Aller au contenu

Photo

Synthesis, control, destroy or refusal which one fits better for paragon Shepard


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
348 réponses à ce sujet

#201
AngryFrozenWater

AngryFrozenWater
  • Members
  • 9 139 messages
To me all three main options are renegade. Shepard either condones the atrocities of the brat and its boys or commits more of them.

Synthesis is the worst of them all, because Shepard betrays his or her allies by surrendering them and finalizes the goal of the brat to infect all races with synthesis against their will. The failed eugenics experiments and using evolution as a tool with a decreased cycle duration by introducing mass relays and force the civilizations along the paths it desires, causing more atrocities and more reapers, are clear indications of that.

Welcoming the reapers as the saviors of the galaxy goes too far, especially because the gazillion atrocities they have committed. Shepard's "essence of who [he/she] is and what [he/she] is" indicates Shepard's mental features and are mixed into the Crucible's energy, which may be an indication of some kind of mind control and may be responsible for the apathy which is hard to explain in any other way. That essence is surely not used to grow five toes on the quarians' feet or give the krogan Shepard's stunning looks.

Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 07 septembre 2012 - 02:14 .


#202
SlyTF1

SlyTF1
  • Members
  • 383 messages
Destroy.

#203
Rhayak

Rhayak
  • Members
  • 858 messages
Well, both Control and Synthesis require your sacrifice, so take your pick.

Ya know, the more we talk about this, the more i think Destroy will ultimately end up being canon.

I just finished re-reading The Fall of Hyperion for like the tenth time and it's weird to put it next to Mass Effect, when we bring up the idea of getting rid of AIs....

#204
I am disappoint

I am disappoint
  • Members
  • 331 messages
Lol Synthesis is not even renegade, it's just ****ing crazy.
Control is probably sorta Paragon.

#205
guacamayus

guacamayus
  • Members
  • 327 messages
I can't see how giving control over the entire galaxy to one single entity is a good thing, specially when that entity is an AI.
And let's not forget the problem is not solved; the catalyst wanted to prevent synthetics from wiping out organics, the new catalyst wants to protect the future of the many.... can't you see the similarities between the two? If the Catalyst was right all along we are going to have a problem, the only logical outcome (the catalyst spent billions of years studying this problem only to find one possible solution) is the harvest. As someone already said, we are trading one villain for another.

Modifié par guacamayus, 07 septembre 2012 - 02:12 .


#206
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

guacamayus wrote...

As someone already said, we are trading one villain for another.


Of course now with Leviathan you're doing that in all three RGB endings anyway. Hooray!

#207
Comsky159

Comsky159
  • Members
  • 1 093 messages

pirate1802 wrote...

guacamayus wrote...

-the removal of free will of every synthetic out there


Got any proof of this or are we dealing with head cannons here?

It's not just headcanon. It's dead wrong. Bioware confirmed via twitter that control explicitly assumes control of the reapers and not all synthetics.

#208
I am disappoint

I am disappoint
  • Members
  • 331 messages

Comsky159 wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

guacamayus wrote...

-the removal of free will of every synthetic out there


Got any proof of this or are we dealing with head cannons here?

It's not just headcanon. It's dead wrong. Bioware confirmed via twitter that control explicitly assumes control of the reapers and not all synthetics.


Twitter is the new lore for Mass effect, Mass effect 4 will be made up of podcasts and tweets.

#209
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

Comsky159 wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

guacamayus wrote...

-the removal of free will of every synthetic out there


Got any proof of this or are we dealing with head cannons here?

It's not just headcanon. It's dead wrong. Bioware confirmed via twitter that control explicitly assumes control of the reapers and not all synthetics.


Twitter canon is an oxymoron.
Again, explain the Geth/Reaper slide in game. Don't give us this twitter crap.

#210
Comsky159

Comsky159
  • Members
  • 1 093 messages

I am disappoint wrote...

Twitter is the new lore for Mass effect, Mass effect 4 will be made up of podcasts and tweets.

I fear you may be right there :/

#211
Vigilant111

Vigilant111
  • Members
  • 2 477 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Vigilant111 wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Vigilant111 wrote...

1. I don't think renegades have morals, renegades have only oneself

Then you aren't thinking at all.


3. We don't know if there are souls, and we don't know if they are still living after being made into goo

We do know that there are gestalt intelligences, and we  do know the Mass Effect universe's not-so-subtle answer to the question of 'do AI's have souls?'


1. Hey, don't just insult me and walk away, you want to refute my proposal, then you have got some explaining to do

You hardly explained your own position, but sure: there are a large number of Renegade-aligned characters in the game that demonstrate compassion and concern for people other than themselves.

Even in ME1, Wrex, Ashley, Renegade!Kaiden, Renegade!Garrus, and even Renegade!Shepard can all demonstrate concern for people other than themselves. Even ****!Udina shows regard and concern for Human interests, rather than personal greed. The list gets even larger in ME2: Mordin who is tied to one of the most Renegade actions in the lore, Jack, and how you could forget Miranda is only explained by a lack of attempt. This is also ignoring the many Renegade justifications for Renegade actions that focus on 'greater good', a concept that is by its nature concerned with the well-being of other people.

Your proposal is refuted by the existence of Renegade characters, justifications, and themes that contradict it.

3. I am not talking about whether AIs have souls.  Read the post properly. Yes, gestalt intelligences which support the slaughter of so many

You were, however, talking about whether the Reapers can be considered alive. The Mass Effect franchise takes a less than subtle position of 'yes.' Even genocidal AIs are as 'alive' as organics.


1. Okay, I will apologize for over generalising renegades, and for mistakening ruthlessness for selfishness

2. I think HYR 2.0 was referring to organic lives being "preserved" in the reaper form and thus they are alive, and I hold a different view, I do not believe those organic beings were still alive, at least not as organics

Modifié par Vigilant111, 07 septembre 2012 - 02:26 .


#212
D24O

D24O
  • Members
  • 7 579 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Twitter canon is an oxymoron.
Again, explain the Geth/Reaper slide in game. Don't give us this twitter crap.


I imagine after hearing it countless times, Shepard is pretty adept at RELEASING CONTROL.

#213
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

D24O wrote...

The Angry One wrote...

Twitter canon is an oxymoron.
Again, explain the Geth/Reaper slide in game. Don't give us this twitter crap.


I imagine after hearing it countless times, Shepard is pretty adept at RELEASING CONTROL.


Yes I'm sure the over-protective megalomaniac AI that thinks it's in charge of everything will just let the Geth go.

#214
MegaSovereign

MegaSovereign
  • Members
  • 10 794 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Comsky159 wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

guacamayus wrote...

-the removal of free will of every synthetic out there


Got any proof of this or are we dealing with head cannons here?

It's not just headcanon. It's dead wrong. Bioware confirmed via twitter that control explicitly assumes control of the reapers and not all synthetics.


Twitter canon is an oxymoron.
Again, explain the Geth/Reaper slide in game. Don't give us this twitter crap.


The Geth/Reaper slide is also in the Synthesis ending if the Quarians are dead. I don't think that slide implies that Geth are being controlled.

#215
Comsky159

Comsky159
  • Members
  • 1 093 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Twitter canon is an oxymoron.
Again, explain the Geth/Reaper slide in game. Don't give us this twitter crap.

Kinda missing the point there. If the developers who made the game tell you something about the narrative, it's probably going to be more than fan speculation.

But if you want to continue believing that then it's fine.

Anyway, I'll play ball. We only see the quarians and geth really getting along in synthesis; most probably because Bioware wants to push that agenda, much in the same way that they've always pushed Liara as a romance option. I just thought that slide showed that the Reapers were keeping the Geth in check. Basically indicates that the quarians and geth aren't biologically 'assimilated' *shudders* as in synthesis.

#216
guacamayus

guacamayus
  • Members
  • 327 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Comsky159 wrote...

pirate1802 wrote...

guacamayus wrote...

-the removal of free will of every synthetic out there


Got any proof of this or are we dealing with head cannons here?

It's not just headcanon. It's dead wrong. Bioware confirmed via twitter that control explicitly assumes control of the reapers and not all synthetics.


Twitter canon is an oxymoron.
Again, explain the Geth/Reaper slide in game. Don't give us this twitter crap.


This, bioware is in a habit of doing pretty heavy retcons using twitter. I can't take those seriously because most of the time they contradict things directly established ingame. It may be thier intentions but they did a poor job explaining those ingame, twitter isn't available to everyone, in fact I didn't even knew they said such thing.
In fact that statement only makes things worse because as it turns out the crucible can discriminate between synthetics so now is directly contradicting something said by the catalyst.

Modifié par guacamayus, 07 septembre 2012 - 02:37 .


#217
jtav

jtav
  • Members
  • 13 965 messages
As far as the geth being controlled, you get the same slide in Synthesis if the quarians are dead, so a more likely interpretation is that the peace tentative in Control. They're allies, and they can share Rannoch, but they aren't fully integrated with each other as in Synthesis.

#218
Atrumitos

Atrumitos
  • Members
  • 406 messages
I'm still all for IT personally. These endings are downright wrong. "Hello I'm the intelligence behind the reapers and you're sitting in my domain, I'll explain how you can destroy or control us!" Sounds... legit?

It destroyed its own creators ffs! Why doesn't it fight us back?! Something's fishy about it... "We destroy them or they destroy us" is the only true answer as far as I'm concerned.

#219
Chardonney

Chardonney
  • Members
  • 2 199 messages
I always play with nearly full paragon Shep and always choose destroy. Wouldn't even consider the other two options.

#220
Pitznik

Pitznik
  • Members
  • 2 838 messages
Geth did first what Shepard did later - used the strength of the Reapers for their own goals, not for the Reapers goals. That is why Geth with Reaper in the background is fitting illustration to words: "There is power in control. There is wisdom in harnessing the strengths of your enemy." Not because it was done them to them, but because they did it themselves.

Modifié par Pitznik, 07 septembre 2012 - 03:11 .


#221
tanisha__unknown

tanisha__unknown
  • Members
  • 1 288 messages
The answer of many will be the ending they prefer themselves. What you'll get from this thread is an impression how popular each ending is.

Isichar wrote...

Your going to get different answers. What do you feel fits with your paragon Shepard? No one knows him better then you.

This

#222
N172

N172
  • Members
  • 945 messages
If the question is Synthesis or Control, the only possible answer is neither really fits paragon shepard, but synthesis is worse than control.

Synthesis enforces an alteration of all organics and synthetics in order to achieve peace between them.
Just ask yourself, what will happen to:
- Javiks Revenge
- Geth building their own future without interference from outside
- Any hate towards the reapers
Answer, its all gone, at the very least anyone who could oppose that synthesis-peace has to be altered in a way that the persons they were are gone.
Prime example is Javik, the Javik as you know him has to die in order to achieve that synthesis-peace, his body might be still alive but the person he was is dead and replaced by some altered Javik who appeals the catalysts ideas.

Control is basically a Shepard-VI claiming the very same position the catalyst and the leviathans claimed before.
It is still enforcing the own means (in this case shepards) on everything, so, regardless of how "paragon" the intentions are, it has to be judged the same way.

EDIT: I will not go into detail in regards to destroy and refuse because it was not ask, its basically achieving freedom by sacrificing synthetics (destroy) and try to do it your way but fail (refuse).
Both not perfect, but by far more paragon than synthesis and control.

Modifié par N172, 07 septembre 2012 - 04:01 .


#223
teh DRUMPf!!

teh DRUMPf!!
  • Members
  • 9 142 messages

Han Shot First wrote...

HYR 2.0 wrote...

"Kill 'em, it's the only way to be sure" is an attitude that is far more prevalent with Renegade morality than Paragon.


Not when you are talking about giant civilization destroying space Cthulhus that have butchered countless trillions across countless extinction cycles for billions of years. There is no gray area when it comes to the Reapers...they are the very embodiment of evil.


Sorry, you can't deny what is/is not paragon morality when it it's not convenient.

Let's look at the track-record:

-- It is paragon to let a merc walk free, even if said merc was initiated by committing murder.
-- *It is paragon to cure the krogan no matter what, even if it leads to the krogan predictably planning to wage war against the galaxy (see: Destroy EC slide, genophage cured/Wreav only).
-- It is paragon to rewrite the geth heretics (willful Reaper-allies) with a virus, one which doesn't have permanent effects.
-- It is paragon to release obviously-indoctrinated salarians.
-- It is paragon to let a crime lord walk free rather than to arrest her.

Paragon morality has never changed based on who/what you're dealing with. It's always been principle, and that has never been infalliable principle either.


As for "no grey area when it comes to the Reapers" ... you may have been right in ME1, or ME2, but as of now this statement is dead wrong. The entire Catalyst reveal proves that the Reapers are no more responsible for their actions than indoctrinated agents, **both are one in the same: controlled by the catalyst and merely slaves to their own bodies.

* Obvious response: "but I can paragon-convince him not to do that!" yes, but only if you take the renegade response at the necessary time and avoid the paragon action of revealing the sabotage.
**Don't believe it? Catalyst says he controls the Reapers, and that he also controlled indoctrinated TIM.


Taking a risk over idealisitic personal beliefs? Hello, Paragon!

Willingly becoming Reaper is the most renegade act in the entire series.


We're talking about a character who becomes an agent operating above the law in one game, and works for a shady organization considered "terrorist" in another. Assuming power has never been paragon/renegade. How Shepard uses it, is.

It is precisely for this reason why Control has both paragon and renegade variations.

There's nothing to suggest that the catalyst is still around. The Citadel being destroyed lends more credence to him being dead.


The only endings where the Catalyst specifically states that he will be destroyed is Destroy and Control. Not suprisingly he views Synthesis as the ideal solution.


Leap. An ideal solution doesn't - necessarily - entail his survival. It's also fallacious to assume a human reaction where he would even prefer to live/die in any solution. It's abundantly clear that AI and man do not always think the same.


You're assuming it's mercy and committing assisted-suicide over an assumption that they want it. What if there are organic souls, possibly even making up the majority of some Reapers, that would prefer to live?

Synthesis is the only path that truly grants mercy here. They all get to live. If they don't want to live, they can off themselves by flying into a sun or black-hole. It can't be a more unfortunate way to go than being hit by an unstable wave of red energy.


They are Reapers. What they want should not matter one iota to Shepard.


I wasn't the one who brought 'mercy' into the equation.

If you really care about mercy, then what they want does have to matter.

You can't assume mercy if you don't know what they want.

What does matter is what the organic souls trapped within would have wanted before they got turned into Reapers and lost their free will.


Absolutely wrong. What they wanted before stopped mattering after they didn't get it. What's done is done now, you can't change what has happened. What matters now is what they want now.

Synthesis isn't mercy. Assuming for a moment that the people turned into Reapers survive in some form as part of the Reaper conciousness, Synthesis condemns those people to remain trapped in an abomination.


Again, you assume that the still-alive organic souls within the Reapers see it the way you do, that they are trapped in an abomination and that death is a mercy to them. It's entirely possible that some of those souls would prefer continued existence in Reaper form.

Synthesis doesn't condemn them to live. Control does. In synthesis, they can commit suicide if their fate is too horrible for them to live with. It's not perfect, but it's better than assuming suicide on their behalf. Flying into a sun or black-hole can't be a much worse way to go than being hit by the unstable explosion of redness.

Speaking of which, Renegade Shepard is the one who echoes this line of thinking. After it is revealed that the Collectors are mutated Protheans, he concludes that killing them is probably just a mercy.

Modifié par HYR 2.0, 07 septembre 2012 - 04:07 .


#224
FlyingSquirrel

FlyingSquirrel
  • Members
  • 2 105 messages
I used to be a supporter of Paragon Control, but lately I'm leaning a bit more towards Synthesis. As pointed out, assuming that the Reapers (or at least some of them) do have their own consciousness and intelligence, then exchanging forced servitude to the Catalyst for forced servitude to an AI version of Shepard is problematic. Especially since, based on the Synthesis ending, they are non-hostile if left to themselves. I think Paragon Control only really makes sense if you assume that AI-Shepard is leading the Reapers by consensus rather than putting them under some sort of mind control.

Synthesis does force a major change on everybody, and one that many may not want, but it does at least leave everyone alive and free to shape their futures as they see fit without the threat of AI-Shepard going crazy and starting the cycle again or otherwise going off the rails.

#225
ghost9191

ghost9191
  • Members
  • 2 287 messages

Pitznik wrote...

Geth did first what Shepard did later - used the strength of the Reapers for their own goals, not for the Reapers goals. That is why Geth with Reaper in the background is fitting illustration to words: "There is power in control. There is wisdom in harnessing the strengths of your enemy." Not because it was done them to them, but because they did it themselves.


always thought of it more like the reapers watching over them. making sure they don't get uppity and threaten the "peace"