Allan, first let me say that I appreciate your sincere engagement with your company's consumers on this forum, but with all due respect, that is PRECISELY the attitude that has brought Kickstarter into being and forced "lesser" developers and studios into private capital raising venues to address, what a great many apparently feel is, an underserved market.
Given I donated, I am quite clear on feeling it's an underserved market.
I want to see what they do as well.
Taking this and making it evidence that this confirms (or denies) that the group was a vocal minority isn't correct. There frankly isn't enough numbers in the kickstarter contribution to be able to qualify whether or not a group is or is not a vocal minority.
here are fairly strong indicators all around us that many gaming consumers (who at least perceive themselves as disenfranchised) want products that the market is just not providing; and that the market, acting as markets do, perhaps has begun to find remedies for these underserved consumers in opportunities like Kickstarter that might well lead to alternate delivery methods for niche (truly an unknown at this point) demand products to the marketplace.
No kidding. I've been an avid support of Kickstarter ever since Tim Schaefer started his, and while I didn't contribute (since I'm not erally an adventure gamer), I did contribute to Wasteland 2. In fact, I have actively encouraged people on this very forum to check it out since I think it'd be right up a lot of their alleys.
Merely stating this in the manner that you have, only invites one of these consumers to ask you what you know of market projections and capital finance. Do you really know something of these projections, or are you just a bit miffed that your company was called out and, in turn lashed out rather unfairly, even as "a supporter?"
No, I'm NOT qualified. Yet you talk down to me as though you are. Or are you just miffed because I called you out that perhaps this doesn't actually have any bearing on whether or not someone is a "vocal minority." If you think that this demonstrates that it's not just a vocal minority after all, then I guess we agree to disagree. I don't think this demonstrates that it is or isn't. What it does tell me is that there's a decent sized group of people that really want to see a game of this quality and they are organized and have enough capital distributed amongst them for Obsidian to achieve the target that they wanted to.
If you're thinking I was defensive, yeah I was. Because someone was taking this not as evidence that "hey here's a game that I want to play and yay kickstarter for allowing it to happen" it becomes "See BioWare. You were wrong!"
I
love what kickstarter has done. Just like I
love the opportunity that digital distribution services have done. Removing barriers to entry in the gaming market only allows for the talent pool of prospectful game developers to grow. You want to know why? Because a game developer is more able to deliver a quality product to a group, even if that group were ONLY 30,000 people. You know what's awesome about Kickstarter... the game
literally doesn't need to sell a single copy in order to be a success. All it needs to do is satisfy those that have contributed. I think that's amazingly powerful.
That a niche title is able to achieve the requisite funding and (hopefully) deliver a game that the target audience wants doesn't mean that it's not still a niche title with a smaller audience.
I hate to say it, but this is the attitude we have come to expect from Bioware; an attitude that is giving rise to the likes of Kickstarter.
An attitude of not letting someone take some data and make a claim from it that can't be supported by such data?
I really hate to preach, but this just rubbed me the wrong way...and yes I know you probably meant no real offense by it, as your engagement from my perspective is normally honest, sincere and fair minded. Perhaps the fangs just came out when someone called your company out?
Perhaps the fangs came out in you when someone didn't agree that this doesn't mean that it's not a vocal minority? Look in the mirror and wonder if my response didn't illicit in you what you think Cultist's response does for me.
The main reason why I qualified that I contributed is because I am not someone against Kickstarter or the opportunities it provides.
As for myself, there were no "fangs out" until someone literally decided to post a disrespectful post towards me. Which I found your post. I found it hypocritical since you basically call me out for being overly sensitive and essentially being a jerk to the fanbase, while demonstrating (and even admitting) that the same has happened to you.
I had a post with two sentences in it. One encouraged a poster to keep some perspective since they were using this to make claims. The other qualified that I'm not against the kickstarter model since I actively contribute to it. Apparently that slights you enough to imply that I was not being honest, sincere, or fair minded with it. At least you did acknowlege that I probably didn't mean any offense, even if you decided to tear into me.
On Obsidian's boards I even state that I hope the game is a runaway success and they can post huge sales numbers because I'd love data points that show this is a more viable market than many may give it credit for.
Modifié par Allan Schumacher, 16 septembre 2012 - 02:09 .