DragonRacer wrote...
Kaseladen wrote...
Derek, cake or pie.
Also why do the RNG gods hate me. I just want a Paladin :C
I hear cookies are fondly received.
How about you make some for us? Sounds good to eat right about now. please please
DragonRacer wrote...
Kaseladen wrote...
Derek, cake or pie.
Also why do the RNG gods hate me. I just want a Paladin :C
I hear cookies are fondly received.
Flog61 wrote...
Pavs719 wrote...
CoddyXD wrote...
Mods in here
Less posting more DLC makin
Oh and nerf Eagle (its funnier that way)
No I want the eagle left alone, I do so like it with my Harrier X
....GET OUT
Derek Hollan wrote...
Pavs719 wrote...
Derek, Im sorry I sound frustrated but they have told me to contact You/Bioware.
I am speaking to the NPlewes right now. Hopefully we can direct you to the right place
Testosticore wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
Developers are people too. The last thing they want to do is have people; telling them their job; telling them they suck; trying to cram their game-design / balance philsophy down their throats; or generally being jerks by saying things like, "BioFail can't patch worth a crap!", etc and the list goes on.
Derek Hollan wrote...
BSN is meant to be a place for civilized discussion. You can disagree with each other
I'm going to disagree in a civilized manner, then. I feel these two quotes are contradictory. Generally, any criticism doesn't seem to be recieved well. That's just human nature, so I don't really blame the devs. Also, the player base in general is a nasty bunch of jerkoffs.
In addition, I feel I've not seen devs interact very much at all with suggestions on balance philosophy. A question is asked here and there and players flood the thread with advice or preferences, but the responses seem a bit spotty. I've not been posting for long but I've lurked a bit and your statement is mildly frustrating. We, the players, spend much more time playing the game than you guys. We also pay to play it wheras you lot get payed to make it. Now, that's not to say I want you to implement even a single player suggestion on balance or design. I'd just like to see more discussion on it. A lot more. It may be entirely too much to ask as well, I don't know your schedules, but I'd love to see two or three solid hours a week of just banter regarding balance and what players don't like/do like between the players and the devs.
And hey, maybe it happens and I just don't see it.
Also, as "civilized" as this post is, this is me frustrated with other things and it's just coming out here. I'm usually much more mellow and admittedly a general snark machine.regardless,
Testo
I am not opposed to this. Someone make some cookiesmasseffect420 wrote...
DragonRacer wrote...
Kaseladen wrote...
Derek, cake or pie.
Also why do the RNG gods hate me. I just want a Paladin :C
I hear cookies are fondly received.
How about you make some for us? Sounds good to eat right about now. please please
Derek Hollan wrote...
@upinya slayin: I can only assume something degraded on that thread and it had to be shut down? I was not the one to do so. I would PM the Mod that handled it. Sorry, I wish I had a more satisfactory answer than that.
Derek Hollan wrote...
@GroverA125: We feel the eagle is a good caster primary weapon. There have been many discussions regarding this but we are comfortable with where it is at this point. We never expect it to take the place of the Talon or Carnifex.
[...]
Weltenschlange wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
@GroverA125: We feel the eagle is a good caster primary weapon. There have been many discussions regarding this but we are comfortable with where it is at this point. We never expect it to take the place of the Talon or Carnifex.
[...]
Shouldn't it at least be better than the Carnifex considering that the Eagle is much harder to get?
Guest_Flog61_*
Weltenschlange wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
@GroverA125: We feel the eagle is a good caster primary weapon. There have been many discussions regarding this but we are comfortable with where it is at this point. We never expect it to take the place of the Talon or Carnifex.
[...]
Shouldn't it at least be better than the Carnifex considering that the Eagle is much harder to get?
Derek Hollan wrote...
Testosticore wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
Developers are people too. The last thing they want to do is have people; telling them their job; telling them they suck; trying to cram their game-design / balance philsophy down their throats; or generally being jerks by saying things like, "BioFail can't patch worth a crap!", etc and the list goes on.
Derek Hollan wrote...
BSN is meant to be a place for civilized discussion. You can disagree with each other
I'm going to disagree in a civilized manner, then. I feel these two quotes are contradictory. Generally, any criticism doesn't seem to be recieved well. That's just human nature, so I don't really blame the devs. Also, the player base in general is a nasty bunch of jerkoffs.
In addition, I feel I've not seen devs interact very much at all with suggestions on balance philosophy. A question is asked here and there and players flood the thread with advice or preferences, but the responses seem a bit spotty. I've not been posting for long but I've lurked a bit and your statement is mildly frustrating. We, the players, spend much more time playing the game than you guys. We also pay to play it wheras you lot get payed to make it. Now, that's not to say I want you to implement even a single player suggestion on balance or design. I'd just like to see more discussion on it. A lot more. It may be entirely too much to ask as well, I don't know your schedules, but I'd love to see two or three solid hours a week of just banter regarding balance and what players don't like/do like between the players and the devs.
And hey, maybe it happens and I just don't see it.
Also, as "civilized" as this post is, this is me frustrated with other things and it's just coming out here. I'm usually much more mellow and admittedly a general snark machine.regardless,
Testo
While I agree it is easier to receive positive criticism, I have been in meetings where 'uncomfortable' criticism has been brought up. The team has been very open to it, especially when presented in a well thought out manner.
That having been said, it is still a state of the environment that keeps the team from wanting to discuss it further in a public forum prone to trolling and spam.
The short answer is, yes, the team accepts negative criticism with professionalism, and accepts it well. They just don't blog about it
Modifié par Testosticore, 13 septembre 2012 - 10:37 .
Zero132132 wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
It will be Jessica Merizan, Chris Priestly, and the rest of the community management team that will be reviewing the surveys.
For my part, when I am not actively working on one project or another, I flit about the MP forums bringing joy and happiness to all the good boys and girls.
Incidently, the survey has gone around internally as well.
If people really want to see more of a dev presence then, here's a tip:
Developers are people too. The last thing they want to do is have people; telling them their job; telling them they suck; trying to cram their game-design / balance philsophy down their throats; or generally being jerks by saying things like, "BioFail can't patch worth a crap!", etc and the list goes on.
BSN is meant to be a place for civilized discussion. You can disagree with each other, certainly, but there is no reason for anyone to be a jerk about it. Although BSN's medium is the internet, this is supposed to be much more civil than the rest of the internet. I equate this to being our home and you are all guests in it. If you urinate in the potted plant, then you will be escorted out. On the same note, if you are an angry, uncontrolled individual, then you will likewise be escorted off the premises regardless of whether or not you have outright broken any of the rules. No one wants to engage that sort of person. No matter the excuse.
We have customer service personnel who specialize in dealing with irate individuals over disputes. As devs, we aren't customer service people. We would like to have more open discussions, but in much more controlled and civilized environments.
Ultimately, it comes down to the fact that no dev wants a negative experience engaging people on the forums but I think everyone can agree, at this stage, BSN does not have the safe feel it once did. Jessica, Chris, and the other BSN managers would like to see that happen again.
Devs can be a shy lot. If they feel threatened, they will scurry back to their dark, safe, cavernous environments, and eat chocolate, cookies, chips, and other comfort foods until the scary things go away before venturing out into the light again.
I am certain none of this comes as a surprise to anyone but, there you have it. We need to make this a safe environment in order for more dev sightings to occur.
Maybe not what you wanted to hear but, c'est la vie.
Cheers
2 things:
1. I get that, and I usually end up being a BW apologist on some of those things, like when people talk about bugs and whine about how long fixes take. I avidly avoid the story forums, because everyone there seems to just be filled with inconsolable rage towards Bioware, and it's exhausting just to see. The problem is, because this forum does exist, there's sort of a hidden sense, maybe an implication, that Bioware will be somewhat responsive to its fanbase when our concerns are voiced. When we don't hear anything at all about bug fixes and we don't even really KNOW what BW's balance philosophy is, it's sort of disheartening. I also get why you guys would want to stay out of certain discussions, because the fanbase is probably GOING to argue, and sometimes, it might be best for us all if we don't have the chance. Just explaining our side of things.
2. Where are the potted plants AT, anyways? I've been holding for hours.
Flog61 wrote...
Weltenschlange wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
@GroverA125: We feel the eagle is a good caster primary weapon. There have been many discussions regarding this but we are comfortable with where it is at this point. We never expect it to take the place of the Talon or Carnifex.
[...]
Shouldn't it at least be better than the Carnifex considering that the Eagle is much harder to get?
This
Starquake wrote...
This is the most I've seen the devs posting in a single thread. I dig it. ^___^
Derek Hollan wrote...
Flog61 wrote...
Weltenschlange wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
@GroverA125: We feel the eagle is a good caster primary weapon. There have been many discussions regarding this but we are comfortable with where it is at this point. We never expect it to take the place of the Talon or Carnifex.
[...]
Shouldn't it at least be better than the Carnifex considering that the Eagle is much harder to get?
This
Ok. At the risk of beginning rumours, I will say Eric has just agreed to look at it again. Please, please PLEASE! Do not get your hopes up on that. But, yes. The fact that it takes longer to level is a good arguement.
Cheers
shnig_1 wrote...
Derek, can you announce that you could possibly announce that in the future something will be announced that will announce some possible MP DLC? Any sort of announcement will do, as i have been completely inactive for about a month now, but i want to come back. Ive been Dark Souls'ing for the past month and im currently on my third playthrough and not looking back. But i want to look back
Descy_ wrote.
Eagle buff...eagle...bird...phoenix...rise from ashes...protheans rising from their ashes...
PROTHEANS CONFIRMED BY DEREK!
Yeah I see a lot of great ideas on BSN. It would be cool if the devs came in and gave their opinions on them. Even though my ideas will probably never happen I would be interested to see what they thought of it anyway.Phoenix535 wrote...
Starquake wrote...
This is the most I've seen the devs posting in a single thread. I dig it. ^___^
Me 2, I hope derek is right. I would love to see the BSN be more freindly if it meant we could get more bioware people putting in thier opions, I'd love to see what the people who made the game would post in both this and the fan cration fourms