ValorOfArms777 wrote...
I don't find it cheating but it's unbalancing certain guns like the claymore I'm really not against it but... if certain guns get TOO much edge it's quite disappointing removing choice over 1 gun for another cause of this it hides the fact most single shot guns really aren't up to par anymore or exponentially blasts the claymores single shot to being a nearly rapid fire gun able to blast enemies to smithereens fast and causing all other shotguns bad rep if some of the reload cancelling was back up a tad on some guns it would feel a tad better... now I do do it BUT I feel pretty sad to be using the same damn gun cause of some sorta "mechanic" that causes other guns to be worthless junk if it's a "mechanic" shouldn't it be taken into consideration? instead of out balancing the poor other shotties in example into dust cause of a claymore or hide the fact that the single shot snipers really DO suck compared to what they used to do and need buffing I'm not saying touch "damage values" persay but isntead touch up the reload cancelling and up some damages that need to be upped cause RC has hidden their flaw
WALL OF TEXT, speed read it...got the basics of your point...
Weapons like the Claymore, Kishock and Widow may have gotten a slightly larger advantage out of RC...but they were already on top of their game without it.
Now granted, some weapons don't gain much of anything from RC due to their already fast reload, but that is part of the game.
Think of it this way; In realaity, a new recruit that is not very experienced with a gun might take a little longer to reload one, right? While an experienced soldier would have done it many times before and knows little tips and tricks to help them reload faster, where they place said next clip, how they handle it and the ejected clip, etc etc.
RC is like that. someone who doesn't know of it or doesn't know how is the new recruit, and the one who knows how is an experienced soldier, then there's those who are soo good at it that it has almost become second nature to them...they would be hardcore veterans that have been around guns all their lives, and know EVERYTHING there is to know about one.
Make sense like that or no?