Stornskar wrote...
If there was closure with the Destroy ending - e.g. a reunion with the LI, drinks with Garrus, etc - then nobody would choose the other endings.
Mcfly616 wrote...
http://social.biowar...ndex/14019012/1
QFTShepnTali wrote...
ME1 -- victory was most emotional moment for me.
ME2 -- Again, victory.. with all the crew's eyes on Shepard after the mission. Even Jack knew the score. This was great.
ME3 -- Saying 'potential' goodbyes. Great writing will make you believe the end may be near, even if you're deep down certain it will all be ok in the end.
Stornskar wrote...
If there was closure with the Destroy ending - e.g. a reunion with the LI, drinks with Garrus, etc - then nobody would choose the other endings.
iakus wrote...
LiarasShield wrote...
Ninja Stan wrote...
Your last thread was closed for being confrontational and elitist, both in the thread title and in your responses to others, not because of the opinions you hold. If you can carry on this conversation without name-calling or insults against those who disagree with you, this thread can stay open.LiarasShield wrote...
This is what bothers me the most and I'm not gonna stop talking about it ninja stan you can lock or ban me if you want but it is not something I'm going to just let go of
I don't believe you
Please don't, LiarasShield. I'm as passionate about this topic as you are. It's something I think the devs really need to hear about and address. And don't want to see this thread closed and buried too.
Ticonderoga117 wrote...
Stornskar wrote...
If there was closure with the Destroy ending - e.g. a reunion with the LI, drinks with Garrus, etc - then nobody would choose the other endings.
They shouldn't pick them anyway because they MAKE NO SENSE (Through character building for Control and science for Synthesis), except refuse.
Blueprotoss wrote...
How is that when all the endings reach a certain point and hand holding isn't neccessary.wright1978 wrote...
Nope compare the clarification/closure provided to the other endings in EC and then watch as shep lives is dumped at the end of high EMS destroy like it was a piece of garbage they were desperate to dispose of.
wright1978 wrote...
Yeah i'm sure a canon will eventually be picked. That doesn't excuse their desperate attempts to avoid providing any real clarification/closure for ME3 shep lives ending in EC.
Blueprotoss wrote...
It seems you missed the point especially when DLC and ME4 are involved. If there was post ending DLC then it wold fall under canon while its up to Bioware since ME is their baby.
Modifié par wright1978, 07 septembre 2012 - 08:30 .
Blueprotoss wrote...
It seems you missed the point especially when DLC and ME4 are involved. If there was post ending DLC then it wold fall under canon while its up to Bioware since ME is their baby.wright1978 wrote...
Yeah i'm sure a canon will eventually be picked. That doesn't excuse their desperate attempts to avoid providing any real clarification/closure for ME3 shep lives ending in EC.
LiarasShield wrote...
fil009 wrote...
Its up to your imagination.
It shouldn't have to be I shoudn't have to imagine shepard being alive when all they would've had to do was normandy get a message of him or her being alive or showing his or her face or a team digging shepard out not a full on reunion but something a bit more
Why couldn't they have done that in extended?
Stornskar wrote...
Oh I'm not disagreeing with you ... I would pick Destroy regardless. Just stating that's why they did it. Kind of like eliminating the middle dialogue option, becauase nobody uses it. Again, not agreeing with it, just stating the reason behind it
Stornskar wrote...
If there was closure with the Destroy ending - e.g. a reunion with the LI, drinks with Garrus, etc - then nobody would choose the other endings.
I know what the file name is. I also know what it says on page 323 of the official strategy guide. But I didn't need any of that because I already have common sense. I never needed a poll. LiarasShield obviously does.Jamie9 wrote...
Mcfly616 wrote...
http://social.biowar...ndex/14019012/1
That's a very small poll and isn't representative of anybody.
However, that cutscene is titled "ShepardLives" in teh PC files.
xsdob wrote...
I got closure, than again I've watched enough movies where they have the cliffhanger he's alive thing to know that, well, he's alive.
Modifié par ShepnTali, 07 septembre 2012 - 08:37 .
ShepnTali wrote...
xsdob wrote...
I got closure, than again I've watched enough movies where they have the cliffhanger he's alive thing to know that, well, he's alive.
I've seen them too, but I generally don't have the same kind of connection with the characters. It's easy to accept it there.
Modifié par EJ107, 07 septembre 2012 - 08:43 .
EJ107 wrote...
It never even explains how Shepard DID survive, which is the biggest question of all. Probably because by all accounts it makes no sense. The complete lack of closure is infuriating.
All I wanted from Mass Effect 3 was a satisfying conclusion where the defeat of the Reapers made sense and I go to see Shepard alive and with his LI like he deserved.
Mass Effect 3 gave me neither of those two things, even after the EC, which is why the Mass Effect 3 will forever be remembered by me as one of the largest disappointments of my life, and one of the worst games I have ever played.
EJ107 wrote...
It never even explains how Shepard DID survive, which is the biggest question of all. Probably because by all accounts it makes no sense. The complete lack of closure is infuriating.
All I wanted from Mass Effect 3 was a satisfying conclusion where the defeat of the Reapers made sense and I go to see Shepard alive and with his LI like he deserved.
Mass Effect 3 gave me neither of those two things, even after the EC, and with excessive ammounts of autodialogue and a boring and semi-mandatory MP feature to boot. That is why the Mass Effect 3 will forever be remembered by me as one of the largest disappointments of my life, and one of the worst games I have ever played.
EJ107 wrote...
It never even explains how Shepard DID survive, which is the biggest question of all. Probably because by all accounts it makes no sense. The complete lack of closure is infuriating.
All I wanted from Mass Effect 3 was a satisfying conclusion where the defeat of the Reapers made sense and I go to see Shepard alive and with his LI like he deserved.
Mass Effect 3 gave me neither of those two things, even after the EC, and with excessive ammounts of autodialogue and a boring and semi-mandatory MP feature to boot. That is why the Mass Effect 3 will forever be remembered by me as one of the largest disappointments of my life, and one of the worst games I have ever played.
xsdob wrote...
EJ107 wrote...
It never even explains how Shepard DID survive, which is the biggest question of all. Probably because by all accounts it makes no sense. The complete lack of closure is infuriating.
All I wanted from Mass Effect 3 was a satisfying conclusion where the defeat of the Reapers made sense and I go to see Shepard alive and with his LI like he deserved.
Mass Effect 3 gave me neither of those two things, even after the EC, which is why the Mass Effect 3 will forever be remembered by me as one of the largest disappointments of my life, and one of the worst games I have ever played.
I've had worse dissapointments, and played worse games.
Though I'm sorry for your loss.
Modifié par EJ107, 07 septembre 2012 - 08:51 .
It doesn't. Not by a long shot. The endings of Mass Effect 1 and 2 had an emotional effect on me that I never experienced in a game before. I felt like my Shepard could take on the world,hell the universe even. Mass Effect 3's ending left me sad and hollow and wondering how Bioware could've ****ed up something so easy.iakus wrote...
ME1 Shepard emerging alive: 1:10-2:55
ME2 Shepard rescue by Normandy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5fj0xvMCJg 1:15-3:15
ME3: Shepard "lives" 9:15-11:00
How does ME3's even compare?
Yet the Epilogue is the Stargazer scene and the only ending choice that extends the endings by thousands of years would be the Refusal ending. It doesn't matter if Shepard dies in most of the endings and lives in one of the endings.wright1978 wrote...
Epilogues take place over hundreds of years. Yet destroy dumps a sequence from immediate aftermath and refuses to provide any exposition for it within the epilogue. Other endings have odes to dead sheps, yet live shep doesn't even get the tiniest amount of exposition.
DLC could allow canon to be established since Arrival in ME2 added to ME2's ending. Either way clarity is subjective based on how everyone varies like how most people are fine with ME3 and some people want more hand holding.wright1978 wrote...
No future games may very well pick a canon universe to start from. That's no different from each game having an established default to start from. Future DLC will definitely not, that doesn't mean they couldn't add an extra slide to provide the proper clarity/integration of shep lives into high EMS destroy
xsdob wrote...
^ Marvel vs Capcom 3, waited 10 years for that game. They promised an interesting story, full cutscenes for each character, advanced co-op and multiplayer features.
And what I got had less in it than even street fighter did, and it was made by the same guys to.
Retour en haut