5 réponses à ce sujet

[Ser Issac]

https://twitter.com/...219206716792832

@comicbookguy_UK: "next time u buy a book ill rip out the last 1/4 and sell u it as dlc.. See if u like it? With EA.. Im THAT cynical!"

@GambleMike: "wow. Do you have any ****ing clue how hard the team has been working over the past year to deliver NEW content ?"

I'm not judging him. I just find it hilarious that dev and fan discussion over the ME3 ending has reached this point, especially since Gamble was originally just tweeting about the DLC screenshot unveiled today.

Modifié par Ser Issac, 16 septembre 2012 - 07:35 .

[Allan Schumacher]

I understand them. I try to keep that anger I have about the endings in check, but it just bubbles over when I read something about Bioware, especially when or how they interact with fans.

[Allan Schumacher]

This is so true. Take Mike's comment for instance, "Do you have any idea..." No we don't have any idea, because the only thing we've been shown is Leviathan, information that should have been in game from the beginning

I haven't played Leviathan. Do you feel there is information in there that is essential to the plot of the game?

[Allan Schumacher]

Well, depends. The story makes a lot more sense with it than without it. So, if you don't mind not knowing what the hell is happening and how something as important to the story as the "Catalyst" came about, then no. It's not essential.

I guess the thing is, if Leviathan is written since people are not satisfied, wouldn't it make sense that it explains more?

The thing that always got me about the Javik one is that people felt he was so important and the general vibe I got was that a lot of people hated that it was Day One DLC because they really wanted to experience his content and people felt BioWare nickel and dimed them.

At the same time, shouldn't we make DLC that people really want to experience? Shouldn't we release other DLC to help flesh out the story? Would people be more satisfied if the contents were in a more traditional "expansion pack" or even a sequel?

[Allan Schumacher]

I guess what I'm saying is, "what type of content do you think SHOULD be in the DLC?"

[Allan Schumacher]

FlamingBoy wrote...

The think about dlc is they are always overvalued and it always pisses people off for 1- 2 hours of play time, also dlc does not follow regular standards of pricing they never seem to lose value except when they are on "sale", so to answer your question a more traditional expansion pack should be dlc

Wouldn't one way to make sure they weren't as overvalued be ensuring higher quality content was within them?