Aller au contenu

Photo

Miranda Lawson


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
522 réponses à ce sujet

#176
Kataphrut94

Kataphrut94
  • Members
  • 2 136 messages

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Can you honestly say that everything Cerberus did was a failure?

1. Rachni warriors. A mistake, and admitted as such by Miranda, due to underestimating the intelligence and cognitive abilities of the Rachni.

2. Thorian Creepers. An indirect experiment done on behalf of Cerberus by ExoGeni, and a successful one until events beyond Cerberus or ExoGeni's control (namely the Geth invasion on Feros and Shepard killing the Thorian) caused the Creepers to go insane and attack.

3. Husk experimentation. We don't have the context of the entire experiment, and we don't know what Cerberus was trying to accomplish. Without a named goal, we can't label this as a success or failure based on Cerberus alone. Ultimately, it did fail, but it was due to Shepard's intervention, not due to any experimental crises shown. Granted, Cerberus would've done better to keep their information even more tightly secured.

4. Akuze. My Shepard was the only survivor, and we of course have no information on Cerberus' goals or motive. This cannot be distinguished as a success or failure without information in mind.

5. Lazarus. Unquestionably a success.

6. Overlord. From a purely technical standpoint, the project, despite the costs in personnel, did indeed achieve a way to control the Geth. It achieved its purpose, even if it was in a semi-rogue state. I'd label it a partial success.

7. Teltin: The purpose of this was to create enhanced biotic capability in humans. This succeeded. Jack was created to be an ultra-powerful biotic, and she is indeed an ultra-powerful biotic. Even though the facility was rogue, I would still call it a partial success due to accomplishing its goal.

8. Firewalker: A success, even though it was internally betrayed by a scientist who sold out the project to the Collectors. The Geth also heavily interfered with the project. However, the Hammerhead was field-tested and approved, and the Prothean artifact was recovered and studied, though much of the information was simply beyond the ability to be understood to modern science.

9. The Derelict Reaper: A success. The Reaper IFF was recovered and direct information about the Reapers themselves was gleaned from the derelict Reaper, even at the cost of the crew. Also, the weapon used by the civilization that destroyed the Reaper was recovered.

Name any others?


Euurgh. Let's look at this again.

1. Agreed.

2. Fair enough.

3. Based on Sanctuary, we can probably assume they were looking for ways to control them. Sensible goal, I'll let it slide.

4. Here's where we get into the dregs- you can't give Akuze a pass for not knoweing the exact goal because the method was still stupid and pointlessly evil. Whatever they were trying to do, it must have had something to do with studying thresher maws and there are so many ways they could have done it that didn't involve sacrificing soldiers. You don't study sharks by strapping steaks to unsuspecting snorkellers. The fact that they were human soldiers, the race that Cerberus is supposedly trying to prop up, makes it all the more ridiculous.

5. Except for the fact that mechs killed all but 3 people and they apparently didn't try to retrive any of the all-important data on the cure for death. If the survival of Shepard is more important to Cerberus than the potentially miraculous Project Lazarus technology, then their priorities and level of basic competence is even worse than I thought.

6. The geth weren't controlled, they were running wild. Plus, Gavin only did what he did because the Illusive Man was rushing him. It wouldn't have been unreasonable for him to just explain TIM that he'd made an important breakthrough and needed a bit more time to iron out all the kinks and maybe build a less traumatic crucifix-esque harness for his mentally challenged brother. As it stands, at least one of Archer and TIM was being evil for the sake of it there.

7. Jack never would have been useful to them without Shepard. I forget when she escaped, but there would have been a good few years between the horrific mad science death lab closing down with everyone either dead or abandoning ship to join the Alliance, and the unexpected return of investment in having the one survivor who hates your guts and wants to kill you and all your guys grudgingly working for you via proxy.

8. I never played Firewalker, but it hardly counts since Shepard was doing all the work. I will give Cerberus credit for understanding they get their best work done when it isn't by their own staff.

9. Are you kidding? All the scientists were indoctrinated and huskified and you call that a success? At this point, Shepard is practically Cerberus' Almighty Janitor, cleaning up the messes they make with a weary sigh and showing more knowledge and competency than any of the overpaid higher-ups whose toilets he diligently scrubs. Can you blame him for leaving as soon as the Collectors were done with?

Modifié par Kataphrut94, 27 novembre 2013 - 10:50 .


#177
TheMyron

TheMyron
  • Members
  • 1 804 messages

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

TheMyron wrote...

Miranda has a good body, no doubt, but Jack still beats her sky-high with facial beauty alone.


Nope. Tattoo's, baldness, hawkish pointed face... no I don't see any beauty in Jack's face at all.

But that's alright, it's a subjective opinion.


I was talking about the face; The tattoos are below it, and the buzz-cut/ponytail is above it. She has a much prettier face than Miranda... better pair of lips anyway.

Anyone else agree with me?

#178
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

TheMyron wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

TheMyron wrote...

Miranda has a good body, no doubt, but Jack still beats her sky-high with facial beauty alone.


Nope. Tattoo's, baldness, hawkish pointed face... no I don't see any beauty in Jack's face at all.

But that's alright, it's a subjective opinion.


I was talking about the face; The tattoos are below it, and the buzz-cut/ponytail is above it. She has a much prettier face than Miranda... better pair of lips anyway.

Anyone else agree with me?


I agree.

#179
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

Kataphrut94 wrote...
4. Here's where we get into the dregs- you can't give Akuze a pass for not knoweing the exact goal because the method was still stupid and pointlessly evil. Whatever they were trying to do, it must have had something to do with studying thresher maws and there are so many ways they could have done it that didn't involve sacrificing soldiers. You don't study sharks by strapping steaks to unsuspecting snorkellers. The fact that they were human soldiers, the race that Cerberus is supposedly trying to prop up, makes it all the more ridiculous.


Well, we need a practical demonstration of the Maws capability against armed forces. It's a bit like the urban legend around the Coventry raid, and how the British supposedly allowed the Germans to bomb a civilian target just to confirm that the code they cracked had indeed been legitimate. I can tell you about all sorts of urban legends in the military about units that were wiped out due to secret weapons tests. I honestly can't say I disapprove. And if you're studying the Maws attack patterns, what they look for, how they hunt, etc, then you're going to want to see how they react to weapons attacks. Also, due to lack of information and context on the operation, I headcanon Cerberus as having watched Shepard for some time and using this as a study to see how crafty and resourceful he is, and whether he should be targeted for recruitment. I will acknoweldge this as completely headcanon.

5. Except for the fact that mechs killed all but 3 people and they apparently didn't try to retrive any of the all-important data on the cure for death. If the survival of Shepard is more important to Cerberus than the potentially miraculous Project Lazarus technology, then their priorities and level of basic competence is even worse than I thought.


That was the entire point. To bring Shepard back. Billions of credits and years of near-psuedo-science and dedication to bring back one man who was an icon of humanity and the only person who could truly bring them forward on a galactic level. Also, Lazarus Project was also the Normandy SR-2 and its crew, and its overall mission was to create a team to take on the Collectors. As I said, it succeeds. Cost of life varies on your playthrough.

6. The geth weren't controlled, they were running wild. Plus, Gavin only did what he did because the Illusive Man was rushing him. It wouldn't have been unreasonable for him to just explain TIM that he'd made an important breakthrough and needed a bit more time to iron out all the kinks and maybe build a less traumatic crucifix-esque harness for his mentally challenged brother. As it stands, at least one of Archer and TIM was being evil for the sake of it there.


Cerberus did find a means to hypothetically control the Geth. Yes, the methods were crude and unrefined since the progenitor of this was an unstable autistic man. As for Dr. Archer, how many times do you think he had tried to explain to TIM about delays and setbacks. TIM was calling for the project to end because he didn't believe it was going anywhere. Dr. Archer acted on his own. That said, they weren't being evil. In a panicked rush, yes, but not evil. Granted 'evil' is a very subjective word, but I hold that if it was evil, it would have been a plan to torture David Archer from the start, and they would have drawn pleasure from it. Still, Cerberus proved that the plausibility of the Geth being controlled.

7. Jack never would have been useful to them without Shepard. I forget when she escaped, but there would have been a good few years between the horrific mad science death lab closing down with everyone either dead or abandoning ship to join the Alliance, and the unexpected return of investment in having the one survivor who hates your guts and wants to kill you and all your guys grudgingly working for you via proxy.


Overall though, they did succeed in creating an ultra-powerful biotic. No she didn't end up having a use for Cerberus (unless you leave her on Grissom Academy), but on notional level, they did succeed in their agenda. They proved the plausibility of their agenda once again.

8. I never played Firewalker, but it hardly counts since Shepard was doing all the work. I will give Cerberus credit for understanding they get their best work done when it isn't by their own staff.


It completely counts, since Shepard is indeed a member of Cerberus. Mine is. He is a Cerberus Officer and Agent, actively working towards a goal stipulated by Cerberus, and funded as such. As for the Hammerhead, it was successfully tested. Thank you Cerberus for giving me a badass hover-tank that's really freaking fast and capable of vaulting over obstacles with ease.

9. Are you kidding? All the scientists were indoctrinated and huskified and you call that a success?


They fulfilled their purpose didn't they?

At this point, Shepard is practically Cerberus' Almighty Janitor, cleaning up the messes they make with a weary sigh and showing more knowledge and competency than any of the overpaid higher-ups whose toilets he diligently scrubs. Can you blame him for leaving as soon as the Collectors were done with?


Yes, I can. And do. Essentially, my Shepard was fired from Cerberus. The messes that Cerberus makes are sides for what they do fundamentally achieve. And they did achieve a lot. On this, they did gain information on the Derelict Reaper, and they did gain the Reaper IFF that was vital for the mission.

I will consent that Cerberus Operations due tend to have a very heavy body count.

IMO, if that's the cost to achieving my goals though, then it will be met without hesitation or remorse.

It's why I pride my Shepard on being unfettered.

#180
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

TheMyron wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

TheMyron wrote...

Miranda has a good body, no doubt, but Jack still beats her sky-high with facial beauty alone.


Nope. Tattoo's, baldness, hawkish pointed face... no I don't see any beauty in Jack's face at all.

But that's alright, it's a subjective opinion.


I was talking about the face; The tattoos are below it, and the buzz-cut/ponytail is above it. She has a much prettier face than Miranda... better pair of lips anyway.

Anyone else agree with me?


Nope. As I said, she has a hawkish pointed face and her eyes are brown. That's not very attractive to me.

#181
TheMyron

TheMyron
  • Members
  • 1 804 messages

Rasofe wrote...

Considering my main Shepard convinced him to end himself (and will again this time), I think he died with more pressing regretts than bringing Shepard back to life.


Turning a countless number of innocents into monstrous troops against their will is something he should have been made to regret.

I wanted to give him a taste of my Omni-blade alone for the countless number of nemesis' and phantoms I was forced to gun down. Plus, gunning down innocent teenagers in the back for running for their life?! You're a dead man, TIM!

P.S. Dammit Bioware, why did you make Cerberus into the main villain in ME3?!

#182
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Unfettered, Well-Intentioned Extremists who are above Good vs. Evil, and have a truly noble goal, and are willing to play dirty to achieve their ends.

That's Cerberus.

I wholeheartedly approve.


What do you believe are Cerberus' intentions and goals?

#183
TheMyron

TheMyron
  • Members
  • 1 804 messages

ImaginaryMatter wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Unfettered, Well-Intentioned Extremists who are above Good vs. Evil, and have a truly noble goal, and are willing to play dirty to achieve their ends.

That's Cerberus.

I wholeheartedly approve.


What do you believe are Cerberus' intentions and goals?


Indeed, TIM claims he want to personally control the Reapers for the betterment of humanity, but historically, hasn't every mass-murdering dictator made the same claim? That once he achieves domination, he will help his people?

#184
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

TheMyron wrote...

Turning a countless number of innocents into monstrous troops against their will is something he should have been made to regret.

I wanted to give him a taste of my Omni-blade alone for the countless number of nemesis' and phantoms I was forced to gun down. Plus, gunning down innocent teenagers in the back for running for their life?! You're a dead man, TIM!

P.S. Dammit Bioware, why did you make Cerberus into the main villain in ME3?!


If it's a worthy enough goal or a desperate enough problem, nothing is off the table.

What good were those innocents going to do for the war effort? They're wasting resources that could go towards fighting the Reapers. 

#185
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

ImaginaryMatter wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Unfettered, Well-Intentioned Extremists who are above Good vs. Evil, and have a truly noble goal, and are willing to play dirty to achieve their ends.

That's Cerberus.

I wholeheartedly approve.


What do you believe are Cerberus' intentions and goals?


To bring humanity forward in a galaxy full of knowlegde and wealth, but also danger and hostility. To ensure that we humans survive and thrive in the galaxy, and have a way to effectively stand up for ourselves and our own interests. That does not mean we need to be hostile to other races, but we need to ensure that we have a capability to better represent ourselves.

#186
Rasofe

Rasofe
  • Members
  • 1 065 messages
Wow.
Are most of the other Miranda fans like this too? I mean I heard you guys got the character boards closed and everything. I hope not, guys like Ieldra and jtav seem a lot more grounded.

#187
hot_heart

hot_heart
  • Members
  • 2 682 messages

Rasofe wrote...

Sooo anyway, while I was beating the Fatal Error challenge with only Miranda as a squaddie, a thought struck me: what if this isn't the real Miranda but just a simulation?

I'll let the nature of that question sink in for a minute.

Anyway, after completing Citadel with Femshep (with Miranda unfortunately dead) I can safely say that since she's not available on Armax, she's probably not a simulation, besides being fictional. And I think there was a law against impersonating people - alive or dead - with a VI without likeness contracts or something.
Nice of them to make sure the answer was "no". For those who actually asked the question.

But she doesn't get all excited anymore ("Night night!", "Down you go!", "Yes!") so it's just not the same. :P

#188
Rasofe

Rasofe
  • Members
  • 1 065 messages
I KNOW, RIGHT!
But that's true for everyone. Remember when Kaidan would go "ECM is hot!" and "I think we're good, Commander." in ME1? And Garrus was like IMPRESSIVE.
That was missing in ME3. I guess giving Miranda her battlecries just because they were the best would be favouritism.

Modifié par Rasofe, 28 novembre 2013 - 12:24 .


#189
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

Rasofe wrote...

Wow.
Are most of the other Miranda fans like this too? I mean I heard you guys got the character boards closed and everything. I hope not, guys like Ieldra and jtav seem a lot more grounded.


This is needlessly insulting to me. 

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 28 novembre 2013 - 12:26 .


#190
Rasofe

Rasofe
  • Members
  • 1 065 messages
Why, what makes you think that?
I'm just saying your statements aren't so much illogical as completely insane. Remember, I'm only attacking the argument. By saying that the premises and axioms that you've based what you said on are simply crazy. And of course the "practical" aspect of being completely unpragmatic and having an argument with anyone who sticks out.
It's nothing personal.

#191
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

Rasofe wrote...

Wow.
Are most of the other Miranda fans like this too? I mean I heard you guys got the character boards closed and everything. I hope not, guys like Ieldra and jtav seem a lot more grounded.


Wait, this was a Miranda thread?

#192
Rasofe

Rasofe
  • Members
  • 1 065 messages
At some point.
It was even cool when Ieldra, Jtav, David and I were disussing the whole normality topic for Miranda. Got me thinking a little.
See page 5 post 3.

Modifié par Rasofe, 28 novembre 2013 - 12:31 .


#193
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

Rasofe wrote...

Why, what makes you think that?
I'm just saying your statements aren't so much illogical as completely insane. Remember, I'm only attacking the argument. By saying that the premises and axioms that you've based what you said on are simply crazy. And of course the "practical" aspect of being completely unpragmatic and having an argument with anyone who sticks out.
It's nothing personal.


What's crazy about them?

What's the flaw in my argument?

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 28 novembre 2013 - 12:33 .


#194
Rasofe

Rasofe
  • Members
  • 1 065 messages
The flaw is that they're elementarily wrongly based on a warped and delusional perspective.
I don't think that I could make it more clear. There's a certain fact about insanity - the flaw is in the premises, not the logic. Of course, you could always perfectly well imply anything out of false premises.
I could go into detail, but it looks like everyone else already has. In broad terms it boils down to that individual people don't mean anything at all in your assesments. Ever.
Is that the kind of premise that I'd like to have representing one of my favourite characters? No. Definately not. It's as bad as xenophobes missrepresenting anthropocentrists.

Modifié par Rasofe, 28 novembre 2013 - 12:39 .


#195
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

Rasofe wrote...

The flaw is that they're elementarily wrongly based on a warped and delusional perspective.
I don't think that I could make it more clear. There's a certain fact about insanity - the flaw is in the premises, not the logic. Of course, you could always perfectly well imply anything out of false premises.
I could go into detail, but it looks like everyone else already has.


Why is the premise flawed? You can make this a lot more clear. 

Warped perspective? Delusional? 

Insanity is relative I think.

If it was fundamentally wrong, it wouldn't be able to exist.

#196
Rasofe

Rasofe
  • Members
  • 1 065 messages
Insanity is not relative. For a practical person, you don't use common sense to build premises. And things can be fundamentally wrong and exist, since false statements exist. They're just false.
Adopting false premises in the first place is insane. That's more or less the common definition, seeing the world through a perspective that other people don't use because it doesn't help anything at all except believing whatever you like and calling it "logical".

Modifié par Rasofe, 28 novembre 2013 - 12:42 .


#197
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 674 messages

Rasofe wrote...

Why, what makes you think that?
I'm just saying your statements aren't so much illogical as completely insane. Remember, I'm only attacking the argument. By saying that the premises and axioms that you've based what you said on are simply crazy. And of course the "practical" aspect of being completely unpragmatic and having an argument with anyone who sticks out.
It's nothing personal.


You should probably explain exactly why the statements are insane. I'm not disagreeing with you, just suggesting strategy.

#198
Rasofe

Rasofe
  • Members
  • 1 065 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

Rasofe wrote...

Why, what makes you think that?
I'm just saying your statements aren't so much illogical as completely insane. Remember, I'm only attacking the argument. By saying that the premises and axioms that you've based what you said on are simply crazy. And of course the "practical" aspect of being completely unpragmatic and having an argument with anyone who sticks out.
It's nothing personal.


You should probably explain exactly why the statements are insane. I'm not disagreeing with you, just suggesting strategy.

Yeah, probably, but it's not worth turning this into an argument. If I don't walk out of this with my dignity, at least I will know I did what Massive does: thinly veiled insults directed towards arguments that "accidentally" hit the person saying them.

I think in the end it's insane that Massive argues for validity of refugees being a strain on the war-effort and Sanctuary being justified to win the war when the character that he's glorifying personally led the effort to shut that place down (and liberate her sister). Miranda Lawson would not approve of Sanctuary because Miranda Lawson was never written as a butcher.

#199
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

Rasofe wrote...

Insanity is not relative.


Insanity is relative.

Perhaps a lunatic is simply a minority of one.

For a practical person, you don't use common sense to build premises. And things can be fundamentally wrong and exist, since false statements exist. They're just false.


An abstraction can exist, but can it exist in material? How is my idea fundamentally wrong?

Adopting false premises in the first place is insane.


What's the false premise?

That's more or less the common definition, seeing the world through a perspective that other people don't use because it doesn't help anything at all except believing whatever you like and calling it "logical".


Oh it helps. It helps me. It helps me achieve the end I want to achieve.

You're really not arguing with my point, just trying to explain a definition of social nature.

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 28 novembre 2013 - 12:52 .


#200
Rasofe

Rasofe
  • Members
  • 1 065 messages
Yep. Here we go again.
Explaining to you why you're wrong about human beings being cheap and expendable is like expaining to a lunatic why one is equal to one. It's a common sense-intuition premise. A real practical person would know that. Practical and sensible are in fact synnonymous.