823 réponses à ce sujet

[Mathias]

Tazzmission wrote...

Isichar wrote...

Umm EA is not to blame for the endings, that was the writers decision, they honestly thought it was good. To some extent I would say a lot of the cut corners in the game is because of EA, but the ending? Nope.

no i dont buy that at all. seriously ask yourself this why would any companey do that to themselves ? it dosent make sence

just because you didnt get what you want doesnt always mean someone higher up did it intentionally to hurt you

seriously alot of you people need to see a thearpist

EA was partially to blame, but the fundamental problem with the ending is Bioware's fault. If Bioware had more time they'd be able to flesh out the ending more like they did with the EC, but we'd still have things like the Catalyst, none of our choices mattering, and Shepard pretty much dying in all 3 endings, not counting the ambiguous breath scene.

[Sublyminal]

Tazzmission wrote...

i tweeted him with the following


TAZZ ‏@TazzMission24
@GambleMike hey mike thanks for the dlc man. F the haters because there all conspiracy theorists with no ideology on how stuff works

Is that a slurping sound I hear?

[Mathias]

If i was to pull percentages out my butt, i would give a rough estimate and say 70% of the problems with the ending was the writers fault, and 30% was EAs.

[Mr.House]

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

Isichar wrote...

Umm EA is not to blame for the endings, that was the writers decision, they honestly thought it was good. To some extent I would say a lot of the cut corners in the game is because of EA, but the ending? Nope.

no i dont buy that at all. seriously ask yourself this why would any companey do that to themselves ? it dosent make sence

just because you didnt get what you want doesnt always mean someone higher up did it intentionally to hurt you

seriously alot of you people need to see a thearpist

EA was partially to blame, but the fundamental problem with the ending is Bioware's fault. If Bioware had more time they'd be able to flesh out the ending more like they did with the EC, but we'd still have things like the Catalyst, none of our choices mattering, and Shepard pretty much dying in all 3 endings, not counting the ambiguous breath scene.

Bioware had plans to make Earth better, there was even a command UI planned. This was all cut because..

1:Time, which if true, is EAs fault and a longer dev time would have had a better final mission

or

2:Bioware didn't care

Modifié par Mr.House, 16 septembre 2012 - 06:39 .

[Isichar]

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

Isichar wrote...

Umm EA is not to blame for the endings, that was the writers decision, they honestly thought it was good. To some extent I would say a lot of the cut corners in the game is because of EA, but the ending? Nope.

no i dont buy that at all. seriously ask yourself this why would any companey do that to themselves ? it dosent make sence

just because you didnt get what you want doesnt always mean someone higher up did it intentionally to hurt you

seriously alot of you people need to see a thearpist

EA was partially to blame, but the fundamental problem with the ending is Bioware's fault. If Bioware had more time they'd be able to flesh out the ending more like they did with the EC, but we'd still have things like the Catalyst, none of our choices mattering, and Shepard pretty much dying in all 3 endings, not counting the ambiguous breath scene.

No. Go find videos on the writers discussing the endings. This is how they intended it to be.

Maybe earth may have been a bit more fleshed out, but in terms of the catalyst and the ending choices and what we saw after... no that was all intended originally.

Modifié par Isichar, 16 septembre 2012 - 06:39 .

[Mathias]

Sublyminal wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

i tweeted him with the following


TAZZ ‏@TazzMission24
@GambleMike hey mike thanks for the dlc man. F the haters because there all conspiracy theorists with no ideology on how stuff works

Is that a slurping sound I hear?

[AresKeith]

Mr.House wrote...

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

Isichar wrote...

Umm EA is not to blame for the endings, that was the writers decision, they honestly thought it was good. To some extent I would say a lot of the cut corners in the game is because of EA, but the ending? Nope.

no i dont buy that at all. seriously ask yourself this why would any companey do that to themselves ? it dosent make sence

just because you didnt get what you want doesnt always mean someone higher up did it intentionally to hurt you

seriously alot of you people need to see a thearpist

EA was partially to blame, but the fundamental problem with the ending is Bioware's fault. If Bioware had more time they'd be able to flesh out the ending more like they did with the EC, but we'd still have things like the Catalyst, none of our choices mattering, and Shepard pretty much dying in all 3 endings, not counting the ambiguous breath scene.

Bioware had plans to make Earth better, there was even a command UI planned. This was all cut out for two reasons.

1:Time, which if true, is EAs fault and a longer dev time would have had a better final mission
2:Bioware didn't care

or 3: all of the above

[Tazzmission]

Isichar wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

HiddenInWar wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

The Spamming Troll wrote...

i feel no sympathy towards bioware and its staff about this.

they are getting what they deserve.

good luck with that, bioware.

They're getting what they deserve? They didn't murder anyone How can anyone say getting hateful/vulgar messages constantly is an 'appropirate' response to not being satisfied with a game?

Why do people that hate this series and company so much continue to be on a social network of their design?

yea i dont understand that either. i guess they have this idiotic idea the more they complain they will get what they want. i mean god forbid if a company wants to do something there way for one game

Singing endless praise is just as worse as idiotic complaining, we come here to discuss how we feel about a game series that is important to us. My opinions on the ending and how it was or should be handled should not automatically disqualify me as a fan should they?

constant spamming of the same endless garnage for 7 months and really being disgusting to not just the devs but people who enjoy the game is ok in your eyes?

i take it you werent here when the nutjob anti enders basicly bashed everyone who enjoyed the game for what it is by calling them a bioware drone or claiming they are on the pay role

but seeing as how the anti enders are always the correct ones they wonder why there are times i wouldnt mind just slapping the taste out of each and every one of them

and seriously who the hell are they to judge on what people buy with there own money?

the issue is they can dish it but when anybody lets there balls drop and stands up to them they cry and go wawawa im a victim

my attitude is dont pick a fight and not expect to get hit back


i have stated many times before the devs need to stand up for themselves and honestly im glad mike did because if i was him i wouldnt want a fanbase that is ignorant digusting selfish and basicly nuts

[Sublyminal]

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

Sublyminal wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

i tweeted him with the following


TAZZ ‏@TazzMission24
@GambleMike hey mike thanks for the dlc man. F the haters because there all conspiracy theorists with no ideology on how stuff works

Is that a slurping sound I hear?

^ 

[Mathias]

Mr.House wrote...

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

Isichar wrote...

Umm EA is not to blame for the endings, that was the writers decision, they honestly thought it was good. To some extent I would say a lot of the cut corners in the game is because of EA, but the ending? Nope.

no i dont buy that at all. seriously ask yourself this why would any companey do that to themselves ? it dosent make sence

just because you didnt get what you want doesnt always mean someone higher up did it intentionally to hurt you

seriously alot of you people need to see a thearpist

EA was partially to blame, but the fundamental problem with the ending is Bioware's fault. If Bioware had more time they'd be able to flesh out the ending more like they did with the EC, but we'd still have things like the Catalyst, none of our choices mattering, and Shepard pretty much dying in all 3 endings, not counting the ambiguous breath scene.

Bioware had plans to make Earth better, there was even a command UI planned. This was all cut because..

1:Time, which if true, is EAs fault and a longer dev time would have had a better final mission

or

2:Bioware didn't care

I would say Priority Mission Earth was mostly EAs fault yes. I was focused on the final 10 minutes though. Honestly this game needed 8-12 more months of development.

[Atakuma]

Why is he still on twitter anyway? I mean, what's the point?

[Eterna]

How can people be so entitled and arrogant to think they deserve an apology? Lmao

[Tazzmission]

Sublyminal wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

i tweeted him with the following


TAZZ ‏@TazzMission24
@GambleMike hey mike thanks for the dlc man. F the haters because there all conspiracy theorists with no ideology on how stuff works

Is that a slurping sound I hear?

yes it is of your mom pleasing me. speaking of wich tell her ill send the child support check in the mail next month. most likely the 3rd that way she can buy you some manners

Modifié par Tazzmission, 16 septembre 2012 - 06:44 .

[El Mito]

Sublyminal wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

i tweeted him with the following


TAZZ ‏@TazzMission24
@GambleMike hey mike thanks for the dlc man. F the haters because there all conspiracy theorists with no ideology on how stuff works

Is that a slurping sound I hear?

Damn son. I agree btw.

[Isichar]

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

Isichar wrote...

Umm EA is not to blame for the endings, that was the writers decision, they honestly thought it was good. To some extent I would say a lot of the cut corners in the game is because of EA, but the ending? Nope.

no i dont buy that at all. seriously ask yourself this why would any companey do that to themselves ? it dosent make sence

just because you didnt get what you want doesnt always mean someone higher up did it intentionally to hurt you

seriously alot of you people need to see a thearpist

EA was partially to blame, but the fundamental problem with the ending is Bioware's fault. If Bioware had more time they'd be able to flesh out the ending more like they did with the EC, but we'd still have things like the Catalyst, none of our choices mattering, and Shepard pretty much dying in all 3 endings, not counting the ambiguous breath scene.

Bioware had plans to make Earth better, there was even a command UI planned. This was all cut because..

1:Time, which if true, is EAs fault and a longer dev time would have had a better final mission

or

2:Bioware didn't care

I would say Priority Mission Earth was mostly EAs fault yes. I was focused on the final 10 minutes though. Honestly this game needed 8-12 more months of development.

To clarify I was not talking about earth when I said the ending, I meant the last 10 minutes, because I agree Earth feels like a cut corner.

[Tazzmission]

Atakuma wrote...

Why is he still on twitter anyway? I mean, what's the point?

i respect mike because why should he punish the people who are civil and dont act like animals?

[Mathias]

Eterna5 wrote...

How can people be so entitled and arrogant to think they deserve an apology? Lmao

Well now it's kinda beating a dead horse and all that BS. But back in March/April, i do think Bioware should've apologized for the original endings or at least admit they made a mistake.

[Mello]

Tazzmission wrote...

Sublyminal wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

i tweeted him with the following


TAZZ ‏@TazzMission24
@GambleMike hey mike thanks for the dlc man. F the haters because there all conspiracy theorists with no ideology on how stuff works

Is that a slurping sound I hear?

yes it is of your mom pleasing me. speaking of wich tell her ill send the child support check in the mail next month. most likely the 3rd that way she can buy you some manners

Oh lord. 

[Mathias]

Isichar wrote...

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

Isichar wrote...

Umm EA is not to blame for the endings, that was the writers decision, they honestly thought it was good. To some extent I would say a lot of the cut corners in the game is because of EA, but the ending? Nope.

no i dont buy that at all. seriously ask yourself this why would any companey do that to themselves ? it dosent make sence

just because you didnt get what you want doesnt always mean someone higher up did it intentionally to hurt you

seriously alot of you people need to see a thearpist

EA was partially to blame, but the fundamental problem with the ending is Bioware's fault. If Bioware had more time they'd be able to flesh out the ending more like they did with the EC, but we'd still have things like the Catalyst, none of our choices mattering, and Shepard pretty much dying in all 3 endings, not counting the ambiguous breath scene.

Bioware had plans to make Earth better, there was even a command UI planned. This was all cut because..

1:Time, which if true, is EAs fault and a longer dev time would have had a better final mission

or

2:Bioware didn't care

I would say Priority Mission Earth was mostly EAs fault yes. I was focused on the final 10 minutes though. Honestly this game needed 8-12 more months of development.

To clarify I was not talking about earth when I said the ending, I meant the last 10 minutes, because I agree Earth feels like a cut corner.

It was very rushed too. There were parts of that mission that weren't even complete. Do you recall the cutscene right before the No Man's Land find, where Anderson is leading Hammer Squad down the ruined streets. That epic music is playing and it shows Hammer squad mow down husks with bullets, but there's a problem. The guns they are all firing are making any sound. Bioware either forget to add the sound effect of gunfire in this cutscene, or didn't have time.

[o Ventus]

Tazzmission wrote...

Sublyminal wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

i tweeted him with the following


TAZZ ‏@TazzMission24
@GambleMike hey mike thanks for the dlc man. F the haters because there all conspiracy theorists with no ideology on how stuff works

Is that a slurping sound I hear?

yes it is of your mom pleasing me. speaking of wich tell her ill send the child support check in the mail next month. most likely the 3rd that way she can buy you some manners

I'll see you when your impending ban lifts in 24 hours.

[AresKeith]

Tazzmission wrote...

constant spamming of the same endless garnage for 7 months and really being disgusting to not just the devs but people who enjoy the game is ok in your eyes?

i take it you werent here when the nutjob anti enders basicly bashed everyone who enjoyed the game for what it is by calling them a bioware drone or claiming they are on the pay role

but seeing as how the anti enders are always the correct ones they wonder why there are times i wouldnt mind just slapping the taste out of each and every one of them

and seriously who the hell are they to judge on what people buy with there own money?

the issue is they can dish it but when anybody lets there balls drop and stands up to them they cry and go wawawa im a victim

my attitude is dont pick a fight and not expect to get hit back


i have stated many times before the devs need to stand up for themselves and honestly im glad mike did because if i was him i wouldnt want a fanbase that is ignorant digusting selfish and basicly nuts

and the fanbase shouldn't be yes men who just handwaves everything Bioware does if its bad either

[Confused-Shepard]

Bio-ware deserves every single insult hurled at them...
Multi-million dollar company and they throw temper tantrums like schoolyard children

[Mathias]

AresKeith wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

constant spamming of the same endless garnage for 7 months and really being disgusting to not just the devs but people who enjoy the game is ok in your eyes?

i take it you werent here when the nutjob anti enders basicly bashed everyone who enjoyed the game for what it is by calling them a bioware drone or claiming they are on the pay role

but seeing as how the anti enders are always the correct ones they wonder why there are times i wouldnt mind just slapping the taste out of each and every one of them

and seriously who the hell are they to judge on what people buy with there own money?

the issue is they can dish it but when anybody lets there balls drop and stands up to them they cry and go wawawa im a victim

my attitude is dont pick a fight and not expect to get hit back


i have stated many times before the devs need to stand up for themselves and honestly im glad mike did because if i was him i wouldnt want a fanbase that is ignorant digusting selfish and basicly nuts

and the fanbase shouldn't be yes men who just handwaves everything Bioware does if its bad either

There's a term for that, i believe it's sheep?

Modifié par Mdoggy1214, 16 septembre 2012 - 06:50 .

[iSousek]

Tazzmission wrote...

Atakuma wrote...

Why is he still on twitter anyway? I mean, what's the point?

i respect mike because why should he punish the people who are civil and dont act like animals?

He isn't really in a position to punish anyone. Nobody on twitter is.

Don't get me wrong man, I generally agree with you, but your tweet to him is just insulting to ppl who still have problem with the lack of content in ME 3. And a lot of those ppl are very polite and approach BW in pleasant manner.