Mike Gamble isn't messing around anymore, he's dropped a Twitter f-bomb
#101
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:20
No. I will not. I will not vote or endorse anything having to do with game of the year for this title. I will not recommend this game either. It's just a huge setup for disappointment. No other community has ever gone through the lengths of extreme passion and dedication as the Mass Effect community to convey their displeasure. We raised tens of thousands of dollars for charity to give a positive effect to our voice, we sent them cupcakes, letters, tons of initiatives to express ourselves.
No. Bioware deserves no mercy, no consideration, no empathy. Fans went out of their way to show how they felt, and many went out of their way to do so with great detail and emotion. Yes, most of the game was awesome. I give credit where credit is due, but it is NOT hyperbole to say that the ending ruins all that came before. No, I'm not sorry Bioware.
#102
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:20
Reptilian Rob wrote...
Yes, which is why the Twitter clown said "EA" and not Bioware...Jade8aby88 wrote...
Reptilian Rob wrote...
The sad thing is that ComicBookGuy is DEAD on....
Not really, the story BioWare wanted to tell they simply didn't have enough time to create. That's where dlc comes in.
And wait, selling content that they didn't have time to put into the $60+ game!? DO TELL!!!
True, well in that regard, yes. He was right. EA didn't care that the game wouldn't be finished in time, their policy is "produce quick, anything that isn't done, sell as extra in dlc."
Gets games out quicker and makes more profit too.
What do you mean about the second sentence?
#103
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:21
noobcannon wrote...
GenericEnemy wrote...
If I was in his position, I would've started dropping them long ago.
And then would you both be as childish as he has been.
#104
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:22
Hrothdane wrote...
Their time management skills leave something to be desired if they make such drastic changes to the script while the game is already in the beta and release is just four months away. While EA's reputation speaks for itself, I wonder how much of the problem was self-inflicted on BioWare's part.
The beat script was leaked in November. Nowhere does it say that it was anywhere near the current state of development at that time at all. Big difference.
#105
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:23
#106
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:23
Siran wrote...
Sparda16 wrote...
If's that the case, then the 'From Ashe's' dlc should have been free. The Prothians are an integral part of the Mass Effect plot, much like the current Leviathan dlc is there to explain the origins of the Reapers and Catalyst.
That has already been discussed in the appropriate threads... Javik in his current form is not integral to the story of ME3, neither is Leviathan. It sheds light on certain topics. But neither is essential to the plot, you can finish and enjoy ME3 just as well without these DLCs. I'd rather have meaningful DLC that ties into the story, than some Firewalker / Pinnacle Station DLC that has nothing to do with the ME storyline at all.
I disagree on the Javik and Leviathan dlc part. Without this dlc, you don't get to see the whole side of the story (so to speak). Some of the plot holes in the storyline are explained to some extent with the dlc, which you wouldn't get to know about if you only played the game itself.
The other dlc i agree with you, this is basically filler which extends the life of the game, while Bioware/EA were busy creating the next game in the series.
#107
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:25
Whether you like the end product or not, the skills of the developers are not in doubt.
I for one, salute you.
#108
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:26
Imagine that you were sold a car, but they didn't have time to put in the gas pedals. So four months later they decided to sell you the gas pedels for 1/4 the cost of the car...Jade8aby88 wrote...
Reptilian Rob wrote...
Yes, which is why the Twitter clown said "EA" and not Bioware...Jade8aby88 wrote...
Reptilian Rob wrote...
The sad thing is that ComicBookGuy is DEAD on....
Not really, the story BioWare wanted to tell they simply didn't have enough time to create. That's where dlc comes in.
And wait, selling content that they didn't have time to put into the $60+ game!? DO TELL!!!
True, well in that regard, yes. He was right. EA didn't care that the game wouldn't be finished in time, their policy is "produce quick, anything that isn't done, sell as extra in dlc."
Gets games out quicker and makes more profit too.
What do you mean about the second sentence?
#109
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:26
I still love you Mike!
#110
Guest_10110001110100_*
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:28
Guest_10110001110100_*
#111
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:28
Sparda16 wrote...
I disagree on the Javik and Leviathan dlc part. Without this dlc, you don't get to see the whole side of the story (so to speak). Some of the plot holes in the storyline are explained to some extent with the dlc, which you wouldn't get to know about if you only played the game itself.
The other dlc i agree with you, this is basically filler which extends the life of the game, while Bioware/EA were busy creating the next game in the series.
I don't see what huge plot holes Javik fills. Same with Leviathan. In the EC the catalyst even hints at most of what is later just being acknowledged by Leviathan (eg the catalyst having meant to be the "overseer" of the synthetics-organics struggles).
#112
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:28
Obeded the 2nd wrote...
He's right, BioWare fans are being ****s right now.
I still love you Mike!
Because most now are no longer fans.
#113
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:28
Most 'fans' are ****s who cannot accept that Bioware has completely different vision of ME3 that they developed in their 'headcannon' so they keep throwing bullcrap.
Yes ME3 isn't a perfect game, but damn, it's fun. Story&Reaper Explanation isn't good enough? Bull****, it's goddamn homicidal AI Cuttlefish. How can anyone take it so seriously.
And Bioware actually developed EC and released it for free. I don't know why people expect them to change their ending and still they actually removed 'depressing' part from them. A compromise, so to speak.
And Leviathan and other paid DLC? It's up to you to pay or not. Yeah they are overpriced but noone forces you to buy them, bah.
Modifié par LilLino, 16 septembre 2012 - 09:29 .
#114
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:29
On their side of things, they probably feel like their under siege (because they are). They probably get sick of hearing about it, and frustrated that it doesn't just go away. And when our frustrations clash with their frustrations, it gets ugly.
And yes, I do feel bad for them. However, I'm also legitimately upset that they presented lies about what the game would be, and have yet to address those.
#115
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:31
Reptilian Rob wrote...
Imagine that you were sold a car, but they didn't have time to put in the gas pedals. So four months later they decided to sell you the gas pedels for 1/4 the cost of the car...
No, that would be like selling Mass Effect 3 without Shepard.
I'd say it's more like central locking or brake lights.
#116
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:32
10110001110100 wrote...
There was content for from ashes on the disk. It was CUT. Content that should have been in the main game was removed to sell as DLC. Poor show. Leviathan was done later and may have been what the dev team were working hard on. Just a shame it's pretty much irrelevant with the endings as they are.
Already been discussed in lenght here Certain elements had to be on the disc for Javik to be integrated into the game (same has been done with Zaeed and Kasumi). The main parts were developed after the game was finished. You either believe Mike, who has worked on the DLC or you don't...
#117
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:34
Siran wrote...
10110001110100 wrote...
There was content for from ashes on the disk. It was CUT. Content that should have been in the main game was removed to sell as DLC. Poor show. Leviathan was done later and may have been what the dev team were working hard on. Just a shame it's pretty much irrelevant with the endings as they are.
Already been discussed in lenght here Certain elements had to be on the disc for Javik to be integrated into the game (same has been done with Zaeed and Kasumi). The main parts were developed after the game was finished. You either believe Mike, who has worked on the DLC or you don't...
Well lets look at Biowares track record and decide if thats the truth or not....hmmm.
#118
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:35
Hexley UK wrote...
Well lets look at Biowares track record and decide if thats the truth or not....hmmm.
Yeah, let's just bring that argument, which can be used to "disprove" just about anything, riiiiight. But believe what you want, it's no wonder the devs are fed up with this.
Modifié par Siran, 16 septembre 2012 - 09:36 .
#119
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:36
#120
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:38
thefallen2far wrote...
I love that this is the conversations we end up having about the game. Not "how awesome was such and such" just good old fashioned hurled insults, speculations on budget restrictions and the morality of the extent of voicing an opinion, just like they wanted when they wrote the ending.
"It's all going according to plan" *pents fingers*
#121
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:39
Well, its not the first time Gamble's lied and I doubt it will be the last.
Modifié par yukon fire, 16 septembre 2012 - 09:39 .
#122
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:39
I just hope they have something up their sleeve that's going to make all this stuff worth purchasing because the way the two top guys wrote the ending ... man it's really bad. Patrick, I feel sorry for you. I know you wanted to do better than that with the EC.
You don't end a series with a cliff hanger. It's just not done, and don't give me this bull**** about "can't use your imagination." It's a ****ing ****ty ending. That's the bottom line, and I don't care if it's "Mac & Casey's story." There have to be people working there who don't like it either.
ME3 is not canon.
#123
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:40
Siran wrote...
Hexley UK wrote...
Well lets look at Biowares track record and decide if thats the truth or not....hmmm.
Yeah, let's just bring that argument, which can be used to "disprove" just about anything, riiiiight. But believe what you want, it's no wonder the devs are fed up with this.
Poor babies are they all fed up? After taking tens (possibly hundreds) of millions of dollars worth of peoples money on false pretences/promises they expect no backlash?
Cry me a river.
#124
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:40
Siran wrote...
Sparda16 wrote...
I disagree on the Javik and Leviathan dlc part. Without this dlc, you don't get to see the whole side of the story (so to speak). Some of the plot holes in the storyline are explained to some extent with the dlc, which you wouldn't get to know about if you only played the game itself.
The other dlc i agree with you, this is basically filler which extends the life of the game, while Bioware/EA were busy creating the next game in the series.
I don't see what huge plot holes Javik fills. Same with Leviathan. In the EC the catalyst even hints at most of what is later just being acknowledged by Leviathan (eg the catalyst having meant to be the "overseer" of the synthetics-organics struggles).
So you weren't in the least bit interested in to find out what a Prothian looked like?, Javiks's backstory?, etc. The same goes with Leviathan, without the dlc would you know who created the catalyst?, why they created the catalyst, in their own words and from their viewpoint?, etc.
These to me are plot holes within the game, which should have been addressed in the main game itself. For instance the Catalyst/ AI/God Kid was just thrown at you at the very end of the game with no explanation of why he was there.
This is simply not good storytelling, fullstop.
#125
Posté 16 septembre 2012 - 09:41
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
Not really. The deal is that they're working in a situation where the lead writers don't want to make any changes to the ending, yet everyone working on all the content knows the ending blows, yet they have to write content now that supports the ending. This has got to be tough. PR people have to support things they don't necessarily believe. The economy still sucks and it's not a time to b*tch about stuff like this. So you do your jobs.
I just hope they have something up their sleeve that's going to make all this stuff worth purchasing because the way the two top guys wrote the ending ... man it's really bad. Patrick, I feel sorry for you. I know you wanted to do better than that with the EC.
You don't end a series with a cliff hanger. It's just not done, and don't give me this bull**** about "can't use your imagination." It's a ****ing ****ty ending. That's the bottom line, and I don't care if it's "Mac & Casey's story." There have to be people working there who don't like it either.
ME3 is not canon.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




