276 réponses à ce sujet

[liggy002]

Ah yes, whoever wrote that ending is my best friend.

[eddieoctane]

dreman9999 wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes. EA did not write this. No sane executive would have let this out the door.

I've been saying this for MONTHS.

So? ea was the ones who didn't give them enough time to make a proper ending. The still are at fault.

Even a poorly presented happy ending would have gone over better. Instead they chose to make it more complicated than it needed to be.

This is the fault of Bioware, not EA.

But bw did want a hapy ending. EA messed with the vision by not letting them have more time. Would we have such an uprowr if the ec ending was the orignal ending?

Most decidedly not. But EA needed the sale figures from ME3 on the previous fiscal year in order to inflate their numbers for the shareholders. Otherwise, EA would have another year of bad sales and senior would likely have felt huge repercussions form the actual owner. John Riccitiello in particular would probably be looking for another job right now, and his micro-transaction ideas along with him. All in all, the world would have been a better place.

[Cutlass Jack]

Was this even a question? Even the slightest logic would tell you that if EA forced an ending on Bioware it would be very vanilla, showy and aimed at the broadest possible audience.

Pushing the button to turn on the Catalyst would result in all the Reapers exploding in a manner so spectacular that Michael Bay would be jealous.

[Jawsomebob]

Ozida wrote...

Fair enough. As somebody said on this forum before, EA didn't hold a gun on BW team demainding: "Make ME suck".

Yep from what it seems Bioware clearly other then deadline requirements was free to make whatever they wanted. The only factor EA played in shaping ME3 was the deadline they put the team under...however Bioware had full control of the content up to that deadline. 

[D24O]

Taboo-XX wrote...

This is the fault of Bioware, not EA.

No, its ur fault Taboo.

[dreman9999]

eddieoctane wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes. EA did not write this. No sane executive would have let this out the door.

I've been saying this for MONTHS.

So? ea was the ones who didn't give them enough time to make a proper ending. The still are at fault.

EA were also the ones who forced MP functions into the game. If given the same budget and no MP features, there would have been far more SP content for a decidely SP game. EA still sucks again.

Mp had nothing to do with the quality of the ME3 endign at all. Stop leaning on that crutch, it has no support.

[Taboo]

D24O wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

This is the fault of Bioware, not EA.

No, its ur fault Taboo.

Gooby pls ths is ur flt

[Taboo]

Arcian wrote...

D24O wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

This is the fault of Bioware, not EA.

No, its ur fault Taboo.

Yeah, where's that goddamn Dino DLC we've all been promised?

It has to come after the Miranda DLC.

Sorry.

[Chaotic-Fusion]

So, how much longer for this topic to get "not ME3 story and campaign related" locked?

[Tazzmission]

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes. EA did not write this. No sane executive would have let this out the door.

I've been saying this for MONTHS.

as did i. but i guess people dont want to except that there favorite developer acted on there own instead of another ea conspiracy

hudson admitted himself he and walters made the decision and yet people ignored that and blamed ea

[dreman9999]

eddieoctane wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes. EA did not write this. No sane executive would have let this out the door.

I've been saying this for MONTHS.

So? ea was the ones who didn't give them enough time to make a proper ending. The still are at fault.

Even a poorly presented happy ending would have gone over better. Instead they chose to make it more complicated than it needed to be.

This is the fault of Bioware, not EA.

But bw did want a hapy ending. EA messed with the vision by not letting them have more time. Would we have such an uprowr if the ec ending was the orignal ending?

Most decidedly not. But EA needed the sale figures from ME3 on the previous fiscal year in order to inflate their numbers for the shareholders. Otherwise, EA would have another year of bad sales and senior would likely have felt huge repercussions form the actual owner. John Riccitiello in particular would probably be looking for another job right now, and his micro-transaction ideas along with him. All in all, the world would have been a better place.

Which is my point. EA has some fault in this. EA saying this is like them buying a prize horse, cut off one of it's legs and then blame the horses trainer if it didn't run well.

[MattFini]

Had EA written the ending it might've been more ... satisfying.

[d-boy15]

writing (especially the ending) - Bioware

rushed quality (second half of the game) - EA

[Tazzmission]

IsaacShep wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes. EA did not write this.

True. But it was EA who forced the deadline which influenced the overall game heavily

um dude bioware was originally gona release me3 in holiday 2011 dont believe me go rewatch vga 2010 

it was pushed back to 2012. you can blame ea all you want but the truth is it was casey and mac that made the final call on the endings without input from the rest of the team

how is ea any way responsible for that? if anything there only guilty of funding till they were finished

Modifié par Tazzmission, 11 septembre 2012 - 06:33 .

[Jawsomebob]

I want dino dlc

[Shepardtheshepard]

It's the fault of both as they are one.
Bioware is a part of EA. Not a company with only a few games publishing deal with them.

Modifié par Shepardtheshepard, 11 septembre 2012 - 06:33 .

[Taboo]

Arcian wrote...
NOT GOOD ENOUGH DUDE

Is this better?

[D24O]

Taboo-XX wrote...

Gooby pls ths is ur flt

K sry...

[eddieoctane]

Arcian wrote...

Cutlass Jack wrote...

Was this even a question? Even the slightest logic would tell you that if EA forced an ending on Bioware it would be very vanilla, showy and aimed at the broadest possible audience.

Pushing the button to turn on the Catalyst would result in all the Reapers exploding in a manner so spectacular that Michael Bay would be jealous.

I would actually prefer that ending.

Same here. I was rather intoxicated through most of me ME3 playthrough. Large explosions would have made me quite happy.

[D24O]

Jawsomebob wrote...

I want dino dlc

F*** yeah!

[-Skorpious-]

eddieoctane wrote...

Arcian wrote...

Cutlass Jack wrote...

Was this even a question? Even the slightest logic would tell you that if EA forced an ending on Bioware it would be very vanilla, showy and aimed at the broadest possible audience.

Pushing the button to turn on the Catalyst would result in all the Reapers exploding in a manner so spectacular that Michael Bay would be jealous.

I would actually prefer that ending.

Same here. I was rather intoxicated through most of me ME3 playthrough. Large explosions would have made me quite happy.

Only as long as Shepard can pull the plug on the catalyst before pushing the button. Wait a sec - EA is probably smart enough to not even add the catalyst in the first place! Yay!

Modifié par -Skorpious-, 11 septembre 2012 - 06:36 .