to getting through the Omega 4 relay, he began to slip in mental thinking. Then his own ego took over when he got the Collector base info from EDI (whether you destroy it or not) and he was to power hungry not to want it all. Time passes from Shep telling him to ***k off at the end of ME2 and he goes hunting for his own quest for Godhood and by the time Shep runs into him on Mars, the man who revived Shep is not the same person or the same mind even as he was before. I don't think they ever say how long it really takes someone to become indoctrinated as it depends on the will of the person (like good ole Shep). There is plenty of time between destroying the Collectors and ME3 for him to become indoctrinated. Especially when you add in him inplating himself with reaper tech. As Jacob asks Shep, "were they blind?" and no they weren't, its just they didn't see while on their mission his beginning slide and once Shep tells him off, who knew what he did after that even more so. Plus, another thing to take into consideration is no matter what you choose to do to the collector base at the end, Cerberus goes and recovers parts of the human/reaper, which means people spent more time around reaper tech too.The Human/Reaper hybrid was also in TIM base and obviously not shielded and he spent all his time there around it. So yes, there is plenty of time for him to become indroctrinated.

Another thought if you like is this: If TIM was indoctrinated prior to reviving Shep, then why would he? All through the game Harbringer is constantly saying they want Shep. We know by now the Reapers want Shep pretty bad, but catching Her/Him has proven to be a royal flop for them. So what better way to catch Shep then to use an agent (TIM) to bring Shep back and then make Shep want to go to them and have a better chance of catching Shep alive? Now you may say if you did LotSB you learn the SB was going to hand Shep over, but Cerberus got Shep and revived Her/Him if he was already going to get Shep's body anyway? Well, if the Reapers really wanted to have Shep to see why they are unlike any other human, alive is preferable, but catching Shep was just not working, so they put into motion what they did and the used Shep's own drive to stop them into a trap to get a LIVE Shep in their hands. They already know Shep will not bow or bend on knee before them after his chat with Sovereign on Virmire and the battle at the citadel that Shep will fight no matter what and it is all consuming to Shep at that point. Laying out a trap like sending  Her/Him after the collectors is exactly something like the reapers would do. Time is nothing to them and allowing Shep to build a team and go on the suicide mission is just a blink of an eye to them anyway, plus if TIM was indoctrinated, then they have a inside view on all of Shep's actions anyway. Is having Shep do that anymore time consuming then what they waited for with using Saren and the Geth? No. And if your going to ask, what about Shep killing all the collectors who work for the reapers, why would they send their slave race to their death, well obviously they don't care since they let them all die at the end as you see Harbringer tell the collector general anyway. So if it took making Shep "think" killing collectora was stopping the reapers, then why would they care? They were tools and expabdable tools at that too.

So thats my take on why I think TIM was indeed indoctrinated. Something I have thought since the beginning of ME2. With his spooky blue eyes, it just reminded me a little to much of Saren's to not think he was. As I played ME2, it just made it that much stronger to me that in ME3 we would find out he was, which is what was said anyway, by Shep, Anderson....and more....

Modifié par InannaAthanasia, 07 septembre 2012 - 10:00 .


#127
Rudy Lis

Rudy Lis
  • Members
  • 2 097 messages

Blueprotoss wrote...

ME3 won't be answering those questions anytime soon.  The answers would most likely be in ME4.


Hehe.Image IPB With that Mayan Armageddon or whats its name I doubt we'll see ME4. Image IPB At least it looks like somebody was hoping for that. Image IPB

But my question on camera was to you, actually. Is such a thing tool or leader? I'd say that's a bit controversional or conflicting to each other. What's your opinion? Not exactly on camera, but on that "little blue child".


Blueprotoss wrote...

So far the Conduit was sabotaged by the Protheans from what Vigil said in ME1.


Well, I have tendency to forget things, but isn't Conduit is relay Protheans built to get to Citadel? Why sabotage it?


Blueprotoss wrote...

Its more so if you're a fan of the series while I can say that the ME comics are enjoyable and interesting.


I guess I was fan of the series, but seeing too much flaws now I just not sure I want to spent my money on anything related. So I'm looking for isolated observant who can lend a hand here. I already stated my problems with books, for example.


Blueprotoss wrote...

It doesn't matter while there are required reads in Halo and Gears to better understand Halo and Gears 3.


Like I said, I have no personal experience with Halo beyond 1-2, so it's about as useful as discuss alcohol with me - I'm teetotaler. Image IPB


Blueprotoss wrote...

It sounds like the lack of enjoyment in Shooters could have formed a bias in you.  Either way whats better is opinion just like what good or bad.


There is enjoyment in shooters - I liked playing Halo, Metro 2033, Medal of Honor (one with Rabbit, Mother, Preacher, Woodoo, and others), Battlefield 3, Far Cry 2 (not one, IMHO those trygens or whatever spoiled all fun, unlike Flood in Halo, though by and large FC2 isn't that great, but I wasn't looking for good story there), Half-life, SW:Republic Commando... Not sure of Bioshocks, or Chronicles of Riddick, or SWAT 3/4, or Jedi Kinght (yeah, I know they are freaking old), or Stalker belong here, plus I've spent significant amount of time in Operation Flashpoint/ArmA community and enjoy those games. Much less codelamers OFP though. And I draw a lot of fun from WH40K: Space Marine, that's for sure. It's not FPS, of course. but it was good. Money well spent. Image IPB Can list few similar games I like, if you wish.
Serious Sam was relatively entertaining back then, as were older Call of Duty series or Medal of Honors (still remember that bazooka guy, bleh!). Now I prefer other games. For example recent MoH I liked very much, much to my own surprise. Crysis, on the contrary, not. For such gamedesign, gamedesigners' hands should be beaten with army belt buckles. Also, I like old Ghost Recon and Rainbow six, but generally don't like newer once. So, go figure.
I guess I just don't like certain elements of games and ME2/3 fell into those categories.


Blueprotoss wrote...

 Yet you're just proving that you don't like the balance in ME3 while it sounds like you would rather prefer a story focused ME1 or a gamplay focused ME2.


I'd prefer best from both worlds. DE:HR has a good story and interesting, variable gameplay, allowing you to choose several approaches, much like, say, Dark Messiah of might and magic - yes, thief sucked, but mage and fighter were quite capable and different, despite same surrounding. As much as I don't like ME2 it has few interesting additions (with proper further development) worthy of combining with ME1 features, which is easily my favorite.

#128
DeathScepter

DeathScepter
  • Members
  • 5 527 messages

BiO_MaN wrote...

iSousek wrote...

BiO_MaN wrote...

iSousek wrote...

AlexMBrennan wrote...

thinking that TIM is indoctrinated, which is completely wrong

Catalyst outright tells you this in the ending so I think you might be mistaken here.


Evolution doesn't prove that TIM is NOT indoctrinated. If anything it hints the opposite.


The Veluvian priests are not a normal form of indoctrination. TIM was not fully transformed, which allowed him to retain his identity, but it also showed him what the Reapers planned. Everything TIM does after that is to thwart the Reapers, not their arrival, but their cycle of harvest. Which is why he never told Shepard about the Alpha Relay, but instead targeted him at the Collectors.


Yes, as I said, Evolution does not exclude the possibility of TIM being indoctrinated. He was in a presence of the reaper artifact, and even more than that.


If TIM was indoctrinated, why the hell did he revive Shepard and pit him against the collectors?


it is called bad writing like Much of the Cerberus related story arch. Well Bioware did tried to make T.I.M. into Saren 2.0 within Mass Effect 3. 

In the ME 2 lead up comic books series with Liara, T.I.M.'s eyes were a part of a High Level biotic implant and it was connect to the frotal area of his brain.


Before ME 3, T.I.M and Cerberus is the natural enemy of Reapers and they were Rengedes to the Alliance Paragon.

#129
Blueprotoss

Blueprotoss
  • Members
  • 3 378 messages

Rudy Lis wrote...

Hehe.Image IPB With that Mayan Armageddon or whats its name I doubt we'll see ME4. Image IPB At least it looks like somebody was hoping for that. Image IPB

Nice!

Rudy Lis wrote... 

But my question on camera was to you, actually. Is such a thing tool or leader? I'd say that's a bit controversional or conflicting to each other. What's your opinion? Not exactly on camera, but on that "little blue child".

It says its the leader along with the indirect comments from Leviathan and Harbinger while I see no reason to disagree.

Rudy Lis wrote... 

Well, I have tendency to forget things, but isn't Conduit is relay Protheans built to get to Citadel? Why sabotage it?

Allow more time for this cycle to defeat the Reapers.

Rudy Lis wrote... 

I guess I was fan of the series, but seeing too much flaws now I just not sure I want to spent my money on anything related. So I'm looking for isolated observant who can lend a hand here. I already stated my problems with books, for example.

Normally knowledge isn't free.


Blueprotoss wrote...

Like I said, I have no personal experience with Halo beyond 1-2, so it's about as useful as discuss alcohol with me - I'm teetotaler. Image IPB

I meant to say Halo 4 while I normally get turned off by mandatory reads on expanded universes.


Rudy Lis wrote... 

There is enjoyment in shooters - I liked playing Halo, Metro 2033, Medal of Honor (one with Rabbit, Mother, Preacher, Woodoo, and others), Battlefield 3, Far Cry 2 (not one, IMHO those trygens or whatever spoiled all fun, unlike Flood in Halo, though by and large FC2 isn't that great, but I wasn't looking for good story there), Half-life, SW:Republic Commando... Not sure of Bioshocks, or Chronicles of Riddick, or SWAT 3/4, or Jedi Kinght (yeah, I know they are freaking old), or Stalker belong here, plus I've spent significant amount of time in Operation Flashpoint/ArmA community and enjoy those games. Much less codelamers OFP though. And I draw a lot of fun from WH40K: Space Marine, that's for sure. It's not FPS, of course. but it was good. Money well spent. Image IPB Can list few similar games I like, if you wish.
Serious Sam was relatively entertaining back then, as were older Call of Duty series or Medal of Honors (still remember that bazooka guy, bleh!). Now I prefer other games. For example recent MoH I liked very much, much to my own surprise. Crysis, on the contrary, not. For such gamedesign, gamedesigners' hands should be beaten with army belt buckles. Also, I like old Ghost Recon and Rainbow six, but generally don't like newer once. So, go figure.
I guess I just don't like certain elements of games and ME2/3 fell into those categories.

There's nothing wrong with this especialy when there's a lot of hate and love that people incuding me have with those mentioned games.

Rudy Lis wrote... 

I'd prefer best from both worlds. DE:HR has a good story and interesting, variable gameplay, allowing you to choose several approaches, much like, say, Dark Messiah of might and magic - yes, thief sucked, but mage and fighter were quite capable and different, despite same surrounding. As much as I don't like ME2 it has few interesting additions (with proper further development) worthy of combining with ME1 features, which is easily my favorite.

I prefer both as well even when ME1 is my favorite, ME2 is my least favorite, and ME3 was the most enjoyable.  The balance is why I loved Space Marines and want to play the RTS games.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 07 septembre 2012 - 11:20 .


#130
Bolt-Action

Bolt-Action
  • Members
  • 367 messages

Blueprotoss wrote...

Bolt-Action wrote...

Last I checked, it's people right to discuss (or b/tch and complain as you call it) the story.

If people (myself included) do not wish to purchase the other media, again, their right. If I buy a book, it'll be a good book, if I purchase something ME related, it'll be DLC.

Opinion is opinion and its okay when its just opinion.

Dont forget the facts in my post;
My (and others) right to chose to purchase/or not other media
My (and others) right to discuss the games story

#131
Blueprotoss

Blueprotoss
  • Members
  • 3 378 messages

Bolt-Action wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

Bolt-Action wrote...

Last I checked, it's people right to discuss (or b/tch and complain as you call it) the story.

If people (myself included) do not wish to purchase the other media, again, their right. If I buy a book, it'll be a good book, if I purchase something ME related, it'll be DLC.

Opinion is opinion and its okay when its just opinion.

Dont forget the facts in my post;
My (and others) right to chose to purchase/or not other media
My (and others) right to discuss the games story

You do have the right to opinion just like everyone else.

#132
ediskrad327

ediskrad327
  • Members
  • 4 031 messages
as much as i like references to the comics and Novels to keep consistency with the Universe you SHOULD NOT NEED them to understand the game

#133
Rudy Lis

Rudy Lis
  • Members
  • 2 097 messages

Blueprotoss wrote...

It says its the leader along with the indirect comments from Leviathan and Harbinger while I see no reason to disagree.


I'\\m afraid I don't have enough linguistic skills to explain why I don't believe it. Mainly because if "little blue child" is the leader, why they needed one Reaper in Hibenation, as emergency transmission relay or runner? And what exactly Protheans did sabotaged and why Reapers leader wasn't able to fix it?


Blueprotoss wrote...

Allow more time for this cycle to defeat the Reapers.


Protheans build Conduit and sabotaged it to let current cycle win? Maybe they sabotaged something that responded on Reapers' signal "open, Sesame" "dinner time!"? Somehow I don't think it was Conduit, maybe they were keepers, or some mechanisms they were maintaining? IIRC Vigil mentioned them.


Blueprotoss wrote...

Normally knowledge isn't free.


It depends on quality of knowledge gained. Because by my evaluation, ME3's overall quality doesn't worth 80 bucks.  


Blueprotoss wrote...

I meant to say Halo 4 while I normally get turned off by mandatory reads on expanded universes.


I guess it depends on overall universe interest. Probably when it were books first, games second. And of course I read bad book used as base for games.


Blueprotoss wrote...

There's nothing wrong with this especialy when there's a lot of hate and love that people incuding me have with those mentioned games.


So I don't have bias towards shooters?Image IPB


Blueprotoss wrote...

I prefer both as well even when ME1 is my favorite, ME2 is my least favorite, and ME3 was the most enjoyable.


Most enjoyable? Can you teach me?Image IPB
I mean there were good moments (not related with Garrus, Valiant and Indra), but they only made rest of the game to look even worse.


Blueprotoss wrote...

The balance is why I loved Space Marines and want to play the RTS games.


As long as single-player part of game left untouched by multi-player "balancing" or is rebalanced as well. Nod gun turrets in CnC (tiberian dawn) - from 250 to 600. My first WTF case. Or another CnC, 3rd, tiberian war, after, 1.05 I think, when they removed defensive constructions from crane's building list. "Build a turret". Aha, yeah, I need to build MCV first. Maybe next time you guys will try not to brush teeth via rectum, there are shorter and more comfortable ways.

#134
Blueprotoss

Blueprotoss
  • Members
  • 3 378 messages

Rudy Lis wrote...

I'm afraid I don't have enough linguistic skills to explain why I don't believe it. Mainly because if "little blue child" is the leader, why they needed one Reaper in Hibenation, as emergency transmission relay or runner? And what exactly Protheans did sabotaged and why Reapers leader wasn't able to fix it?

Think of the Catalyst as a guiding hand instead of a general in the military.

Rudy Lis wrote... 

Protheans build Conduit and sabotaged it to let current cycle win? Maybe they sabotaged something that responded on Reapers' signal "open, Sesame" "dinner time!"? Somehow I don't think it was Conduit, maybe they were keepers, or some mechanisms they were maintaining? IIRC Vigil mentioned them.

The Conduit was sabotaged especially when Sovreign had to physically access it.


Rudy Lis wrote... 

It depends on quality of knowledge gained. Because by my evaluation, ME3's overall quality doesn't worth 80 bucks.

Its up to individuals to buy a game in general whether its the normal edition or one of the collector editions.  If you're really going to measure dollar for dollar on quality then thats a losing battle especially when anything tech related is downgraded upon release and this happens on a daily basis.  Also games degraded over time that will decrease its value just like everything eventualy does.  Personally I judge CE differently then the normal editions because I'm focused on the extra not the game itself.

Rudy Lis wrote...  

I guess it depends on overall universe interest. Probably when it were books first, games second. And of course I read bad book used as base for games.

This is a strong possibilty.

Rudy Lis wrote... 

So I don't have bias towards shooters?[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/wink.png[/smilie]

Everyone has some bias in them.B)

Rudy Lis wrote... 
Most enjoyable? Can you teach me?Image IPB
I mean there were good moments (not related with Garrus, Valiant and Indra), but they only made rest of the game to look even worse.

For starters I judge every game separately like how ME1 was the beginning, ME2 was the middle, and ME3 as the end.  I also did one playthrough for each of the games.  I guess another reason could be me being disappointed with the lack of RPG elements in ME2.

Rudy Lis wrote... 

As long as single-player part of game left untouched by multi-player "balancing" or is rebalanced as well. Nod gun turrets in CnC (tiberian dawn) - from 250 to 600. My first WTF case. Or another CnC, 3rd, tiberian war, after, 1.05 I think, when they removed defensive constructions from crane's building list. "Build a turret". Aha, yeah, I need to build MCV first. Maybe next time you guys will try not to brush teeth via rectum, there are shorter and more comfortable ways.

Even when Starcraft is heavily balanced the Singeplayer usually isn't touched by the Multiplayer changes.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 08 septembre 2012 - 12:19 .


#135
D24O

D24O
  • Members
  • 7 579 messages
Answer me this OP, can you build strength with middle to high reps?

#136
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

D24O wrote...

Answer me this OP, can you build strength with middle to high reps?


Bro he doesn't even lift.

#137
Guest_BringBackNihlus_*

Guest_BringBackNihlus_*
  • Guests
MY UPPER BODY IS MASSIVE

#138
D24O

D24O
  • Members
  • 7 579 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

D24O wrote...

Answer me this OP, can you build strength with middle to high reps?


Bro he doesn't even lift.


Do you even lift?

#139
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

D24O wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

D24O wrote...

Answer me this OP, can you build strength with middle to high reps?


Bro he doesn't even lift.


Do you even lift?


All the time. I have to stay in shape.

#140
D24O

D24O
  • Members
  • 7 579 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

D24O wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

D24O wrote...

Answer me this OP, can you build strength with middle to high reps?


Bro he doesn't even lift.


Do you even lift?


All the time. I have to stay in shape.


So then you answer me that.

#141
The Night Mammoth

The Night Mammoth
  • Members
  • 7 476 messages
So let me get this straight.

Because there are important details contained in out-of-game media sources, like books and comics, which I don't read full-stop, it's then my fault if I get the details of the overall story slightly incorrect, despite coming to a completely logical conclusion from the information the actual product gives me?

gooby pls

#142
bboynexus

bboynexus
  • Members
  • 1 484 messages
He DID NOT say it was your fault.

#143
The Night Mammoth

The Night Mammoth
  • Members
  • 7 476 messages
That first post pretty much implies exactly that.

It's my fault I might not know the story because I haven't shelled out £30 for a bunch of books and comics that I would never usually think about reading, as opposed to it being BioWare's fault for not actually including important details in the game, that product I bought under the impression it would have a complete, functioning, and enjoyable plot. 

Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 08 septembre 2012 - 12:51 .


#144
bboynexus

bboynexus
  • Members
  • 1 484 messages
No, as he has said repeatedly throughout this thread, it's BIOWARE'S fault. Nonetheless, he validly points out that regardless of who is at fault, othe rmaterial should NOT be disregarded based on some idealistic principle at the expense of informed discussion.

#145
The Night Mammoth

The Night Mammoth
  • Members
  • 7 476 messages
Then I apologize for any offense if that is indeed true, as I didn't read every page and thought I had the gist of things.

I still stand by the comments even if they are no longer directed at anyone (except BioWare).

I don't mean to discredit the people who put work into the extended universe materials either. I don't miss out because of concerns of quality, but I guess it's more to do with how much Mass Effect you really want, how invested you are. I play the games because I like the characters it has to offer, and because of the interactivity.

Regardless, all plot essential details should be in the game, not outside it. One product should not be deliberately diminished to make more money. Maybe that's 'just business', but it shouldn't be.

Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 08 septembre 2012 - 01:15 .


#146
bboynexus

bboynexus
  • Members
  • 1 484 messages
Absolutely they should be but, alas, they weren't. Does that mean one should ignore the extended universe and make themselves feel worse about the plot than is necessary?

#147
BiO

BiO
  • Members
  • 2 057 messages

bboynexus wrote...

No, as he has said repeatedly throughout this thread, it's BIOWARE'S fault. Nonetheless, he validly points out that regardless of who is at fault, othe rmaterial should NOT be disregarded based on some idealistic principle at the expense of informed discussion.


I'd just like to expand a little on this - I don't condemnt Bioware for ME3's fail, I blame EA. Bioware's fail is a by-product from that.

#148
The Night Mammoth

The Night Mammoth
  • Members
  • 7 476 messages

bboynexus wrote...

Absolutely they should be but, alas, they weren't. Does that mean one should ignore the extended universe and make themselves feel worse about the plot than is necessary?


I suppose that depends on how bad you feel about the plot. 

A couple of books were never going to solve my problems, so I had to rewrite the entire story. No jokes. Just left school, I have lots of time. 

I will say though that I never really felt that concerned about the details any exteneded-universe material might have. There weren't any gaps I felt they could fill, and to be honest I didn't really think about them that much. Which brings a certain contradiction forward. It seems BioWare/EA/whoever wanted books and the like to be more important, but didn't do a lot to tell people like me, already an avid fan, about them. 

#149
Blueprotoss

Blueprotoss
  • Members
  • 3 378 messages

BiO_MaN wrote...

bboynexus wrote...

No, as he has said repeatedly throughout this thread, it's BIOWARE'S fault. Nonetheless, he validly points out that regardless of who is at fault, othe rmaterial should NOT be disregarded based on some idealistic principle at the expense of informed discussion.


I'd just like to expand a little on this - I don't condemnt Bioware for ME3's fail, I blame EA. Bioware's fail is a by-product from that.

Yet the expanded universe n ME was started under by Micorsoft not EA if you want to walk that road.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 08 septembre 2012 - 02:00 .


#150
MB957

MB957
  • Members
  • 1 526 messages

LanceSolous13 wrote...

If they were such amazingly important plot points, It should have been stated in the game. That is the difference between good writing and bad.

The games themselves should have all the information you need to understand it. If something important happened in one of the books that effects the main game, then I need to know what happened, why it happened, and what the consequences are of what happened.

If the audience is having to ask questions, you've failed as a writer. I'm sorry for how harsh that sounds but the point to being an author is to clearly convey messages and story and asking questions shows that they either didn't state something clearly or didn't state what they needed to in the first place.


thank you!  exactly!