Blueprotoss wrote...
Logic isn't your friend especially when you're using opinions not statements.Isichar wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
The "I'm rubber you're glue" defence isn't working.
Then why do you keep using it??
Modifié par Isichar, 14 septembre 2012 - 02:10 .
So you're telling us that scale isn't important because you think its a Capital ship just based on general size. All the Reapers look roghly the same other then Sovreign and Harbinger.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The scale isn't important because you can't tell what the scale is.
Reaper big. Kodiak small. Tell the the dimensions of a Capital Ship, Reaper destroyer, Kodiak, and the Leviathan Reaper, and then you can talk about scale.
Since you don't have the fourth in that list, you can't use scale.
Since it looks exactly like a Capital ship should look like, it's then obviously that, and not a destroyer.
Sovreign was never alone especially when Harbinger always had contact with the Collectors.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The Leviathan Reaper was there with its.
Sovereign STILL acted alone for tens of thousands of years.
Yet you just contradicted your statement when the Leviathan was told. Anyone can be told something like how the Civil War was started for slavery while it actually wasn't.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The Leviathan says what it's been told by those that came before it; that they were forced to become Reapers, that the Catalyst killed them without warning. The Catalyst coroborates this with its own statement.
How is .that when the Catayst has 1st hand knowledge while the Leviathan has 2nd hand knowledgeThe Night Mammoth wrote...
The Catalyst's version of the story does not contradict what the Leviathan's tell us.
Yet your own sources are showing contradictions through assumptions.The Night Mammoth wrote...
I don't assume anything. I believe what two seperate and opposing sources of infomation tell me.
The Leviathans did not want to become Reapers and were slaughtered in a surprise attack and then made into them, The Catalyst admits this, the Leviathans say this.
Clearly you don't know what logic is especially when it involves Aristole. Haters gonna hate.Isichar wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Logic isn't your friend especially when you're using opinions not statements.Isichar wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
The "I'm rubber you're glue" defence isn't working.
Then why do you keep using it??
Again, pretty much describes the logic you have been using in every thread I see you in.
But then again who needs logic when you can just deny, deny, deny right?
Modifié par Blueprotoss, 14 septembre 2012 - 02:14 .
Blueprotoss wrote...
Clearly you don't know what logic is especially when it involves Aristole. Haters gonna hate.Isichar wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Logic isn't your friend especially when you're using opinions not statements.Isichar wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
The "I'm rubber you're glue" defence isn't working.
Then why do you keep using it??
Again, pretty much describes the logic you have been using in every thread I see you in.
But then again who needs logic when you can just deny, deny, deny right?
Blueprotoss wrote...
So you're telling us that scale isn't important because you think its a Capital ship just based on general size. All the Reapers look roghly the same other then Sovreign and Harbinger.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The scale isn't important because you can't tell what the scale is.
Reaper big. Kodiak small. Tell the the dimensions of a Capital Ship, Reaper destroyer, Kodiak, and the Leviathan Reaper, and then you can talk about scale.
Since you don't have the fourth in that list, you can't use scale.
Since it looks exactly like a Capital ship should look like, it's then obviously that, and not a destroyer.
Sovreign was never alone especially when Harbinger always had contact with the Collectors.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The Leviathan Reaper was there with its.
Sovereign STILL acted alone for tens of thousands of years.
Yet you just contradicted your statement when the Leviathan was told. Anyone can be told something like how the Civil War was started for slavery while it actually wasn't.The Night Mammoth wrote...
The Leviathan says what it's been told by those that came before it; that they were forced to become Reapers, that the Catalyst killed them without warning. The Catalyst coroborates this with its own statement.
How is .that when the Catayst has 1st hand knowledge while the Leviathan has 2nd hand knowledgeThe Night Mammoth wrote...
The Catalyst's version of the story does not contradict what the Leviathan's tell us.
Yet your own sources are showing contradictions through assumptions.The Night Mammoth wrote...
I don't assume anything. I believe what two seperate and opposing sources of infomation tell me.
The Leviathans did not want to become Reapers and were slaughtered in a surprise attack and then made into them, The Catalyst admits this, the Leviathans say this.
Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 14 septembre 2012 - 02:43 .
Olaf_de_IJsbeer wrote...
I just want to point out that the Reaper on Rannoch and the one you nuke with a Thanix missile in London are Destroyers, not capital ships.
a load of stanton wrote...
Olaf_de_IJsbeer wrote...
I just want to point out that the Reaper on Rannoch and the one you nuke with a Thanix missile in London are Destroyers, not capital ships.
destroyers have about the same sheilding as a turian dreadnought they were only destroyed because they left there fireing chamber open which pretty much has no shielding
Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 14 septembre 2012 - 02:57 .
I didn't call myself a hypocrite at all and plus you don't know what logic is being used even when I mentioned Aristotle. Logic in any case isn't your friend.Isichar wrote...
I agree.
But I am using your logic so...
you pretty much just called yourself a hypocrite
The Thrasher Maw attacked with a physical attack not with a projectile attack like how melee weapons in Halo by pass shields. Insulting others still isn't helpful.The Night Mammoth wrote...
a load of stanton wrote...
Olaf_de_IJsbeer wrote...
I just want to point out that the Reaper on Rannoch and the one you nuke with a Thanix missile in London are Destroyers, not capital ships.
destroyers have about the same sheilding as a turian dreadnought they were only destroyed because they left there fireing chamber open which pretty much has no shielding
And the one that's crushed by a Thresher Maw?
Instead of building that ****** space ****** they could have just bred a MASSIVE army of Thresher Maws, give them space-suits, and fire them from a space-trebuchet from the Charon Relay.
Genius.
Blueprotoss wrote...
I didn't call myself a hypocrite at all and plus you don't know what logic is being used even when I mentioned Aristotle. Logic in any case isn't your friend.Isichar wrote...
I agree.
But I am using your logic so...
you pretty much just called yourself a hypocrite
Modifié par Isichar, 14 septembre 2012 - 03:34 .
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet you're still wrong.Fixers0 wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet its not a Captial ship because the visuals says that its a lot smaller then a Capital ship.
Visual evidence trumph visual conjecture.
Yet scale is very important when we know what Reapers are based more on scale then looks. All the Reapers look roughly the same other then Sovreign and Harbinger.The Night Mammoth wrote...
I'm telling you that scale isn't important because you don't know what the scale is. It looks like a Capital ship. Capital ship look exactly like that. Unless you can tell me how big it is, you have nothing else to argue with.
Yet you seem to forget that the Reapers didn't think this cycle was a threat until Harbinger noticed that Sovreign died based on the humans.The Night Mammoth wrote...
Sovereign didn't recieve help from the Collectors. It acted alone, as the Vanguard.
Yet you are contradicting yourself when you're focuing on the 2nd hand knowledge that those Leviathans are told.The Night Mammoth wrote...
Contradiction? Eh? Look in a dictionary please, there's no contradiction there.
The only thing you have is the baseless assumption that the Leviathan doesn't have all its information correct. That is disproven because the Catalyst confirms its statement.
This is far from irrelevant since the Catayst has 1st hand knowledge while the Leviathan has 2nd hand knowledgeThe Night Mammoth wrote...
Irrelevant, they both say the same thing.
Yet you keep on talking about the 2nd hand knowedge of the Leviathans.The Night Mammoth wrote...
There's no contradictions in anything I've said. You just told me the Catalyst has 1st hand knowledge of events, so it's not assuming anything. Because its statements match that of the Leviathan, the latter isn't making any either, and neither am I.
They aren't the same and you're still assuming what occured.The Night Mammoth wrote...
Why are you arguing? Two characters say the same thing about the same event, and you have nothing to refute that. All you have is your own assumption that they don't have their facts straight.
Your logic isn't my logic especially when I don't rely on opinion.Isichar wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
I didn't call myself a hypocrite at all and plus you don't know what logic is being used even when I mentioned Aristotle. Logic in any case isn't your friend.Isichar wrote...
I agree.
But I am using your logic so...
you pretty much just called yourself a hypocrite
Well your arguing against your own logic so...
Opinion isn't proof. If thats the case Fox News would never be wrong based on how they say their opinions are facts.Fixers0 wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet you're still wrong.Fixers0 wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet its not a Captial ship because the visuals says that its a lot smaller then a Capital ship.
Visual evidence trumph visual conjecture.
Yet Proof still trumphs conjecture anyday.
Modifié par Blueprotoss, 14 septembre 2012 - 03:44 .
Blueprotoss wrote...
Your logic isn't my logic especially when I don't rely on opinion.Isichar wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
I didn't call myself a hypocrite at all and plus you don't know what logic is being used even when I mentioned Aristotle. Logic in any case isn't your friend.Isichar wrote...
I agree.
But I am using your logic so...
you pretty much just called yourself a hypocrite
Well your arguing against your own logic so...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Opinion isn't proof. If thats the case Fox News would never be wrong based on how they say their opinions are facts.Fixers0 wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet you're still wrong.Fixers0 wrote...
Blueprotoss wrote...
Yet its not a Captial ship because the visuals says that its a lot smaller then a Capital ship.
Visual evidence trumph visual conjecture.
Yet Proof still trumphs conjecture anyday.
Jawsomebob wrote...
If the ending made me feel the same way this song does:
jsl1016 wrote...
This is for those that hated the ending, like me. If you liked the ending, I am NOT looking to start another thread to fight with you, so please look to other threads for entertainment.
Now, for those of you that hated the ending, would you have found it better if they had made Conventional Victory possible?
This may have been said before, but I for one think they should have just had LESS REAPERS. Yeah they (the Reapers) are powerful, and yeah if you didn't have enough allies you could lose or win with devastating effects. But they (Bioware) clearly showed throughout the series that reapers could be destroyed (Sovereign, Reaper on Rannoch, Reaper in London), but if you just had LESS OF THEM a conventional victory would have been very achieveable.
This way, starbrat could have been taken out of the equation and we could have had a bad ass boss battle at the end with Harbinger and TIM.
Would this have made you happy? It would have made me ecstatic to see all that firepower come to earth and devastate the Reapers while I took out TIM & Harbinger.
Just my thoughts.
xeNNN wrote...
jsl1016 wrote...
This is for those that hated the ending, like me. If you liked the ending, I am NOT looking to start another thread to fight with you, so please look to other threads for entertainment.
Now, for those of you that hated the ending, would you have found it better if they had made Conventional Victory possible?
This may have been said before, but I for one think they should have just had LESS REAPERS. Yeah they (the Reapers) are powerful, and yeah if you didn't have enough allies you could lose or win with devastating effects. But they (Bioware) clearly showed throughout the series that reapers could be destroyed (Sovereign, Reaper on Rannoch, Reaper in London), but if you just had LESS OF THEM a conventional victory would have been very achieveable.
This way, starbrat could have been taken out of the equation and we could have had a bad ass boss battle at the end with Harbinger and TIM.
Would this have made you happy? It would have made me ecstatic to see all that firepower come to earth and devastate the Reapers while I took out TIM & Harbinger.
Just my thoughts.
i probably would of been happy, but idk about everyone else........nobody seems to care about the good parts of the game to busy being butt hurt about the parts they didnt like. :/
Retour en haut