Rotward wrote...
Trolling is delibrately derailing a thread, or pissing people off, just because one can.
I saw your interprutation of massively's stance the way I view US media: leaving out details to dramatize issues. That said, someone called massively delusional, and massively did say something about sociopathic backstabbing... *cough*
Your personal attack on davey was the biggest red flag. Were I aware of your prior acquantence, I probably wouldn't have cried troll. Still, you attacked him personally, and offered no counterarguments. How do you think denial works, if you disagree with his assesment? You don't like it when people state their opinions as facts, but it seems to me, you stated your opinon as fact.
I'll give you that religious debate was on topic as a comparison, but you went on to claim that this thread and all religious debate is pointless. While I don't disagree, it looks inflamatory, and it's you stating your opinion as a fact.
This thread was long off the rails before I even posted here. In fact, given that I called for the end of an argument and added to the discussion I did more to bring it back on topic than I did to derail it. There were a lot of back and forth arguments, disguised insults and so on. And there were more than 2 posters in the argument, too. That's why I left out the details.
I don't know how long you have been around but my "personal attack" is nothing compared to what Davey does on an average day. I find it amusing that you said absolutely nothing when he attacked Massively in this very thread and got on my back when I did the same to Davey. Might be just me, but it would seem that you are hardly impartial. And unlike him I didn't call anybody stupid, I just said he was bad with people, which I believe he is.
And I'll quote it for you:
David7204 wrote...
But it's not actions. It's words. A person continually repeating something to himself or herself is the surest sign they don't believe it. If Miranda really believed being 'normal' was so great she wouldn't feel any need to say so.
Do I really have to explain why this is "surest" nonsense?
And lastly, how many religious debates have you seen that ended in "I can see it clearly now. Boy, how wrong was I"? Yeah, I've never seen anything like that either, especially when 2 headstrong people clash. It's not because we're asses, either. We are programmed to disregard all evidence that endangers our beliefs, it's human nature. Best case scenario would have been a "Let's agree to disagree". Trust me, I might be blunt but I'm hardly combative. There were far more inflamatory things in this thread that you chose to overlook. May I ask why?
Modifié par CynicalShep, 29 novembre 2013 - 04:54 .