GottvonHoff wrote...
Is that a... Collector ship!? (the red one)
No.
GottvonHoff wrote...
Is that a... Collector ship!? (the red one)
Phoenix535 wrote...
Rudest wrote...
If collectors made it into single player DLC it would be far more likely to see them in multiplayer afterwards. A whole enemy faction is alot of resources/game assets. Models, Skins, Animations, Voice Acting, Coding, AI ----I find it incredibly unlikely to find them in one and not the other!
Well yeah, but they probaly wouldnt have as much work as adding something completly new, after all they made 6 new chrs. for the latest DLC thats 6 new models and 18 new powers (mostly) each faction usually has about 6-8 enemies I think thts the number, plus they would probaly have SOMETHING to base it off from ME2. thats not to say it wouldnt be in SP as well, but they just released levathin and it requires much more time for voice acting, story making etc. for the single player campaign
Modifié par FeralJester616, 16 septembre 2012 - 09:04 .
FeralJester616 wrote...
Oh and now I think about it...
Paladin is just another of the Cerb armours from SP...
The Red One that Shep can ware... I forget the name...
Modifié par DarthKilby, 16 septembre 2012 - 09:10 .
DarthKilby wrote...
FeralJester616 wrote...
Oh and now I think about it...
Paladin is just another of the Cerb armours from SP...
The Red One that Shep can ware... I forget the name...
Inferno Armor I believe. The Slayer is also a Kai Leng remodel, not sure about the Demolisher
Modifié par weirdopo, 16 septembre 2012 - 09:15 .
weirdopo wrote...
The Demolisher is a female version of the Cerberus Combat Engineer.
[/quote] 
Modifié par kazumasoju, 16 septembre 2012 - 10:24 .
kazumasoju wrote...
Snip
BlackbirdSR-71C wrote...
kazumasoju wrote...
Snip
Nice collection of information!
One thing I'd like to note though is that all the weekend operation mentioned was an "inconsistency in Reaper ground movement". It doesn't mention collectors or new enemies at all, all it means is that Reapers are using different tactics.
If I always send Brutes first and Banshees second, but one day change that to Banshees first and Brutes second, that's an inconsistency in ground movement as well!
Modifié par kazumasoju, 16 septembre 2012 - 10:56 .
kazumasoju wrote...
BlackbirdSR-71C wrote...
kazumasoju wrote...
Snip
Nice collection of information!
One thing I'd like to note though is that all the weekend operation mentioned was an "inconsistency in Reaper ground movement". It doesn't mention collectors or new enemies at all, all it means is that Reapers are using different tactics.
If I always send Brutes first and Banshees second, but one day change that to Banshees first and Brutes second, that's an inconsistency in ground movement as well!
Ahhh, hmm how I was thinking of it was more so attacks from the reapers that are something unknown to Alliance knowledge, or a higher number than expected.
" We’ve been receiving a number of strange reports that are inconsistent with our knowledge of Reaper ground troop movement "
The Alliance never really witnessed the Collectors and only heard about them from stories from Shepard. Its even evident that the galaxy doesnt know much about them when shepard first sees an image of them on Freedom's Progress ~ you can see that Shepard had even questioned their existence.
Also I was thinking that Admiral Hackett woudn't have actually have seen the collectors as he is just receiving word from the ground troops ( alot of the information seemed like it came in bits in pieces to Admiral HAckett as this is the biggest war witnessed in the Galaxy ) and is coordinating attacks and like I said before, the ground troops would't have known what the collectors looked like. Heck, Shepard and his crew hadnt even known what most of the Reapers troops looked like in the ME3 until they saw them in battle. So the " N7 " Special forces could have very possibley not been able to tell the difference between Collectors and Reapers.
What do you think?
kazumasoju wrote...
BlackbirdSR-71C wrote...
kazumasoju wrote...
Snip
Nice collection of information!
One thing I'd like to note though is that all the weekend operation mentioned was an "inconsistency in Reaper ground movement". It doesn't mention collectors or new enemies at all, all it means is that Reapers are using different tactics.
If I always send Brutes first and Banshees second, but one day change that to Banshees first and Brutes second, that's an inconsistency in ground movement as well!
Ahhh, hmm how I was thinking of it was more so attacks from the reapers that are something unknown to Alliance knowledge, or a higher number than expected.
" We’ve been receiving a number of strange reports that are inconsistent with our knowledge of Reaper ground troop movement "
The Alliance never really witnessed the Collectors and only heard about them from stories from Shepard. Its even evident that the galaxy doesnt know much about them when shepard first sees an image of them on Freedom's Progress ~ you can see that Shepard had even questioned their existence.
Also I was thinking that Admiral Hackett woudn't have actually have seen the collectors as he is just receiving word from the ground troops ( alot of the information seemed like it came in bits in pieces to Admiral HAckett as this is the biggest war witnessed in the Galaxy ) and is coordinating attacks and like I said before, the ground troops would't have known what the collectors looked like. Heck, Shepard and his crew hadnt even known what most of the Reapers troops looked like in the ME3 until they saw them in battle. So the " N7 " Special forces could have very possibley not been able to tell the difference between Collectors and Reapers.
What do you think?
BlackbirdSR-71C wrote...
kazumasoju wrote...
BlackbirdSR-71C wrote...
kazumasoju wrote...
Snip
Nice collection of information!
One thing I'd like to note though is that all the weekend operation mentioned was an "inconsistency in Reaper ground movement". It doesn't mention collectors or new enemies at all, all it means is that Reapers are using different tactics.
If I always send Brutes first and Banshees second, but one day change that to Banshees first and Brutes second, that's an inconsistency in ground movement as well!
Ahhh, hmm how I was thinking of it was more so attacks from the reapers that are something unknown to Alliance knowledge, or a higher number than expected.
" We’ve been receiving a number of strange reports that are inconsistent with our knowledge of Reaper ground troop movement "
The Alliance never really witnessed the Collectors and only heard about them from stories from Shepard. Its even evident that the galaxy doesnt know much about them when shepard first sees an image of them on Freedom's Progress ~ you can see that Shepard had even questioned their existence.
Also I was thinking that Admiral Hackett woudn't have actually have seen the collectors as he is just receiving word from the ground troops ( alot of the information seemed like it came in bits in pieces to Admiral HAckett as this is the biggest war witnessed in the Galaxy ) and is coordinating attacks and like I said before, the ground troops would't have known what the collectors looked like. Heck, Shepard and his crew hadnt even known what most of the Reapers troops looked like in the ME3 until they saw them in battle. So the " N7 " Special forces could have very possibley not been able to tell the difference between Collectors and Reapers.
What do you think?
I'm not trying to prove you wrong! I'm just saying that the rest of your post had 100% undeniable sources, but the weekend op seemed to vague. I'm just saying it could be a hint at the DLc as much as it could be nothing really.
But one point does speak in your favor: "The Reapers have a plan". Whatever that plan is, wether it involves collectors or not, it's definitely hinting at something upcomming - what else but the next DLC?
The fool you should have eaten wrote...
Perhaps. After all, Anderson made his own appearnce for the Earth DLC. And he's no where to be seen in MP. Did you know that he was born in London?